Jadad Scale Research Articles

Systematic review of the literature about immunogenity and antibodies persistance of Tdap vaccination

Abstract Introduction In industrialized countries, routine use of pertussis vaccines has shifted the burden of pertussis disease from children to infants, adolescents and adults, leading to the necessity of booster doses. Materials and methods We prepared the review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) with the aim of a) to describe the immunogenity of the main available vaccines for adolescents and adults b) to describe antibodies persistance after immunization with the main vaccines available in childhood and adults and, also, possible co-administration and c) to identify the gold standard for adolescent and adult immunizations. Results Of 6906 records identified, after removing duplicate records, 12 RCT were included (people aged 11-73): of these 7 studies had only 1 control group, 4 studies had 2 control group and 1 had 5 control group; moreover, of the 12 studies included only 2 regarding co-administration and all were about immunogenity. 9 out 12 studies had a Jadad score above 3 points and 10 out 12 meet the criteria of Cocrane Back Review Group Criteria List for Methodological Quality Assessment. Discussion and conclusions We found a limited number of good-quality RCTs investigating our object. The five component vaccines, although containing a lower dosage of antigen, are found to be more effective than one components vaccines for prevention. Evidences support the use of 5- components vaccines for booster sessions in adolescence and adulthood. Key messages • Although 3-component and 5-component vaccines contain a lower dose of antigen, they are more effective than 1-component vaccines in the prevention of diphtheria-tetanus and Bordetella pertussis. • The robustness of the data and the analytical tests support the use of vaccines with reduced antigen concentration for decennial booster sessions in adolescence and adulthood.

Cannabidiol (CBD): A Systematic Review of Clinical and Preclinical Evidence in the Treatment of Pain

Background/Objectives: Cannabis sativa L. is a plant that has been used for thousands of years for its industrial and medicinal properties. In recent years, there has been a rise in the study of this plant due to its bioactive compounds for pharmaceutical applications. Particularly, cannabidiol has demonstrated analgesic and non-psychoactive properties. The objective of this systematic review is to update and to gather the clinical and preclinical evidence on CBD in pain treatment. Methods: This study was performed following the PRISMA guidelines and using the following search terms “((cannabidiol) NOT (THC)) NOT (tetrahydrocannabinol)) AND (pain treatment)” in PubMed and Web of Science, with the following inclusion criteria: CBD pain treatment without THC in monotherapy, including both clinical and preclinical trials. From the initial sample of more than 500 articles, a total of 40 studies were selected, eliminating duplicate studies from the databases and considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria. On one hand, clinical trials were analyzed using CBD products without THC used in monotherapy, assigning a Jadad score to evaluate the quality/bias of the trials; on the other hand, the main preclinical trials were analyzed, grouping the results into in vivo and in vitro trials. Results: Based on the review conducted, there is sufficient clinical and preclinical evidence of CBD in pain treatment, so CBD could be an effective and safe treatment in reducing pain due to its analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties. These effects appear to be primarily mediated by the activation of TRPV-1, 5HT-1A, and CB1, with emerging therapeutic relevance in the management of osteoarthritis and chronic pain. Conclusions: Although clinical and preclinical research show promising results, clinical evidence is limited, and more studies should be performed in the future with isolated CBD.

Effectiveness of combined physical exercise and cognitive training in older adults with cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Falls among cognitively impaired older adults are a global concern. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of combining physical exercise and cognitive training to improve balance among older adults. A systematic search of databases, including Embase, Medline-OVID, CINAHL-EBSCOhost, and Central-Cochrane Library, was conducted from March 9 to April 6, 2023. The search used keywords based on the PICO question, where the population was older adults with cognitive impairment. Compared to a single therapy, the intervention involved a combination of muscle strengthening and cognitive therapy, with the outcome of falls or balance. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in any setting. Studies with participants under 60 years old and lacking baseline clinical assessments were excluded. EndNote 20 was used as a reference manager tool, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 flow diagram was used to map out the number of identified records. Two investigators worked independently, and the Jadad scale was used for critical appraisal. The PROSPERO registration number is CRD42023454876. A fixed-effects meta-analysis was performed using an inverse-variance method. Four articles met the inclusion criteria, three of which were included in the meta-analysis. Studies were from Europe, New Zealand, and the Philippines, with a total sample of 255 participants and mean ages of 65.9–87.5 years. The studies used combined physical and cognitive training in one group. Results showed a significant moderate effect size (effect size (ES): 2.29; standardized mean difference (SMD): 0.41; p<0.05; heterogeneity (I2): 0%) indicating no heterogeneity. In conclusion, the combined intervention displayed the potential to improve balance for cognitively impaired older adults.

