Islet Antibodies Research Articles

Psychological impact of childhood islet autoantibody testing in families participating in the BABYDIAB study.

To determine anxiety in parents of children undergoing testing for islet autoantibodies. Children of parents with Type 1 diabetes (T1DM) were tested at birth, age 9 months, 2 years and 5 years for islet autoantibodies. Families were informed about islet autoantibody status in the child after each visit. The psychological impact of islet autoantibody testing was assessed in parents before and after the 5 years visit. Anxiety was measured using a subscale of the State-Trait-Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and structured single-item questions. Four hundred and sixty-three parents were evaluated before blood drawing and 317 parents at notification of islet autoantibody status. Before blood withdrawal, anxiety was increased in mothers and in particular in mothers of islet autoantibody-positive offspring compared with a normative control group. At notification of islet antibody status, anxiety significantly decreased in parents of islet autoantibody-negative offspring, and increased in parents of islet autoantibody-positive offspring. Blood withdrawal was considered a burden for parents and offspring (15% and 48%, respectively). Most parents from islet autoantibody-negative and -positive offspring wished to know the diabetes risk of their child (95% and 100%, respectively) and were glad to be informed about their child's islet antibody status (97% and 87%). Overall, islet autoantibody testing in early childhood reduces anxiety in T1DM families. The increased anxiety associated with islet autoantibody-positive status suggests, however, that testing should be performed in centres which can provide accurate risk information and counselling if required.

Islet antibodies and remaining beta-cell function 8 years after diagnosis of diabetes in young adults: a prospective follow-up of the nationwide Diabetes Incidence Study in Sweden.

To establish the prevalence of remaining beta-cell function 8 years after diagnosis of diabetes in young adults and relate the findings to islet antibodies at diagnosis and 8 years later. Population-based cohort study. Nationwide from all Departments of Medicine and Endocrinology in Sweden. A total of 312 young (15-34 years old) adults diagnosed with diabetes during 1987-88. Plasma connecting peptide (C-peptide) 8 years after diagnosis. Preserved beta-cell function was defined as measurable C-peptide levels. Three islet antibodies - cytoplasmic islet cell antibodies (ICA), glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies and tyrosine phosphatase antibodies - were measured. Amongst 269 islet antibody positives (ab+) at diagnosis, preserved beta-cell function was found in 16% (42/269) 8 years later and these patients had a higher body mass index (median 22.7 and 20.5 kg m-2, respectively; P = 0.0003), an increased frequency of one islet antibody (50 and 24%, respectively; P = 0.001), and a lower prevalence of ICA (55 and 6%, respectively; P = 0.007) at diagnosis compared with ab+ without remaining beta-cell function. Amongst the 241 patients without detectable beta-cell function at follow-up, 14 lacked islet antibodies, both at diagnosis and at follow-up. Sixteen per cent of patients with autoimmune type 1 diabetes had remaining beta-cell function 8 years after diagnosis whereas 5.8% with beta-cell failure lacked islet autoimmunity, both at diagnosis and at follow-up.

CRP and IL-6 concentrations are associated with poor glycemic control despite preserved beta-cell function during the first year after diagnosis of type 1 diabetes.

The role of non-specific inflammation in beta-cell loss in type 1 diabetes is unclear. In the present study, inflammatory markers were determined in patients with newly diagnosed disease and related to beta-cell function, glycemic control and autoimmunity. Ninety-seven adult patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (80% islet antibody positives, ab(+)) were examined at diagnosis and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the start of insulin treatment. Plasma C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-peptide, islet autoantibodies, insulin requirement and HbA(1c) were assessed. The concentrations of CRP were high-normal at diagnosis and did not change during the study period. A positive correlation between CRP at diagnosis and BMI was observed in ab(+) as well as in ab(-) cases. Detectable concentrations of IL-6 were found in 32% (157/485) of the samples and did not change during the study. Ab(-) patients had higher values of CRP at diagnosis and throughout the study compared to the ab(+). Among the ab(+) patients, CRP concentrations during the study were positively correlated to C-peptide at 12 months and an increase in HbA(1c) levels between 6 and 12 months. No associations between the presence or levels of islet autoantibodies and CRP were noted. In type 1 diabetes, the islet destructive process and the development of beta-cell remission are not associated with changes in CRP or IL-6. Instead, elevated CRP concentrations are prevalent and seem to reflect insulin resistance, as positive associations to BMI, C-peptide and deterioration of glycemic control were observed.

