Irrelevant Visual Stimuli Research Articles

Neural Mechanisms Underlying the Impact of Visual Distraction on Retrieval of Long-Term Memory

Filtering information on the basis of what is relevant to accomplish our goals is a critical process supporting optimal cognitive performance. However, it is not known whether exposure to irrelevant environmental stimuli impairs our ability to accurately retrieve long-term memories. We hypothesized that visual processing of irrelevant visual information would interfere with mental visualization engaged during recall of the details of a prior experience, despite goals to direct full attention to the retrieval task. In the current study, we compared performance on a cued-recall test of previously studied visual items when participants' eyes were closed to performance when their eyes were open and irrelevant visual stimuli were presented. A behavioral experiment revealed that recollection of episodic details was diminished in the presence of the irrelevant information. A functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment using the same paradigm replicated the behavioral results and found that diminished recollection was associated with the disruption of functional connectivity in a network involving the left inferior frontal gyrus, hippocampus and visual association cortex. Network connectivity supported recollection of contextual details based on visual imagery when eyes were closed, but declined in the presence of irrelevant visual information. We conclude that bottom-up influences from irrelevant visual information interfere with top-down selection of episodic details mediated by a capacity-limited frontal control region, resulting in impaired recollection.

Unfiltered and unforgotten: The fate of irrelevant visual stimuli in elderly adults

Unfiltered and unforgotten: The fate of irrelevant visual stimuli in elderly adults

The visual mismatch made visible

Event Abstract Back to Event The visual mismatch made visible Christine Smit1*, E. Schweiger1 and W. Wittling1 1 Center for Neuropsychological Research, University of Trier, Germany As the brain is a capacity limited system and has to deal with a continuous stream of information from its surroundings, only a part of the vast amount of information can be completely processed and be brought to conscious awareness. This information, which passes through attentional filters is used for goal-directed behaviour. Therefore, the change detection mechanism is a very useful aid to cope with important information which is outside the focus of our attention. To explore this mechanism in the visual modality a paradigm was developed combining a 2-choice response time task with a hidden visual mismatch detection task. The ERP results showed a modality-specific mismatch response at the occipital cortex and a more general response at the frontocentral midline. Preliminary analyses of fMRI data of change induced activation revealed activity in superior occipital areas, hippocampus, and medial frontal and cingulate areas. It is plausible to assume that these regions are associated with the different processes underlying change detection, like sensory memory update and comparison, detection of conflict in input, and involuntary attention shifting. The findings in this study were taken as an indication that the human brain is capable of detecting changes in a series of repeated irrelevant visual stimuli during the performance of another demanding visual task and thus support the existence of a visual mismatch detection mechanism. Conference: MMN 09 Fifth Conference on Mismatch Negativity (MMN) and its Clinical and Scientific Applications, Budapest, Hungary, 4 Apr - 7 Apr, 2009. Presentation Type: Oral Presentation Topic: Workshop 1: Visual Mismatch Negativity (vMMN) Citation: Smit C, Schweiger E and Wittling W (2009). The visual mismatch made visible. Conference Abstract: MMN 09 Fifth Conference on Mismatch Negativity (MMN) and its Clinical and Scientific Applications. doi: 10.3389/conf.neuro.09.2009.05.031 Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters. The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated. Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed. For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions. Received: 20 Mar 2009; Published Online: 20 Mar 2009. * Correspondence: Christine Smit, Center for Neuropsychological Research, University of Trier, Trier, Germany, cm.smit@yahoo.de Login Required This action requires you to be registered with Frontiers and logged in. To register or login click here. Abstract Info Abstract The Authors in Frontiers Christine Smit E. Schweiger W. Wittling Google Christine Smit E. Schweiger W. Wittling Google Scholar Christine Smit E. Schweiger W. Wittling PubMed Christine Smit E. Schweiger W. Wittling Related Article in Frontiers Google Scholar PubMed Abstract Close Back to top Javascript is disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser settings in order to see all the content on this page.