Infraclavicular versus supraclavicular nerve block for upper limb surgeries: A meta-analysis.

The impact of infraclavicular versus supraclavicular nerve block on the analgesia for upper limb surgeries is unclear. This meta-analysis and systematic review aims to study the analgesic efficacy of infraclavicular versus supraclavicular nerve block for upper limb surgeries. We searched several databases including PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO and Cochrane library databases from inception to December 2023, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of infraclavicular versus supraclavicular nerve block for upper limb surgeries were included. We excluded studies reporting other nerve block approaches. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated by the modified Jadad scale. Standard mean difference with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to assess continuous outcomes. This meta-analysis was conducted by the fixed-effect model or random-effect model based on the heterogeneity. Eight RCTs and 725 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with supraclavicular nerve block for upper limb surgeries, infraclavicular nerve block was able to significantly increase duration of motor block (SMD = 0.34; 95% CI = 0.12 to 0.56) and decrease readiness for surgery (SMD = -0.43; 95% CI = -0.77 to -0.10), but showed similar duration of sensory block (SMD = 0.17; 95% CI = -0.05 to 0.39), block performance time (SMD = -0.14; 95% CI = -0.51 to 0.22), onset of sensory blockade (SMD = -0.13; 95% CI = -0.59 to 0.33) and onset of motor blockade (SMD = -0.17; 95% CI = -0.26 to 0.12). No high heterogeneity was seen among the included studies. Infraclavicular nerve block may be superior to control the analgesia for upper limb surgeries than supraclavicular nerve block.

Efficacy of Yoga in Reducing Depressive Symptoms: A Systematic Review

Introduction: The fast pace of changes in contemporary life increases the need to adapt, which leads to depressive pathologies due to psychological suffering. Yoga has therefore emerged as a complementary approach to the treatment of depression. Objective: To analyze the efficacy of yoga in reducing depressive symptoms. Materials and methods: This is a systematic literature review, which followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for systematic reviews of efficacy, with the review protocol registered on Prospero under the code CRD42023448158. To devise the research question, the Pico strategy was adopted, in which “P” stands for people with depression, “I” for yoga; “C” for people who have not been submitted to yoga, and “O” for improvement/reduction of depressive symptoms. The requirements of the Prisma flowchart were followed and the search was conducted in the Medline/PubMed, Web of Science, Lilacs, BDEnf, Ibecs, PsycINFO, and Cinahl databases. The Jadad scale was used to assess methodological quality and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 to assess the risk of bias. Results: A total of 1138 studies were found, of which 10 were selected for data extraction, detailed reading, and qualitative synthesis. Yoga, especially mindfulness yoga, has been shown to be an effective intervention for various conditions, including depression. Its benefits include significant improvements in depression severity, health-related quality of life, motor dysfunction, mobility, spiritual well-being, and parasympathetic nervous system activity. Conclusion: The studies highlight the efficacy of yoga in reducing depressive symptoms in various populations and contexts, highlighting its effectiveness as a complementary therapeutic approach in the management of depression.

