Isolated Olecranon Fractures Research Articles

Factors Associated With 30-Day Morbidity and Mortality Following the Surgical Treatment of Olecranon Fractures.

The objective of this study was to identify factors independently associated with complications, hospital readmission, reoperation, and death in the 30-day period after surgical treatment of isolated olecranon fractures. A retrospective case-control study was performed using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database by querying the Current Procedural Terminology code for patients who underwent surgical treatment of isolated olecranon fractures from 2011 to 2020. A total of 4404 patients were included. The main study outcomes were 30-day medical or wound complications, hospital readmission, reoperation, and death. A bivariate screen was performed for explanatory variables associated with our outcome variables, and variables with P<.1 in the bivariate screen were included in multivariable regression models. Of the 4404 patients in our cohort, 29 patients (0.7%) developed medical or wound complications, 157 patients (3.6%) were readmitted, 123 patients (2.8%) underwent reoperation, and 12 patients (0.3%) died during the 30-day postoperative period. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that older age, smoking, bleeding disorders, and higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification were associated with readmission; that older age, bleeding disorders, and higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification were associated with reoperation; and that bleeding disorders were associated with mortality. No identifiable factors were independently associated with medical or wound complications. In this National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database study of olecranon fractures treated surgically during a recent 10-year period, we identified demographic and comorbid factors independently associated with 30-day postoperative readmission, reoperation, and mortality. Our findings are relevant for preoperative risk stratification and counseling. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(5):e310-e316.].

Olecranon Fractures: A Critical Analysis Review.

Olecranon fractures account for 10% of all elbow fractures and are more likely to result from a low-energy injury. A displaced fracture with a stable ulnohumeral joint (Mayo type 2) is the most common type of injury. The management of an isolated olecranon fracture is based on patient factors (age, functional demand, and if medically fit to undergo surgery) and fracture characteristics including displacement, fragmentation, and elbow stability. Nonoperative management can be successfully used in undisplaced fractures (Mayo type 1) and in displaced fractures (Mayo type 2) in frail patients with lower functional demands. Patients with displaced olecranon fractures with a stable ulnohumeral joint without significant articular surface fragmentation (Mayo type 2A) can be managed with tension band wiring, plate osteosynthesis (PO), intramedullary fixation, or suture repair. PO is advocated for multifragmentary fractures and fractures that are associated with ulnohumeral instability. It is essential to consider the variable anatomy of the proximal ulna during surgery.

Risk Factors for Loss of Reduction After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Isolated Olecranon Fractures in Adults.

We sought to determine whether any relevant patient, fracture, surgical, or postoperative characteristics are associated with loss of reduction after plate fixation of isolated olecranon fractures in adults. Patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of an olecranon fracture at our institution over an 11-year period were analyzed. Electronic patient charts and radiographic images were reviewed to gather patient, fracture, surgical, and postoperative data. Statistical analysis to explore the differences between groups was performed. Seven of 96 patients experienced a loss of fracture reduction diagnosed at a median of 19 days after their initial surgery (range: 4-116 days). The radiographic mode of failure of all patients who lost reduction was proximal migration of the proximal fracture fragment with or without implant failure. The group that lost reduction had a significantly smaller proximal fragment (14.2 vs 18.6 mm), a higher incidence of malreduction with a persistent articular step-off greater than 2 mm (6/7 vs 14/89), a greater distance between the most proximal screw and the olecranon tip (19.8 vs 13.5 mm), a higher proportion of constructs with screws placed outside of the primary plate (4/7 vs 14/89), and a higher proportion of patients that were not immobilized postoperatively (3/7 vs 8/89). Our results suggest anatomical reduction at the articular surface and adequate fixation of the proximal fragment are key factors in maintenance of reduction, with smaller proximal fragments being at higher risk for failure. A period of postoperative immobilization may decrease the risk of loss of reduction.

