Iron-depleted Cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton Broth Research Articles

A multicenter performance evaluation of cefiderocol MIC results: ComASP in comparison to CLSI broth microdilution.

There are very limited commercial methods available to clinical laboratories for cefiderocol minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing. The Compact Antimicrobial Susceptibility Panel (ComASP) Cefiderocol method includes iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth, which eliminates variability in cefiderocol MIC results based on iron levels. The lyophilized multi-well format of ComASP also provides for room temperature storage. In comparison to what an individual lab may do for method verification, this multi-site, multi-isolate study provides a robust evaluation and greater assurance to clinical microbiologists of the method's accurate and reproducible performance.

Real-world performance of susceptibility testing for cefiderocol: insights from a prospective multicentre study on Gram-negative bacteria.

Cefiderocol is a novel siderophore-conjugated cephalosporin developed for the treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial (GNB) infections. However, the current gold standard for cefiderocol susceptibility testing, broth microdilution (BMD) using iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth, presents challenges for many microbiology laboratories. In this study, we evaluate the real-world performance of disc diffusion (DD) and a commercial BMD method (ComASP®) to test cefiderocol susceptibility in a series of isolates collected prospectively from severely ill patients in a multicentre study. The susceptibilities of 1472 isolates (632 Enterobacterales, 532 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 84 Acinetobacter spp. and 224 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia) collected in 60 Spanish hospitals were analysed following the EUCAST 2023 and 2024 criteria. We assessed the performance of DD (cefiderocol 30 μg disc, Liofilchem) and a commercial BMD method (ComASP® Cefiderocol, Liofilchem). A total of 1408 and 1450 isolates were susceptible by DD and ComASP® BMD, respectively. Overall, the agreement between both methods was 96.9%. Forty-four isolates were resistant by DD but susceptible by ComASP® BMD, and two were susceptible by DD but resistant by ComASP® BMD (Acinetobacter baumannii isolates). Adoption of the updated 2024 EUCAST DD breakpoints and areas of technical uncertainty (ATUs) led to a decrease in susceptibility among Enterobacterales (95.3% versus 92.6%). DD is a straightforward, rapid and accessible method for routine determination of cefiderocol susceptibility in real-world practice. ComASP® BMD shows a high agreement with DD in susceptible isolates and may help to resolve DD interpretability concerns in isolates with susceptibility results within the ATU, but caution is warranted when testing resistant isolates.

Surveillance of In Vitro Activity of Cefiderocol Against Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Clinical Isolates in a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Antibiotic resistance among Gram-negative bacterial isolates is increasingly observed. With the emergence of carbapenem-resistant and pan-resistant pathogens, treating these resistant infections is becoming more challenging due to the limited number of effective drugs. There is a desperate need for the discovery of new antibiotics with novel mechanisms of action. Cefiderocol is one such novel antibiotic with a unique siderophore-based mechanism of action, which has been recently approved for clinical use against drug-resistant pathogens. The present study aims to identify the in vitro activity of cefiderocol against major carbapenem-resistant clinical isolates, including those resistant to colistin. One hundred and one carbapenem-resistant clinical isolates were included in the study. Identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing were performed using the automated VITEK® 2 Compact (bioMérieux SA, Marcy-l'Étoile, France) identification and susceptibility testing system, except for colistin and cefiderocol. Colistin resistance in Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa was assessed using the agar dilution minimum inhibitory concentration method, while for Acinetobacter baumannii, broth microdilution method was employed. Cefiderocol susceptibility testing was conducted using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method with 30 µg discs on standard Mueller-Hinton agar plates. For selected isolates, cefiderocol minimum inhibitory concentration detection was performed using broth microdilution with iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth. Of the total 101 isolates, the majority (75, 74.25%) were Enterobacterales which includedKlebsiella pneumonia (42, 41.58%) and Escherichia coli (33, 32.67%), followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (13, 12.87%) and Acinetobacter baumannii (10, 9.9%). Only three (2.97%)of the isolates were Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Most of the isolates were susceptible to cefiderocol, with only four (3.96%) isolates showing resistance. Colistin resistance was observed in six (6.12%) of the isolates. There was a good correlation between disc diffusion testing and broth microdilution testing for the detection of cefiderocol-resistant isolates. No cross-resistance with colistin was observed, as all colistin-resistant isolates were uniformly susceptible to cefiderocol Conclusion: Cefiderocol is highly effective with good in vitro activity against the majority of carbapenem-resistant pathogens. While some isolates do show resistance, it is relatively uncommon. Given its safety profile compared to colistin, cefiderocol can serve as an alternative to colistin to treat carbapenem-resistant infections and it may be considered even for the management of colistin-resistant cases. Disc diffusion testing is a reliable method for identifying cefiderocol-resistant isolates in routine clinical and diagnostic laboratories, especially in resource-limited settings.

2790. Activity of Cefiderocol and Comparator Agents Against Pediatric Isolates of Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus species complex, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia from the SENTRY Surveillance Program (2020-2022)