Brain response to complex visual stimuli in Parkinson's patients with hallucinations: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study

Visual hallucinations (VH) in Parkinson's disease (PD) have been associated with gray matter reductions in visual associative areas and with abnormal patterns of brain activation in posterior and frontal regions. However, all previous fMRI studies have used simple visual stimuli. The objective of our study was, therefore, to compare the pattern of brain activation during a one-back face detection task. We examined 10 PD patients with VH, 10 PD patients without VH, and 10 controls matched for age and education. The fMRI task consisted in three blocks of 21-face stimuli (activation condition) and three blocks of 21-colored mosaics (control condition). Subjects were asked to press a key when two identical stimuli were presented consecutively. During the face condition, compared with patients without VH, hallucinating PD patients showed significant reductions in the activation of several right prefrontal areas, such as the inferior (BA 10,47), superior (BA 6/8), middle frontal (BA 8), and anterior cingulate gyrus (BA 31/32). In the control condition, we found a hyperactivation in the hallucinating PD sample compared with the nonVH patients in the right inferior frontal gyrus. A dysfunction of the frontal areas associated with the control of attention could predispose to VH through an abnormal processing of relevant and irrelevant visual stimuli.

Toward a model of microsaccade generation: The case of microsaccadic inhibition

Microsaccades are one component of the small eye movements that constitute fixation. Their implementation in the oculomotor system is unknown. To better understand the physiological and mechanistic processes underlying microsaccade generation, we studied microsaccadic inhibition, a transient drop of microsaccade rate, in response to irrelevant visual and auditory stimuli. Quantitative descriptions of the time course and strength of inhibition revealed a strong dependence of microsaccadic inhibition on stimulus characteristics. In Experiment 1, microsaccadic inhibition occurred sooner after auditory than after visual stimuli and after luminance-contrast than after color-contrast visual stimuli. Moreover, microsaccade amplitude strongly decreased during microsaccadic inhibition. In Experiment 2, the latency of microsaccadic inhibition increased with decreasing luminance contrast. We develop a conceptual model of microsaccade generation in which microsaccades result from fixation-related activity in a motor map coding for both fixation and saccades. In this map, fixation is represented at the central site. Saccades are generated by activity in the periphery, their amplitude increasing with eccentricity. The activity at the central, fixation-related site of the map predicts the rate of microsaccades as well as their amplitude and direction distributions. This model represents a framework for understanding the dynamics of microsaccade behavior in a broad range of tasks.

Multisensory-Mediated Auditory Localization

Multisensory integration is a powerful mechanism for maximizing sensitivity to sensory events. We examined its effects on auditory localization in healthy human subjects. The specific objective was to test whether the relative intensity and location of a seemingly irrelevant visual stimulus would influence auditory localization in accordance with the inverse effectiveness and spatial rules of multisensory integration that have been developed from neurophysiological studies with animals [Stein and Meredith, 1993 The Merging of the Senses (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)]. Subjects were asked to localize a sound in one condition in which a neutral visual stimulus was either above threshold (supra-threshold) or at threshold. In both cases the spatial disparity of the visual and auditory stimuli was systematically varied. The results reveal that stimulus salience is a critical factor in determining the effect of a neutral visual cue on auditory localization. Visual bias and, hence, perceptual translocation of the auditory stimulus appeared when the visual stimulus was supra-threshold, regardless of its location. However, this was not the case when the visual stimulus was at threshold. In this case, the influence of the visual cue was apparent only when the two cues were spatially coincident and resulted in an enhancement of stimulus localization. These data suggest that the brain uses multiple strategies to integrate multisensory information.

The cognitive locus of distraction by acoustic novelty in the cross-modal oddball task

Unexpected stimuli are often able to distract us away from a task at hand. The present study seeks to explore some of the mechanisms underpinning this phenomenon. Studies of involuntary attention capture using the oddball task have repeatedly shown that infrequent auditory changes in a series of otherwise repeating sounds trigger an automatic response to the novel or deviant stimulus. This attention capture has been shown to disrupt participants’ behavioral performance in a primary task, even when distractors and targets are asynchronous and presented in distinct sensory modalities. This distraction effect is generally considered as a by-product of the capture of attention by the novel or deviant stimulus, but the exact cognitive locus of this effect and the interplay between attention capture and target processing has remained relatively ignored. The present study reports three behavioral experiments using a cross-modal oddball task to examine whether the distraction triggered by auditory novelty affects the processing of the target stimuli. Our results showed that variations in the demands placed on the visual analysis (Experiment 1) or categorical processing of the target (Experiment 2) did not impact on distraction. Instead, the cancellation of distraction by the presentation of an irrelevant visual stimulus presented immediately before the visual target (Experiment 3) suggested that distraction originated in the shifts of attention occurring between attention capture and the onset of the target processing. Possible accounts of these shifts are discussed.