EVALUATION OF FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME OF MODIFIED TENSION BAND WIRING AT 6 MONTHS IN ISOLATED OLECRANON FRACTURES IN ADULTS

Introduction: Fractures of the olecranon account for 8 - 10 % of all fractures around the elbow joint . An uncomplicated fracture of the olecranon is considered to be a common injury. Incidence in adult population is approximately 11.5% per 1 64 100000 population .Younger individuals suffer fracture olecranon due to high energy trauma and older individuals due to simple fall . When displaced, open reduction and internal xation is usually required to obtain anatomical realignment of the articular surface and restore normal elbow function. The xation should be stable, allow active elbow exion and extension and promote union of the fracture. There are other modalities of xation of isolated olecranon fractures, such as olecranon hook plate and cannulated lag screws as well but tension band wiring is less costly and operative complications are less in non comminuted olecranon fractures. Material and methods: This prospective observational study was done over a period of 2 years on transverse and oblique fractures of olecranon. Results: the outcome of our study was favorable in support of tension band wiring in transverse and oblique fracture of olecranon in respect to union rate, early initiation of physiotherapy and nal range of motion. Conclusion: By this method post-operative immobilization in POP is greatly minimized. Thereby avoiding fracture disease.Because of rigid xation between the fracture fragments, early active and functional movements can be given to the patient reducing the chances of joint stiffness. Early initiation of physiotherapy program within 2 – 3 weeks induces compression between the fragments. This compression hastens fracture healing. Because of early union of fracture, patient is back to work earlier

When Is an Isolated Olecranon Fracture Pathognomonic for Osteogenesis Imperfecta?

Isolated fractures of the olecranon process of the ulna in pediatric patients with open physes are classically considered pathognomonic for osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). The purpose of this study was to distinguish the clinical manifestations of isolated olecranon fractures in patients with and without OI to help practitioners assess when further evaluation for OI may be necessary. All patients younger than 18 years old who were treated for an isolated olecranon fracture at a pediatric tertiary care center between 2009 and 2021 were identified. Patients without radiographs available for review, those with known skeletal dysplasia other than OI, and patients with multiple fractures (eg, polytraumas) or with concomitant dislocations were excluded. Of the 701 patients identified, 403 were included for analysis. Demographic variables, mechanism of injury, treatment type, and determination of OI diagnosis were collected. Patients with a previously confirmed diagnosis of OI or with genetic confirmation of OI following their fracture were designated as OI (+), and the remainder were designated OI (-). The Mann-Whitney U and χ2 tests were used to compare groups. Of the 403 patients, the median age was 7.8 years (interquartile range 5.2 to 12.5), and 270 (67%) were male. There were 14 confirmed cases of OI (3.5%). The OI (+) and OI (-) groups did not differ significantly by age or sex (P>0.05). OI (+) patients were more likely to sustain an injury from low-energy mechanisms (86% vs. 32%, P<0.001), sustain displaced fractures (86% vs. 21%, P<0.001) and undergo operative treatment (86% vs. 20%, P<0.001), and to report a history of previous fracture (79% vs. 16%, P<0.001) than OI (-) patients. 36% of OI (+) patients sustained a second olecranon fracture during the study period; there were no subsequent olecranon fractures in the OI (-) group. Isolated olecranon fractures may not be pathognomonic for OI. However, orthopaedists must be vigilant about the possibility of OI in patients who sustain displaced, isolated olecranon fractures under low-energy mechanisms with a history of previous fracture(s). Level III.

Short-Term Outcomes of Herbert Screw Fixation for Isolated Olecranon Fractures in Children: A Single-Institution Retrospective Study.

The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of closed reduction with percutaneous Herbert screw fixation in children with isolated olecranon fractures. We retrospectively reviewed the records of children treated at our center for isolated olecranon fractures (Mayo type IIA) with closed reduction and percutaneous Herbert screw fixation. The related indices and data of the group were collected for comparative analysis after an average follow-up of 6-8months. The Herbert screws were removed by a second operation. Overall, 14 patients with an average age at the time of injury of 11.36 (range 10-14) years were included. All patients had good radiological and clinical outcomes at 6-8months postoperatively; all had normal elbow ranges of motion and showed complete bone healing on radiographs. There were no foreign body irritation, implant migration, or osteoarthritis cases. Premature epiphyseal closure was noted in six patients. The average QuickDASH score was 1.58. Fixation of olecranon fractures with Herbert screws is a safe and easy method in young patients, leading to good functional and radiological results. Nonetheless, determination of the effects of this treatment method on the olecranon ossification center requires long-term follow-up.

