Abortion Rights Research Articles

Counter-forensics and the geographies of images

Counter-forensics emerged in order to deploy scientific investigative techniques usually wielded by the state against the state. In this article, we theorize how a counter-forensic approach can inform geographical approaches to the study of images. Our counter-forensic approach centers the material and semantic instability of images and highlights the indeterminacy of meaning and thus, the importance of the discursive activity of articulating the relationship between images and political claims. The article offers two case studies that deploy this approach. The first engages with cell phone images made by migrants at sea, showing how they can be read as evidence of the broader spatial politics of Europe’s external borders. The second case study examines the materiality of ultrasound technologies in relation to the changing legal terrain of abortion politics in the United States. Both studies use images as openings to intervene in contested politics that are part of the production of uneven geographies of state domination and control.

Mistrust: conservative rhetoric in the Oireachtas 2018 abortion debates

ABSTRACT In 2018, the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution of Ireland, which had prohibited abortion except under certain severe circumstances, was repealed by an overwhelming majority of voters in a national referendum. This article addresses opposition in the Oireachtas to the liberal changes to the abortion legislation that preceded and followed the referendum. By employing a critical discourse analysis approach, I identify characteristically conservative rhetoric and arguments used in the debates. Furthermore, I adopt an analytical framework provided by Albert O. Hirschman to argue that the opposing rhetoric employed wasrooted in the conservative tradition: the opponents of the abortion legislation argued both that the changes to the legislation will have the opposite result than intended and lead to unacceptable consequences. The legislation will not only harm society but also undermine the interests of women. I conclude that the opposition to the legislation was based on a mistrust of women, their agency and self-determination. The study aims to shed light on how core ideas of conservatism, such as opposition to ‘excessive’ equality, manifested in the contemporary political debates on abortion and how, ultimately, the rhetoric in the Irish debates fits within the larger framework of conservatism as a school of thought.

Health aspects of the presidential election in the United States.

The prospect of a Biden-Trump rematch had raised concerns. The argument of Trump on the older age of Biden led to a boomerang effect when the latter was replaced by the much younger Kamala Harris whose mixed African and Asian ancestry should lead to her support on international issues. Swing voters might be attracted by her potential as the first female president. Assertive on the politically controversial issue of abortion, Kamala Harris already spent a substantial part of her vice-presidency on women issues. Her promotion of sexual and reproductive rights during the presidential campaign augurs well for restoring those priorities on the American political agenda.

Setting boundaries between crime and rights

Abstract In 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling on Dobbs v. Jackson overturned two precedents, thus ending American women’s 50-year-old constitutional right to abortion. Drawing on Van Leeuwen’s legitimation framework and Labov’s model of narrative structure, this study focuses on how justices (de)legitimate abortion rights in contrasting narratives in Dobbs through authorization, moral evaluation, rationalization, and mythopoesis. Specifically, we propose a theoretical model of judicial narrative strata to deconstruct the language of justices and explain how judicial narratives set boundaries between two different moral economies around abortion and realize the transformation of a conceived right into a punishable crime. Furthermore, this study suggests that in the post-Dobbs era, the justices’ narrative reconfiguration of moral boundaries may turn into social boundaries and trigger more gender segregation, which might also have theoretical and practical implications for legislation and judicial practices in other jurisdictions.

A Critical Introduction to the Ethics of Abortion: Understanding the Moral Arguments, written by Bernie Cantens

A Critical Introduction to the Ethics of Abortion: Understanding the Moral Arguments, written by Bernie Cantens

The Debate on Abortion Rights in the United States at the End of the 20th Century

The Debate on Abortion Rights in the United States at the End of the 20th Century

Ethics of abortion in transplantation.

