We read with interest the article by Koniaris and colleagues in the December 2004 issue: “Complete esophageal diversion: A simplified, easily reversible technique.” The authors describe how, in addition to primary repair and tube drainage, “complete esophageal diversion can be extremely helpful in controlling ongoing thoracic contamination and sepsis” secondary to thoracic esophageal perforation. We, too, have resorted to diversion, usually when ongoing sepsis prohibits primary repair or resection and reanastomosis. Koniaris and colleagues perform primary repair and tube drainage in addition to proximal esophageal diversion; we more often make no attempt at primary repair in what should be a highly select group of patients “too sick to operate on.” We have found that with complete esophageal diversion and exclusion, neither primary repair nor resection and reconstruction are necessary. Our method of proximal (cervical) diversion is essentially as described by Koniaris and colleagues; we use three number-1 chromic catgut ligatures as our absorbable ligatures. As described by others, distal esophageal diversion of gastric reflux must also be accomplished for complete esophageal exclusion. So, we similarly ligate the esophagogastric junction, placing gastrostomy for suction, jejunostomy for nutrition, and tube thoracostomy for pleural drainage. From March 3, 2000, through December 10, 2004, we have treated 9 patients as described previously out of a total of 27 patients who presented with thoracic esophageal perforation during the same time period. Three patients were treated with primary repair and cervical diversion as described by Koniaris and associates, all surviving, with mean hospitalization of 36 days. One patient required subsequent esophageal dilatation, and two patients required reoperation. In one patient, revision of the primary repair was necessary; another needed resection of the repair, using Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy and esophagogastrostomy. Six other extremely sick patients were treated with simple, cervical diversion and exclusion, without any attempt at primary repair, as described previously and elsewhere. All but one patient recovered nicely, and none required delayed primary repair or reconstruction. Mean hospitalization in this group was 30 days. One patient, operated on after incurring esophageal perforation at coronary revascularization with left ventricular aneurysm repair, died from brain death secondary to air embolism related to the aneurysm repair. There were no identifiable problems related to the patient’s diversion and exclusion at the time of death. Otherwise, all patients recovered nicely, with simple outpatient takedown and closure of the cervical esophagocutaneous fistula, usually performed 3 to 4 months later. Only three of the six patients required any esophageal dilatation at the distal cervical or gastroesophageal ligation site, and those patients, only once. All perforations healed naturally, and none of these six patients has any dysphagia at mean followup of 36 months.
Read full abstract