Abstract Background Cefiderocol (CFDC) is a siderophore cephalosporin with broad activity against Gram-negative bacteria including multi-drug resistant isolates. The in vitro activity of CFDC and comparator agents was evaluated against pediatric (0-17 years old) isolates collected in 2020–2022 as part of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. In vitro Activity of Cefiderocol and Comparator Agents Against Pediatric Isolates Methods 2,249 Enterobacterales (ENT), 707 P. aeruginosa, 194 Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex (ABC) and 220 S. maltophilia from the USA and Europe were tested for susceptibility (%S) by broth microdilution with cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CAMHB). Iron-depleted CAMHB was applied for CFDC. Comparators included newer β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) combinations ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T), imipenem-relebactam (I-R) and meropenem-vaborbactam (MVB) as well as ampicillin/sulbactam (SAM) meropenem (MEM) and colistin (CST). %S was interpreted according to 2023 CLSI & EUCAST breakpoints. Carbapenem non-susceptible (CarbNS) was defined as non-susceptibility to imipenem and MEM. Results All agents displayed >96 %S for ENT while CFDC (MIC50/90, 2/4 mg/L; 91.7 %S) was the most active agent against CarbNS ENT. P. aeruginosa susceptibilities to CFDC and BL/BLI combinations were >97.0%. CFDC was the most potent agent against CarbNS P. aeruginosa with MIC50/90 values of 0.12/0.25 mg/L and 100 %S & 98.5 %S per CLSI & EUCAST breakpoints, respectively. ABC susceptibility to CFDC was >97% per CLSI & EUCAST while the susceptibility for MEM was 87.1% (CLSI & EUCAST) and SAM was 80.9% (CLSI). CFDC (MIC50/90, 0.25/1 mg/L; 95.7 %S) displayed better in vitro potency in CarbNS ABC as compared to SAM (MIC50/90, 32/ >64 mg/L; 17.4 %S CLSI) and CST (MIC50/90, 0.5/ >8 mg/L; 78.3%S EUCAST). Among pediatric S. maltophilia, CFDC was the most active agent with MIC50/90, 0.06/0.25 and 100 %S per CLSI & EUCAST breakpoints. Conclusion CFDC was a highly active β-lactam against contemporary pediatric isolates of Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa, ABC, and S. maltophilia, including CarbNS subsets for which treatment options are limited. These data suggest CFDC may be a valuable treatment for serious Gram-negative infections in pediatric patients. Disclosures Sean T. Nguyen, PharmD, Shionogi: Employee|Shionogi, Inc: Employee Boudewijn L. DeJonge, PhD, Shionogi Inc.: Employee Jason J. Bryowsky, PharmD, MS, Shionogi Inc.: Employee Anne Henriksen, PhD, Shionogi: Employee Christopher M. Longshaw, PhD, Shionogi BV: Employee Joshua Maher, PhD, AbbVie: Grant/Research Support|Affinity Biosensors: Grant/Research Support|AimMax Therapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Alterity Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Amicrobe, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Arietis Pharma: Grant/Research Support|Armata Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Astrellas Pharma, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Basilea Pharmaceutica AG: Grant/Research Support|Becton Dickinson And Company: Grant/Research Support|bioMerieux, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Boost Biomes: Grant/Research Support|Diamond V: Grant/Research Support|Fedora Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Iterum Therapeutics plc: Grant/Research Support|Johnson & Johnson: Grant/Research Support|Kaleido Biosciences, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Meiji Seika Pharma Co. Ltd.: Grant/Research Support|National Institutes of Health: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Roche Holding AG: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Summmit Therapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Zoetis Inc: Grant/Research Support Rodrigo E. Mendes, PhD, AbbVie: Grant/Research Support|Basilea: Grant/Research Support|Cipla: Grant/Research Support|Entasis: Grant/Research Support|GSK: Grant/Research Support|Paratek: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Grant/Research Support Miki Takemura, n/a, Shionogi & Co., Ltd.: Stocks/Bonds Yoshinori Yamano, PhD, Shionogi HQ: Employee

2761. Activity of Cefiderocol and Comparator Agents Against Achromobacter and Burkholderia Isolates, Collected During 2020-2022 as Part of SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program

Abstract Background Achromobacter and Burkholderia species are opportunistic pathogens in individuals with an immunodeficiency, most notably cystic fibrosis. Cefiderocol (CFDC) is a siderophore-conjugated cephalosporin with broad activity against Gram-negative bacteria. In this study, the activity of CFDC and comparator agents was determined against isolates of Achromobacter and Burkholderia cepacia species complex, collected in 2020–2022 in Europe and the USA as part of the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program. Activity of cefiderocol and comparator agents against Achromobacter and Burkholderia Isolates Methods Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined according to CLSI guidelines against 167 Achromobacter and 160 Burkholderia cepacia species complex isolates, using broth microdilution with cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CAMHB) for comparator agents and iron-depleted CAMHB for CFDC. Comparator agents included β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, imipenem-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, piperacillin-tazobactam, as well as meropenem, ceftazidime, levofloxacin, amikacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and minocycline. Susceptibility was assessed for agents with CLSI breakpoints. For agents without established CLSI breakpoints, only MIC50, MIC90 and MIC ranges were reported. Results CFDC was the most potent agent tested against Achromobacter, showing MIC50 and MIC90 values of 0.03 and 0.25 µg/mL and all isolates were inhibited at ≤4 µg/mL (Table). Isolates from cystic fibrosis patients (n=15) showed higher MIC50 and MIC90 values for most agents, but CFDC MIC50 and MIC90 values remained low (0.06 and 0.25 µg/mL, respectively). Against Burkholderia cepacia species complex, CFDC was the most potent agent tested, with MIC50 and MIC90 values of 0.06 and 0.5 µg/mL, and 156 out of 160 isolates inhibited at ≤4 µg/mL. None of the comparator agents showed >90% susceptibility against these isolates (Table). Conclusion CFDC showed potent activity against a set of contemporary clinical Achromobacter and Burkholderia cepacia species complex isolates. These in vitro data suggest that CFDC could be an important treatment option for infections caused by these opportunistic pathogens. Disclosures Boudewijn L. DeJonge, PhD, Shionogi Inc.: Employee Sean T. Nguyen, PharmD, Shionogi: Employee|Shionogi, Inc: Employee Jason J. Bryowsky, PharmD, MS, Shionogi Inc.: Employee Christopher M. Longshaw, PhD, Shionogi BV: Employee Joshua Maher, PhD, AbbVie: Grant/Research Support|Affinity Biosensors: Grant/Research Support|AimMax Therapeutics, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Alterity Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Amicrobe, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Arietis Pharma: Grant/Research Support|Armata Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Astrellas Pharma, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Basilea Pharmaceutica AG: Grant/Research Support|Becton Dickinson And Company: Grant/Research Support|bioMerieux, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Boost Biomes: Grant/Research Support|Diamond V: Grant/Research Support|Fedora Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Iterum Therapeutics plc: Grant/Research Support|Johnson & Johnson: Grant/Research Support|Kaleido Biosciences, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Meiji Seika Pharma Co. Ltd.: Grant/Research Support|National Institutes of Health: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Roche Holding AG: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Summmit Therapeutics, Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Zoetis Inc: Grant/Research Support Rodrigo E. Mendes, PhD, AbbVie: Grant/Research Support|Basilea: Grant/Research Support|Cipla: Grant/Research Support|Entasis: Grant/Research Support|GSK: Grant/Research Support|Paratek: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Grant/Research Support Miki Takemura, n/a, Shionogi & Co., Ltd.: Stocks/Bonds Yoshinori Yamano, PhD, Shionogi HQ: Employee