Clinical Efficacy of Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Chronic and Acute Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Current guidelines for pain treatment recommend a personalized, multimodal and interdisciplinary approach as well as the use of a combination of drug and non-drug therapies. Risk factors for chronification should already be reduced in patients with acute pain, e.g., after surgery or trauma. Auricular vagus nerve stimulation (aVNS) could be an effective non-drug therapy in the multimodal treatment of chronic and acute pain. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of aVNS in treating chronic and acute pain conditions. A systematic literature search was performed regarding the application of auricular electrical stimulation in chronic and acute pain. Studies were classified according to their level of evidence (Jadad scale), scientific validity and risk of bias (RoB 2 tool) and analyzed regarding indication, method, stimulation parameters, duration of treatment and efficacy and safety. A meta-analysis on (randomized) controlled trials (using different comparators) was performed for chronic and acute pain conditions, respectively, including subgroup analysis for percutaneous (pVNS-needle electrodes) and transcutaneous (tVNS-surface electrodes) aVNS. The visual analog pain scale (VAS) was defined as primary efficacy endpoint. A total of n = 1496 patients were treated with aVNS in 23 identified and analyzed studies in chronic pain, 12 studies in acute postoperative pain and 7 studies in experimental acute pain. Of these, seven studies for chronic pain and six studies for acute postoperative pain were included in the meta-analysis. In chronic pain conditions, including back pain, migraine and abdominal pain, a statistically significant reduction in VAS pain intensity for active compared to sham aVNS or control treatment with an effect size Hedges' g/mean difference of - 1.95 (95% confidence interval [CI]: - 3.94 to 0.04, p = 0.008) could be shown and a more favorable effect in pVNS compared to tVNS (- 5.40 [- 8.94; - 1.85] vs. - 1.00 [- 1.55; - 0.44]; p = 0.015). In acute pain conditions, single studies showed significant improvements with aVNS, e.g., in kidney donor surgery or tonsillectomy but, overall, a non-statistically significant reduction in VAS pain intensity for active compared to sham aVNS or control with - 0.70 [- 2.34; 0.93] (p = 0.15) could be observed in the meta-analysis. In acute pain results vary greatly between studies depending especially on co-medication and timepoints of assessment after surgery. A significant reduction in analgesics or opiate intake was documented in most studies evaluating this effect in chronic and acute pain. In 3 of the 12 randomized controlled trials in patients with chronic pain, a sustainable pain reduction over a period of up to 12months was shown. Overall, aVNS was very well tolerated. This systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that aVNS can be an effective and safe non-drug treatment in patients with specific chronic and acute postoperative pain conditions. Further research is needed to identify the influence of simulation parameters and find optimal and standardized treatment protocols while considering quality-of-life outcome parameters and prolonged follow-up periods. A more standardized approach and harmonization in study designs would improve comparability and robustness of outcomes.

The Effects of Hydrogen-Rich Water on Blood Lipid Profiles in Metabolic Disorders Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Context: Metabolic disorders are a growing global concern, especially in developed countries, due to their increasing prevalence. Serum lipid profiles, including triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL), are commonly used clinical biomarkers for monitoring the progression of these metabolic abnormalities. In recent decades, hydrogen-rich water (HRW) has gained attention as a safe and effective treatment, with regulatory effects on lipid peroxidation and inflammatory responses in clinical trials. Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the effectiveness of HRW therapy on blood lipid profiles in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for metabolic disorders. Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines, a search for RCT studies was conducted in the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar databases up to January 2024. Eight studies that met all eligibility criteria, including RCTs involving metabolic dysfunctions and evaluations of lipid profiles, were included for further analysis. Data extraction was followed by quality evaluation using the Jadad scoring system. Meta-analysis was conducted using STATA software. Results: The eight selected RCTs included a total of 357 patients with various metabolic disorders. All studies showed either no or low risk of bias. The overall levels of TG [95% CI: -0.27 (-0.47, -0.07)], TC [95% CI: -0.07 (-0.32, -0.18)], and LDL [95% CI: -0.06 (-0.28, 0.15)] demonstrated slight decreases across the studies. However, there was some heterogeneity in HDL levels [95% CI: -0.11 (-0.37, 0.14)] among the studies (I² = 37.32%). Meta-regression analysis further indicated a positive association between the outcomes and the duration of the intervention as a moderating factor. Conclusions: Hydrogen-rich water demonstrated modest lipid-lowering effects in patients with metabolic disorders. However, due to the observed heterogeneity in HDL variations, further long-term trials involving larger populations are needed to clarify these inconsistencies.

