Any state wishing to place itself in the context of its international environment must have a conception of the structure of that environment, a vision of the way international order operates, and of the way it ought to operate. When states order the same physical international space according to differing conceptual frameworks, international conflict is often the result. It could be argued, for example, that the deterioration in relations between the United States and Japan in the period between the Washington naval conference and the opening of the Pacific war was the inevitable consequence of the two powers' mutually irreconcilable sets of assumptions about the structure of international order, both about how it did work, and about how it should work. Leaving aside the question of whether either of these visions was correct, it is beyond doubt that Japan's vision of international order was one that was both hierarchical and Japan-centred. This vision found expression in Prince Konoe's 'New Order in East Asia', and the 'Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere', and in countless pronouncements intended as much for domestic as for international propaganda. The pre-modern sources of this conception of Japan's place in the world, however, have not been clearly enough delineated, and to the extent they have been examined, it has been principally as a problem in the history of ideas, rather than as an exploration of the interaction between empirical diplomatic experience and ideas themselves.
Read full abstract