Elimination of Dietary Gluten and Development of Type 1 Diabetes in High Risk Subjects

Removal of dietary gluten is associated with a lower frequency of type 1 diabetes (T1D) in patients with celiac disease. Therefore, we performed a pilot study in which seven islet-antibody-positive first degree relatives of patients with T1D were placed on a gluten-free diet for 12 months, followed by gluten re-exposure for 12 months, to investigate whether this could reduce levels of circulating autoantibodies. We found that islet autoantibody levels at the end of the gluten-free period were not different to those before the commencement of the diet nor to antibody levels at the end of the gluten re-exposure period. In the present study, we have followed the 7 children formerly placed on a gluten-free diet for the manifestation of T1D for up to 5 years (mean follow-up time after fulfilling inclusion criteria: 4.8 years, SE 0.82 years) and compared them to 30 siblings and offspring of patients with T1D with similar characteristics to the intervention group (mean follow-up time: 5 years, SE 0.62 years). The cumulative 5-year risk of T1D in the intervention group did not differ from that in the prediabetic control group (42.9%, 95 CI (6.3-79.5%) vs. 49.7%, 95 CI (30.9-68.5%), p=0.87, log-rank test). These findings suggest that removing gluten from the diet over a period of one year is effective neither in the short nor in the long term in high-risk prediabetic individuals with a fully activated immune response to different islet antigens close to manifestation of T1D. These and recent data showing that exposure to dietary gluten in offspring of mothers and fathers with T1D very early in life is associated with an increased risk of developing islet antibodies also suggest that removal of dietary gluten should be tested as early as possible in children with an increased risk of islet autoimmunity, i.e. before an immune response to islet antigens is established.

An association of autoantibody status and serum cytokine levels in type 1 diabetes.

At onset of type 1 diabetes, the islet autoantibody status of patients has been reported to predict progression of the disease. We therefore tested the hypothesis that the systemic immunoregulatory balance, as defined by levels of circulating cytokines and chemokines, is associated with islet autoantibody status. In 50 patients with recent-onset type 1 diabetes, antibodies to GAD and insulinoma-associated antigen 2 (IA-2) were analyzed by radioimmunoassay; cytoplasmic islet cell antibodies were determined by indirect immunofluorescence. Cytokine and chemokine concentrations were measured by rigidly evaluated double antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Of four classically defined Th1/Th2 cytokines (gamma-interferon, interleukin [IL]-5, IL-10, IL-13), none showed an association with multiple autoantibody positivity. Of six mediators mainly produced by innate immunity cells, three were associated with multiple autoantibody status (IL-18 increased, MIF and MCP-1 decreased) and three were unaffected (IL-12, MIP-1beta, IP-10). GAD and/or IA-2 antibody titers negatively correlated with systemic concentrations of MIF, MIP-1beta, and IL-12. Combining the data of several cytokine and chemokine levels made it possible to predict islet antibody positivity in individual patients with 85% sensitivity and 94% specificity. These data suggest a close association of islet antibody status with systemic immunoregulation in type 1 diabetes.

HLA-DQ genotypes in classic type 1 diabetes and in latent autoimmune diabetes of the adult.

In 1993-1996, islet autoantibodies, C-peptide, and HLA-DQ genotypes were evaluated in 345 insulin-treated diabetic patients of all ages from the Skaraborg Diabetes Registry 5-6 years after their diagnosis and in 216 control subjects from the Skaraborg County, Sweden, population. The aims of this study were to clarify the importance of age at diagnosis of diabetes for HLA-DQ associations in patients with classic type 1 diabetes and whether patients considered to have latent autoimmune diabetes of the adult differed in their human leukocyte antigen (HLA) associations. An abnormally low fasting C-peptide value was used as the definition of type 1 diabetes, found in 182 of 345 (53%) patients. No major associations between age at diagnosis and HLA susceptibility or protective genotypes were detected in type 1 diabetic patients. Among the 163 patients with preserved beta-cell function, the frequency of HLA protective genotypes was clearly decreased (5% vs. 42%) in the 46 of 163 with islet antibodies compared with the 117 of 163 antibody-negative patients. The authors conclude that there were no major effects of age at diagnosis on HLA-DQ associations in classic type 1 diabetic patients, whereas lack of HLA-DQ protective genotypes was a feature of patients with slow-progressing type 1 diabetes (latent autoimmune diabetes of the adult).