Efficacy of Extracts of Oleogum Resin of Boswellia in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) has recently been ranked as the 11th highest contributor to global disability. More than 40% of patients use complementary and alternative medicine including supplements containing phytoextracts with anti-inflammatory properties as those from the Boswellia genus. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of phytoextracts from the oleogum resin of the Boswellia genus as supplementation for patients affected by knee OA. Four electronic databases were used for the research and PRISMA statements were followed throughout the study. The following inclusion criteria were used: (a) the subjects of the study were humans with a diagnosis of knee OA reported by medical staff; (b) randomization and the presence of control (placebo, negative or positive control), and (c) outcomes reported with WOMAC and/or visual analog scale (VAS) score. Publication bias was assessed with a funnel plot and through the Egger test. The Jadad scale was used in order to assess the quality of the studies included. The statistical heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. Results of meta-analysis and subgroup analysis were reported using a forest plot. A total of 13 studies involving 850 (WOMAC) and 1185 (VAS) patients met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis did not detect a significant effect of the use of Boswellia extracts between the control and the treatment groups due to the high heterogeneity of the studies (p = 0.0865 for WOMAC) and (p = 0.3966 VAS). However, the subsequent subgroup analysis demonstrated the significant beneficial effect of Boswellia extracts in the treatment of knee OA with respect to a placebo (lower WOMAC score in the treatment groups). This was also confirmed in the meta-regression applied to the WOMAC scores. This is an important finding as people exposed to NSAID-related adverse effects could benefit from the use of Boswellia extracts. However, further high-quality studies are needed to establish the clinical efficacy of extracts from the genus Boswellia.

Prognosis evaluation and efficacy analysis of different treatment options for patients with visceral pleural invasion in stage IIA–IIB lung cancer

ObjectiveControversy surrounds the treatment of visceral pleural invasion in lung cancer, and no studies have compared the efficacy of its four main treatment options (i.e., surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy). This study aims to compare and analyze surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy outcomes and explore the optimal treatment of visceral pleural invasion in lung cancer.MethodsWe searched electronic databases (i.e., Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database Search) for relevant studies of treatment options for patients with visceral pleural invasion in stage IIA–IIB lung cancer. Searches times were limited to studies published between January 1, 2000 and February 20, 2021. Meta analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software We also downloaded original RNA transcription data about lung cancer invasion in the GEO and TCGA tumor databases, and used R 4.0.3 software to perform differential expression and co-expression gene network analyses.ResultsWe included a total of 25 high-quality (i.e., Jadad score 4–7) studies. Meta-analysis found that surgical treatment was associated with a 3-year survival rate OR = 3.80 (95% CI 3.53, 4.09; P < 0.0001), 5-year survival rate OR = 4.10 (95% CI 3.72, 4.53; P < 0.0001), and median survival time OR = 2.71 (95% CI 2.53, 2.89; P < 0.0001). Chemotherapy was associated with a 3-year survival rate OR = 2.08 (95% CI 1.93, 2.25; P < 0.0001), 5-year survival rate OR = 1.68 (95% CI 1.49, 1.89; P < 0.0001), and median survival time OR = 1.84 (95% CI 1.66, 2.04; P < 0.0001). Targeted therapy was associated with a 3-year survival rate OR = 2.91 (95% CI 2.65, 3.19; P < 0.0001), 5-year survival rate OR = 1.83 (95% CI 1.39, 2.33; P < 0.0001), and median survival time OR = 1.76 (95% CI 1.59, 1.94; P < 0.0001). Finally, immunotherapy was associated with a 3-year survival rate OR = 1.89 (95% CI 1.73, 2.07; P < 0.0001), 5-year survival rate OR = 1.66 (95% CI 1.46, 1.88; P < 0.0001), and median survival time OR = 2.53 (95% CI 2.27, 2.82; P < 0.0001). After screening differential genes and co-expressed genes in tumor gene databases, we found that AC245595.1, ITGB1-DT and AL606489.1 may be involved in the process of lung cancer invasion, and macrophages M1 and M2, CD4+-Th1, CD8+-Th1 may participate in immune infiltration.ConclusionsIn patients with visceral pleural invasion of stage IIA-IIB lung cancer, chemotherapy has shown a significant effect on improving prognosis and enhancing efficacy. However, surgical treatment did not significantly improve the overall prognosis. Therefore, the individual situation of the patient and the comprehensive benefits of the treatment program should be fully considered when developing the treatment program.

Efficacy and tolerability of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in patients with plantar fasciopathy: a systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression.

