Jackhammer Esophagus Research Articles

Sex/Gender Differences in Esophageal Motility Disorders

Esophageal motility disorders are relatively rare and are attributed to an imbalance between the excitatory and inhibitory nerves that innervate the esophagus. These disorders include achalasia, distal esophageal spasms, and jackhammer esophagus. The prevalence of achalasia is equal in men and women; however, lower esophageal hypermotility disorders are slightly more common in women. Women with achalasia experience chest pain more frequently, whereas men tend to have high lower esophageal sphincter pressure. Additionally, women with achalasia respond better to pneumatic balloon dilatation than men. However, research on sex and gender differences in the outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy remains insufficient. Future studies should investigate the differences in outcomes, complications, and long-term effects to ensure optimal treatment in men and women with esophageal motility disorders. This research will be useful to develop sex-tailored treatments for esophageal motility disorders.

Pull-back myotomy to prevent mucosal injury during peroral endoscopic myotomy for jackhammer esophagus.

Pull-back myotomy to prevent mucosal injury during peroral endoscopic myotomy for jackhammer esophagus.

A rare case of Jackhammer esophagus presenting with reflux-like symptoms in Guizhou, China

Jackhammer Esophagus (JE) is a rare esophageal motility disorder characterized by hyperdynamic contraction of the distal esophagus. High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry (HREM) remains the diagnostic benchmark. Clinically, JE manifests as dysphagia, chest pain, and symptoms suggestive of gastroesophageal reflux [1] often leading to misdiagnosis as Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD). Treatment approaches lack unified guidelines, with notable variability in outcomes. Initial management typically favors medical interventions [2]. This article examines the diagnostic and therapeutic journey of a JE case and provides insights into recent advancements in its diagnosis and management.

Anesthesia choice and its potential impact on endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe measurements in esophageal motility disorders

The widespread use of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has revolutionized the management of esophageal motility disorders (EMDs). The introduction of an endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe (EndoFLIP, Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) can serve as a complementary diagnostic tool to assess the mechanical properties (ie, pressure, diameter, distensibility, topography) of the esophagus. During EndoFLIP measurements, different anesthesia techniques may induce variable degrees of neuromuscular blockade, potentially affecting esophageal motility and altering the results of EndoFLIP metrics. The aim of this study was to compare the impact of using total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) versus general anesthesia with inhalational anesthetics (GAIA) on diagnostic EndoFLIP measurements. This retrospective study included all adult patients (≥18 years) undergoing EndoFlip during the POEM procedure at our institution between February 2017 and February 2022. Differences in pressure, diameter, and distensibility index were obtained by using propofol-based TIVA versus sevoflurane-based GAIA with a 30 mL and a 60 mL balloon. The differences were divided into terciles and compared between diagnoses by using univariate comparisons and logistic regression models. A total of 49 patients were included (39% type I achalasia, 43% type II or III achalasia, and 18% jackhammer esophagus [JE]). Compared with spastic disorders (types II and III achalasia and JE), type I had lower values of pressure differences at 60 mL in univariate (3.75 vs 15.20, P= .001) and multivariate (adjusted odds ratio, .89; 95% confidence interval, .82-.978) analyses. Compared with type I, types II and III achalasia had higher rates of pressure differences at 60 mL in the univariate (9.85 vs 3.75, P= .04) analysis and nearly reached significance in the multivariate analysis (1.09; 95% confidence interval, 1-1.20). Compared with type I achalasia, JE exhibited higher values in pressure differences at 60 mL (27.7 vs 3.75, P< .001). Esophageal pressure, as measured by EndoFLIP, was significantly reduced when patients were sedated with sevoflurane-based GAIA. The use of sevoflurane-based GAIA for diagnostic EndoFLIP may potentially lead to the misclassification of spastic disorders as type I achalasia. Propofol-based TIVA should therefore be considered over sevoflurane-based GAIA for sedation during the diagnostic test.

Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy Is an Effective Treatment Option for Managing Jackhammer Esophagus: A Single Center Experience.

