A field study has been performed which assessed the effectiveness of two warning sounds under realistic factory conditions. The thirty subjects were press operators who were involved in their regular work activities during the course of the experiment. The noise levels at their work stations were in the range 85 to 95 dB(A). The warning sound, plus four other irrelevant sounds, each at one of five different intensities, were presented via a loudspeaker in random order and at random time intervals (mean inter-stimulus interval, 30 s; range, 10 to 50 s). The influence of the factors hearing level and age of the subjects and use of hearing protection were investigated. The results showed significant differences between the intentional and incidental warning sounds investigated. Whilst the perception of the intentional horn warning sound was unaffected by the hearing sensitivity of the subjects and the wearing of hearing protectors, these two factors had a significant effect on the perception, as a warning, of the clinking sound of metal components. Subjects classified as having a substantial hearing loss perceived, on average, 18 percent fewer clinking sounds than those subjects with normal hearing or a mild hearing loss and, when wearing hearing protectors, the subjects overall perceived, on average, 9 percent fewer clinks. It is of note that the results of the field study differ from those of earlier laboratory-based experiments in finding that the distinctive intentional warning sound was not entirely reliable as a warning, even at levels substantially above its masked threshold, and in observing more than double the adverse effect of wearing hearing protection.