Ipsilateral Intertrochanteric Fracture Research Articles

Ipsilateral intertrochanter and femoral shaft fracture with a floating knee injury: A case report with management and review of literature

Isolated ipsilateral intertrochanteric fracture with femoral shaft fracture is a rare injury. Similarly, a floating knee injury (ipsilateral fractures of the femur and tibia) is relatively uncommon. We describe a case of 50 year old man with ipsilateral intertrochanteric fracture with the femoral shaft with an ipsilateral floating knee injury.

As an unusual traumatic presentation, acetabular fracture and concomitant ipsilateral intertrochanteric femur fracture: a retrospective case series of 18 patients

BackgroundAcetabular fracture and concomitant ipsilateral intertrochanteric femur fracture has been suggested as an unusual traumatic presentation and rarely reported in the literature. The aims of this study were (1) to identify the etiological characteristics, (2) to summarize the treatment strategy, and (3) to present the mid- to long-term results of patients with this rare traumatic presentation.MethodsIn this retrospective study, 18 patients (15 males, 3 females; mean age = 42.77 ± 17.74 years, range = 16 to 87 years) who were diagnosed and treated for simultaneous acetabular fracture and ipsilateral intertrochanteric fracture were included. Injury mechanisms, fracture classifications, and treatment strategies were noted. To assess functional status, the Harris score was used. To evaluate pain intensity, visual analogous scale (VAS) was used. The reduction quality of acetabular fractures was examined as per Matta’s standard. Postoperative complications were also recorded.ResultsThe mean follow-up was 10.04 ± 3.38 (range = 6.2 to 16 years). The most common injury mechanism was traffic accident, followed by falling from a tall height. As per the Evans classification, intertrochanteric fractures were defined as type 3 in 13 patients, type 2 in one patient, and type 4 in 4 patients. In acetabular fracture site, the most common fractures were posterior wall fractures, followed by anterior column fractures. All patients received internal fixation for their intertrochanteric fractures. Ten out of 18 patients also received internal fixation for their acetabular fracture. However, for the remaining patients, acetabular fractures were treated conservatively or with fracture fragment resection. Bony healing was achieved in all but one patient who died postoperatively. Twelve patients achieved excellent and good results (Harris score ≥ 80 points) whereas five patients achieved fair and poor results (Harris score < 80 points). The proportion of patients who achieved an excellent-good Harris score was 70.6%. Dislocation of the hip was found to be an independent risk factor (HR = 9.194, 95% CI = 1.024-82.515) for the poor patient outcome.ConclusionTo sum up, high-impact trauma is the main cause of acetabular fracture and concomitant ipsilateral intertrochanteric femur fracture. For patients who have undergone surgical treatment, fracture healing is usually achieved. However, the occurrence of complications, especially avascular necrosis, is the major cause of a poor prognosis. Dislocation of the hip joint at the time of injury is considered to be an important risk factor for a poor prognosis.

Advantages and limitations of intramedullary nailing for the surgical treatment of ipsilateral intertrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures: a retrospective comparative study based on propensity score matching.

The aim of the present study was to introduce surgical technique using long PFNA for the treatment of ipsilateral intertrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures, and evaluate the characteristics of this fracture by comparing its surgical outcomes with those of isolated intertrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures. Between March 2013 and December 2018, 38 patients with ipsilateral intertrochanteric and femoral shaft fracture were identified at two institutions. Twenty-eight patients with ipsilateral intertrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures were enrolled in the present study. After propensity score matching, fifty-six patients with isolated intertrochanteric (group B) and femoral shaft (group C) fractures were finally enrolled in the present study for 1:2 matching to compare surgical outcomes to that of ipsilateral intertrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures (Group A). All 28 patients achieved union of intertrochanteric fractures, while two experienced non-union of femoral shaft fractures. The union time of intertrochanteric fractures in group A was significantly shorter than that in group B. The union time of femoral shaft fractures in group A was significantly longer than that in group C. The surgical treatment of ipsilateral intertrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures using long PFNA was advantageous as it allowed both fractures on the same femur to be fixed in one go and showed good surgical outcomes. However, fixation of femoral shaft fractures might be insufficient depending on the fracture level and configuration, and can be a cause of hypertrophic non-union.