Processing of irrelevant visual motion during performance of an auditory attention task

The extent to which irrelevant perception of visual motion distractors can be modulated by manipulating auditory load in a relevant task was assessed with Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and behavioural experiments. Subjects performed an auditory task and ignored an irrelevant visual motion stimulus, under two conditions. In a low load condition, subjects were asked to detect words spoken in a loud voice among words spoken in a quiet voice, while in a high load condition they attempted to detect bisyllabic words among monosyllabic and trisyllabic words. We found that motion-related visual areas were strongly activated by the irrelevant motion stimulus, compared to a static stimulus, under both conditions of load in the auditory task. In a second behavioural experiment, the duration of the motion after-effect was similarly unaffected by adaptation under low or high auditory load. These results are in clear contrast with the strong modulation of irrelevant motion processing by visual load, as reflected in the duration of the motion after effect ( Section 6) and neural responses in motion-related visual areas (Rees et al., Science, (1997) 278, 338). These findings support the claim that attentional capacity is restricted within but not between sensory modalities, and indicate that processing of visual distractors may occur whenever there is sufficient visual capacity to process them, despite being task- and modality-irrelevant.

Response of neurons in the lateral intraparietal area to a distractor flashed during the delay period of a memory-guided saccade.

Recent experiments raised the possibility that the lateral intraparietal area (LIP) might be specialized for saccade planning. If this was true, one would expect a decreased sensitivity to irrelevant visual stimuli appearing late in the delay period of a memory-guided delayed-saccade task to a target outside the neurons' receptive fields. We trained two monkeys to perform a standard memory-guided delayed-saccade task and a distractor task in which a stimulus flashed for 200 ms at a predictable time 300-100 ms before the end of the delay period. We used two locations, one in the most active part of the receptive field and another well outside the receptive field. We used six kinds of trials randomly intermixed: simple delayed-saccade trials into or away from the receptive field and distractor trials with saccade target and distractor both in the receptive field, both out of the receptive field, or one at each location. This enabled us to study the response to the distractor as a function of the monkey's preparation of a memory-guided delayed-saccade task. We had assumed that the preparation of a saccade away from the receptive field would result in an attenuation of the response to the distractor, i.e., a distractor at the location of the saccade goal would evoke a greater response than when it appeared at a location far from the saccade goal. Instead we found that neurons exhibited either a normal or an enhanced visual response to the distractor during the memory period when the target flashed outside the receptive field. When the distractor flashed at the location of the saccade target, the response to the distractor was either unchanged or diminished. The response to a distractor away from the target location of a memory-guided saccade was even greater than the response to the same target when it was the target for the memory-guided saccade task. Immediate presaccadic activity did not distinguish between a saccade to the receptive field when there was no distractor and a distractor in the receptive field when the monkey made a saccade elsewhere. Nonetheless the distractor had no significant effect on the saccade latency, accuracy, or velocity despite the brisk response it evoked immediately before the saccade. We suggest that these results are inconsistent with a role for LIP in the specific generation of saccades, but they are consistent with a role for LIP in the generation of visual attention.

Effects of inter- and intramodal selective attention to non-spatial visual stimuli: an event-related potential analysis

Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded to trains of rapidly presented auditory and visual stimuli. ERPs in conditions in which subjects attended to different features of visual stimuli were compared with ERPs to the same type of stimuli when subjects attended to different features of auditory stimuli. This design permitted us to study effects of variations in both intramodal and intermodal visual attention on the timing and topography of ERP components in the same experiment. There were no indications that exogenous N110, P140 and N180 components to line gratings of high and low spatial frequencies were modulated by either intra- or intermodal forms of attention. Furthermore, intramodal and intermodal attention effects on ERPs showed similar topographical distributions. These combined findings suggest that the same neural generators in extrastriate occipital areas are involved in both forms of attention. Visual ERPs elicited in the condition in which subjects were engaged in auditory selective attention showed a large positive displacement at the occipital scalp sites relative to ERPs to attended and unattended stimuli in the visual condition. The early onset of this positivity might be associated with a highly confident and early rejection of the irrelevant visual stimuli, when these stimuli are presented among auditory stimuli. In addition, the later onset of selection potentials in the intramodal condition suggests that a more precise stimulus selection is needed when features of visual stimuli are rejected among other features of the same stimulus pattern, than when visual stimuli are rejected among stimuli of another modality.