Plantar fasciopathy (PF) is a common musculoskeletal condition characterized by heel pain and functional impairment. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) has gained increasing interest in the treatment of PF, but the optimal ESWT program is still debated. Therefore, this systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression aimed at providing a comprehensive assessment of the efficacy and tolerability of ESWT in PF management. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published until February 2023 were systematically searched on PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and PEDro. Studies assessing adult patients with PF treated with ESWT were considered. The primary outcome was the tolerability of ESWT, measured by treatment adherence, dropouts, and safety. Secondary outcomes were pain intensity and functional outcomes. Meta-analysis and meta-regression were performed to examine the relationship between ESWT program characteristics and treatment outcomes. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Jadad scale and the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Our findings showed that ESWT is effective in reducing pain intensity assessed by Visual Analogue Scale [focal-ESWT: -2.818 (SE 0.803, -4.393, -1.244; P< 0.0001; radial-ESWT: -3.038 (SE 0.428, -3.878, -2.199; P<0.001)]. Meta-regression analysis indicated a positive relationship between specific ESWT parameters (frequency, number of pulses, energy flux density and frequency, and number of pulses, pressure) and pain intensity (all P<0.05) and dropout (all P<0.05). ESWT seems to be an effective and tolerable treatment for PF, albeit the peculiarity of parameters might affect both the efficacy in pain relief and the adherence to the treatment. Physicians should consider individual patient characteristics when selecting the ESWT parameters for PF treatment. Further high-quality studies are warranted to establish the optimal ESWT protocol to treat PF.

Nurse-Led Interventions in Managing Cancer-Related Fatigue: A Systematic Review.

Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is common among patients with cancer. Various interventions have been reported to reduce fatigue, and some evidence suggests that nurse-led interventions may be effective in the management of CRF. A systematic review was conducted to assess the effectiveness of nurse-led interventions for CRF in patients with cancer and survivors. The aim of this study was to review and appraise the evidence for the effectiveness of different types of nurse-led interventions on fatigue in patients with cancer and survivors. Electronic databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect were searched to identify studies published from January 2013 to October 2023. The studies that described nurse-led interventions in patients with cancer or survivors regardless of treatment duration, modes of intervention delivery, and any based intervention were included. The studies were excluded if no fatigue was an outcome measure. Twelve studies from 2013 to 2023 were included and eligible for the review. Nine studies obtained a Jadad score of 3 or more, indicating high quality for the quality assessment. Eleven of the included studies reported a significant effect of the nurse-led interventions in reducing fatigue in patients with cancer or survivors. Nurse-led interventions that focus on multidisciplinary, exercise, psychological, and behavioral approaches appear promising in the management of CRF. More research is needed in order to determine the most acceptable forms of intervention. The development of evidence-based interventions for managing CRF is significant to nursing practice.

Efficacy and Accuracy of Ultrasound Guided Injections in the Treatment of Cervical Facet Joint Syndrome: A Systematic Review.

Background/Objectives: Cervical facet joint syndrome (CFJS) is a frequent cause of neck pain and motor disability. Among the available therapies for CFJS, ultrasound (US)-guided injections are becoming more and more widespread, but the evidence about their accuracy and effectiveness is still debated in the scientific literature. The aim of this systematic review is to assess efficacy, accuracy and feasibility of US-guided cervical facet injections for the related chronic neck pain treatment. Methods: This review was conducted following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis 2020 (PRISMA) statement guidelines. The scientific articles were identified through the PubMed, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library databases. Qualitative assessment of the selected studies was carried out using the modified Oxford quality scoring system. Nine studies with a total of 958 patients were included in this review. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. The protocol was registered at PROSPERO 2024 (n°CRD42024512214). Results: The results of this review suggest that the US-guided cervical facet injection for CFJS treatment is an effective technique in terms of accuracy (using the lateral technique it ranges from 92% to 98%), and efficiency (it grants pain relief with a decrease in the procedure time and fewer needle passes in comparison with the X-ray-guided technique, which also involves radiation exposure). Conclusions: US-guided injections are a safe and effective method to treat this musculoskeletal disease, granting a high functional recovery and long-lasting pain relief, net of the used drugs. However, these procedures are strictly operator-dependent and require important training to acquire good expertise.

118 Can we reasonably recommend strength training twice weekly for the general adult population aged 18-64 years to secure optimal body functionality?