Management Of An Additional Trochanteric Fracture On Previously Femoral Shaft Fracture : An Atypical Case Report

Background. Ipsilateral hip and femoral shaft fractures are rare injuries and difficult to manage. Ipsilateral intertrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures occupy one fourth approximately of these injuries. Predominantly, male patients in the fourth decade of their life are suffering these fractures following polytraumatization. A high energy trauma known as the mechanism of these injury, in contrast to low energy trauma or pathological fractures. Method. We present a case of 37 years old male with an additional ipsilateral trochanteric fracture on previously femoral shaft fracture. The patient suffered an open fracture of right femoral shaft with oblique configuration and displacement of the fracture segment. Patient and family refused to go for surgery. Ten months after the initial injury, patient had a motor vehicle accident for the second time and later was brought immediately to our center. Patient underwent plate and screw fixation for the femoral shaft fracture. The surgery worked well and postoperative the patient routinely attend the rehabilitation center. Results. PFNA-long can stabilize and fix both fractures simultaneously compared with plate combinations. Operating time was shorter and perioperative blood loss less in the PFNA-long group Conclusion. In ipsilateral intertrochanteric and femoral shaft fracture, a combination between proximal femoral nail anti-rotation and conservative plate and screw is an option to consider. The benefit from this option include shorter operation time and less intraoperative blood loss.

Posterior dislocation of hip with ipsilateral intertrochanteric fracture: A report of two cases.

Posterior dislocations of the hip are known to be associated with fractures of the femoral head, neck, shaft, or posterior acetabular wall. However, its association with ipsilateral intertrochanteric fracture has only been anecdotally described in the English literature. We report two such cases managed by open reduction (OR) of the hip and internal fixation (IF) of the intertrochanteric fracture. The first case was a 26-year-old male who was managed by OR of the hip with IF of the intertrochanteric fracture with a dynamic hip screw and had a good functional result at 1-year followup. The second case was a 36-year-old female who was also managed by OR of the hip with IF of the head fragments with Herbert screw and IF of the intertrochanteric fracture with a dynamic condylar screw. The patient had a fair, functional result at 1-year followup. With the increase in high energy trauma, these fracture patterns have become more common, and there is an urgent need to review the existing classifications so that these fractures are better categorized, and treatment guidelines defined.

Frequency of External Iliac Artery Branch Injury in Blunt Trauma: Improved Detection with Selective External Iliac Angiography

PurposeTo assess the utility of selective external iliac artery (EIA) angiography and the frequency of injury to branches of the EIA in cases of blunt pelvic trauma. Materials and MethodsA retrospective review of pelvic angiograms in 66 patients with blunt pelvic trauma was conducted over a 12-month period. Pelvic and femur fracture patterns were correlated to the presence of EIA injury. Pelvic arteriography was compared versus selective EIA angiography for the detection of arterial injury. ResultsFifty-four of 66 patients (82%) exhibited pelvic arterial injury or elicited enough suspicion for injury to warrant embolization. Internal iliac artery embolization was performed in 50 of 66 (76%). EIA branch injury was identified in 11 of 66 patients (17%), and 10 were successfully embolized. EIA branch vessel injury was identified more frequently when there was ipsilateral intertrochanteric fracture (P = .07) or ipsilateral ilium fracture (P = .07). The sensitivity of nonselective pelvic angiography in the detection of EIA branch vessel injury was 45%. ConclusionsEIA branch injury occurs in a substantial fraction of patients with blunt pelvic trauma who undergo pelvic angiography. Selective EIA angiography should be considered in all patients undergoing pelvic angiography in this situation.

