Understanding how materials bend, stretch, or compress under an applied force (or “load”) is essential in the design of buildings, vehicles, and machines. These deformations can be straightforwardly calculated for materials like aluminum, glass, or carbon fiber, which tend to deform little and can therefore, to a good approximation, be treated as linear: doubling the load doubles the effect, like pulling on a spring. In contrast, scientists are still looking for the right way to perform the equivalent calculations on stretchy materials like rubbers and foams, and disconnected “granular” materials, such as soil, sand, and cereals. All of these materials share a common property that they are easy to deform by large amounts, and therefore, the linear approximation no longer applies. Corentin Coulais, now at the University of Leiden, the Netherlands, and his colleagues report experiments on a model “soil” in which they carefully tracked the soil’s elastic response to a force exerted on it via a series of very gradual steps [1]. By comparing their results to predictions of an idealized theory of granular materials, they were able to identify the theory’s strengths and limitations. The work could therefore help researchers develop more reliable methods for predicting the behavior of granular materials. Physicists have been working on a number of models to understand how granular materials cross the boundary between being able to support a load to failing completely—a problem of considerable importance for engineers who need to know if a soil can serve as a foundation for a house or bridge. A promising route is to describe this boundary as a “jamming transition” [2, 3]. In this picture, particles are collectively “jammed” into place by their neighbors. However, under an applied stress, they can dislodge from those cages and give way—an “unjamming” transition that is analogous to the melting of an ordinary solid. Similar to the thermodynamic equations of state, where compressibility is a known function of state variables like pressure or temperature, the theory behind jamming can predict material properties of granular materials, such as how they stiffen as a function of particle packing density. But, so far, most of these predictions assume that the particles are frictionless, leaving it unclear which aspects of the theory apply to real situations in which friction is present. Coulais and his colleagues focused their study on two key predictions from the jamming framework [2, 3] that had not been tested for real, frictional particles. The first is the values of the critical exponents that describe how elasticity and dilatancy (the tendency to decrease packing density under shear [4]) vary as the material is sheared near the jamming transition. The second is to measure how characteristic lengths, in this case the one that characterizes the onset of nonlinearity as a function of distance from a disturbance, depend on the proximity of the material to the jamming/unjamming transition. To test these predictions, they used an experimental technique that allowed them to measure the force on each particle as they pushed grains in a jammed state outward from the center of the material. Instead of actual grains of sand, they used 5-millimeter-diameter polymer disks, laying 8000 of these disks in a single, densely packed layer. The polymer disks are photoelastic, meaning they rotate the polarization of light passing through them by an amount that depends on how much stress they experience. When properly calibrated [5, 6], these patterns of birefringence (Fig. 1) can measure the force at each individual contact. To generate shear within the layer of disks, Coulais and his colleagues slowly inflated a 26-millimeter “balloon” at the center of the packed layer. They then observed the progressive changes in the particle-scale stress, strain, dilation, and pressure resulting from each inflation step. For the tiniest steps possible, the researchers observed that the grain-scale stresses (forces between particles) were a nonlinear function of the local strain (the amount the aggregate deformed). But with each subsequent step, the packing experienced a dilatancy-associated pressure rise and a decreased in stiffness. This dilatancy softening
Search from 250 M+ research papersSearch from 250 M+ research papers
Open Access
Jan 1, 2015
C Coulais + 2