Abstract Purpose The objective of the study was to conduct a quality assessment of the scientific literature underlying the Danish Health Authorities (DHA) revised recommendations on physical activity (PA), with focus on the new advice on strength training twice a week to secure optimal body functionality in the adult population aged 18-64 years. Methods The study was a scoping review. Reviews conducted by the World Health Organization (WHO), the American and Canadian Health Authorities, and evidence referenced in earlier reports from DHA were included for initial review, as DHA refer to these as base for their PA-guideline revision. Studies included in the reviews were title- and abstract screened to assess whether they investigated PA and/or strength training in a population of adults aged 18-64 years. Studies identified through this screening, were furthermore full text screened, and finally included in a quality assessment, if they investigated a strength training intervention in relation to a measure of body functionality. The quality assessment was inspired by STROBE and the Jadad Scale (for observational studies and RCTs respectively) and extended with an assessment of the study’s research goal compliance (causal or predictive) to evaluate the study’s ability to detect eventual effects of the intervention on body functionality. Results A total of 25 out of 879 studies identified in the reviews were selected for quality assessment. Great variations in quality were identified, and many studies (13 out of 25) did not achieve 2/3 of potential quality points. The studies generally support strength training as an effective intervention on body functionality. However, 15 of the 16 RCTs investigated a study population with functional limitations, e.g. populations with musculoskeletal disorders, and most studies were based on a study population in the higher end of the age spectrum 18-64 years. Conclusions The literature does not clearly support a recommendation on strength training twice weekly for the general adult population to secure optimal body functionality. The formulation of PA-guidelines should be based on evidence that 1) aims to draw causal conclusions on the effect of the recommended intervention and 2) investigates a population comparable to the target audience. Funding None

ATUALIZAÇÕES EM BIOMARCADORES PARA DIAGNÓSTICO PRECOCE DE DOENÇAS ÓSSEAS

Introduction: Biomarkers play a crucial role in the early identification of diseases and the assessment of treatment response. This study aims to explore the efficacy of different biomarkers in predicting and monitoring chronic diseases, with a focus on cardiovascular and oncological conditions. Methodology: A systematic review of studies published between 2010 and 2023 was conducted, analyzing the validity and applicability of specific biomarkers such as troponin, BNP (B-type natriuretic peptide), and CA-125. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and meta-analyses were included. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Jadad scale and the Newcastle-Ottawa method. Results: The analyzed biomarkers showed high sensitivity and specificity for early diagnosis and monitoring of diseases. Troponin was particularly effective in detecting myocardial infarction, while BNP performed well in assessing heart failure. CA-125 was useful for monitoring ovarian cancer progression but had limitations in early detection. Discussion: The analysis indicates that biomarkers can provide valuable information for managing chronic diseases, improving diagnosis and treatment follow-up. However, the accuracy of biomarkers may be affected by variables such as comorbidities and individual patient characteristics. Further studies are needed to validate and refine the use of these biomarkers in different clinical contexts. Conclusion: Biomarkers are promising tools for the detection and monitoring of chronic diseases, with the potential to transform clinical practice. The implementation of biomarkers should be accompanied by further studies to ensure their efficacy and accuracy in various clinical scenarios.

Impact of Telemedicine on Women's Sexual Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Context: Sexual satisfaction is crucial for women's overall well-being; however, traditional interventions often face challenges such as high costs, limited access, inadequate specialized care, and discomfort during counseling sessions. Telemedicine presents a promising solution to these issues. Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the efficacy of telemedicine interventions in improving sexual function and satisfaction among women. Evidence Acquisition: We searched SCOPUS, Web of Science, and PubMed for relevant articles published up to January 2024. The search strategy and keywords were crafted using the PICO approach to align with the study's objectives and ensure a comprehensive and structured review. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Jadad scale. The primary outcome measures were sexual desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, pain, satisfaction, and overall Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) scores. A random-effects model was employed for the meta-analysis, and the I-square index was used to assess heterogeneity. Results: The systematic review identified six studies from an initial pool of 4,174 that demonstrated a positive effect of telemedicine interventions on all domains of the FSFI questionnaire, except for the pain domain and overall sexual function scores in women. The effects of telemedicine on sexual desire [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.51, 1.32], sexual arousal (SMD = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.42, 1.53), vaginal lubrication (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.23, 0.59), orgasm (SMD = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.21, 0.58), sexual satisfaction (SMD = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.48, 1), and total FSFI (SMD = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.49, 1.58) were found to be significant. However, the effect on pain was not statistically significant (SMD = 0.15, 95% CI = -0.10, 0.40). Conclusions: This study supports the effectiveness of telemedicine in improving women's sexual satisfaction and function. However, due to limitations in the included studies, such as small sample sizes, lack of randomization, and lack of blinding in some cases, more comprehensive studies are recommended. Future research should address these methodological limitations to provide stronger evidence on the effectiveness of telemedicine interventions for women's sexual health.