Assessment of cefiderocol disk diffusion versus broth microdilution results when tested against Acinetobacter baumannii complex clinical isolates.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between inhibitory zones and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) when testing cefiderocol against Acinetobacter baumannii complex using disk diffusion and the broth microdilution (BMD) method according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) criteria. Four-hundred and sixty-eight non-duplicated A. baumannii complex clinical isolates were collected from 56 hospitals of the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network from 2019 to 2021. BMD using iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (ID-CAMHB) and standard disk diffusion methods were performed according to CLSI guidelines. Results were interpreted according to the CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints. Categorical agreement (CA), minor error (mE), major error (ME), and very major error (VME) were calculated for disk diffusion methods. The susceptibilities of all A. baumannii complex isolates by BMD were 98.7% (CLSI) and 97.6% (EUCAST). For all A. baumannii complex isolates, CA was 98.1% (CLSI) and 97.0% (EUCAST), with 0.9% (CLSI) and 1.9% (EUCAST) of VME, respectively. For the carbapenem-susceptible A. baumannii complex, the CA was 100%, with no mE or VME using both CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints. For carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii complex, CA was 97.5% (CLSI) and 96.2% (EUCAST), with 1.1% (CLSI) and 2.5% (EUCAST) of VME, respectively. Regarding the difficult-to-treat resistance A. baumannii complex isolates, CA was 97.6% (CLSI) and 95.7% (EUCAST), with 1.2% (CLSI) and 3.1% (EUCAST) of VME, respectively. Cefiderocol disk diffusion was difficult to assess in this study. Very few isolates were resistant to cefiderocol by BMD using CLSI breakpoint, and these were categorized as susceptible with the disk diffusion test. This study did, however, show that the main proportion of A. baumannii isolates were susceptible to cefiderocol by BMD, including carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii. IMPORTANCE Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii is a major global health concern due to its high prevalence and limited treatment options. Cefiderocol is the only novel Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved β-lactam agent for the salvage treatment of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii infection. Currently, a commercial automated susceptibility testing panel of cefiderocol is unavailable. Both the preparation of iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth and the performance of broth microdilution are cumbersome in routine microbiology laboratories. A disk diffusion method is convenient for cefiderocol antimicrobial susceptibility testing, but limited data are available specifically for A. baumannii clinical isolates. Moreover, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute published revisions to the A. baumannii cefiderocol disk diffusion breakpoints in 2022. Hence, we evaluated the performance of cefiderocol disk diffusion compared with the reference BMD against A. baumannii clinical isolates, especially those with cefiderocol zone diameters ≤ 14 mm.

In vitro activity of cefiderocol against Pseudomonas aeruginosa demonstrating evolved resistance to novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors.

Cefiderocol demonstrates excellent activity against MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa; however, the activity against isolates from patients previously treated with β-lactam agents is unknown. We aimed to determine the activity of cefiderocol against P. aeruginosa collected before and after treatment with traditional β-lactams and new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors. Cefiderocol MICs were determined in triplicate in iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth and compared with β-lactam MICs tested by standard methods. All isolates underwent WGS analysis to identify mutations associated with resistance. One hundred and seventy-eight P. aeruginosa isolates were evaluated; 48% (86/178) were non-susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam and/or imipenem/relebactam. The cefiderocol MIC50 and MIC90 were 0.12 and 1 mg/L, respectively. Median cefiderocol MICs did not vary against isolates classified as MDR, XDR, or those non-susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam and/or imipenem/relebactam when compared with non-MDR isolates. Against isolates collected from patients previously treated with ceftolozane/tazobactam, cefiderocol MICs were increased 4-fold compared with baseline. Cross-resistance to cefiderocol was identified in 21% (3/14) of patients who developed treatment-emergent resistance to ceftolozane/tazobactam. Overall, 6% (11/178) of isolates demonstrated cefiderocol MICs ≥2 mg/L, which were disproportionately collected from patients previously treated with ceftolozane/tazobactam (73%; 8/11). Isolates with reduced cefiderocol susceptibility harboured mutations in ampC, tonB-dependent receptors, the response regulator pirR and ftsI. Cefiderocol demonstrates excellent in vitro activity against P. aeruginosa isolates exposed to other novel β-lactam agents; however, some exceptions were identified. Cross-resistance between cefiderocol and ceftolozane/tazobactam was evident, but not with ceftazidime/avibactam or imipenem/relebactam. Reduced cefiderocol susceptibility was mediated by mutations in ampC and tonB-dependent receptors.