A comparative study of ipsilateral intertrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures treated with long proximal femoral nail antirotation or plate combinations

To compare the results of long proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA-long) and plate combinations in the treatment of ipsilateral intertrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures. Between March 2004 and April 2009, 23 patients with ipsilateral intertrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures were treated with PFNA-long or plate combinations. The patients were divided into two groups. Group I contained 13 patients who were treated with dynamic hip screws (DHS) combined with compression plate fixation. The 10 patients in Group II were treated with PFNA-long. The average follow-up was 17.8 and 16.8 months for Groups I and II, respectively. The average union time for intertrochanteric fractures was 17.4 and 16.6 weeks in Groups I and II, respectively, and for femoral shaft fracture 22.2 and 21.5 weeks, respectively. There were nine good, two fair, and two poor functional results in Group I, and eight good, one fair, and one poor in Group II. There was nonunion of two femoral shaft fractures in Group I and one in Group II. There were no significant differences between the two groups in functional outcomes or major complications. Both treatment methods achieve satisfactory functional outcomes in patients with ipsilateral intertrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures. PFNA-long is the better choice for the treatment of complex fractures, having the advantages of minimal exposure, reduced perioperative blood loss, and achievement of biological fixation of both fractures with a single implant.

Basicervical fracture with ipsilateral intertrochanteric fracture

Basicervical fracture with ipsilateral intertrochanteric fracture

Femoral Neck Fracture Following Hardware Removal

It is uncommon for femoral neck fractures to occur after proximal femoral hardware removal because age, osteoporosis, and technical error are often noted as the causes for this type of fracture. However, excessive alcohol consumption and failure to comply with protected weight bearing for 6 weeks increases the risk of femoral neck fractures.This article describes a case of a 57-year-old man with a high-energy ipsilateral inter-trochanteric hip fracture, comminuted distal third femoral shaft fracture, and displaced lateral tibial plateau fracture. Cephalomedullary fixation was used to fix the ipsilateral femur fractures after medical stabilization and evaluation of the patient. The patient healed clinically and radiographically at 6 months. Despite conservative treatment for painful proximal hardware, elective hip screw removal was performed 22.5 months after injury. Seven weeks later, he sustained a nontraumatic femoral neck fracture.In this case, it is unlikely that the femoral neck fracture occurred as a result of hardware removal. We assumed that, in addition to the patient's alcohol abuse and tobacco use, stress fractures may have attributed to the femoral neck fracture. We recommend using a shorter hip screw to minimize hardware prominence or possibly off-label use of an injectable bone filler, such as calcium phosphate cement.

Stress fractures in the gapped area of a two implant construct: a case report

The concomitant occurrence of femoral shaft and hip fractures are not rare. The ideal management of ipsilateral intertrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures is still controversial and needs to be addressed. Cephalomedullary nail fixations of both the fractures have been described with excellent results. Similar results have been published with two implant constructs treating both of these injuries separately. We report the case of a stress fracture, in the gapped area above the proximal interlocking screw of a retrograde femoral nail placed for a segmental femur fracture and a trochanteric fracture treated with a sliding hip plate screw construct, 9 months after initial injury. The gapped area of a two implant construct is of concern and biomechanical studies have shown that the proximal end of the nail and the interlocking screws may act as a stress riser in the femur. A stress fracture in the gapped area of a two implant construct has not been described earlier, although a cadaveric study had shown that the area of the proximal screw hole of the retrograde nail is a common site for a fracture, on loading. Kissing or overlapping instrumentation increases the load to failure and creates a biomechanically stable construct.