Jackhammer esophagus (JE) is a rare hypercontractile motility disorder often associated with dysphagia, regurgitation, and chest pain. In patients with clinically relevant symptoms, treatment options aim to decrease esophageal contractions. Medical, endoscopic and surgical therapies have limited long-term efficacy. The advent of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has evolved as a minimally invasive treatment option. Yet data regarding JE is scare. As such we aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of JE. This was a single center retrospective study of consecutive adult patients undergoing POEM for JE from April 2018 to September 2021. All procedures were conducted by a single endoscopist. Primary outcome was clinical success, defined as Eckardt score (ES) ≤3 following the procedure. A total of 13 patients (mean age 58, 7 females) underwent POEM with a mean duration of symptoms of 42.6 months. Preprocedure mean ES was 8.92. Nine patients were treatment naive. Pre-POEM endoluminal functional luminal imaging probe (n=10) demonstrated a distensibility index of 0.34. The average length of follow-up after POEM was 15.8 months.There was a 92.3% (12/13) clinical success rate, with a mean post-POEM ES of 1.53. One patient's ES improved from 12 to 1 after POEM; however, 2.5 years later she developed recurrent symptoms (ES 10). Only 1 patient had endoscopic evidence of Los Angeles grade A esophagitis. One year after POEM, 5 patients had gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms, but only 2 required acid suppression therapy. POEM is an effective treatment modality with long-term efficacy. Larger, prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

Clinical utility of the solid meal test during high-resolution esophageal manometry. A study in a Latin American population

Introduction and aimsThe solid test meal (STM) is a challenge test that is done during esophageal manometry and appears to increase the diagnostic yield of the study. The aim of our analysis was to establish the normal values for STM and evaluate its clinical utility in a group of Latin American patients with esophageal disorders versus healthy controls. Material and methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted on a group of healthy controls and consecutive patients that underwent high-resolution esophageal manometry, in which STM was done at the final part of the study and consisted of asking the subjects to eat 200 g of precooked rice. The results were compared during the conventional protocol and the STM. ResultsTwenty-five controls and 93 patients were evaluated. The majority of the controls (92%) completed the test in under 8 min. The STM changed the manometric diagnosis in 38% of the cases. The STM diagnosed 21% more major motor disorders than the conventional protocol; it doubled the cases of esophageal spasm and quadrupled the cases of jackhammer esophagus, whereas it demonstrated normal esophageal peristalsis in 43% of the cases with a previous diagnosis of ineffective esophageal motility. ConclusionsOur study confirms the fact that complementary STM during esophageal manometry adds information and enables a more physiologic assessment of esophageal motor function to be made, compared with liquid swallows, in patients with esophageal motor disorders.

Utilidad clínica de la prueba de comida sólida durante la realización de manometría esofágica de alta resolución. Un estudio en población latinoamericana

Introduction and aimsThe solid test meal (STM) is a challenge test that is done during esophageal manometry and appears to increase the diagnostic yield of the study. The aim of our analysis was to establish the normal values for STM and evaluate its clinical utility in a group of Latin American patients with esophageal disorders versus healthy controls. Material and methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted on a group of healthy controls and consecutive patients that underwent high-resolution esophageal manometry, in which STM was done at the final part of the study and consisted of asking the subjects to eat 200g of precooked rice. The results were compared during the conventional protocol and the STM. ResultsTwenty-five controls and 93 patients were evaluated. The majority of the controls (92%) completed the test in under 8min. The STM changed the manometric diagnosis in 38% of the cases. The STM diagnosed 21% more major motor disorders than the conventional protocol; it doubled the cases of esophageal spasm and quadrupled the cases of jackhammer esophagus, whereas it demonstrated normal esophageal peristalsis in 43% of the cases with a previous diagnosis of ineffective esophageal motility. ConclusionsOur study confirms the fact that complementary STM during esophageal manometry adds information and enables a more physiologic assessment of esophageal motor function to be made, compared with liquid swallows, in patients with esophageal motor disorders.

Efficacy and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal diverticula.