1715. In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Cefiderocol against Difficult-to-treat Resistant (DTR) Gram-negative Pathogens in United States from SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program in 2020/2021

Abstract Background Difficult-to-treat resistant (DTR) isolates are defined as resistance to all first-line high-efficacy, low-toxicity antibiotics (penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems and quinolones), leaving physicians with limited treatment options. Cefiderocol (CFDC) is a siderophore cephalosporin with activity against a wide variety of Gram-negative bacteria, including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and non-fermenters. We evaluated the in vitro activity of cefiderocol against DTR isolates collected in United States as part of SENTRY surveillance program in 2020 and 2021. In vitro susceptibility of cefiderocol and comparator agents to DTR isolates Methods Susceptibility testing was performed by broth microdilution according to CLSI guidelines. All antibiotics were tested in cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CAMHB) except for CFDC, for which iron-depleted CAMHB was used. Susceptibility rate (%) was determined according to CLSI breakpoints, and DTR pathogens were defined as being resistant to cefepime, ceftazidime ceftriaxone (only for Enterobacterales), imipenem, meropenem, ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin according to CLSI/FDA breakpoints. Results Among a total of 8,328 Enterobacterales, 2,241 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and 586 Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-baumannii complex (ACB) clinical isolates from the United States, 50 Enterobacterales (0.6%), 36 P. aeruginosa (1.6%) and 114 ACB (19.5%) isolates showed a DTR phenotype, respectively. CFDC demonstrated its potent in vitro activity against these DTR isolates with MIC90 of ≤4 μg/mL with a susceptibility rate of ≥92% except for DTR ACB based on FDA breakpoint (75.4%). In contrast, MIC90s of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination drugs showed lower activity (Table). Conclusion Cefiderocol demonstrated potent in vitro activity against DTR isolates of Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa and ACB, indicating cefiderocol has high potential for treating infections caused by these difficult-to-treat strains. Disclosures Yoshinori Yamano, PhD, Shionogi: Employee Miki Takemura, n/a, Shionogi: Employee Dee Shortridge, PhD, AbbVie: Grant/Research Support|JMI Laboratory: Employee|Melinta: Grant/Research Support|Menarini: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Grant/Research Support Christine M. Slover, PharmD, Shionogi: Employee Christopher M. Longshaw, PhD, Shionogi: Employee Roger Echols, MD, Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant Roger Echols, MD, Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant Roger Echols, MD, Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant.

660. In vitro activity of cefiderocol against difficult-to-treat resistance European Gram-negative bacterial pathogens from the multi-national sentinel surveillance study, SENTRY in 2020 and 2021

Abstract Background Difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) organisms are defined as non-susceptible to all first-line high-efficacy, low-toxicity antibiotics (penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems and fluoroquinolones), leaving physicians with limited treatment options. Cefiderocol is a parenteral siderophore cephalosporin with potent activity against aerobic Gram-negative pathogens, including carbapenem-resistant strains. We evaluated the in vitro activity of cefiderocol and comparators against DTR pathogens collected in Europe by the SENTRY surveillance study in 2020 and 2021. Methods A total of 11434 clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacilli were systematically collected from 16 EU countries, Israel and Turkey in 2020 and 2021. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined by broth microdilution for a panel of twenty-two antibiotics according to CLSI guidelines. All antibiotics were tested in cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CAMHB) except for cefiderocol, for which iron-depleted CAMHB was used. Susceptibility was determined according to CLSI breakpoints, and DTR pathogens were defined as being resistant to cefepime, ceftazidime ceftriaxone, imipenem, meropenem, ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin according to CLSI breakpoints. Results Among 11434 Gram-negative isolates collected in 2020 and 2021, 792 (7.0%) were resistant to all 1st line therapy including cephalosporins, carbapenems and fluoroquinolone and could be defined as DTR. DTR was most frequently observed in Acinetobacter spp. (530/931, 56.9%), Enterobacterales (201/7739, 2.6%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (61/2440, 2.5. Based on CLSI breakpoints, cefiderocol was the most active antibiotic tested against DTR-Acinetobacter spp. (MIC90= 2mg/L, 97.4% susceptibility). Ampicillin/sulbactam was active in less than 1% of the DTR-Acinetobacter spp isolates. None of the drugs recommended by the IDSA for the treatment of resistant Gram-negative infections were as potent as cefiderocol (Table 1). Conclusion Cefiderocol was the only treatment option with demonstrated in vitro activity against more than 95% of all the tested DTR Gram-negative pathogens with limited treatment options. Disclosures Anne Laurence Santerre Henriksen, PhD, Shionogi: Contractor|UTILITY therapeutics Ltd: Advisor/Consultant Christopher M. Longshaw, PhD, Shionogi: Employee Dee Shortridge, PhD, AbbVie: Grant/Research Support|JMI Laboratory: Employee|Melinta: Grant/Research Support|Menarini: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Grant/Research Support Jennifer M. Streit, BS, MT(ASCP), Cidara: Grant/Research Support|GSK: Grant/Research Support|Melinta: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Grant/Research Support Miki Takemura, n/a, Shionogi: Employee Yoshinori Yamano, PhD, Shionogi: Employee.

1721. In Vitro Activity of Cefiderocol against IMP-Producing Enterobacterales Isolated in Japan

Abstract Background Beta-lactam resistance is a major worldwide concern. Metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) are a group of enzymes that can inactivate most commonly used β-lactam antibiotics including carbapenems and are not affected by new β-lactamase inhibitors. Therefore, treating infections caused by MBL producing strains is difficult. Imipenemase (IMP) type MBL is a rare family of acquired carbapenemases detected from Enterobacterales globally, however, it has been detected and become a major therapeutic concern in clinical settings mainly in East Asia including Japan [1]. Cefiderocol (CFDC) is a novel injectable siderophore cephalosporin antibiotic with potent activity against a wide variety of carbapenem resistant strains including both serine- and metallo-type carbapenemase-producers. We evaluated in vitro activity of CFDC and comparator agents against IMP-producing Enterobacterales isolated in Japan. Methods A total of 150 IMP-producing strains consisting of 48 Escherichia coli, 34 Klebsiella pneumoniae, 29 Klebsiella oxytoca, 21 Enterobacter cloacae, 7 Citrobacter freundii, 7 Serratia marcescens, 2 Providencia rettgeri, 1 Klebsiella aerogenes, and 1 Morganella morganii were tested. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for CFDC, ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T), imipenem-relebactam (I-R), meropenem (MEM), and amikacin (AMK) by broth microdilution according to CLSI guidelines. CFDC was tested in iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth. Results MIC50 and MIC90 of CFDC were 0.25 and 1 µg/mL, respectively. MICs of CFDC for all tested strains ranged from ≤ 0.03 to 4 µg/mL, which showed all strains were susceptible to CFDC based on the CLSI breakpoint (≤ 4 µg/mL). On the other hand, MIC90s of CZA, C/T, I-R, MEM, and AMK were > 32/4, > 32/4, 8/4, > 32, and 4 µg/mL, respectively. The susceptibilities were 98.0% for AMK, 66.0% for I-R, and < 10% for CZA, C/T and MEM. Conclusion CFDC had potent in vitro activity against IMP-producing Enterobacterales collected from Japan, indicating CFDC has high potential for treating infections caused by these difficult-to-treat strains. Reference: 1. Logan, LK. et al., J Infect Dis. 2017 Feb 15;215(suppl 1):S28-S36. Disclosures Hidenori Yamashiro, Shionogi & Co., Ltd.: Employee Ryuichiro Nakai, n/a, Shionogi TechnoAdvance Research CO., LTD.: Employee Miki Takemura, n/a, Shionogi: Employee Yoshinori Yamano, PhD, Shionogi: Employee.