Effect of astragalus injection on left ventricular remodeling in HFmrEF: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the effect of astragalus injection (AI) on left ventricular remodeling (LVR) in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF). The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of AI in treating HFmrEF were retrieved from 8 major English and Chinese electronic databases, up until November 30, 2023. To evaluate the methodological quality of the included studies, the Cochrane bias risk tool and the Modified Jadad Scale were employed. Stata 17.0 software was utilized for statistical analysis, sensitivity analysis, and assessment of publication bias. Ten RCTs with 995 patients (562 males and 433 females) were identified. Meta-analysis indicated that compared to conventional treatment (CT), AI significantly improved LVR, specifically increasing left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, MD = 4.56, 95% CI: 3.68-5.44, p < 0.00001), decreasing left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV, MD = -7.89, 95% CI: -11.13 to -4.64, p < 0.00001), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD, MD = -4.18, 95% CI: -5.79 to -2.56, p < 0.00001), left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV, MD = -8.11, 95% CI: -11.79 to -4.43, p < 0.00001), and left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD, MD = -3.42, 95% CI: -4.90 to -1.93, p < 0.00001). AI also improved clinical efficacy (RR = 4.62, 95% CI: 3.11-6.88, p < 0.00001), reduced N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP, MD = -27.94, 95% CI: -43.3 to -12.36) level, without increasing the incidence of adverse reactions (RR = 1.60, 95% CI: 0.59-4.29, p = 0.35). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the reliability of the merged results, and Begg's and Egger's tests showed no significant publication bias. The systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that combining AI with CT improves LVR without increasing adverse events in HFmrEF patients. However, caution is needed in interpreting the results due to limited evidence. Future high-quality RCTs are needed to support these conclusions. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, PROSPERO [CRD42022347248].

Estradiol and testosterone associated with risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis

Background: To investigate the correlation between estradiol and testosterone in patients with breast cancer. Methods: The literatures on the correlation between estradiol and testosterone on the risk of breast cancer were searched and collected. The time limit is that each database is established until December 2023. After screening, the modified Jadad scale was used to evaluate the quality of the research literature. NoteExpress 3.2 was used for literature management, and Excel 2003 was used for data collection and extraction. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.1 software to determine whether there was heterogeneity in the study according to the size of Q test (P-value), and then the OR value of combined effects was calculated using fixed or random effects models and forest maps were drawn. At the same time, the literatures with the greatest weight were excluded for sensitivity analysis, and the literature bias was evaluated by drawing funnel plot. Results: A total of 628 literatures were retrieved, and 11 case-control trials met the criteria for inclusion. Meta-analysis results showed that the level of E2 in breast cancer patients was higher than that in non-breast cancer control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (OR=121.56, 95%CI (-3.32-264.44), P=0.06). The level of E2 in premenopausal patients with breast cancer was higher than that in non-breast cancer control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (OR=8.26, 95%CI (-2.83-19.34), P=0.14). The level of E2 in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer was higher than that in non-breast cancer control group, and the difference was statistically significant (OR=20.36, 95%CI (7.04-33.68), P=0.003). Preoperative T level was higher in patients with breast cancer than in non-breast cancer control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (OR=14.77, 95%CI (-14.11-43.65), P=0.32). The T level before and after surgery in breast cancer patients was higher than that in non-breast cancer control group, and the difference was statistically significant (OR=12.91, 95%CI (4.43-21.39), P=0.003). Sensitivity analysis showed that the combined effect size results were stable and reliable OR (95%CI) was 24.41 (10.21~38.61), P=0.0007. Funnel plot results showed publication bias. Conclusion There is a positive correlation between the levels of estradiol and testosterone and the occurrence and development of breast cancer after menopause.

Potential Health Benefits of a Diet Rich in Organic Fruit and Vegetables versus a Diet Based on Conventional Produce: A Systematic Review.

