The topic of this roundtable prompts me to reflect with some optimism on the contrast between the uncertain status of Italian film studies when I began teaching and researching in the field over twenty years ago, and the flourishing profile it enjoys today as a sub-discipline of Italian studies in the Anglophone academy. It also obliges me to acknowledge that the institutional inclusion of Italian screen studies (ISS; now encompassing both film and television) within italianistica has meant that it exists in relative isolation from some of the theoretical discourses and methodological trends developing in the broader field of film and media studies, more specifically transnational film criticism. My own introduction to the study of cinema occurred in the context of a film studies department in the 1980s, at a time when the discipline was marked by the conjunction of semiotics, psychoanalytic film theory, and feminism. This theoretical background did not necessarily provide the most compelling preparation for a teaching career in a department of Modern Languages and Literatures, where the focus of my research was expected to match the field in which I was hired to teach, that is, Italian studies — then, as now, dominated by literary history and analysis. Nonetheless, it enabled me to bring theoretical discourse to bear on my investigation of Italian cinema and Italian cultural production more generally. It also trained me to approach all films as texts that offer rich potential for deconstructive inquiry, rather than as aesthetic objects to be cherished or cast aside according to predetermined hierarchies of value. My decision to focus my research on contemporary Italian cinema met with some incomprehension at the outset, particularly among italianisti. This resistance has not yet entirely disappeared. ‘Ma il cinema italiano non esiste piu’ is the dismissive comment I still hear, more often in Italy than elsewhere, from a number of colleagues who assert that the films produced in Italy over the past twenty or thirty years are rarely worth viewing, much less worth studying. Rather than reflecting a reasoned assessment of Italian cinema at present, such claims are symptomatic of a refusal to move beyond out-dated evaluative criteria and canonical hierarchies, such as the embalmment of neorealism as the gold standard of Italian filmmaking, the privileging of a discourse of autori, and so on — taken-for-granted values that were astutely challenged in a landmark article by Catherine O’Rawe about five years ago, and further elaborated in a more recent study by Alan O’Leary in collaboration with O’Rawe. The Italianist, 34. 2, 268–271, June 2014