1734. Susceptibility of Cefiderocol between US Census Regions against Gram-Negative Organisms collected from the SENTRY Surveillance Program: 2020-2021

Abstract Background Cefiderocol (CFDC) is a siderophore-conjugated cephalosporin with broad activity against Gram-negative (GN) bacteria, including multidrug-resistant organisms. GN bacteria such as Enterobacterales (ENT), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PsA), Acinetobacter baumannii complex (ABC), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (StM) can be challenging to treat and are often carbapenem-resistant (CR). Regional susceptibility of CFDC and comparators were investigated against US GN isolates collected in 2020-2021 as part of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. Methods GN pathogens were consecutively collected from 32 US hospitals between 2020 to 2021. Susceptibility testing was performed using the broth microdilution method. CFDC was tested in iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth. FDA or CLSI breakpoints were used where available. Other agents tested included the beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) combinations ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, imipenem-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, piperacillin-tazobactam, and ampicillin-sulbactam. CR-PsA, or CRAB was defined as meropenem resistant while CRE was defined as imipenem or meropenem resistant by CLSI breakpoints. Results A total of 8328 ENT, 2241 PsA, 586 ABC, and 404 StM were collected. For ENT and PsA, CFDC susceptibility between the 9 US Census regions remained above 98% susceptible by CLSI or FDA breakpoints in all regions (Table 1). Amongst the BL/BLI combinations, the majority had >90% susceptibility across regions except for piperacillin-tazobactam with 79.7% for ENT and 65.9% for PsA in the MidAtlantic by FDA breakpoints. For ABC and StM, CFDC susceptibility was > 88% across all regions. For CR pathogens, 96 CRE, 327 CR-PsA, and 199 CRAB were collected. CFDC had >87.5% susceptibility in all regions for CRE and CR-PSA. For CRAB, 4 regions were > 87.5% by FDA breakpoints and the lowest was 63.6% in 11 isolates in the Mountain region (Table 2). For CRAB, every BL/BLI had susceptibility ≤27.3% in every region. Ampicillin-sulbactam had 27.3% susceptibility in the Mountain region. Table 1 Susceptibility of Cefiderocol against Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii complex and Stenotrophomonas maltiphilia isolates in the cefiderocol program collected from medical centers in the USA Table 2: Susceptibility of cefiderocol against CRE, CR Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and CR Acinetobacter baumannii complex isolates in the cefiderocol program collected from medical centers in the USA Conclusion US GN isolates, including CR pathogens, had high susceptibilities to CFDC across the US census regions. CFDC remains an important treatment option for GN infections in all US census regions. Disclosures Frank H. Kung, PhD, Shionogi Inc: Employee Sean Nguyen, n/a, Shionogi: Employee Christine M. Slover, PharmD, Shionogi: Employee Dee Shortridge, PhD, AbbVie: Grant/Research Support|JMI Laboratory: Employee|Melinta: Grant/Research Support|Menarini: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Grant/Research Support Jennifer M. Streit, BS, MT(ASCP), Cidara: Grant/Research Support|GSK: Grant/Research Support|Melinta: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Grant/Research Support Roger Echols, MD, Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant Roger Echols, MD, Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant Roger Echols, MD, Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant Miki Takemura, n/a, Shionogi: Employee Yoshinori Yamano, PhD, Shionogi: Employee.

In vitro Activity of Cefiderocol and Comparators against Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens from France and Belgium.

Infections with carbapenem-resistant (CR) Gram-negative (GN) pathogens have increased in many countries worldwide, leaving only few therapeutic options. Cefiderocol (CFDC) is approved in Europe for the treatment of aerobic GN infections in adults with limited treatment options. This study evaluated the in vitro activity of cefiderocol and comparators against multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria including meropenem-resistant (MR) or pandrug-resistant (PR) GN clinical isolates from France and Belgium. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of CFDC were determined by broth microdilution, using iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller–Hinton broth, and were compared to those of 10 last-line antibiotics. The MICs were interpreted according to EUCAST and CLSI breakpoints, and in the absence of species-specific breakpoints, non-species-related pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic breakpoints were used. Among the 476 isolates tested, 322 were carbapenemase producers (CP), 58 non-CP-CRs, 52 intrinsically CR, 41 expanded-spectrum cephalosporin resistant and 5 were multi-susceptible. Susceptibility to CFDC was high using EUCAST breakpoints 81%, 99% and 84%, and was even higher using CLSI breakpoints to 93%, 100% and 88% for Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii, respectively. Susceptibility to cefiderocol using non-species-related breakpoints for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Achromobacter xylosoxydans and Burkholderia cepacia, was 100%, 100% and 92.3%, respectively. The susceptibility rates were lower with the NDM producers, with values of 48% and 30% using EUCAST breakpoints and 81% and 50% using CLSI breakpoints for Enterobacterales and Acinetobacter spp, respectively. CFDC demonstrated high in vitro susceptibility rates against a wide range of MDR GN pathogens, including MR and PR isolates.