Development of autoantibodies to islet antigens during childhood: implications for preclinical type 1 diabetes screening.

Serum islet antibodies signify increased risk for type 1 diabetes (T1D). Knowledge of the relationship between age and seroconversion would guide screening for at-risk individuals. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of islet antibody screening in early childhood, in particular the proportion of negative children who subsequently seroconverted. We identified 554 children with a first-degree relative with T1D who had tested negative for islet cell antibodies (ICA) and insulin autoantibodies (IAA) when first screened at a mean age of 7.2 yr. Of 423 who were eligible, 350 consented to re-testing for ICA and IAA and antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase (GADAb) and tyrosine phosphatase-like insulinoma antigen IA-2 (IA2Ab) at a mean age of 11.1 yr. GADAb and IA2Ab were measured in 239 of the initial stored samples. Of the 350 children who tested negative at first screening, 12 (3.4%) subsequently seroconverted, becoming positive for ICA (n = 4), IAA (n = 7), GADAb (n = 6) or IA2Ab (n = 2). Of 239 initially negative for ICA and IAA, 8/239 (3.3%) now tested positive for GADAb (n = 7) or IA2Ab (n = 1). Four of these children were positive for GADAb in both tests; the one child initially positive for IA2Ab only was positive for all four antibodies 4.6 yr later and developed diabetes. Screening for ICA and IAA failed to identify 2-3% of genetically at-risk children who subsequently developed islet antibodies. Testing for GADAb and IA2Ab would not have avoided this. Maximizing the sensitivity of detecting risk for T1D requires repeat screening for islet antibodies throughout childhood.

Insulin autoantibodies are of less value compared with islet antibodies in the clinical diagnosis of autoimmune type 1 diabetes in children older than 3 yr of age.

Insulin autoantibodies (IAA), antibodies against endogenous insulin, may be detected in type 1 diabetic children before the start of insulin treatment. To relate IAA to islet antibodies (i.e., islet cell antibodies [ICA], and antibodies against two ICA-related islet antigens, glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 [GADA] and protein tyrosine phosphatase IA-2 [IA-2 A]) at diagnosis, and to endogenous beta-cell function at follow-up after diagnosis in diabetic children. We investigated 74 children, aged 1-15 yr, at the diagnosis of diabetes and 1-10 yr later. Insulin treatment may induce antibody development against exogenous insulin. Patients with insulin treatment > or = 1 wk (n = 5) were therefore excluded from the final analysis. Radioligand-binding assays based on human recombinant antigen were used to measure IAA, GADA, and IA-2 A. ICA were determined with indirect immunofluorescence. IAA were detected at a significantly lower frequency (43%; p < or = 0.001) than ICA (86%), GADA (72%), and IA-2 A (80%). In agreement, IAA measurements only marginally increased the frequency of positive autoimmune markers at diagnosis of diabetes (from 97 to 99% positive for at least one autoantibody). Preserved beta-cell function (detectable fasting p-C-peptide levels) was found in only nine patients, who were older (13 +/- 3 vs. 7 +/- 6 yr, p = 0.002) and had fewer of the antibodies (IAA, GADA, IA-2 A, ICA) in high titer (> median) compared with 60 patients with undetectable p-C-peptide levels. Insulin autoantibodies are of less clinical value compared with islet antibodies in the diagnosis of autoimmune type 1 diabetes in children.

A 12-year prospective study of the relationship between islet antibodies and beta-cell function at and after the diagnosis in patients with adult-onset diabetes.