Over the past decade, the production and consumption of organic food (OF) have received increasing interest. Scientific studies have shown better quality of organic fruit and vegetables (FV) in terms of nutrients and pesticide contents, but it appears difficult to conclude if there are potentially greater health benefits of these products compared with conventional food (CF). To determine whether the current scientific literature demonstrates that a diet rich in organic FV is healthier than 1 based on conventional produce. A systematic search was conducted using the PubMed and Web of Science databases for articles published between January 2003 and December 2022. Articles were analyzed uniformly by 2 reviewer, using a specific template summary sheet, and scored from 1 to 5. The level of evidence and the quality of studies in humans were assessed using the Jadad score and the French National Authority for Health method. A total of 12 human studies were included. Studies often reported contradictory or even opposite results, with methodological limitations. Only 6 of the 12 studies found significant associations between OF and the health outcomes evaluated. The current data do not enable a firm conclusion about a greater health benefit for a diet rich in FV based on products grown organically compared with conventional farming. There is a paucity of available data and considerable heterogeneity in study designs (participants, exposures, durations, health outcomes, and residual confounding factors). Well-designed interventional studies are required.

Evaluating cognitive assessment tools for patients with major depressive disorder receiving electroconvulsive therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundMajor Depressive Disorder (MDD) affects 350 million people worldwide. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is effective, yet research on cognitive assessments post-treatment is lacking. This study systematically reviews and meta-analyzes the effectiveness of cognitive assessment tools post-ECT to optimize MDD treatment. MethodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, this review was pre-registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023470318). Searches were conducted across nine databases up to November 12, 2023. Quality assessment for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental studies was performed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, JBI critical appraisal tools, and the Jadad scale. Meta-analyses for short-term and long-term cognitive function involved 24 and 18 tools, respectively. FindingsThirty studies (20 RCTs and 10 quasi-experimental) involving 2462 MDD patients were evaluated. Results indicated no significant differences in overall short-term and long-term cognitive functions post-ECT. Short-term analysis showed impairments in memory, learning, and verbal abilities but improvements in attention and processing speed. Long-term analysis revealed enhancements in memory, learning, verbal, and visuospatial abilities compared to baseline. Based on GRADE classification, we recommend 11 tools for assessing acute cognitive function and 10 tools for chronic cognitive impairment. These tools demonstrated high reliability and validity, supporting their clinical use. InterpretationThese findings provide critical evidence for future ECT clinical guidelines in managing MDD. The recommended tools can aid clinicians in adjusting ECT regimens, identifying early cognitive changes, and improving therapeutic outcomes in MDD treatment.

AB079. Whole-brain radiotherapy versus high dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation for consolidation therapy in primary central nervous system lymphoma.

Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is commonly used as consolidation therapy in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). However, high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HD-ASCT) has emerged as an alternative approach for PCNSL. This systematic review aims to assess the efficacy and safety of both treatment modalities. The systematic review follows PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search strategy identified relevant studies from PubMed, Europe PMC, and Cochrane Library. The following search terms were used: "primary central nervous system lymphoma", "Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation", and "whole-brain radiotherapy". We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) cohort studies evaluating the use of whole-brain radiotherapy and high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in the treatment of histologically-confirmed PCNSL. Publications included were limited to English language full texts that were published in the past 10 years. Data extraction & manuscript quality assessment was done by two independent reviewers with a third reviewer to resolve any discrepancy. Primary outcomes include overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) & treatment related toxicity (TRT). Secondary outcomes were clinical neurological function and performance score assessments. Individual studies were assessed using the Jadad Scale and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. We identified 5 studies, consisting of 2 RCTs and 3 cohort studies. After all studies considered, analysis revealed that consolidation therapy with HD-ASCT had a better overall PFS and OS compared to whole-brain radiotherapy (P<0.005). Both groups showed similar TRT with mostly haematological toxicity. Holistically clinical cognitive functions are found to be improved in HD-ASCT Patients and poorer results are exhibited by WBRT patients primarily in executive functions. Performance statuses are scored differently across all studies with slightly preferable results shown in patients treated with HDC-ASCT. Based on the findings of this systematic review, HDC-ASCT might be a preferable choice of consolidative therapy as shown with better OS, PFS with similar TRT. While WBRT are more feasible and cost-efficient, risks of cognitive impairment and reduced performance status after WBRT should be considered for further treatment choices. Further randomized clinical trials with a similar scoring system are needed.