Analysis of In Vitro Activity of Cefiderocol Against Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli by Broth Microdilution and Disk Diffusion Method: A Single-Center Study in Odisha, India

IntroductionCefiderocol (CFDC), a novel semi-synthetic siderophore cephalosporin has been developed to combat the menace of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (CR-GNB) including Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and Carbapenem-resistant Nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli (CR-NFGNB).MethodsWe determined the in vitro activity of CFDC against a contemporary collection of 503 CR-GNB isolates by the reference broth microdilution method (BMD) using Iron depleted cation adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (ID-CAMHB). Performance of CFDC disk diffusion (DD) was evaluated against the reference BMD, as an alternative convenient testing method. Molecular characterization of carbapenemase in CR-GNB was performed by PCR targeting blaNDM-1, blaOXA-48like alleles, blaKPC, blaIMP, and, blaVIM. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distribution of CFDC in CR-GNB harbouring different carbapenemase enzymes was also analyzed.ResultsIn our study, 81.7% (411/503) of CR-GNB isolates [81.3%, (278/342) CRE and 82.6% (133/161) CR-NFGNB] were susceptible to CFDC (p>0.05). Categorical agreement (CA) of DD ranged from 79.8% to 87.5%, Minor error (mE) ranged from 0 to 14%, Major error (ME) ranged from 0 to 3.5%, and Very Major error (VME) ranged from 0 to 12.5% with variations by species tested. Overall CFDC MIC50 and MIC90 values of CR-GNB isolates without any carbapenemase genes were higher as compared to those with the presence of carbapenemase genes (4 µg/mL and 128 µg/mL versus 2 µg/mL and 16 µg/mL respectively).DiscussionCFDC is not yet available for clinical use in India. Hence, multicentric studies are the need of the hour in India for standardization of CFDC susceptibility using disks and CAMHB from different manufacturers as well as understanding mechanisms of high MIC values.

Assessment of In Vitro Cefiderocol Susceptibility and Comparators against an Epidemiologically Diverse Collection of Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical Isolates.

Cefiderocol is a catechol-substituted siderophore cephalosporin combining rapid penetration into the periplasmic space with increased stability against β-lactamases. This study provides additional data on the in vitro antimicrobial activity of cefiderocol and commercially available comparators against an epidemiologically diverse collection of Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates. Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested using pre-prepared frozen 96-well microtiter plates containing twofold serial dilutions of: cefepime, ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam, ampicillin/sulbactam, meropenem, meropenem/vaborbactam, ciprofloxacin, minocycline, tigecycline, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and colistin using the standard broth microdilution procedure in cation-adjusted Mueller–Hinton broth (CAMHB). For cefiderocol, iron-depleted CAMHB was used. A collection of 113 clinical strains of A. baumannii isolated from Argentina, Azerbaijan, Croatia, Greece, Italy, Morocco, Mozambique, Peru and Spain were included. The most active antimicrobial agents against our collection were colistin and cefiderocol, with 12.38% and 21.23% of non-susceptibility, respectively. A high proportion of multidrug-resistant (76.77%) and carbapenem-resistant (75.28%) A. baumannii isolates remained susceptible to cefiderocol, which was clearly superior to novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. Cefiderocol-resistance was higher among carbapenem-resistant isolates and isolates belonging to ST2, but could not be associated with any particular resistance mechanism or clonal lineage. Our data suggest that cefiderocol is a good alternative to treat infections caused by MDR A. baumanni, including carbapenem-resistant strains.

1287. Double Disk Diffusion Study to Evaluate the Synergistic Effect Between Cefiderocol and Ceftazidime-Avibactam Against Cefiderocol-Non-susceptible Acinetobacter baumannii

Abstract Background Cefiderocol (CFDC), a siderophore cephalosporin, has broad coverage of Gram-negative bacteria and has been approved for clinical use in USA and Europe. The SIDERO-WT surveillance studies showed that CFDC shows >95% susceptibility against Acinetobacter baumannii. Against many of CFDC non-susceptible isolates, most of which had blaPER gene, the combination use of avibactam significantly decreased the MIC by broth microdilution (BMD). In this study, we evaluated the appropriate methodology to evaluate the synergistic effect by disk diffusion studies. Methods The susceptibility testing was conducted as recommended by the CLSI using CFDC non-susceptible isolates (MIC of >4 µg/mL based on CLSI breakpoint). The MIC by BMD was determined using iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth, in the presence or absence of 4 µg/mL of avibactam. The disk diffusion was evaluated using Mueller-Hinton agar, and the synergy was evaluated by using disk stacking methods. For disk stacking methods, CFDC disk was placed on agar on which bacterial suspension of 0.5 McFarland units was spread, then the ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) disks was stacked on the top, followed by adding a drop (30 µL) of saline on the stacked disks. As an alternative method, CZA was immersed in saline for 1 second instead of adding a drop of saline, followed by the stacking on the top. The disk zone size was determined after 24-hour incubation at 37°C. Results Against blaPER-positive A. baumannii which showed >64 µg/mL MIC of CFDC and CZA, CFDC MIC decreased to 0.25 µg/mL in the presence of avibactam. The disk diffusion methods also showed isolates resistant to CFDC and CZA and showed susceptiblilty disk zone to CFDC by stacking both disks. On the other hand, against blaNDM-positive A. baumannii which showed 64 µg/mL MIC of CFDC and CZA, the disk diffusion methods showed resistance even when stacking both disks. Against multiple isolates, the MIC of CFDC without or with avibactam was correlated well with the disk zone produced by CFDC disk alone or stacked with CZA disks, respectively (Figure). Conclusion The synergistic effect between CFDC and avibactam by BMD methods could be detected by disk stacking methodology using CFDC and CZA disks. Disclosures Yoshinori Yamano, PhD, Shionogi (Employee) Miki Takemura, MS, SHIONOGI & CO., LTD. (Employee) Roger Echols, MD, Shionogi (Consultant) Christopher Longshaw, PhD, Shionogi (Employee)