To clarify the relationships between islet antibodies (islet cell antibody [ICA], GAD antibody [GADA], and IA-2 antibody [IA-2A]) versus the progression of beta-cell dysfunction, we have followed a group of diabetic patients from their diagnosis at 21-73 years of age. Patients with ICA had high levels of GADA and/or IA-2A at diagnosis and a more severe beta-cell dysfunction 5 years after diagnosis than those with only GADA in low concentrations. The aim of the current 12-year follow-up study was to examine the further progression of beta-cell dysfunction in relation to islet antibodies at and after diagnosis. Among 107 patients, complete beta-cell failure 12 years after diagnosis was restricted to those with islet antibodies at diagnosis (16 of 21 [77%] with multiple antibodies and 4 of 5 [80%] with only GADA). In contrast, among antibody-negative patients, fasting P-C-peptide levels were unchanged. Most GADA-positive patients (22 of 27 [81%]) remained GADA positive after 12 years. Associated with decreasing fasting P-C-peptide levels (0.85 nmol/l [0.84] at diagnosis vs. 0.51 nmol/l [0.21] 12 years after diagnosis, P < 0.05), ICA developed after diagnosis in 6 of 105 originally antibody negative mostly overweight patients. In conclusion, multiple islet antibodies or GADA alone at diagnosis of diabetes predict future complete beta-cell failure. After diagnosis, GADA persisted in most patients, whereas ICA development in patients who were antibody negative at diagnosis indicated decreasing beta-cell function.

Islet autoantibodies, nationality and gender: a multinational screening study in first-degree relatives of patients with Type I diabetes

First-degree relatives of patients with Type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus diagnosed at 20 years of age or under were screened for islet cell antibodies (ICA) in the course of recruitment to an international diabetes prevention trial. Our aim was to evaluate the influence of age, gender, proband characteristics and nationality on the prevalence of ICA and co-existence of autoantibodies to GAD, IA-2 and insulin. A central laboratory screened samples from 10 326 non-diabetic relatives who were aged less than 40 years, from eight European countries for ICA. Antibodies to GAD and IA-2 were measured in all samples with ICA of 10 JDF units or more. Overall, 8.9 % of relatives had ICA of 10 JDF units or more, 3.8 % with ICA of 20 JDF units or more. Of 921 relatives with ICA of 10 JDF units or more, 29 % had co-existing antibodies to GAD or IA-2 or both. ICA of 10 JDF units or more were more prevalent in males (10.8 %) than females (7.3 %). ICA with GAD or IA-2 antibodies or both were also more common in males (3.4 %) than females (1.9 %) and in relatives under 20 years of age (3.5 % vs 1.5 %). Multiple regression analysis showed nationality to be a determinant of ICA of 10 JDF units or more but not of ICA of 20 JDF units or more or of ICA with co-existing islet antibodies, and confirmed the importance of age and gender as determinants of islet autoimmunity. Relatives from different European countries have similar rates of islet autoimmunity despite wide variation in the background incidence of childhood diabetes, and male excess is equally evident in all populations. The male excess of ICA and islet autoimmunity over 10 years of age reflects the higher male incidence of Type I diabetes in this age group, and suggests that boys may be more likely than girls to develop islet autoimmunity during adolescence.

No Evidence for an Association of Coxsackie Virus Infections during Pregnancy and Early Childhood with Development of Islet Autoantibodies in Offspring of Mothers or Fathers with Type 1 Diabetes

Recent case-control studies reported an increased frequency of antibodies against Coxsackie virus (CV) antigens in patients with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes and during pregnancy in mothers of diabetic offspring, suggesting a role for CV infections in the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes (T1D). However, it is not known whether CV infections are causally related to the development of islet autoantibodies or merely represent secondary events in subjects already affected with established islet autoimmunity. Therefore we have prospectively evaluated CV infections from birth, prior to and in parallel with the appearance of islet autoantibodies in offspring of parents with T1D. Using indirect ELISAs, IgG-antibodies (abs) against a panel of CV, and IgG- and IgM-abs to CVB3, CVB4, and CVB5 were measured at 9 months, 2, 5, and 8 years in 28 offspring of mothers or fathers with T1D or of mothers with gestational diabetes who developed persistent islet antibodies (IAA, GADA, IA-2A), and compared to 51 islet autoantibody-negative offspring matched for place and date of birth. CV infections were also determined at delivery in 16 mothers whose offspring developed islet autoantibodies later in life and compared to 110 mothers (matched for HLA-DR, place and date of birth) whose offspring remained islet autoantibody-negative during early childhood. CV-antibodies were detected in only 2/28 (7.1%) offspring who developed islet autoantibodies during follow up and in 7/51 (13.7%) offspring without islet autoantibodies (median follow up time 3.0 years, range 2.0–8.7). CV-IgG abs were detected in one mother (6.3%), whose offspring developed islet autoantibodies during early childhood, compared to 15 mothers (13.6%) with islet autoantibody-negative offspring (P=0.5). Also, partum levels of CV-IgG and CVB3-, -4-, and -5-IgM abs were similar in both groups (median 35U, 0.08 index (I), 0.08, 0.05 vs. 35U, 0.06I, 0.11, and 0.06, resp.,P> 0.35 in each case). These data make it unlikely that CV infections during pregnancy or in early childhood play a major role in the induction of islet autoimmunity in offspring of mothers or fathers with T1D or of mothers with gestational diabetes.