Mini-fragment plating of olecranon fractures is comparable to precontoured small-fragment plating

IntroductionThough long-term functional outcomes of olecranon fracture plate fixation are favorable, postoperative implant irritation commonly leads to elective removal. We hypothesized that mini-fragment plates will decrease implant removal compared to precontoured plates. MethodsPatients with isolated olecranon fracture (AO/OTA 2U1–B1) treated with plate fixation were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified into groups based on whether they underwent open reduction and internal fixation with a (1) surgeon contoured mini-fragment or (2) precontoured olecranon-specific plate. Rates of symptomatic implants and implant removal were compared. Results98 and 32 patients were treated with precontoured and mini-fragment plates, respectively. Baseline demographics and comorbidities were similar. Mean follow-up was 20.6 months. There were no differences in rates of postoperative complication (22/98, 22.4% vs. 5/32, 15.6%; p = 0.41) or reoperation (37/98, 37.8% vs. 8/32, 25%; p = 0.19). Symptomatic implants were common in the precontoured cohort (44/98, 44.9% vs. 7/32, 21.9%; p < 0.05). Implant removal rates were 36.7% and 18.8%, respectively (p = 0.06). Discussion/conclusionOlecranon fracture stabilization with mini-fragment plate is associated with lower rates of symptomatic implants, with no difference in postoperative complications or reoperations. Mini-fragment plating is a safe and promising alternative to precontoured plating.

Epidemiology of isolated olecranon fractures: a detailed survey on alarge sample of patients in a suburban area.

BackgroundLiterature lacks data concerning several epidemiologic aspects of isolated olecranon fractures (IOFs). The few studies that have analyzed this type of fracture show a low sample size and contradicting results.MethodsThis retrospective study included 165 consecutive patients (82 men and 83 women) who sustained an IOF in the past 10 years. Participants who were aged <16 years or had a previous elbow fracture or had a fracture that involved other bones of the elbow joint were excluded. Data regarding age, sex, season, date, and fracture side were collected. As per the mechanism of injury, we arbitrarily distinguished 7 subgroups. IOFs were classified as per the Mayo and AO classifications using x-ray. Statistics were performed.ResultsThe patients’ mean age was 58.5 (standard deviation [SD], 21.3) years, and men and women were aged 48.1 (SD, 19.8) years and 67.9 (SD, 18.8) years, respectively. The most frequent fracture patterns were the MAYO 2A and the AO 2U1B1(d). Low-energy mechanisms caused simple dislocated-stable fractures, whereas high-energy mechanisms caused both simple and comminuted displaced-stable fractures. Significant differences in the trauma mechanism were found between male and female patients. The former fractures showed a bimodal distribution depending on the patients’ age group, whereas in women, the traumatic event was mainly represented by a low-energy mechanism. Overall, the most common cause of fracture was a low-energy accident. The seasonal distribution of fractures was different for male and female patients being more frequent in summer among young men and more frequent in winter among the elderly, both men and women. The left side was involved in 87 patients.ConclusionIOFs occur equally in both genders, although with different age distribution. The most common fracture pattern was a simple displaced-stable fracture (MAYO 2A and AO 2U1B1[d]). Young men are more often subject to high-energy injuries that occur in road accidents, whereas with aging, they become more prone to fragility fractures as women. Female patients are usually older and are mostly affected by low-energy traumas as a fall from a standing height.

Epidemiology, classification and treatment of olecranon fractures in adults: an observational study on 2462 fractures from the Swedish Fracture Register