In vitro activity of cefiderocol and comparators against isolates of Gram-negative bacterial pathogens from a range of infection sources: SIDERO‑WT‑2014−2018 studies in Spain

The incidence of antimicrobial resistance in Europe is rising. Cefiderocol is approved in Europe for treatment of aerobic Gram-negative bacterial (GNB) infections in adults with limited treatment options. We report the in vitro activity of cefiderocol versus comparators against GNB clinical isolates from Spain. MICs were determined by broth microdilution according to International Organization for Standardization guidelines. Cefiderocol was tested using iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth. Susceptibility rates were based on EUCAST breakpoints; if a species-specific breakpoint was unavailable, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic breakpoints were used. Of 2303 isolates [1502 (65.2%) Enterobacterales and 801 (34.8%) non-fermenters], 2260 (98.1%) were susceptible to cefiderocol compared with 80.8-86.9% for comparators. By infection source, susceptibility to cefiderocol ranged from 97.3% (721/741) in isolates from patients with nosocomial pneumonia to 98.9% (349/353) in bloodstream infection isolates and was greater than susceptibility to comparators (70.7-93.6% across infection sources). Overall, 368/2303 isolates (16.0%) were meropenem-resistant. A high proportion of meropenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii [169/175 (96.6%)] and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [48/50 (96.0%)] were cefiderocol-susceptible, similar to colistin [169/175 (96.6%) and 47/50 (94.0%), respectively] but higher than ceftazidime/avibactam [26/175 (14.9%) and 20/50 (40.0%), respectively] and ceftolozane/tazobactam [17/175 (9.7%) and 25/50 (50.0%), respectively]. All meropenem-resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates [120/120 (100%)] were cefiderocol-susceptible, including one trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole-resistant isolate, with fewer susceptible to colistin [86/120 (71.7%)], ceftazidime/avibactam [42/120 (35.0%)] and ceftolozane/tazobactam [35/120 (29.2%)]. A high proportion of clinical isolates from Spain, representing a wide range of pathogens across multiple infection sources, were susceptible to cefiderocol. Cefiderocol retained activity against meropenem-resistant isolates.

1455. Potential Mechanisms of Cefiderocol MIC Increase in Enterobacterales in In Vitro Resistance Acquisition Studies

BackgroundCefiderocol (CFDC) is a novel siderophore, iron-chelating cephalosporin, which is transported into bacteria via iron transporters. CFDC has potent in vitro and in vivo activity against all aerobic Gram-negative bacteria, including carbapenem-resistant strains. To date, clinical isolates with cefiderocol MIC >4 µg/mL have been found infrequently, in which the presence of a few β-lactamases or altered iron transport was found. We investigated potential new mechanisms causing CFDC MIC increases in non-clinical studies.MethodsThe mutation positions were determined by whole genome sequencing using four K. pneumoniae mutants including two KPC producers and one NDM producer that had shown CFDC MIC increases in previous in vitro resistance-acquisition studies. The mutant strains were obtained at the frequency of 10-7 to < 10-8 by spreading bacteria on standard Mueller‒Hinton agar medium containing CFDC at concentrations of 10× MIC, with or without apo-transferrin (20 μg/mL). CFDC MIC was determined by broth microdilution using iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth based on Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. The emergence of MIC increase mutants was also assessed by in vitro chemostat models under humanized plasma pharmacokinetic exposures of CFDC.ResultsThe possible resistance mechanisms were investigated. Mutation of baeS or envZ, sensors of two-component regulation systems, were found in three or two mutants among the tested four isolates, respectively, and caused the MIC to increase by 4–32-fold. The altered expression level of specific genes by the baeS or envZ mutation could affect CFDC susceptibility, but the specific genes have not been identified. In addition, the mutation of exbD, an accessory protein related to iron transport, was identified in one case and caused the MIC to increase by >8-fold. In vitro chemostat studies using two isolates (one NDM producer and one KPC producer) showed no resistance acquisition during 24-hour exposure.Table. Overview of mutation emergence in five isolates of K. pneumoniae ConclusionThe mutation of two-component regulation systems (BaeSR and OmpR/EnvZ) and iron transport-related proteins were shown to be possible mechanisms causing CFDC MIC increases, but these mutants did not appear under human exposures.DisclosuresYoshinori Yamano, PhD, Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Employee) Rio Nakamura, BSc, Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Employee) Miki Takemura, MSc, Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Employee) Roger Echols, MD, Shionogi Inc. (Consultant)

1297. In-Vitro Antibacterial Activities of Cefiderocol (S-649266) Alone and With the Addition of Beta-Lactamase Inhibitors Against Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

BackgroundMultidrug-resistant (MDR) infections caused by Acinetobacter baumannii continue to pose a serious public health threat. Cefiderocol (CFDC) is a new parental siderophore cephalosporin that has displayed potent activity against Gram-negative bacteria, more specifically non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli, including A. baumannii. Although uncommon, elevated minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to CFDC have been reported, when tested against A. baumannii isolates, in-vitro. The addition of beta-lactamase inhibitors has been shown to be successful in decreasing elevated CFDC MICs. The evaluation of sulbactam (SUL), tazobactam (TAZO), or clavulanic acid (CLAV) in addition to CFDC against A. baumannii isolates with elevated CFDC MICs, has yet to be reported. The objective of this study was to evaluate the activity of several beta-lactamase inhibitors in combination with CFDC against A. baumannii strains with high CFDC MICs.MethodsOne hundred and fifty carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii strains were selected from the Anti-infective Research Laboratory. MIC susceptibility testing was performed for all of the strains via broth microdilution (BMD). Seven strains that exhibited elevated CFDC MICs,16-32 mg/L, were assessed via BMD, with the addition of the following beta-lactamase inhibitors: TAZO, SUL, AVI, and CLAV to CFDC. All in-vitro testing for CFDC was completed with the use of iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth to ensure the induction of bacterial iron transporters per manufacturer standards.ResultsA decline in elevated CFDC MIC values was observed in six of the seven A. baumannii strains, with the addition of each beta-lactamase inhibitor. AVI showed the most potent activity when added to CFDC, with an average 28- fold reduction in MIC values observed. SUL and CLAV produced similar fold reductions in the MIC values with an average 20-fold reduction observed with the addition of either agent to FDC. The addition of TAZO to CFDC also presented with a decline in MIC values, with an average 7-fold-reduction observed.Cefiderocol (CFDC) strains with MICs of 16-32 mg/l plus Beta-Lactamase Inhibitors ConclusionThe addition of several beta-lactamase inhibitors to CFDC has shown promise in decreasing elevated CFDC MICs. Further research is warranted to determine the role of BLIs on CFDC activity.DisclosuresMichael J. Rybak, PharmD, MPH, PhD, Paratek (Grant/Research Support)