Lower Extremity Bypass Graft Occlusion After Intramedullary Fixation of Intertrochanteric Hip Fracture on a Fracture Table

This article presents a case of a 90-year-old woman who previously underwent a common femoral to anterior tibial artery bypass grafting with a Gore-Tex graft (Gore Medical, Flagstaff, Arizona). She subsequently sustained an ipsilateral intertrochanteric hip fracture after a mechanical fall and underwent internal fixation with an intramedullary nail using a fracture table. In the immediate postoperative period, she developed limb-threatening ischemia in her leg due to graft thrombosis. The patient underwent a successful thrombectomy and embolectomy. However, she subsequently developed nonhealing ulcers to this extremity over the course of weeks, requiring surgical debridement. Gangrene ensued and she underwent a below-the-knee amputation.Complications from the use of fracture tables have been described for perineal soft tissue injury, leg malrotation or malalignment, neurologic injury, and iatrogenic compartment syndrome of the healthy leg. Arterial complications after intramedullary fixation of femur fractures are rare and may be caused by direct arterial trauma during placement of the locking screws through the intramedullary nail. This article is the first, to our knowledge, to describe an occlusion of a lower extremity bypass graft after intramedullary fixation on a fracture table. Surgeons should be aware of potential limb threatening ischemia in patients with peripheral vascular disease, especially in those with prior lower extremity bypass grafts. Proper preoperative counseling should be given to these patients when using fracture tables during hip fracture surgery.

Femoral neck fracture in association with low-energy pelvic ring fractures in an elderly patient

Concomitant fractures of the pelvic ring and proximal femur in the setting of low-energy trauma are rare but not mutually exclusive. An 82-year-old woman, without prior hip pain, presented to our institution after a fall from standing height. Ipsilateral pubic rami and sacral ala fractures were diagnosed with plain radiographs and computed tomography scanning, respectively, and corroborated by physical examination. No further imaging was performed in the emergency department. However, with adequate in-house pain control, the patient's complaints and physical examination were also indicative of a hip fracture. A subsequent magnetic resonance imaging study revealed a nondisplaced ipsilateral intertrochanteric femur fracture. Previously, it has been reported that occult fractures of the hip and pelvic ring appear to be mutually exclusive. Moreover, if acute fractures of the pubic ramus are identified, it has been recommended that no further investigation is warranted to rule out fracture of the hip. This case report demonstrates that low-energy pelvic ring and hip fractures can occur together. Sound clinical acumen is imperative and must supercede literature reports when providing patient care.

A polytrauma patient with an unusual posterior fracture-dislocation of the femoral head: a case report

We report a case of a 27-year-old man who was involved in a high-speed car accident. He sustained multiple organ damage including multiple brain petechiae suggesting diffuse axonal damage, aortic dissection, retroperitoneal haematoma and a fracture-dislocation of the right hip with a femoral head fracture and an ipsilateral intertrochanteric fracture. Due to the general condition of the patient, physiological stabilisation was prioritized, and at 2 weeks the fracture-dislocation of the hip was treated with a proximal femoral nail for the intertrochanteric fracture and Herbert screws for the femoral head fracture. Postoperatively, two episodes of recurrent hip dislocation occurred, and this was stabilized eventually with a Steinman pin inserted across the hip joint and taken out 1 month later. Weight-bearing was allowed according to clinical and radiographical assessments. Heterotopic ossification developed around the hip joint, but without evidence of AVN or osteoarthritis. At 18-months follow-up, the fractures had healed and the patient had a Harris Hip score of 79.1. Anatomical reduction and stable fixation of fracture-dislocations of the hip are important for achieving an acceptable result.

Evaluation of femoral reconstruction intramedullary nail fixation for femoral fracture combining with ipsilateral femoral intertrochanteric fracture

Objective To investigate an effective surgical treatment for complex femoral fracture and evaluate the efficacy of femoral reconstruction intramedullary nail fixation for femoral fracture combining with ipsilateral femoral intertrochanteric fracture.Methods Retrospective analysis was performed for 21 cases suffering from femoral fracture combining with ipsilateral femoral intertrochanteric fracture treated by femoral reconstruction intramedullary nail fixation from May 2000 to December 2004.Results 21 cases were followed up,ranging from 7 to 62 months,average 18.7 months,average time for fracture union was 6.9 months,and no postoperative infection,avascular necrosis of femoral head and failure of internal fixation occurred.According to Ma Yuanzhang criterion system,the percentage of excellent clinical result was 90.0%.Conclusion Femoral reconstruction intramedullary nail fixation is an ideal surgical treatment for femoral fracture combining with ipsilateral femoral intertrochanteric fracture.By this process,femoral head,neck and shaft become an intact body. Key words: Femoral bone; Fracture; Internal fixation; Intramedullary nail

