Range information is very important for automatic control of manufacturing systems. Part location, edge detection, and motion guidance are just a few examples of problems in which range information is required. Through simple time‐of‐flight measurements acoustic systems can conveniently and reliably provide the distance between the sensor and the workpiece. Scanning with the acoustic transducer furthermore allows one to reconstruct the nearfield 3‐D environment. Difficulties arise primarily from the need that the workpiece surface should be reasonably parallel to the surface of the acoustic transducer. Iterative search strategies allow one to overcome this problem. Alternatively, optical range‐finding systems typically use triangulation strategies to measure the sensor/workpiece distance. Their depth resolution is comparable to that of acoustic transducers. The lateral resolution is better in optical systems. Furthermore, the orientation dependence of the workpiece/sensor surface is less critical than it is for acoustic transducers. Acoustic systems are less expensive than their optical counterparts. They also can survive in the sometimes harsh manufacturing environment. The advantages and disadvantages of optical and acoustical range finding sensors are discussed in the context of applied manufacturing problems.