In Vitro Activity of Cefiderocol Against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Clinical Isolates

Background: New antimicrobials are being developed as a response to the global threat of multidrug-resistant and panresistant bacterial pathogens. Cefiderocol (FDC; Shionogi &amp; Co) is a novel parenteral siderophore cephalosporin with activity against gram-negative rods. Here, we report on the in vitro activity of FDC against multidrug-resistant gram-negative isolates collected by the CDC, including isolates available through the CDC and FDA Antibiotic Resistance Isolate Bank (AR Isolate Bank). Methods: The challenge set of gram-negative isolates (n = 339), most of which were obtained from the AR isolate bank (n = 258), comprised 188 Enterobacteriaceae (ENT), 72 Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA), and 79 Acinetobacter baumannii (ACB). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for FDC in iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth were determined using frozen reference broth microdilution panels (IHMA, Schaumburg, IL) according to CLSI guidelines. Isolates displaying nonsusceptibility to FDC (MIC &gt;4 µg/mL) underwent additional testing with β-lactamase inhibitors (FDC with 4 µg/mL avibactam, FDC with 100 µg/ml dipicolinic acid (DPA), and FDC with both 100 µg/mL dipicolinic acid (DPA) and 4 µg/mL avibactam). Results: Cefiderocol MICs ranged from ≤0.03 to &gt;64 µg/mL, and 313 (92.3%) isolates displayed susceptibility to FDC (MIC ≤4 μg/mL). The proportions of susceptible ENT, PSA, and ACB were 93.1%, 94.4%, and 88.6%, respectively. Among isolates harboring Ambler class A, class B, or class D carbapenemases, the proportions of susceptible isolates were 96.5%, 79.5%, and 94.0%, respectively. Overall, 26 (7.7%) isolates were categorized as FDC nonsusceptible (MIC ≥ 8 µg/mL); 65% of these were NDM producers. We selected 23 isolates for testing with β-lactamase inhibitors. The combination FDC-avibactam reduced the MIC to susceptible for all isolates harboring an Ambler class A or D carbapenemase, except for 1 OXA-71–producing ACB and 1 KPC-producing Citrobacter farmeri. The combination FDC-DPA reduced the MIC to susceptible for 9 of 13 (69.2%) NDM-producing and 4 of 4 (100%) OXA-23–producing ACB. By combining FDC with both DPA and avibactam, the MIC was reduced to susceptible (91%) for all but 1 KPC-producing and 1 NDM-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolate. Conclusions: Cefiderocol (FDC) demonstrated potent activity against a diverse collection of multidrug-resistant, gram-negative isolates, including producers of Ambler class A, B, and D carbapenemases. Among the 26 FDC nonsusceptible isolates, 65% were NDM positive. Our data indicate that FDC combined with β-lactamase inhibitors may restore susceptibility in FDC nonsusceptible isolates. Additional studies are needed to understand the underlying mechanism(s) of FDC resistance and to further explore the use of β-lactamase inhibitors in combination with FDC.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

723. Synergistic Effect of Cefiderocol Combined With Other Antibiotics Against Cefiderocol High MIC Isolates From the Multi-National SIDERO-WT Studies

BackgroundCefiderocol (CFDC) is a novel siderophore cephalosporin, which demonstrated potent activity at MICs of ≤4 µg/mL against ≥99% of the Gram-negative clinical isolates, including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae spp. and nonfermenters in a multi-national SIDERO-WT study. In this study, we evaluated the synergistic effects of CFDC combined with other antibiotics against isolates with high CFDC MIC (i.e., ≥8 µg/mL).MethodsThe combination effects of CFDC and other antibiotics were evaluated by several Methods. (1) broth microdilution method in the presence of β-lactamase inhibitors avibactam and/or picolinic acid, (2) checkerboard method or time-kill assays in the presence of amikacin, meropenem, colistin, ceftazidime/avibactam or ceftolozane/tazobactam, (3) chemostat model reproducing humanized antibiotic exposures. Iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller–Hinton broth was used as the standard medium for CFDC as recommended by the Clinical Laboratory and Standard Institute (CLSI).ResultsA total of 39 CFDC nonsusceptible (NS) isolates were found among 9,205 isolates in the SIDERO-WT-2014 study. Among 28 CFDC-NS A. baumannii, 25 isolates were PER producers mainly from Russia and Turkey. Among 9 CFDC-NS Enterobacteriaceae, 5 isolates were NDM-producers from Turkey. Against all 34 non-NDM-producing isolates, the addition of avibactam significantly reduced CFDC MIC. The combination of CFDC with ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam also showed strong synergy against these isolates, presumably due to the effect of β-lactamase inhibition. In addition, CFDC had synergistic effects with meropenem against 42.9% (9 of 21) of carbapenem NS isolates. Against the CFDC-NS isolates, including PER-producing A. baumannii, the combination of CFDC and meropenem under humanized drug exposures (chemostat model) showed synergistic effect leading to sustained eradication of bacteria over 24 hours.ConclusionEven against the non-NDM-producing CFDC-NS isolates, including PER-producing A. baumannii, the combinations of CFDC with ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, or meropenem were effective due to synergistic effects. The mechanism of CFDC-meropenem synergy against A. baumannii is not known.Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.