In this issue of the Journal, Dugani et al. present a case concerning a patient undergoing a caudal block for chronic pain treatment wherein a bowel hernia, inferoposterior to the coccygeal ligament, was found incidentally using fluoroscopy and confirmed with ultrasound. The initial procedure was abandoned, and subsequently, the patient underwent coccygeal hernia repair. In this case, Dugani et al. raise two important issues in both chronic pain management and ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia, namely, ‘‘incidental detection’’ and ‘‘the capability of ultrasound to identify nonneural pathology’’, that are more notable than the authors’ ability to define the pathological condition and modify patient management using ultrasound and fluoroscopy. Undoubtedly, the continuing popularity of ultrasound techniques in regional anesthesia will result in the exposure of anesthesiologists to these issues; in fact, an increasing number of such cases are reported in many journals. However, when it comes to diagnosing pathology using ultrasound, most anesthesiologists lack training and experience. Collaboration with radiologists and formal training in ultrasound are considerations for equipping anesthesiologists to take advantage of the possibilities offered by imaging technologies. In chronic pain management, pain syndromes can be complex and difficult to diagnose. Coccydynia is no exception, presenting with symptoms from discomfort to acute and severe pain, varying between patients, and changing over time. It can occur after falls, childbirth, repetitive strain, or prior surgery. In many cases, the origin of the pain is unclear and the cause unknown. Although a diagnosis of coccydynia often is based solely on the symptoms, other organic causes (e.g., local rashes from shingles) and bone and tissue disorders (fracture) must be ruled out by performing a physical examination, diagnostic imaging, and other appropriate tests. In many cases, this ‘‘incidental detection’’ can be avoided from the outset; however, in this case, could investigations have been performed prior to the caudal injection to prevent the ‘‘on-table’’ incidental finding? Recently, the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society proposed a joint clinical practice guideline suggesting a focused history and examination is important to identify the nature of the pain and the warning signs for underlying pathologies. Appropriate diagnostic imaging should be considered and reserved for patients with severe or progressive neurologic deficits or in cases where serious underlying conditions are suspected. In the case of Dugani et al., bowel herniation post-coccygectomy is extremely rare, and the symptoms persisting after surgery would not necessarily prompt further investigations prior to intervention, barring a change of symptoms. This case reminds clinicians to conduct appropriate investigations in patients with nonspecific pain prior to committing to an invasive intervention, especially after a surgical procedure. Nevertheless, despite the most thorough history and examination, diagnoses will occasionally be missed, thus opening the window for ‘‘incidental detection’’ in cases where extensive investigations are not indicated. Ultrasound is a challenging imaging modality because it is highly operator-dependent in terms of both acquisition and interpretation of the image. The inherent user-dependent sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound could result in either a false negative (missed diagnosis) or a false positive (misinterpretation of an insignificant lesion). Either of B. C. H. Tsui, MD (&) V. H. Y. Ip, MBChB Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Alberta Hospital, 8-120 Clinical Sciences Building, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G3, Canada e-mail: btsui@ualberta.ca
Read full abstract