Slow eye movement evoked by sudden appearance of a stationary visual stimulus observed in a step-ramp smooth pursuit task in monkey.

We examined the influence of a peripheral visual stimulus on eye movement while monkeys performed a horizontal step-ramp pursuit task. When an irrelevant visual stimulus was presented before the onset of the target motion, slow eye movement away from the stimulus was observed. When the stimulus appeared during a temporal gap between the offset of the fixation point and the onset of target motion the velocity of the slow eye movement increased. The onset of the movement was time-locked to the onset of the extraneous visual stimulus and its latency was comparable to the latency of smooth pursuit in trials without a peripheral stimulus. The results demonstrate a new form of smooth eye movement, suggesting that the eye movement may be contained in the initial stages of smooth pursuit observed in step-ramp paradigms.

Inability of rhesus monkey area V1 to discriminate between self-induced and externally induced retinal image slip.

Retinal image slip can result from an eye movement across a stationary object or alternatively from motion of the object while the eyes are stationary. The ability to discriminate between these two kinds of retinal image slip is necessary for the perception of a stable visual world. In order to determine if this ability is already present in monkey visual area V1, we asked if single V1 units are able to differentiate between externally and self-induced retinal image slip. Externally induced retinal image slip was realized in the 'object motion' condition (OMC) by moving a behaviourally irrelevant visual stimulus ('object': a bar or a large random dot pattern) across the receptive field while the monkey fixated a small, stationary target. Conversely, self-induced retinal image slip of comparable size was evoked in the 'ego motion' condition (EMC) by asking the monkey to pursue the target, moving at the speed of the object in the OMC, while the object was kept stationary. We recorded 221 units from visual area V1, 51, (23%) of them directionally selective, and compared their responses to self-induced and externally induced retinal image slip. Many of them seemed to give some preference to externally induced retinal image slip. However, on closer examination it became clear that this seeming preference could be attributed to the fact that oculomotor performance was less precise in the EMC than in the OMC, causing a larger deviation from the optimal retinal image trajectory in the EMC. We show that the impact of eye position errors can be eliminated by the use of a position-invariant stimulus, such as large-field random dot patterns. We then show that the impact of both eye position errors and deviation of eye velocity from target velocity in the EMC can be eliminated by moving the stimulus in a given OMC trial according to an inverted replica of the eye movement trajectory in the preceding EMC trial, guaranteeing identical retinal stimulation in the OMC and the EMC. If identical retinal stimulation was ensured, none of the V1 units tested was able to differentiate between externally and self-induced retinal image slip. We conclude that V1 does not contribute to the perception of a world which is stable despite eye movements.

Effects of Attention on Visuomotor Activity in the Premotor and Prefrontal Cortex of a Primate

We examined neuronal activity in the primate premotor (PM) and prefrontal (PF) areas during a demanding spatial matching task. On each behavioral trial, a rhesus monkey moved its forelimb when a visual stimulus, called the "prime stimulus," reappeared at a previously cued location. Because it triggered a movement, the part of space cued by the prime stimulus had to be either remembered or attended during the time between prime stimulus presentations. Between the first and second appearances of the prime stimulus, behaviorally irrelevant visual stimuli could appear at one or several locations other than that of the prime stimulus. We could thereby examine the activity that followed a stimulus when it was attended versus when it was irrelevant and presumably unattended. We found that visuospatial attention affected neuronal activity in both the motor and "nonmotor" parts of the frontal cortex. The magnitude of attention effects exceeded that previously reported--a finding that probably resulted from the intensive attentional demands of the present task.

Stimulus suffixes and visual presentation.

Seven experiments studied whether irrelevant visual stimuli (stimulus suffixes) would interfere with immediate serial recall of supraspan lists of digits presented visually. Across experiments a wide number of conditions were run, varying in method of presentation (sequential or simultaneous), rate of list presentation, and presence or absence of articulatory suppression. In no condition did a visual suffix have a significant detrimental effect on recall. These results stand in marked contrast to those found when auditory lists and suffixes have been used.