Prevalence, characteristics and diabetes risk associated with transient maternally acquired islet antibodies and persistent islet antibodies in offspring of parents with type 1 diabetes.

Accurate assessment of type 1 diabetes risk in young children requires discrimination between antibodies that are produced by the child and antibodies acquired through the placenta from an islet antibody-positive mother. We studied 682 offspring from mothers with type 1 diabetes and 329 offspring from fathers with type 1 diabetes and nondiabetic mothers for insulin (auto)antibodies, glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies, and tyrosine phosphatase IA-2 antibodies before age 1 yr and again at age 2 yr to ascertain transience or persistence. Antibodies were detected at age 9 months in 5 (1.5%) offspring from fathers with type 1 diabetes; all were insulin (auto)antibodies only, all persisted and developed multiple antibodies, and 1 developed type 1 diabetes. In contrast, 31 (4.5%) offspring from mothers with type 1 diabetes had antibodies at 9 months; 12 (1.8%) persisted at age 2 yr, and 19 (2.8%) did not persist, suggestive of transient residual maternal antibodies. Multiple antibodies at 9 months were usually persistent (3 of 4 offspring), as were single insulin (auto)antibodies in offspring from mothers with type 1 diabetes (8 of 13 offspring), whereas persistent glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies (1 of 12) and tyrosine phosphatase IA-2 antibodies (0 of 2) were rare. Offspring with persistent antibodies at age 9 months had a high type 1 diabetes risk (100% by age 5 yr for those with multiple antibodies and 27% for single antibodies at 9 months), whereas offspring with transient antibodies had 0% type 1 diabetes risk (P < 0.01). Transience was associated with very high antibody levels at birth. For insulin (auto)antibodies, the measurement of subclass was also informative. Residual maternal antibody was indicated by similar insulin (auto)antibodies subclasses at 9 months and at birth, whereas different subclasses were indicative of nonmaternal antibody. Moreover, the presence of IgG1-insulin (auto)antibodies was associated with antibody persistence and type 1 diabetes risk. These strategies are helpful in discriminating high and low risk antibodies before age 1 yr and should be important for prognosis and reducing unnecessary parent anxiety.

Prevalence, Characteristics and Diabetes Risk Associated with Transient Maternally Acquired Islet Antibodies and Persistent Islet Antibodies in Offspring of Parents with Type 1 Diabetes

Prevalence, Characteristics and Diabetes Risk Associated with Transient Maternally Acquired Islet Antibodies and Persistent Islet Antibodies in Offspring of Parents with Type 1 Diabetes