Background and study aims Epiphrenic diverticula are rare and mainly occur in patients with underlying esophageal motility disorders. The current standard treatment is surgical diverticulectomy often combined by myotomy and is associated with significant adverse event (AE) rates. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy in reducing esophageal symptoms in patients with esophageal diverticula. Patients and methods We performed a retrospective cohort study including patients with an esophageal diverticulum who underwent POEM between October 2014 and December 2022. After informed consent, data were extracted from medical records and patients completed a survey by telephone. The primary outcome was treatment success, defined as Eckardt score below 4 with a minimal reduction of 2 points. Results Seventeen patients (mean age 71 years, 41.2 % female) were included. Achalasia was confirmed in 13 patients (13 /17, 76.5 %), Jackhammer esophagus in two patients (2 /17, 11.8 %), diffuse esophageal spasm in one patient (1 /17, 5.9 %) and in one patient no esophageal motility disorder was found (1 /17, 5.9 %). Treatment success was 68.8 % and only one patient (6.3 %) underwent retreatment (pneumatic dilatation). Median Eckardt scores decreased from 7 to 1 after POEM (p < 0.001). Mean size of the diverticula decreased from 3.6 cm to 2.9 cm after POEM (p < 0.001). Clinical admission was one night for all patients. AEs occurred in two patients (11.8 %) which were classified as grade II and IIIa (AGREE classification). Conclusions POEM is effective and safe to treat patients with esophageal diverticula and an underlying esophageal motility disorder.

Long-term Outcome of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in Esophageal Motility Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an established treatment for achalasia. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to analyze the mid and long-term outcomes of POEM in esophageal motility disorders. Literature search was performed in databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane databases, and Google scholar from January 2010 to May 2021. The primary objective of the study was the clinical success (Eckardt score ≤3 or <4) at mid-term (30 to 60 mo) and long-term (>60 mo) follow-up after POEM. Secondary objectives included post-POEM gastroesophageal reflux (GER) as evaluated by symptoms, increased esophageal acid exposure, and reflux esophagitis. Seventeen studies with 3591 patients were included in the review. Subtypes of motility disorders were type I (27%), type II (54.5%), type III (10.7%), distal esophageal spasm/Jackhammer esophagus (2%), and esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (17.5%). Pooled mean follow-up duration was 48.9 months (95% CI, 40.02-57.75). Pooled rate of clinical success at mid-term follow-up was 87% (95% CI, 81-91; I2 , 86%) and long-term was 84% (95% CI, 76-89; I2 , 47%). In nonachalasia motility disorders (esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction, distal esophageal spasm, and Jackhammer esophagus), pooled rate of clinical success was 77% (95% CI, 65-85; I2 , 0%). GER as estimated by symptoms was 23% (95% CI, 19-27; I2 , 74%), erosive esophagitis was 27% (95% CI, 18-38%; I2 , 91%), and increased esophageal acid exposure was 41% (95% CI, 30-52; I2 , 88%). POEM is a durable treatment option in cases with achalasia. One-fourth of patients suffer from erosive GER in the long-term and success rates are lower in nonachalasia esophageal motility disorders.

Usefulness of EndoFLIP in Diverticular Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Symptomatic Epiphrenic Diverticulum.

Diverticular peroral endoscopic myotomy (D-POEM) is known to be a safe and feasible technique for managing diverticular diseases of the esophagus. In this study, we aim to report our experience with D-POEM and to investigate the usefulness of endoscopic functional luminal imaging probe (EndoFLIP) in determining the need for cardiomyotomy with septotomy for symptomatic epiphrenic diverticulum. Consecutive patients who underwent D-POEM for symptomatic epiphrenic diverticulum between September 2019 and September 2021 were eligible for this study. EndoFLIP and high-resolution manometry results and endoscopic treatment outcomes were retrospectively investigated. A total of 9 patients with symptomatic epiphrenic diverticulum were included. The median size of the diverticulum and septum was 50 (interquartile range [IQR], 48-80) mm and 20 (IQR, 20-30) mm, respectively. The overall technical success rate was 100%, with a median procedure time of 60 (IQR, 46-100) minutes. The 5 patients (high-resolution manometry results; 3 normal, 1 ineffective esophageal motility, and 1 Jackhammer esophagus) who had decreased esophagogastric junction distensibility index on pre-procedure EndoFLIP underwent cardiomyotomy with septotomy regardless of the presence of esophageal motility disorders, and the distensibility index increased and normalized after procedure. The mean dysphagia score decreased from 2.0 ± 1.0 pre-procedure to 0.4 ± 0.7 during a median follow-up of 11 (IQR, 4-21) months post-procedure. No serious adverse events that required surgical intervention or delayed discharge were noted. EndoFLIP may help decide whether to perform combined cardiomyotomy and septotomy for the treatment of an epiphrenic diverticulum. Further large-scale studies are needed to confirm these results.