PurposeThis nationwide study aims to describe the epidemiology, fracture classification and current treatment regimens of olecranon fractures in adults.MethodsWe performed a descriptive study based on registered data from the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR). All non-pathological olecranon fractures reported between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2018 in patients aged ≥ 18 years were included. Data on age, sex, injury mechanism, fracture classification (according to the modified Mayo classification system), primary treatment and seasonal variation were analyzed. We compared patients < 65 with those > 65 years regarding injury mechanism, distribution of fracture types and subsequent treatment.ResultsIn total, 2462 olecranon fractures were identified in the SFR. Median age was 66 years and 65% were women. Of all fractures, 303 (12%) were proximal avulsion, 1044 (42%) simple central, 717 (29%) comminuted central and 398 (16%) distal olecranon fractures. Nonoperative treatment was performed in 21% of the patients < 65 and 35% of the patients > 65 years. Tension band wiring was used for most simple central fractures. Plate fixation was used in almost half of the operatively treated fractures classified as unstable comminuted central and distal olecranon fractures. Men show a higher proportion of high-energy trauma than women in both age groups.ConclusionIsolated fractures of the olecranon occur after a low-energy trauma, especially in older women (> 65 years). Non-operative treatment is common in uncomplicated fractures and operative treatment in more complex fractures nationwide. A shift to plate fixation in the more unstable fracture patterns is observed. These results may help health care providers and clinicians gain a better understanding of isolated olecranon fractures.

Risk factors for symptomatic hardware removal after plate fixation of olecranon fractures: a retrospective chart review

Background: Risk factors for removal of symptomatic hardware after plate fixation of olecranon fractures are not well defined. We examined patient, fracture, and surgical characteristics in relation to hardware removal for symptomatic instrumentation after plate and screw fixation of isolated olecranon fractures in adults. Methods: Eighty-four patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of isolated olecranon fractures with a plate and screw construct were analyzed retrospectively. Those with subsequent hardware removal for symptomatic hardware were identified. Charts and radiographs were reviewed to gather patient, fracture, and surgical characteristics in relation to management of their olecranon fracture. Univariate analysis was performed to test for statistical significance between groups. Results: Seventeen of 84 patients (20.2%) underwent hardware removal for symptomatic instrumentation at an average of 326 days after ORIF. Compared to patients who retained hardware, those who underwent removal trended younger (40.0 vs. 49.4 yr, P=0.076), had a higher percentage of one particular plate design (35% vs. 8%, P=0.026), and had their plate fixated an average of 1.3 mm farther from the olecranon tip (3.4 vs. 2.1 mm; P=0.011). There was an 8.2 times increased likelihood of hardware removal for plates that were placed more than 2 mm from the olecranon tip [1.7 to 38.7, 95% confidence interval (CI); P=0.003]. Conclusions: This study resulted in approximately 20% rate of symptomatic hardware necessitating removal. Patients who request removal tend to be younger. Fixating the plate closer to the olecranon tip may decrease the incidence of symptomatic hardware and need for subsequent removal. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Long-term outcomes after different types of Horne and Tanzer olecranon fractures

BackgroundIt is unclear whether the outcomes differ after different Horne and Tanzer types of olecranon fractures.Materials and methodsWe evaluated 40 men and 55 women with isolated olecranon fractures, journals and radiographs from fracture event. The fractures were classified according to Horne and Tanzer. After a mean 19 years after the fracture events, we evaluated subjective, clinical and radiographic outcomes, using the uninjured arms as controls.Results95% of patients with type I fractures reported, at follow-up, no differences between the elbows, 80% with type II fractures and 95% with type III fractures (p = 0.43). The three types of fractures had no differences in elbow range of motion or hand grip strength (when comparing injured and uninjured arms) and the proportions of individuals with radiographic elbow degenerative changes or joint space reduction were no different (all p > 0.05). Individuals with elbow degenerative changes had no inferior subjective elbow function compared to individuals with normal radiographs (p = 0.66), in contrast to those with joint space reduction compared to individuals with normal radiographs (p < 0.001).InterpretationAll types of Horne and Tanzer olecranon fractures have favourable long-term outcome. Elbow joint space reduction is associated with inferior subjective elbow function while degenerative changes are not.

Can low-profile double-plate osteosynthesis for olecranon fractures reduce implant removal? A retrospective multicenter study