Subtipos "no clásicos" de diabetes mellitus

Some adult, obese and diabetic patients, initiate their disease with a severe diabetic ketoacidosis without a precipitating factor and do not require insulin thereafter. These patients are classified as having a "non classical" diabetes mellitus. To study the clinical, immunological, genetic and metabolic features of patients with non classical diabetes mellitus. Ten patients (9 men, aged 45 +/- 12 years old) with non classical diabetes mellitus were studied. Anti islet and anti glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies (ICA and anti GAD), HLA DQ alpha arginine 52 and non aspartic beta 57 were measured. Insulin secretion was measured by C peptide after glucagon injection and with the minimal model of Bergman. The latter model was also used to determine insulin sensitivity. Three patients were immunologically classified as type 1, since they had positive ICA or antiGAD antibodies and type 1 genetics (neutral or susceptible HLA DQ alpha and beta). They had insulin secretion after glucagon stimulus (C peptide ranging from 2.2 to 7.5 pmol/ml), but an almost absent response to a glucose load. They were also insulin resistant (a sensitivity index ranging from 0.05 to 1.67 x 10(-4) min/microU x ml). These three cases could be categorized as latent type 1. The other seven patients were ICA negative and antiGAD negative. Five had a susceptible HLA genotype for type 1 diabetes and two were neutral. All had insulin secretion after glucagon stimulation and a variable response to glucose. Six were insulin resistant (sensitivity index ranging from 0.32 to 1.29 x 10(-4) min/microU x ml). One patient was insulin sensitive (sensitivity index of 3.83 x 10(-4) min/microU x ml). Therefore all these patients were classified as type two diabetics with an atypical debut. Not all diabetics presenting with a severe diabetic ketoacidosis are type I. Among these, there are subjects with a latent type 1 diabetes or with an atypical type 2 diabetes.

High Levels of Antigen-Specific Islet Antibodies Predict Future -Cell Failure in Patients with Onset of Diabetes in Adult Age

High Levels of Antigen-Specific Islet Antibodies Predict Future -Cell Failure in Patients with Onset of Diabetes in Adult Age

High Levels of Antigen-Specific Islet Antibodies Predict Futureβ -Cell Failure in Patients with Onset of Diabetes in Adult Age1

It is unclear whether high levels of antigen-specific islet antibodies [GADA (glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 antibodies) and IA2-ab (protein tyrosine phosphatase-like protein antibodies)] predict beta-cell failure in patients with onset of diabetes in adult age. Therefore, GADA and IA2-ab levels at the diagnosis of diabetes were related to fasting plasma C-peptide levels 5 yr later in 148 patients with diabetes onset in adult age (age at onset, 20-77 yr; median, 57 yr). Classical islet cell antibodies (ICA) were also determined. Complete beta-cell failure (undetectable fasting plasma C-peptide) was only present in 4 patients at diagnosis of diabetes, but in 21 patients 5 yr thereafter. At diagnosis, ICA were detected in 20 of 21 (95%) patients with beta-cell failure after 5 yr and in only 7 of 127 (5%) without, whereas GADA and/or IA2-ab (>97.5 percentile of healthy controls) were detected in all 21 (100%) with but also in 23 of 127 (18%) patients without beta-cell failure after 5 yr. Thus, ICA had a higher positive predictive value (74%) than GADA and/or IA2-ab (47%; P < 0.05). With high cutoff values for GADA and IA2-ab, however, GADA and/or IA2-ab were detected in 19 of 21 (90%) patients with beta-cell failure vs. only in 5 of 127 (4%) without, giving a positive predictive value of 79%. Slightly elevated GADA levels in IA2-ab-negative patients were associated with progressive but not complete beta-cell failure within the study period. Hence, high GADA and/or IA2-ab levels predict a future complete beta-cell failure, whereas low GADA levels predict slowly progressive beta-cell insufficiency.

Environmental triggers of type 1 diabetes

High risk HLA class II alleles account for 40% of the genetic susceptibility to type 1 diabetes in Caucasians, but the majority of the genetically predisposed do not develop the disease. This supports some environmental modification of the autoimmune destruction of beta cells that precedes type 1 diabetes. Identical twin studies and geographical variation in incidence also argue for a critical role of environmental factors. Attention has been directed to the possible harmful effect of cow's milk protein (or protective effect of breast-feeding) and enteric infections in early life. Natural history studies that follow children at increased risk of type 1 diabetes provide the best opportunity to study environmental triggers. The Australian Baby Diab Study has followed approximately 500 babies from birth who have a first-degree relative with type 1 diabetes. No prospective association between duration of breast-feeding or introduction of cow's milk and the development of islet autoimmunity was found. The same Australian cohort demonstrated a relationship between rotavirus infection and the first appearance or increase in islet antibodies. Enteroviral infection is seen more frequently in prediabetic children and prior to the onset of islet autoimmunity in Finnish cohorts. Environmental factors may interact. Breast milk protects against enteric infections; enteric infections in turn could increase immunity to dietary antigens by increasing intestinal permeability. It is also possible that an alteration in gut mucosal immune function in genetically susceptible individuals underlies any effect of dietary or viral proteins on the development of islet autoimmunity in early life.