The controversial medical procedure of abortion is the subject of this article. It argues that for transplant patients, including recipients, abortion is ethical. In June 2022, the United States Supreme Court overturned the long-standing decision of Roe v. Wade. This decision has led to a socio-legal environment where obtaining an abortion is impossible for some patients. However, the moral position relating to patients who have undergone transplants or are on a waiting list has been largely overlooked. End-stage renal, liver, and heart disease presents a hazardous situation for pregnancy, posing risks to both the fetus and the pregnant person. The abortion procedure is medically safer and allows a patient to proceed with a transplant. Limiting access to abortion or preventing it altogether will have a significant negative impact on transplant patients. The ethical analysis of abortion can be likened to compelling a relative or loved one of a transplant recipient to donate an organ to their family member or loved one. This article emphasizes the importance of maintaining the legal availability of abortion for transplant patients. Allowing abortions in transplant patients upholds ethical parity, as seen in the analogous situation of live organ donation.

The Social Work Code of Ethics: Supporting Reproductive Justice for Women

ABSTRACT The 2022 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization overturned reproductive, health, and abortion rights for women. Using the NASW Code of Ethics, a course assignment is offered for students to examine the professional, ethical commitment and responsibility of social workers to advocate for these rights and reproductive justice for women. Practical ideas for incorporating content examining ethics into coursework in higher education are examined. An advocacy practice and policy model is provided and examined for consideration and use for advocacy when promoting reproductive rights and justice for women. The course assignment centers on the work of Freire (1970), as students work in small groups to identify generative themes in relationship to the NASW Code of Ethics and reproductive and health rights and justice for women. Practical and useful follow-up considerations, assignments, and takeaways are offered for assessing student learning in relationship to the course assignment.

Teaching Social Justice After the Dobbs Decision

ABSTRACT On June 24, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court issued the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision, overturning 50 years of protected abortion rights in the United States. The decision directly impacts the way social work educators address current social issues that relate to bodily autonomy and social justice. This paper used mixed methodology to collect quantitative and qualitative survey data from MSW students to explore how they perceive the overturning of Roe v. Wade, how the topic was covered in their social work courses, and receive recommendations on how it should be taught. Constructivist Grounded Theory and Thematic Analysis were used to code for reoccurring and emergent themes. Findings indicate that students believe the Dobbs decision was not discussed enough in social work courses, that students believe reproductive justice discussions should be grounded in NASW values, and that students view the Dobbs decision negatively. Student suggestions for teaching reproductive justice are to focus on educational information, try to avoid politics, and set a civil classroom tone. The aim of this research study is to elevate the voices of students as educators grapple with navigating how the Dobbs decision impacts micro- and macro-level curriculum.

Malta: Political Developments and Data in 2023

AbstractThe year in politics was marked by the exposure of a number of scandals, chief among which concerned the privatisation of three public hospitals. Polls still continued to give the governing Labour Party a strong lead over the opposition Nationalist Party, which showed little sign of recovery. The economy performed well, but inflation hit people's spending power, and sustained growth continued to be reflected in overcrowding and congestion. The abortion debate closed in an anti‐climax. A brighter picture emerged in foreign relations as Malta took its place in the UN Security Council and was chosen to chair the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe.

Abortion, Reproductive Justice, and Justice-Based Sexual Ethics in the Episcopal Church

This article offers a critical theo-ethical reflection on abortion from a reproductive justice (RJ) perspective. Focusing on the socio-political structure that shapes abortion discourses and legislation and affects women’s agency over their reproductive ability, I complicate the ways of thinking about abortion. The abortion debate reveals what we, as the church, value, how we embody God’s love and justice, and how we should live. In search of the answers to these questions, the article engages in women of color’s theory and activism for RJ through the theological, the political, and the sexual. Finally, the article suggests that the Episcopal/Anglican church reconsider abortion as a social justice issue and meditate on its commitment to God’s justice in light of RJ.

The Impact of Changing Abortion Legislation on Emergency Medicine Residents in a State With Protected Abortion Rights.