Esophageal retention cyst: Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) as a potential etiology and management with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR).

Introduction and importanceEsophageal retention cysts are acquired cysts with no known etiology. They are characterized by dilation of the submucosal glands. Symptomatic cysts are traditionally managed by surgical resection.Case presentationWe present a case of progressive dysphagia and chest pain secondary to esophageal retention cysts in the mid and distal esophagus with associated esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) and jackhammer esophagus on high resolution manometry (HRM). The patient underwent staged endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with subsequent improvement in her symptoms. However, EGJOO persisted after resection, suggesting it was the primary pathology and not a consequence of the obstruction from the cysts.Clinical discussionEsophageal retention cysts are rarely reported in the literature with most descriptions coming from incidental post-mortems. The presented case suggests EGJOO as a potential etiology of retention cysts. The proposed mechanism is that a significant rise in esophageal intraluminal pressure creates a state of stasis in the esophagus, ideal for the development of these cysts. Symptomatic or malignant retention cysts should be resected. We demonstrate the feasibility of EMR as an alternative to surgical resection.ConclusionEsophageal retention cyst is a rare entity, which may arise as a result of EGJOO. The natural history and malignant potential of these cysts are unknown, and no formal guidelines have been established for follow-up for patients with asymptomatic retention cysts. Endoscopic mucosal resection can be used to successfully manage these cysts.

Predictors of Long-Term Outcomes, Recurrent Dysphagia, and Gastroesophageal Reflux After Per-oral Endoscopic Myotomy in Esophageal Motility Disorders

BackgroundThere is limited data on long-term outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). In this study, we aim to evaluate the efficacy of POEM in patients who completed a minimum follow-up of 5 years. MethodsData of patients who underwent POEM and completed ≥ 5-year follow-up were analyzed, retrospectively. Primary outcome of study was clinical success (Eckardt ≤ 3) at ≥ 5 years after POEM. Secondary outcomes included predictors of dysphagia and symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) on long-term follow-up. ResultsThree hundred nineteen patients (males 182, mean age 40.5±14.2 years) completed a median of 73-(60–89) month follow-up. Esophageal motility disorders included idiopathic achalasia (type I 26.6%, type II 60.8%, type III 5.6%) and Jackhammer esophagus or distal esophageal spasm (2.8%). POEM was technically successful in 307 (96.2%) patients. Long-term success was 92.6% (overall), 92.1% (type I), 94.7% (type II), 87.5% (type III), and 75% (Jackhammer esophagus/distal esophageal spasm). Symptomatic GERD and reflux esophagitis were detected in 28.9% and 35.3% patients, respectively. On multivariate analysis, young age and female gender were independent risk factors for recurrent dysphagia (p = 0.037) and symptomatic GERD after POEM (p = 0.025), respectively. Lower post-POEM lower esophageal sphincter pressure was an independent predictor for reflux esophagitis (p = 0.016). ConclusionPOEM is an effective and durable treatment for achalasia and non-achalasia spastic motility disorders. Young patients and females may be at higher risk for recurrent dysphagia and symptomatic GERD, respectively.

Clinical presentation and therapeutic outcome of patients with jackhammer esophagus—a multicenter cohort study in Japan