Because of poor soft-tissue coverage at the proximal ulna and prominent posteriorly positioned implants, hardware removal remains the most common reason for revision surgery of olecranon fractures that were operatively treated using plate osteosynthesis. We hypothesized that low-profile double-plate osteosynthesis would reduce the number of soft tissue-related hardware removals compared with single posterior plating whereas the functional results would be comparable. This study retrospectively included patients who were treated with low-profile double-plate osteosynthesis or a posterior 2.7-/3.5-mm locking compression plate (LCP) for isolated olecranon fractures from 3 study centers. In addition to the implant removal rate, functional outcome measures (range of motion; Mayo Elbow Performance Score; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Handscore) were statistically compared. The study included 79 patients, with a mean follow-up period of 36 months (range, 24-77 months). Of these patients, 37 were treated with low-profile double-plate osteosynthesis and 42, with a 2.7-/3.5-mm LCP. The mean age was 57 years (range, 18-93 years). Range of motion after treatment with low-profile double-plate osteosynthesis and a 2.7-/3.5-mm LCP measured 129° (range, 80°-155°) and 139° (range, 100°-155°), respectively. The Mayo Elbow Performance Scores were 95 (range, 65-100) and 99 (range, 85-100), respectively (P = .028), and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores were 5.0 (range, 0-49) and 4.6 (range, 0-28), respectively (P = .673). Hardware was removed in 32% and 50% of patients after treatment with double-plate osteosynthesis and a 2.7-/3.5-mm LCP, respectively (P = .11). Hardware removal owing to soft-tissue irritationwas noted in 27% of patients after double-plate osteosynthesis and 38% after LCP treatment (P = .30). Low-profile double-plate osteosynthesis for treating olecranon fractures resulted in good clinical outcomes. However, the rate of hardware removal was not significantly reduced, and the functional results were comparable to those of common single-posterior plate osteosynthesis.

Long-Term Outcomes after Colton Type I and II Fractures of the Olecranon

Background: It is unclear if the outcomes differ in different subtypes of olecranon fractures. Objective: Evaluate the outcomes of different Colton types of olecranon fractures, and if outcomes differ in dominant and non-dominant arms and in men and women. Methods: We evaluated primary journals and radiographs in 40 men and 55 women with isolated olecranon fractures and classified fractures according to Colton. Mean 19 years after fracture event, we re-examined subjective, clinical and radiographic outcomes in the former patients, using the uninjured arms as controls. Results: 89% of patients with Colton type I fractures reported at follow-up no subjective differences between the elbows, 84% with type II oblique/transverse fractures and 84% with type II comminuted fractures (p=0.91). The uninjured to former fractured arm differences in elbow range of motion and strength were no different in the 3 fracture types, the proportions of individuals with radiographic elbow degenerative changes were greater in type II than in type I factures (p&lt;0.001), and there were no differences between the proportions of individuals with reduced joint space in the 3 groups (p=0.40). The outcomes were no different if the fractures had occurred in the dominant or non-dominant arms (p=0.43), or in men or women (p=0.43). Conclusion: There were no different outcomes after Colton type I, type II oblique/transverse or type II comminuted fractures, no different outcomes between fractures in dominant or non-dominant arms and no different outcomes in men and women.

Plate fixation and tension band wiring after isolated olecranon fracture comparison of outcome and complications

ObjectiveOlecranon fractures are common injuries in patients of any age. The vast majority are treated with two operation techniques: a plate fixation (PF) or tension band wiring (TBW). The objective of this study is to compare the outcomes of surgically treated olecranon fractures with plate fixation or tension band wiring. We hypothesise that PF patients would show significantly inferior outcomes due to more complex injuries. Patients and methodsBetween 2010 and 2017, a total of 108 patients were treated with plate fixation and or tension band wiring. Clinical data of 40 surgically treated olecranon fractures were collected and analysed. Clinical and functional evaluations were performed using Mayo-Score, DASH-Score, Weseley -Score and subject elbow value (SEV). Furthermore, complication rates, time to return to work and operation duration were documented. ResultsThe mean follow-up was 70.5 ± 45.6 months. Time of return to work was 6.5 ± 2.2 weeks in the TBW group and 10.9 ± 6,6 in the PF group (p = 0.372). The mean duration of surgery was 95.2 ± 47.0 min in the TBW group and 192.5 ± 113.0 min in the PF group (p = 0.001). In the TBW group, the mean hospitalisation period was 7.9 ± 10.1 days and 11.2 ± 9.8 days in the PF group. Revisions were required in 0.3 ± 0.6 of cases (0.2 ± 0.5 in TBE and 0.4 ± 0.7 in PF). The median DASH Score was 7.0 (3.6–13.7) in the TBW group and 12.1 (5.5–24.8) in the PF group (p = 0.948) ConclusionTension band wiring and plate fixation are both practical treatment options with mostly positive outcomes, even though high complication rates can occur. There were no significant differences in either group concerning functional outcome or time back to work. The duration of surgery was significantly higher in the PF group, whereas the incidence of metalwork-associated complications was higher in the TBW group.