Background The US Supreme Court's 2022 ruling in Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization overturned Roe v Wade, allowing individual states to determine abortion restrictions, significantly impacting graduate medical education (GME). While focus has been on states enacting restrictions, the impacts in states where abortion rights are safeguarded are equally important. Emergency medicine (EM) serves as a safety net within the health care system, making it ideal for understanding the broader implications of these legal changes on GME. Objective To explore the experiences and perspectives of EM residents regarding changing abortion legislation in California, an abortion-protective state. Methods We conducted a qualitative study using transcendental phenomenology. Thirteen postgraduate year 4 EM residents from a single large university-based program in California participated in semistructured interviews in 2023. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results Four themes were identified: (1) impact of changing abortion legislation on practice; (2) personal and professional decisions influenced by legislation; (3) navigating legal uncertainties in practice; and (4) advocacy and engagement beyond clinical practice. Residents reported varying levels of awareness and concern about the implications of abortion laws on EM practice, the influence of these laws on their career decisions, the need for legal guidance, and a commitment to advocacy. These themes highlight a complex interplay between legal changes, personal values, and professional responsibilities. Conclusions This study highlights the significant impact of the Dobbs decision on EM residents in California, revealing that residents face unique ethical, legal, and advocacy challenges that may affect their professional identity formation.

Factors Affecting Willingness to Provide Medication Abortion Among North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology Members Caring for Adolescents and Young Adults Following the Dobbs Decision

To assess willingness to provide medication abortion among North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology (NASPAG) clinicians caring for adolescents and young adults (AYA) following Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. Cross-sectional online survey. Potential participants received an e-mail invitation via the NASPAG listserv. A 43-item questionnaire queried demographics, practice setting, abortion training and practice, willingness to provide medication abortion, potential or real barriers to providing medication abortion, and sentiments of abortion. Descriptive statistics, χ2, and Fisher's exact tests were used. Of the 70 participants, 51% were willing to provide a medication abortion for an adolescent who requested it in their clinical practice. The most common barriers to providing medication abortion were legislative restrictions (47%) and dispensing pills from clinic (33%). Participants' willingness to provide a medication abortion differed by type of practice (P = .001), availability of mifepristone (P = .006), perception of state's abortion policy (P = .001), concern about legislative restrictions (P = .008), experience providing abortion (P = .04), and receipt of medication abortion training (P = .02). Willingness to provide medication abortion also differed based on various sentiments of abortion measured but not on opinion regarding legality of abortion for adolescents (P = .49). Perception of state's abortion rights and concern about legislative restrictions influenced NASPAG clinicians' willingness to provide medication abortion for adolescents. Interventions to minimize legislative interference with medical care, increase abortion training, and implement medication abortion in pediatric settings may expand AYA medication abortion access.

Women’s experiences of needing abortion care whilst incarcerated: a systematic review of the international literature

Incarcerated women are confined in institutions designed to punish. These sites often ignore the complex mental and physical health needs of people who are incarcerated. Despite the World Health Organization stressing the need for access to reproductive healthcare in carceral institutions, stigma surrounding abortion care and health inequalities create contextually specific issues for incarcerated people seeking to access these services. There is also a dearth of research conducted directly with incarcerated women, trans men and non-binary people to examine their experiences of abortion. A systematic review of international peer-reviewed and grey literature was completed to summarise existing evidence from research conducted on the experiences of needing abortion care whilst incarcerated. Various experiences were identified including: conditions of confinement shaping abortion decisions; bureaucratic obstacles to accessing abortion services; incarcerated women, carceral staff and carceral healthcare staff’s lack of understanding of abortion rights and procedures; and a scarcity of support and empathy, including experiences of stigmatisation and lack of confidentiality. There exists a significant gap in research examining the experiences of incarcerated people who may need an abortion, emphasising the need for international collaboration and advocacy to address systemic issues that extend beyond local contexts.

