In 1893, a Norwegian mineralogist, W.C. Brøgger, defined “metamikte” as a third class of naturally occurring, amorphous materials. Metamict minerals were determined to be amorphous based on conchoidal fracture and isotropic optical properties; however, well developed crystal forms evidenced the prior crystalline state.In 1914, A. Hamberg, based on the observation of pleochroic haloes, first suggested that metamictization is a radiation-induced, periodic-to-aperiodic transition caused by α-particles which originate from decay of constituent U and Th. Within a few years, F. Rinne and L. Vegard confirmed by X-ray diffraction that metamict minerals were either amorphous or finely crystalline. By 1940, M. v. Stackelberg and E. Rottenback had established that the decrease in density, refractive indices and birefringence correlated with the breakdown of the structure with increasing α-decay event dose. They tested this hypothesis by bombarding a thin slab of zircon, tetragonal ZrSiO2, with α-particles. The result was inconclusive, but this must have been one of the first experiments in which an “ion-beam” was used to “modify” a ceramic material. Metamict minerals remained a curiosity and a daunting challenge, as compositions were exceedingly complex (lanthanides were abundant) and no structure remained, except that which was restored on heating. In 1952, Adolf Pabst, in his presidential address to the Mineralogical Society of America, carefully tabulated the changes in properties (e.g., release of stored energy and decreased resistance to leaching) which resulted from the radiation damage. Pabst specifically noted that some structures are “resistant” to damage accumulation (e.g., monoclinic ThSiO2) while other polymorphs are often found in the metamict state (e.g., tetragonal ThSiO2).The use of zircon (isostructural with thorite) in U/Pb dating, however, focused substantive studies on the process of radiation damage. Holland and Gottfried (1955) investigated damage accumulation as an age-dating technique in a classic study of natural zircons (570 million years old; doses up to 1016α-decay events/mg = 0.7 dpa); and developed a modern model of damage accumulation. Recent studies are reviewed which include Pu-doped and ion-beam irradiated zircons. With the exception of radiation effects on alumina and silica, zircon is now probably the most studied complex ceramic.