BackgroundJackhammer esophagus (JE) is a hypercontractile esophageal motility disorder diagnosed using high-resolution manometry (HRM). We sought to determine the clinical presentation and therapeutic data of patients with JE in Japan.MethodsThe study included patients with JE, diagnosed through HRM performed for suspicious esophageal motility disorders. Demographics, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, radiology, and therapy data were collected from patient charts.ResultsAmong the 4,412 HRM tests performed, 89 patients (61.6 ± 13.4 years; 64 males, 25 females) were diagnosed with JE (2.0%). Dysphagia was the most frequent symptom (80%), followed by chest pain (40%) and heartburn (25%). Esophagogastroduodenoscopy showed abnormal findings in 32% of patients: corkscrew/rosary beads appearance in 26%, narrowing in 11%. Eosinophilic infiltration (> 15 eosinophils/high power field) was diagnosed in 21%. Esophagography showed abnormal findings in 9% of the patients. For the initial therapy, 47 patients received medical treatment followed by peroral endoscopic myotomy (21 patients) and laparoscopic myotomy (two patients). Thirteen patients did not receive any treatment and 10 of those (77%) reported spontaneous resolution of symptoms. Patients who required invasive treatment experienced severe disability in their quality of life and greater maximal distal contractile integral than those who did not.ConclusionsHRM showed that the prevalence of JE was very low (2%). Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed some characteristic features of JE in patients. Some patients showed improvement of symptoms without invasive treatments. Follow-up with/without medical treatment should be considered before performing invasive treatment in patients whose distal contractile integral is relatively low and the quality of life is not impaired.

A134 UES MANOMETRIC PARAMETERS IN ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY DISORDERS

BackgroundUpper esophageal sphincter (UES) function may be evaluated manometrically using a solid-state high-resolution manometry (HRM) system, which allows for the measurement of manometric parameters specific to the UES. While many of these parameters have yet to be validated for use in clinical practice, there is some suggestion that there may be an association between esophageal motility and UES function.AimsWe aimed to identify the relationship between UES manometric variables and high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) diagnoses.MethodsA retrospective analysis of HREM studies was performed between 2019 and 2021. Extraction of esophageal and UES manometric variables were performed. UES manometric values of interest included: mean basal pressure (mmHg), mean residual pressure (mmHg), relaxation time-to-nadir (ms), relaxation duration (ms), and recovery time (ms). Relationships between manometric diagnosis (Chicago Classification version 3) and UES manometric variables were explored. All values are expressed a medians and group means were compared with the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test.Results2119 symptomatic patients underwent HREM over the study period. Manometric diagnoses were achalasia (72 patients), esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (286), absent contractility (108), distal esophageal spasm (53), jackhammer esophagus (32), and ineffective esophageal motility (694). 886 patients had no specific motility disorder; 643 of whom had ≤ 20% ineffective swallows and were considered symptomatic controls.Patients with achalasia had significantly higher mean basal pressures (63.2 vs. 54.4, p = .001), mean residual pressure (3.8 vs. -1.9, p < .001), relaxation-time-to-nadir (182.0 vs. 142.0, p = .005), relaxation duration (820.5 vs. 708.0, p < .001) and recovery time (623.0 vs. 562, p < .001) compared to control patients. Among patients with achalasia, the presence of panesophageal pressurization correlated weakly with recovery time (R2 .3, p = .03). Patients with ineffective esophageal motility had significantly higher mean basal pressures (61.7 vs. 54.0, p < .001).Among all patients, patients with incomplete bolus clearance (≥ 30%) had significantly higher UES mean basal pressure (58.9 vs. 54.6, p = .004), mean residual pressure (-.62 vs. -2, p < .001), relaxation duration (724.0 vs. 707.0, p = .014) and recovery time (580 vs. 558.0, p < .001).ConclusionsPatients with achalasia may have higher basal and residual UES pressures, and slower relaxation compared to patients with normal esophageal motility. This may reflect dynamic changes of the UES in response to obstruction at the esophagogastric junction. Elevated UES pressures are also seen in patients with ineffective esophageal motility, potentially reflecting a response to poor bolus clearance. More work needs to be done to validate these parameters in clinical practice.Funding AgenciesNone

Geriatric patients with esophageal motility disorders benefit more from minimally invasive peroral endoscopic myotomy: a multicenter study in Japan.