Constitutional enshrinement as a way of safeguarding abortion rights: The case of France

France's landmark constitutional amendment in 2024 enshrines abortion freedom in its supreme legal framework, representing a profound milestone against the backdrop of shifting global political and social attitudes toward abortion. This decision, influenced by disruptive events such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the overturning of constitutional abortion rights in the United States, places France to the forefront of protecting abortion access. Despite ongoing challenges in accessing services in certain areas and circumstances, this amendment sets a precedent for other nations considering similar protections. We offer key insights into this case and reflect on how it can potentially shape legislative trends in abortion rights worldwide.

“When does human life begin?” teaching human embryology in the context of the American abortion debate

The Dobbs decision of the United States Supreme Court and the actions of several state legislatures have made it risky, if not outright dangerous, to teach factual material concerning human embryology. At some state universities, for instance, if a professor's lecture is felt to teach or discuss abortion (as it might when teaching about tubal pregnancies, hydatidiform moles, or eneuploidy), that instructor risks imprisonment for up to 14 years (Gyori, 2023). Some states' new censorship rules have thus caused professors to drop modules on abortion from numerous science and humanities courses. In most states, instructors can still teach about human embryonic development and not risk putting their careers or livelihoods in jeopardy. However, even in many of these institutions, students can bring a professor to a disciplinary hearing by claiming that the instructor failed to provide ample trigger warnings on such issues. This essay attempts to provide some strategies wherein human embryology and the ethical issues surrounding it might be taught and students may be given resources to counter unscientific falsehoods about fertilization and human development. This essay provides evidence for teaching the following propositions.Mis-information about human biology and medicine is rampant on the internet, and there are skills that can be taught to students that will help them determine which sites should trusted. This is a skill that needs to be taught as part of science courses.

Competing framings of abortion in the Northern Ireland Assembly and Westminster: the long and winding road to abortion decriminalisation

ABSTRACT Abortion was decriminalised in Northern Ireland in October 2019. This historic change was introduced by the UK Parliament following lengthy activist campaigns, national and international inquiries, and regional and national court cases. This paper focuses on two legislatures, the Northern Ireland Assembly, and the UK Parliament, examining the role played by each in how decriminalisation was achieved. Tracing efforts dating back to the introduction of the Northern Ireland Assembly in 1998, the analysis charts how the often-hostile approach to reform changed, prior to, and following, decriminalisation. In contrast, the UK Parliament's treatment of the abortion issue in Northern Ireland over the same period veered from ignorance to apathy to engagement. The paper examines the external and internal influences in each legislature, illustrating the different discourses within each. In the Northern Ireland Assembly, we trace how the debate on abortion was shaped around the question of abortion, whereas in the UK Parliament, the issue of devolution dominated. This paper offers a unique comparative analysis from the position of involved campaigners, of the multi-jurisdictional efforts to bring about historic legal change which moved Northern Ireland from having one of the most restricted legal frameworks globally on abortion to one of the most liberal.

On Becoming Human and Being Humane: Human Rights, Women’s Rights, Species Rights

This essay focuses on the nexus of vulnerability and rights. It argues that in transforming vulnerability from a stigma that alienated women from their humanity to the signature of human dignity, women bridged the gap between the liberatory promise of human rights and its exploitative patriarchal politics. It finds that the ideas of Mary Wollstonecraft, Simone de Beauvoir, Drucilla Cornell, and Jean-Luc Nancy were/are crucial to this transformed idea of dignity. Religious ideas have played a complex role in this transformation. Wollstonecraft appealed to theological ideas of the soul to contest men’s claims that the Bible enshrined women’s subordination to men. Current abortion politics in the U.S., and the Iranian women’s Women, Life, Freedom rebellion continue to show how sacred texts have been used to defend and reject women’s demands for rights. Religious and secular arguments for the dignity of vulnerability, used by feminists to re-write the sexual difference, direct us to rethink our exploitative relationship to the earth and the multiple species it harbors. As we take up the task of confronting the environmental crisis of our times, they call on us to see ourselves as stewards of the earth’s bounty who are morally obliged to create humane relationships with our other-than-human neighbors.