Auditory and visual evoked potentials to irrelevant stimuli during conditioning to a visual stimulus.

Amplitude changes of evoked responses to irrelevant auditory (click) and visual (optic tract stimulation) stimuli were examined during appetitive conditioning to a flashing light. Four female cats, with chronically implanted electrodes along the visual and auditory pathways, were conditioned with pairings of a flashing light and food reinforcement. The results showed that, as conditioning progressed, the auditory evoked potentials were attenuated while the visual evoked potentials did not change significantly. The data seem to indicate possible differences in the neural processing of irrelevant information.

Frontal decortication in rhesus monkeys: A test of the interference hypothesis

Four monkeys with dorsolateral frontal ablations and 3 unoperated controls were run on discrimination problems which sequentially presented both relevant and irrelevant visual stimuli prior to the opportunity for a choice response. As previously reported, monkeys with undamaged brains performed significantly better on those problems presenting relevant information first, being unaffected by later occurring irrelevant stimuli. Contrary to the behavior of the normal monkeys, monkeys with lesions of the dorsolateral frontal cortex were severely impaired when irrelevant stimuli were presented after the relevant stimuli had been processed, but before the opportunity to respond had occurred. In other words, the frontal monkeys performed just the opposite of the normals in these procedures, even though the relevant and irrelevant stimuli were manipulated within the usual temporal definitions of the two-choice discrimination trial. These data demonstrate that the presentation of irrelevant stimuli before the choice response can significantly impair frontally decorticated monkeys and that this impairment does not require the use of a long temporal delay preceding the opportunity to respond. For this reason the data were interpreted as rather direct support of the interference hypothesis of frontal dysfunction. On the basis of these and other data discussed, it was concluded that one function of the dorsolated frontal cortex involves the suppression of interfering stimulus events interposed between the information necessary to guide behavior and the behavior itself.

Information Processing Components of Digit Symbol Performance in Schizophrenia

The present report is of the relationship between digit symbol performance in schizophrenia and measures derived from a visual choice reaction-time task. The ability to ignore irrelevant visual stimuli was most closely related to digit symbol performance, other measures adding little to the predicted variance.

Anticipation of relevant stimuli and evoked potentials: a comment on Donchin's and Cohen's "averaged evoked potentials and intramodality selective attention".

Donchin and Cohen (1967) reported having demonstrated amplitude differences of late components of occipital evoked potentials related to intramodal selective attention within the visual modality even under conditions in which the relevant stimuli could not be anticipated by S. They delivered flashes at irregular intervals from 2 to 3 sec. and, timed independently of these, background reversals at irregular intervals from 3 to 4 sec. on the same retinal location. The triangular test flash was superimposed on either of the background figures, one or the other of which was present at any given time. When S's attention was directed to the flashes, these elicited occipital potentials with larger late components than when attention was directed to the background reversals. Especially the late positive component (latency to peak 250 to 300 msec.) was considerably enhanced. The same effect was reported to have been observed with respect to the occipital potentials elicited by the background reversals. It is suggested here that the effect was actually induced by the anticipatory and preparatory reactions to the presentation of the relevant stimuli, conditioned by the regularities in the stimulus sequence. These differential anticipatory and preparatory reactions might include momentarily increased cortical activation as well as simultaneous changes in peripheral receptor conditions, such as improved ocular fixation and accommodation in addition to increased diameter of the pupil. In this author's view, these nonspecific factors may have caused the evoked potential amplitude differences between relevant and irrelevant visual stimuli which were interpreted by Donchin and Cohen to reflect intramodal selective attention.

Information processing related to stimulus novelty and complexity in a signal detection paradigm.

Three experiments are reported which investigated the informational properties of novel and complex stimuli. Irrelevant visual stimuli varying in novelty and complexity were employed as noise in an auditory signal detection task. Signal detection increased over the time of exposure of the visual stimuli, suggesting that the amount of information being processed from a stimulus is a function of its novelty. The judged complexity of the stimulus did not systematically influence signal detection. The investigations employed both within‐ and between‐subjects experimental designs.

Effect of irrelevant peripheral visual stimuli on discrimination learning in minimally brain-damaged children.

Effect of irrelevant peripheral visual stimuli on discrimination learning in minimally brain-damaged children.