Functional Outcome of Ipsilateral Intertrochanteric and Femoral Shaft Fractures

The purpose of this study was to compare the functional outcome of patients with ipsilateral intertrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures treated with a reconstruction nail versus a sliding hip screw and retrograde nail. Retrospective cohort study. Two level 1 trauma centers. Twenty-six patients with ipsilateral intertrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures treated between 1993 and 2003 with a reconstruction nail (n=13) or with a sliding hip screw and retrograde nail (n=13). Internal fixation with a reconstruction nail or a sliding hip screw and retrograde nail. Functional outcome was measured using the Short Form-36 (SF-36), Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA), and Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS). The average time to follow-up was 49.6 months. Functional outcome was significantly better in the sliding hip screw with retrograde nail group for the role emotional (P=0.001) and mental component scores (P=0.016) of the SF-36. This group also scored better on the LEFS, although not reaching statistical significance (P=0.099). For most outcome measures, no significant differences in functional outcome scores were observed between the 2 treatment groups. The results of this study suggest the need for a randomized controlled trial with a larger sample size to more definitively compare the 2 fixation constructs.

Realization of the operative treatment for 35 cases of femoral shaft fractures with ipsilateral femoral neck or intertrochanteric fractures

目的 观察动力髁螺钉(DCS)、近端股骨髓内钉(PFN)治疗股骨干骨折合并同侧股骨颈及转子间骨折的临床疗效.方法采用内固定方式治疗35例股骨干骨折合并同侧股骨颈或转子间骨折,其中股骨干合并同侧股骨颈骨折10例,合并转子间骨折25例,使用DCS固定9例,使用PFN固定26例.结果随访时间6～30个月,平均18个月,33例骨折愈合、患肢关节功能优良,2例出现股骨头坏死,愈合率为94%,不愈合率为6%.结论对于股骨干骨折合并同侧股骨颈或转子间的复杂骨折,选择采用DCS或PFN治疗,DCS适用于较稳定的骨折,PFN有手术时间短,组织损伤小的优点.两者均具有在骨折愈合、功能恢复和早期活动方面均较满意的效果。

Unreamed intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures.

Seventy-five patients with 81 femoral shaft fractures were treated with unreamed antegrade intramedullary nailing using a titanium alloy implant (AIM femoral nail, ACE Medical) with static interlocking. There were 73 closed fractures and 8 open fractures. Six patients had bilateral femoral shaft fractures. In two cases there was an ipsilateral fracture of the femoral neck, two patients had an ipsilateral intertrochanteric fracture, in one case there was a concomitant subtrochanteric fracture, and four patients had sustained an ipsilateral fracture of the acetabulum in addition to their femoral shaft fractures. In 43 cases (53%) the fracture of the femoral shaft was a comminuted type fracture. Thirty-nine patients (52%) had suffered multiple injuries; the mean Injury Severity Score was 41.2. Sixty-nine fractures were stabilized primarily within 8 hours after admission and 12 fractures were treated secondarily, in a mean of 5.8 days after injury. Closed intramedullary nailing was performed in 73 femora and open nailing with cerclage wiring was done in 8. All 81 nails were implanted unreamed and static was used in every case. The diameters of the nails used were 9 mm (n = 68) and 10 mm (n = 13). Proximal interlocking was distally directed in 76 cases and proximally directed in 5 cases. Two patients died of severe head injuries and one patient died of multiple organ failure. The infection rate was 0%, and uneventful consolidation of the fractures was seen in all cases within a mean of 3.8 months. Neither in the case of nails nor in the case of interlocking bolts did an implant failure occur.