From political priority to service delivery: complexities to real-life priority of abortion services in Ethiopia.

Improving access to abortion services has been coined a high priority by the Ethiopian Federal Ministry of Health. Nevertheless, many women are still struggling to access abortion services. The dedicated commitment to expanding abortion services by central authorities and the difficulties in further improving access to the services make for an interesting case to explore the real-life complexities of health priority setting. This article thus explores what it means to make abortion services a priority by drawing on in-depth interviews with healthcare bureaucrats and key stakeholders working closely with abortion service policy and implementation. Data were collected from February to April 2022. Health bureaucrats from 9 of the 12 regional states in Ethiopia and the Federal Ministry of Health were interviewed in addition to key stakeholders from professional organizations and NGOs. The study found that political will and priority to abortion services by central authorities were not necessarily enough to ensure access to the service across the health sector. At the regional and local level, there were considerable challenges with a lack of funding, equipment and human resources for implementing and expanding access to abortion services. The inadequacy of indicators and reporting systems hindered accountability and made it difficult to give priority to abortion services among the series of health programmes and priorities that local health authorities had to implement. The situation was further challenged by the contested nature of the abortion issue itself, both in the general population, but also amongst health bureaucrats and hospital leaders. This study casts a light on the complex and entangled processes of turning national-level priorities into on-the-ground practice and highlights the real-life challenges of setting and implementing health priorities.

P-394 Using machine learning to predict the risk of miscarriage in infertile couples undergoing assisted reproductive cycles

Abstract Study question Can an artificial intelligence (AI)-based model predict chemical abortion using basic clinical data of infertile couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART)? Summary answer We have combined basic clinical data and machine learning algorithms to create a noninvasive AI model for prediction of chemical abortion. What is known already Approximately 10 to 15 percent of natural pregnancies encounter the issue of abortion, it significantly gets worse in pregnancies resulting from assisted reproductive methods. The emotional burden on infertile couples during their self-belief therapy journey is substantial. Predicting treatment outcomes can significantly decrease the anxiety experienced by these couples. This research aims to develop a machine learning-based model for predicting chemical abortion in infertile women who have conceived through assisted reproductive methods, offering an initial assessment. Study design, size, duration This study involved analysis of retrospectively collected records including basic clinical data and pregnancy outcomes of 1234 records between March 2020 and August 2022. It designs in two fundamental phases: data extraction and model implementation. The extracted data from the study group was evaluated with registered physical and electronic records to validate and correct the information. Participants/materials, setting, methods This study was conducted at Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Yazd, Iran. Data pre-processing was performed for data mining and model implementation. This process yielded a dataset of 1234 samples containing 32 selected variables. Machine learning algorithms, including decision tree, random forest, logistic regression, and support vector machine, were employed for models’ assessment. Regarding the imbalance nature of the gathered dataset, balancing techniques were performed to enhance model performance. Balancing was applied using SMOTE, ADYNS algorithms. Main results and the role of chance Evaluation of the above-mentioned models across unbalanced, balanced, and reduced datasets revealed the random forest model as the most robust choice, achieving accuracies of 79.80%, 88.90%, and 89.90% in the respective test phases. In terms of balancing process, ADYNS was superior to SMOTE. In addition, this research identified 18 influential variables for predicting abortion. Limitations, reasons for caution This investigation was performed using retrospective data; some incomplete records were excluded. In addition, the data heterogenicity may affect the analysis. The model developed is limited to the analysis of basic clinical data, further modification of the model is needed to incorporate information from different stages of the ART cycle. Wider implications of the findings This study demonstrated a model to predict chemical miscarriage. The high accuracy of this model showed that this model could be implemented in ART clinics as a primary tool to assist clinicians in making an accurate initial judgment on the condition of patients with infertility and history of pregnancy loss. Trial registration number not applicable