Reviewed by: The Field of Cloth of Gold by Glenn Richardson Brian Brege (bio) Henry VIII, Francis I, Charles V, Field of Cloth of Gold, Renaissance Diplomacy, Court Culture, Jousting, Renaissance Spectacle, Summit Diplomacy, Machiavelli Glenn Richardson. The Field of Cloth of Gold. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2013. 288 pages + xii. $65.00. Between May 26 and July 13, 1520, three young monarchs met near the shores of the English Channel where their lands converged. The papal proclamation of Universal Peace, which provided the respite enabling these meetings, was to have constituted the prelude to a united front against the rapidly expanding Ottoman Empire, fresh from its conquest of Egypt and knocking upon Europe's door.1 In celebration of both this Universal Peace and peace between France and England, Francis I and Henry VIII had long agreed to meet.2 Meanwhile, however, newly elected Emperor Charles V harbored fears that the weakest of the three monarchs, Henry VIII, would join his mighty rival Francis I in alliance against him and his possessions. Consequently, Charles arranged to meet Henry in May and again in July on both sides of Henry's summit with Francis in June.3 Amid intense dynastic and national competition and a rising tide of religious conflict, the grandly proclaimed peace would prove fleeting. In the following years not only would these three rulers repeatedly [End Page 123] find themselves at war, but Henry VIII would also famously break with the Papacy, and France would join in alliance with Suleiman the Magnificent's Ottoman Empire. Pope Leo X and Cardinal Wolsey's vision for Universal Peace had proved a chimera. Surely, then, the Field of Cloth of Gold, the grand Anglo-French tournament-cum-summit-meeting meant to seal the Peace, must have been no more than an extravagantly wasteful party marred by duplicity and empty rhetoric. This line of criticism dates back nearly to the event itself and was expressed cogently in a 1532 sermon by Bishop Fisher that set the tone for subsequent historiography.4 In a well-researched and perceptive history of the vast spectacle, The Field of Cloth of Gold, Glenn Richardson argues, however, that the failure of the aspiration to Universal Peace does not mean that the participants in the Field were insincere or unserious or that their extravagant spending was frivolous, but merely that they were unsuccessful.5 Richardson bookends his analysis with summaries of the political and diplomatic context that explain the rationale for the Field and the political stakes for all involved. Chapter 1, "European War and 'Universal Peace,'" sets the stage with an apposite passage from Shakespeare's Henry VIII. It then briefly introduces the major characters, the dramatic political context of the Italian Wars, and Charles V's contested Imperial election.6 Nearly in passing, Richardson notes that it was in 1519, in the context of preparing for the Field of Cloth of Gold, that resident ambassadors were first exchanged between France and England.7 Resident ambassadors perform a starring role in the traditional narrative of the development of modern diplomacy. In Richardson's account, the ambassadors play an essential part in organizing the Field, sending and receiving gifts, allaying concerns, relaying information, and serving as honorable proxies. The heralds who regularly appear—Garter King of Arms, Orléans King of Arms, Norroy King of Arms, and so on—have an unresolved relationship to the new resident ambassadors borrowed from fifteenth-century Italian practice.8 Greater reflection on the interaction of old and new, whether with cannons and knights or resident ambassadors and heralds, would have been welcome. Richardson's argument instead concentrates on likening the Field to modern patterns. He adopts Peter Gwyn's description of Cardinal Wolsey doing "'shuttle diplomacy'" avant la lettre and makes comparisons with the Beijing Olympics.9 Above all, Richardson characterizes the Field as a prototype of summit diplomacy, citing the modern litany from the Big Three at Tehran, Potsdam, and Yalta through Nixon in China to Reagan and Gorbachev in Reykjavik.10 [End Page 124] Richardson begins with the simple, yet powerful "premise that people do not generally spend huge amounts of money on major social and political events...