Geriatric patients with existing studies on the safety and efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia involve small sample sizes and single institutions. However, multi-center, large-scale data analyses are lacking. The study aimed to clarify the characteristics of geriatric patients with esophageal motility disorders (EMDs) and determine the procedure-related outcomes and clinical course following POEM. This cohort study included 2,735 patients with EMDs who were treated at seven Japanese facilities between 2010 and 2019. The patients' characteristics and post-POEM clinical courses were compared between the geriatric (age ≥ 75years; n = 321) and non-geriatric (age < 75years; n = 2,414) groups. Compared with the non-geriatric group, the geriatric group had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status scores; more recurrent cases; lower incidence of chest pain; and higher incidence of type III achalasia, distal esophageal spasm, and Jackhammer esophagus. Furthermore, the incidence of sigmoid esophagus was higher, although esophageal dilation was not severe in this group. POEM was safe and effective for geriatric patients with treatment-naïve and recurrent EMDs. Furthermore, compared with the non-geriatric group, the geriatric group had lower post-POEM Eckardt scores, fewer complaints of refractory chest pain, and a lower incidence rate of post-POEM reflux esophagitis. Geriatric patients are characterized by worse clinical conditions, more spastic disorders, and greater disease progression of EMDs, which are also the indications for minimally invasive POEM. POEM is more beneficial in geriatric patients as it has lowering symptom scores and incidence rates of reflux esophagitis.

Efficacy and Safety of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Esophageal Achalasia and Achalasia-Related Diseases in Patients Aged 75 Years and Over.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has become a popular treatment for esophageal achalasia and other esophageal motility disorders. However, its efficacy and safety in elderly patients are unclear. To clarify that, we reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent POEM in our hospital. A total of 11 patients who underwent POEM for esophageal achalasia (n = 10) and jackhammer esophagus (n = 1) were included. Procedural success, defined as the completion of an esophageal and gastric myotomy, was 100%. Clinical success, defined as an Eckardt score of 3 or less, without the use of additional treatments at 2 months, was 100%. The median Eckardt score significantly decreased after the POEM (baseline vs. 2 months after POEM; 7 (2–8) vs. 0 (0–1), p < 0.01). In the second and third years, the cumulative treatment effect maintenance rate was 88.9%. All patients taking antithrombotic agents had safe operations with the temporary discontinuation of these agents. There were four adverse events (two pneumoperitoneum, one mucosal injury, and one pneumonia), all of which improved with fasting or antibiotics. In conclusion, POEM is an effective and safe treatment for esophageal achalasia and achalasia-related diseases in patients aged 75 years and over.

Symptom Severity Related With Contraction Peaks in Patients With Jackhammer Esophagus.

Background/AimsJackhammer esophagus is an uncommon heterogeneous motility disorder associated with a distal contractile integral > 8000 mmHg∙sec∙cm. The spectrum of abnormality ranges from a relatively normal looking contraction to chaotic repetitive contractions akin to a jackhammer. Although previous studies have shown an uncertain correlation between peristaltic vigor and symptoms, we hypothesize that symptoms may be more severe with repetitive contractions as opposed to an elevated contractile measure. Thus, this study aims to investigate whether symptom severity is related to the contraction pattern in the patients with hypercontractile esophagus.MethodsPatients with hypercontractile esophagus were retrospectively identified, their demographic and high-resolution manometry characteristics were collected. Contraction pattern on high-resolution manometry was categorized into single-peak and multiple-peak. Comparison was performed between patients with single-peak and multiple-peak.ResultsAltogether 35 patients (age range, 45-70 years; femalemale, 2411) were included. Seven patients presented with single-peak hypercontractile swallows, while 28 patients presented with multiple-peak hypercontractile swallows. The patients with multiple-peak showed higher Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire scores compared with patients with single-peak. The jackhammer swallows with multiple-peak were associated with higher distal contractile integral values, longer distal latency intervals, and a lower integrated relaxation pressure.ConclusionsRepetitive contractions akin to a jackhammer were common amongst patients with hypercontractile esophagus. Patients with the jackhammer pattern also presented with more severe symptoms. Further distinction of hypercontractile esophagus into a jackhammer dominant subtype may be warranted.

Per-oral Endoscopic Myotomy: State of the Art.

For more than a decade, per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has been performed for the treatment of achalasia and other dysmotilities of the esophagus. POEM has become an accepted alternative to Heller myotomy, a salvation technique for patients not responding to Heller myotomy and the favorite intervention for diffuse esophageal spasm and jackhammer esophagus. POEM paved the way for endoscopic pyloromyotomy, Zenker's diverticulum myotomy, and submucosal tunneling with endoscopic resection. This review will cover the technique and the most current literature of this revolutionary third space technique.

