Irritable Pouch Syndrome Research Articles

Irritable pouch syndrome: a new category of diagnosis for symptomatic patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: B. Shen, J-P. Achkar, B.A. Lashner, et al. Am J Gastroenterol 97:972–977 (Apr), 2002

Irritable pouch syndrome: a new category of diagnosis for symptomatic patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: B. Shen, J-P. Achkar, B.A. Lashner, et al. Am J Gastroenterol 97:972–977 (Apr), 2002

Diagnosis and management of pouchitis

Diagnosis and management of pouchitis

Diagnosis and treatment of patients with pouchitis.

Pouchitis is the most common long-term complication of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with underlying ulcerative colitis. Clinical symptoms of pouchitis are not specific, and they can be caused by other conditions such as rectal cuff inflammation and irritable pouch syndrome. Therefore, to make an accurate diagnosis, endoscopic evaluation together with symptom assessment is necessary. Among five available treat-first and test-first strategies, the initial approach with pouch endoscopy without histology was the most cost-effective strategy for the diagnosis of pouchitis. On the basis of clinical course, pouchitis can be classified into acute, relapsing and chronic forms. Pouchitis can also be classified into three categories based on the response to antibacterial therapy: antibacterial-responsive; antibacterial-dependent; and antibacterial-resistant. Metronidazole and ciprofloxacin are both effective in treating acute pouchitis. Although antibacterial therapy can induce and maintain remission, probiotics such as VSL#3 can also be used as to maintain clinical remission and prevent relapse in patients with relapsing or chronic pouchitis. For patients with chronic pouchitis that is resistant to antibacterials, therapy with anti-inflammatory agents and immunomodulators is often required.

Irritable pouch syndrome: a new category of diagnosis for symptomatic patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Pouchitis often is diagnosed based on symptoms alone. However, increased stool frequency, urgency, and abdominal pain could be due to a condition resembling irritable bowel syndrome. This study was designed to assess the etiology of bowel symptoms using the Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (PDAI). Symptoms, endoscopy, and histology were assessed in 61 consecutive symptomatic patients with ulcerative colitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Pouchitis was defined as a PDAI score of > or = 7, cuffitis was defined as endoscopic and histological inflammation of the rectal cuff and no inflammation of the pouch, and irritable pouch syndrome (IPS) was defined as symptoms with a PDAI of <7 and the absence of cuffitis. Thirty-one patients (50.8%) had pouchitis, four (6.5%) had cuffitis, and 26 (42.6%) had IPS. Demographics were similar in the three groups. Increased stool frequency, urgency, and abdominal cramps were the most common symptoms in the three groups. Rectal bleeding was seen only in cuffitis (p < 0.001). No patient in the three groups had fever. Twenty-seven patients (87.1%) with pouchitis responded to a 2-wk course of ciprofloxacin or metronidazole with a reduction in PDAI scores of > or = 3. All four patients with cuffitis responded to topical hydrocortisone or mesalamine with a reduction in the PDAI symptom component score of > or = 1. Twelve patients with IPS (46.2%) responded to antidiarrheal, anticholinergic, and/or antidepressant therapies with a reduction in the PDAI symptom component score of > or = 1, whereas the remaining patients had persistent symptoms despite therapy. A substantial number of symptomatic patients after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis do not meet the diagnostic criteria for either pouchitis or cuffitis and have been classified as having IPS. There is an overlap of symptoms among patients with pouchitis, cuffitis, and IPS, and endoscopic evaluation can differentiate among these groups. Distinction between these three groups has therapeutic implications.

Irritable pouch syndrome: a new category of diagnosis for symptomatic patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

OBJECTIVE: Pouchitis often is diagnosed based on symptoms alone. However, increased stool frequency, urgency, and abdominal pain could be due to a condition resembling irritable bowel syndrome. This study was designed to assess the etiology of bowel symptoms using the Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (PDAI). METHODS: Symptoms, endoscopy, and histology were assessed in 61 consecutive symptomatic patients with ulcerative colitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Pouchitis was defined as a PDAI score of ≥7, cuffitis was defined as endoscopic and histological inflammation of the rectal cuff and no inflammation of the pouch, and irritable pouch syndrome (IPS) was defined as symptoms with a PDAI of <7 and the absence of cuffitis. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients (50.8%) had pouchitis, four (6.5%) had cuffitis, and 26 (42.6%) had IPS. Demographics were similar in the three groups. Increased stool frequency, urgency, and abdominal cramps were the most common symptoms in the three groups. Rectal bleeding was seen only in cuffitis ( p < 0.001). No patient in the three groups had fever. Twenty-seven patients (87.1%) with pouchitis responded to a 2-wk course of ciprofloxacin or metronidazole with a reduction in PDAI scores of ≥3. All four patients with cuffitis responded to topical hydrocortisone or mesalamine with a reduction in the PDAI symptom component score of ≥1. Twelve patients with IPS (46.2%) responded to antidiarrheal, anticholinergic, and/or antidepressant therapies with a reduction in the PDAI symptom component score of ≥1, whereas the remaining patients had persistent symptoms despite therapy. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial number of symptomatic patients after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis do not meet the diagnostic criteria for either pouchitis or cuffitis and have been classified as having IPS. There is an overlap of symptoms among patients with pouchitis, cuffitis, and IPS, and endoscopic evaluation can differentiate among these groups. Distinction between these three groups has therapeutic implications.

Irritable pouch syndrome (IPS) is a common diagnosis in symptomatic patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA)

OBJECTIVES:Chronic inflammation in the ileal pouch is the most significant late complication after ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA). It leads to changes in mucosal morphology, with consequent decreased vitamin B12, bile acid and cholesterol absorption documented. The aims of this study were to evaluate long term metabolic consequences at least 5 yr after IPAA and the influence of pouchitis on pouch histology and on bile acid, lipid, and vitamin B12, A, E, and D metabolism.METHODS:A total of 104 patients with a J-pouch who were operated on between 1985 and 1994, as well as 21 ulcerative colitis patients with a conventional ileostomy were enrolled for the study. Routine blood tests, vitamin status, vitamin B12 levels, and bile acid absorption were determined, as well as endoscopy with biopsies. The pouchitis disease activity index (PDAI) was calculated. On the basis of histology, IPAA patients were divided into three subgroups: 1) those with no villous atrophy, 2) those with partial villous atrophy, and 3) those with subtotal or total villous atrophy.RESULTS:Incidence of pouchitis was 42.3%, and was strongly associated with villous atrophy. In IPAA patients with subtotal or total villous atrophy (32.7%), serum levels of albumin, calcium, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and vitamin E were significantly reduced (p < 0.05). The lowest bile acid and vitamin B12 absorption rates were seen in patients with inflammation in the proximal limb. Vitamin D deficiency was seen in 10.6%, and vitamin A and B12 deficiency in approximately 5% of IPAA patients.CONCLUSIONS:Metabolic consequences after IPAA are associated with pouchitis, grade of villous atrophy, and extent of inflammation in the remaining ileum. Patients with active chronic inflammation need long term follow-up.