Comparison of the Subjective Elbow Value with the DASH, MEPS und Morrey Score after Olecranon Fractures.

Olecranon fractures are common injuries that can occur in patients of any age. To assess the postoperative outcome, multiple scoring systems like the DASH, MEPS und Morrey Score have been described. The goal of this paper is to compare the subjective elbow value (SEV) to these commonly used scoring systems. We hypothesized that the SEV would have a high correlation and practicability for the evaluation of elbow function after isolated olecranon injury. Clinical data of 40 patients were collected and retrospectively analysed. All patients suffered an isolated olecranon fracture and were surgically treated by tension band wiring or plate fixation. In the follow-up examinations the Mayo Score, DASH Score, Morrey Score and SEV were measured for correlation purposes. The mean follow-up time was 70.5 ± 45.6 months. The median DASH Score was 9.9 (4.1 - 20.4) and 100 (85 - 100) for the MEPS. The median Morrey Score was 98 (92 - 100). The median SEV was 90% (80 - 95%). The Pearson correlation between the DASH and SEV was -0.85 and 0.80 between the MEPS and the SEV. The SEV shows a high correlation to the most commonly used scoring systems for outcome evaluation after elbow injury. It is easy to use and can be seen as a valuable tool to assess patients after olecranon fractures.

Results of non-operative treatment of olecranon fracture in over 75-year-olds.

Surgery is the gold-standard treatment of displaced olecranon fracture, but is associated with numerous complications, especially in the elderly. Functional results of non-operative treatment in this population have never been analyzed in a prospective study. Non-operative treatment of isolated olecranon fracture with stable elbow-joint in over 75-year-olds gives functional results comparable to those of surgery as reported in the literature, with fewer complications. A prospective study analyzed functional results of non-operative treatment of isolated closed MayoI and II olecranon fracture with stable elbow, in patients aged ≥75years. The principal assessment criterion was functional recovery on the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and QuickDASH at 6months. Twenty-two fractures in 21patients were included. Mean MEPS was 95.26/100 (range, 85-100), and mean QuickDASH 4.3 (range, 0-29.55). Eighteen fractures showed osteoarthritis of the olecranon. There were no cases of elbow instability. There were no complications. Non-operative treatment of olecranon fracture in patients aged ≥75years provided excellent functional results at 6months, without associated complications. Single-center prospective observation cohort study. 4.

Isolated olecranon fractures in children affected by osteogenesis imperfecta type I treated with single screw or tension band wiring system: Outcomes and pitfalls in relation to bone mineral density.

The purpose of this study is to compare the results of 2 techniques, tension band wiring (TBW) and fixation with screws, in olecranon fractures in children affected with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) type I. Between 2010 and 2014, 21 olecranon fractures in 18 children with OI (average age: 12 years old) were treated surgically. Ten patients were treated with the screw fixation and 11 with TBW. A total of 65% of olecranon fractures occurred as a result of a spontaneous avulsion of the olecranon during the contraction of the triceps muscle. The average follow-up was 36 months. Among the children treated with 1 screw, 5 patients needed a surgical revision with TBW due to a mobilization of the screw. In this group, the satisfactory results were 50%. In patients treated with TBW, the satisfactory results were 100% of the cases. The average Z-score, the last one recorded in the patients before the trauma, was −2.53 in patients treated with screw fixation and −2.04 in those treated with TBW. TBW represents the safest surgical treatment for patients suffering from OI type I, as it helps to prevent the rigidity of the elbow through an earlier recovery of the range of motion, and there was no loosening of the implant. In analyzing the average Z-score before any fracture, the fixation with screws has an increased risk of failure in combination with low bone mineral density.

Outcome of isolated olecranon fractures in skeletally immature patients: comparison of open reduction and tension band wiring fixation versus closed reduction and percutaneous screw fixation.