S473 High Prevalence of Esophageal Motility Disorders in Patients With Rheumatic Diseases

Introduction: While esophageal motor dysfunction is known to be associated with systemic sclerosis, the prevalence of esophageal dysmotility in other rheumatic conditions is not well known. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of esophageal motility disorders in rheumatic diseases. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, adults with a diagnosis of a rheumatic disease [rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Sjogren’s syndrome, systemic sclerosis (SS), systemic lupus erythematous (SLE), mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD), idiopathic Raynaud’s phenomenon, and other], who underwent high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) were included. Demographics, clinical characteristics, rheumatic diseases and associated therapies, HREM findings, motility disorders per Chicago classification (CCv3.0) criteria and swallow characteristics, were extracted from the medical record. We analyzed the data using descriptive statistics to assess the prevalence and types of esophageal motor disorders amongst patients with known rheumatic conditions. Results: Of 118 patients, 80% were women, and 73% were white (Table). The most common esophageal symptoms were dysphagia (88%), heartburn (81%), and regurgitation (41%). Rheumatic diseases included RA (38%), Raynaud’s (30%), Sjogren’s (22%), SS (19%) and MCTD (11%). On HREM, 53% had an esophageal motility disorder per Chicago classification. Of note, 38% of the sample with a normal barium swallow had an esophageal dysmotility disorder on HREM. Esophageal hypocontractility (including ineffective esophageal motility, absent contractility, and fragmented peristalsis) was diagnosed in 29 patients (25%), achalasia and/or esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction were found in 25 (21%), and esophageal hypercontractility (including diffuse esophageal spasm and jackhammer esophagus) in 8 (7%). These esophageal disorders were found amongst rheumatic diseases including SLE, RA, Sjogren’s, SS, MCTD, psoriatic arthritis and Raynaud’s (Figure). Conclusion: Esophageal motor disorders were found in more than half of patients with rheumatic diseases who underwent HREM, even though many patients previously had a normal barium swallow. HREM should be considered in patients with rheumatic conditions who present with esophageal symptoms.Figure 1.: Disorders of Esophageal Motility by Rheumatologic DiseaseTable 1.: Patient Characteristics and Manometry Findings

153 THE CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF INCOMPLETE BOLUS CLEARANCE IN PATIENTS WITH DYSPHAGIA

Abstract The primary function of the esophagus is to facilitate bolus transport to the stomach. High-resolution manometry assesses the functions of esophageal motility, but not the clearance of bolus transit through the esophagus. The development of combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry (MII-EM) has enabled simultaneous measurement of bolus transport and manometry. This study investigated the effects of bolus transit on esophageal motility disorders and its effect on the quality of life of patients with dysphagia. Methods A total of 810 wet swallows were reviewed and analyzed in 81 patients with dysphagia who underwent MII-EM. Incomplete bolus clearance (IBC) was defined based on impedance measurement. IBC was classified into four types (A: normal, B: incomplete clearance in the upper esophagus, C: incomplete clearance in the lower esophagus, D: incomplete clearance of the whole esophagus), and was also evaluated according to the appearance rate of complete bolus transit. Then, the clinical significance of IBC was determined by our previously validated dysphagia symptom score and the SF8 quality of life instrument (physical component summary and mental component summary). Results There were 16 cases of esophageal achalasia (Ach), 9 of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO), 8 of distal esophageal spasm (DES), 7 of Jackhammer esophagus (JE), 2 of absent contractility (AC), 10 of ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) and 29 normal cases. The figure shows the breakdown of IBC for each disorder. Complete bolus transit was found in 27.8% in EGJOO, 52.5% in DES, 14.2% in JE, 4.0% in IEM, and 83.3% in normal; no CBT was found in Ach and AC. Patients with IBC had significantly higher dysphagia symptom scores (p &amp;lt; 0.05) and lower mental component summaries (p &amp;lt; 0.05) than those without. Conclusion Patients with dysphagia with esophageal dysmotility were classified into two groups: those with and without IBC. Assessment of bolus transport is an important clinical marker for patients with dysphagia, because those with IBC had a significantly higher dysphagia symptom scores and impaired quality of life.