In 1989, Denmark became the first country in the World which established a registration scheme for same-sex couples providing most of the rights and duties granted to married couples, with a few exceptions. One of these differences between marriage and register partnership was that, in the case of the latter, at least one of the partners was required to be Danish citizen domiciled in Denmark. The main purposes behind these requirements were to prevent Denmark from becoming a gay heaven for couples from abroad and to avoid limping registrations. These requirements evolved and, in 1999, foreign couples were allowed to register as long as they both were domiciled in the country for at least two years before registering. Furthermore, nationality and domicile of some other countries have been considered on the same footing as the Danish ones: Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Finland, the Netherlands, Belgium and Spain. This complicated solution, which may be worded as a list system, is different from the general rules with regards to marriage and it no longer seems suitable for the purposes it was created for. The list system may be changed once same-sex marriage is approved in the coming months, although it is likely to remain for the purposes of recognition of foreign registered partnerships. It is, in any case, an example of a confusing approach by the Danish legislator, with a lack of tradition to legislate on private international law issues, in a sensitive matter.
Read full abstract