The influence of hydrochloric, chloric, sulfuric and sulfurous acids (HCl, HClO4, H2SO4 and SO2×H2O, respectively) on protolytic equilibria in the system monoethanolamine (MEA) – tropeolin OOO (TrOOO) – water (CMEA = 0.1 M; pH = 1.0 ÷ 9.5) was studied by pH-metric, spectrophotometric and colorimetric methods. The acid-base behavior of the HOCH2CH2NH2 – TrOOO – H2O system was investigated at CTrOOO = 1,12 ×10-4 М, CMEA = 1,0×10-4 ÷ 1,0 М (pH = 8,25 ÷ 12,05), T = 293 K. TrOOO in this system exists in two tautomeric forms due to acid-base dissociation of the 4-OH group and associates formed by H-bonding with MEA molecules. There is a direct ratio between the pH values of solutions and the total color difference (ΔE76), in contrast to the specific color difference (SCD). The difference in the behavior of the H2SO4 – HOCH2CH2NH2 – TrOOO – H2O system from the systems with HCl and HClO4 is due to the fact that the interaction of the first acid with MEA (8,0 £ pH) forms an ionic associate [HOCH2СH2NH3]2(SO4), which is more stable than ionic pairs [[HOCH2СH2NH3](HSO4), [HOCH2СH2NH3](ClO4), [HOCH2СH2NH3]Cl и [HOCH2СH2NH3](O3S-C10H6-N=N-C6H4-SO3)[H3NCH2СH2OH]. Acid-base dissociation constants in systems significantly depend on the structure and physicochemical parameters of the mineral acid. In the electronic absorption spectra of the SO2 – MEA – TrOOO – H2O system (pH £ 7,5), there is a pronounced isobestic point at 415 nm, due to the dynamic equilibrium between ion-molecular forms. The coincidence of the maxima on the curves ΔE76 = f(pH) and SCD = f(pH) for the indicated system, in contrast to others studied in this work, was stated. The difference between the spectrophotometric and colorimetric behavior of the SO2 – MEA – TrOOO – H2O system from behavior of the systems with HCl, HClO4, and H2SO4 systems is due to the sulfur(IV)oxyanions with an azo indicator redox interaction.
Read full abstract