The olecranon fracture is an uncommon injury reported to incur many possible complications in children. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of two different surgical techniques in isolated olecranon fracture. We retrospectively evaluated 22 children with isolated olecranon fracture treated by open reduction and tension band wiring fixation versus closed reduction and percutaneous screw fixation. We compared the dislocation before and after surgery by radiography. The patients were evaluated clinically with Quick DASH(®). Both techniques showed good radiological and clinical outcome (Quick DASH(®) 1.82 vs. 3.42) with no statistically significance difference (p>0.05). In two cases (16.6%) of the group treated with cannulated screw, it was necessary to convert into open reduction to obtain optimal reduction of the fracture. All the children returned to previous activity. In four cases, the extension of the elbow was slightly reduced (15°-20°), with no statistically significant difference in the two groups. It is not contraindicated to operate skeletally immature patients with displaced olecranon fracture. However, results were essentially the same, and so either method is a satisfactory choice for pediatric displaced olecranon fractures, with equally acceptable radiological results and similar rate of complications and clinical outcome at final follow-up. III.

Factors Associated With Reoperation After Fixation of Displaced Olecranon Fractures.

Surgery for fixation of olecranon fractures is associated with reoperation, mostly for implant removal. A study of a large cohort of patients treated by many different surgeons allows us to determine if specific techniques or implants are associated with a higher rate of reoperation. After open reduction and internal fixation of isolated olecranon fractures, what factors are associated with (1) reoperation and (2) implant removal? Three hundred ninety-two adult patients who had operative treatment of a displaced olecranon fracture not associated with other fractures, dislocation, or subluxation at two area hospitals between January 2002 and May 2014 were analyzed to determine factors associated with reoperation. One hundred thirty-eight (35%) patients had plate and screw fixation and 254 (65%) tension band wiring. Nearly 100% of patients with displaced olecranon fractures are currently treated operatively at our hospitals. All patients were followed for at least four months. Two hundred three of the 392 (52%) patients were followed for one year or more. Ninety-nine patients (25%) had a second operation, 92 (93%) at least in part for implant removal (12 for wire migration [3% of all fractures, 12% of reoperations]). We considered patient-related, fracture-related, and implant-related endpoints as possible factors associated with reoperation. With a total sample size of 99 reoperations, an α of 0.05, and an effect size of 0.3, we had 87% power. Reoperation was less common in men (36 [36%], women: 63 [64%]; adjusted odds ratio, 0.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.56; p < 0.001) and older patients (adjusted odds ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.87; p < 0.001). Similarly, request for implant removal was less in men (33 [36%], women: 59 [64%], adjusted odds ratio, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.56; p < 0.001) and older patients (adjusted odds ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.87; p < 0.001). Patients who have operative fixation of a fracture of the olecranon can be counseled that most patients keep their implants, that only 3% experience implant migration, and that technical factors such as the type or configuration of an implant seem less important than personal factors in determining who requests a second surgery for implant removal. Level III, prognostic study.

Complex proximal ulna fractures: outcomes of surgical treatment.

To review the results of plating of various fracture patterns of proximal ulna fractures including isolated olecranon fractures, olecranon fractures combined with a coronoid fracture, and olecranon fractures combined with a coronoid and radial head fracture. The study included 38 patients with either an isolated olecranon fracture or combined injuries, all treated with open reduction and internal fixation of the olecranon. Other procedures were performed as needed, including radial head fixation or arthroplasty, fixation of the coronoid, and repair of the lateral collateral ligament complex. There were 27 men and 11 women with an average age of 49 years. Clinical and radiographic assessment was obtained at an average follow-up time of 15 and 8.4 months, respectively. All fractures healed within 5 months. The average arc of ulnohumeral motion was 91° (range 0°-140°); average pronation-supination arc was 128° (range 0°-180°). Subgroup analysis showed a statistically significant lower rotational motion arc in patients with associated radial head (73°) or coronoid fractures (68°) compared to isolated olecranon fractures. All other parameters including ulnohumeral motion, complication rate, and revision rate were similar among the groups. A stable, functional elbow can be restored in most patients with proximal ulna fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation. Loss of full flexion is likely with high-energy trauma, complex fracture patterns, and concomitant injuries. Fracture patterns involving the coronoid and/or the radial head are associated with restricted forearm rotation. III.