Risk assessment, prediction and prevention of type 1 diabetes.

Circulating antibodies to pancreatic beta-cell antigens are markers of islet autoimmunity. In first-degree relatives of persons with type 1 diabetes, the levels and range of antigen specificities of these islet antibodies reflect the risk for clinical diabetes. However, in the general population, in which the disease prevalence is up to 30-fold lower, the predictive value of islet antibodies is correspondingly less. Islet antibody assays are primarily research tools to identify 'prediabetic' individuals for secondary prevention trials, but can also discriminate type 1 diabetes in several clinical situations. Loss of first-phase insulin response (FPIR) to intravenous glucose signifies imminent diabetes, but FPIR is normal in most islet-antibody-positive individuals. The contribution of a single FPIR measurement to risk assessment is therefore limited, but rate of fall of FPIR may be a useful predictor. Although beta cells are destroyed by autoreactive T cells, the assay of islet antigen-reactive T cells is not routine. Genetically, the major histocompatibility complex encoding human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles accounts for about 50% of familial clustering of type 1 diabetes. HLA typing is not diagnostic, but can be used to differentiate high- from low-risk individuals, e.g. at birth. While 'preclinical' diagnosis raises important medical and ethical questions, an optimized screening strategy provides a basis for counselling and follow-up. Recent knowledge of disease mechanisms and 'proof-of-principle' in the non-obese diabetic (NOD) mouse model justify expectations that type 1 diabetes is preventable, and even intervention that only delays onset of clinical diabetes is likely to be cost-effective.

Islet autoantibodies in the prediction of diabetes in school children

In 1987 serum was collected from 1031 non-diabetic schoolchildren in the Southeast area of Sweden with the aim of evaluating islet autoantibody status (ICA, GADA and IA2-ab) in the prediction of diabetes in schoolchildren. The clinical development of Type 1 diabetes in the children was assessed in 1994 and 1997. The combination of ICA, GADA and IA2-ab were found in four subjects whereas six had two and 35 children one of these antibodies. After 10 years, six of the 1031 children had developed clinical diabetes and five of these six children were positive for islet antibodies. Two were positive for all three antibodies, two were positive for ICA and GADA, and one was positive for GADA. Among the individual autoantibodies, ICA showed the highest positive predictive value (29%) whereas the predictive value for the combination of two autoantibodies was highest for GADA and ICA (40%). Thus, GADA and ICA measurements may be a rational approach to detect schoolchildren at risk for developing diabetes.

No major association of breast-feeding, vaccinations, and childhood viral diseases with early islet autoimmunity in the German BABYDIAB Study.

Environmental factors have been suggested to play an important role in the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of breast-feeding, vaccinations, and childhood viral diseases on the initiation of islet autoimmunity in early childhood. Data were prospectively collected from questionnaires obtained at birth, at 9 months of age, and at 2 years of age in 823 offspring from parents with type 1 diabetes. By 2 years of age, 31 offspring had islet antibodies, and 10 developed overt diabetes by the time of follow-up. In offspring from mothers with type 1 diabetes, duration of exclusive and total breast-feeding did not differ between islet antibody-positive and -negative children, regardless of HLA genotype, and breast-feeding of 3 months or longer was not associated with protection from antibody development or diabetes onset. In offspring from diabetic fathers, non-statistically significant reductions in exclusive and total breast-feeding times were observed in the antibody-positive cohort. Neither type nor quantity of vaccinations (including Bacille Calmette-Guerin vaccine; haemophilus influenzae vaccine; diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis vaccine; tick-born encephalitis vaccine; or measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine) were associated with the development of islet antibodies and diabetes. Measles, mumps, and rubella were not reported in children with islet antibodies or diabetes. This study showed no evidence that proposed environmental factors affect islet antibody development in the first 2 years of life in offspring from parents with type 1 diabetes.