Involvement Of General Practitioners Research Articles

Barriers and facilitators of healthcare professionals in integrating shared decision-making in pancreatic cancer treatment: A network approach.

Shared decision-making (SDM) is crucial in pancreatic cancer treatment due to its choice-sensitive nature and limited prognosis. Treatment of pancreatic cancer is organized in a network approach. Several obstacles exist on different levels-patient, healthcare professional, organizational, societal-that impede integration of SDM. This study aims to identify barriers and facilitators to SDM implementation within a comprehensive cancer network. A qualitative research design was applied, involving interviews and focus groups on barriers and facilitators with healthcare professionals involved in the implementation of SDM. In one comprehensive cancer network in the Netherlands, including seven hospitals, a project was initiated with the goal of empowering patients and healthcare professionals in SDM throughout primary, secondary and tertiary healthcare settings. A total of 17 participants were assessed. Directed qualitative content analysis was performed by two researchers. Main findings revealed barriers such as time constraints, lack of priority of physicians, little involvement of general practitioners, and insufficient social context of patients in referrals, alongside facilitators including learning communities with practical SDM examples, metro mapping, involvement of case manager in implementation and patient empowerment strategies. Addressing cultural, systemic barriers and developing innovative strategies are of importance to enhance SDM in pancreatic cancer treatment in a network approach. This study provides understanding of SDM implementation in complex healthcare settings and offers valuable guidance for future interventions seeking to improve decision-making processes in pancreatic cancer treatment and beyond.

Effectiveness of Community-Based Multidisciplinary Integrated Care for Older Adults with General Practitioner Involvement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract Background Changing demographics has led to healthcare systems reorientating healthcare delivery towards the community setting and implementing integrated models of care worldwide. A knowledge gap exists with regards to what elements of integrated care facilitate effective age-attuned healthcare delivery. This systematic review examines the effectiveness of community-based multidisciplinary integrated care strategies with General Practitioner (GP) participation for community-dwelling older adults and describes the level of care integration in each study. Methods PUBMED, EMBASE, CINAHL, Central Register of Controlled Trials in the Cochrane Library and MEDLINE were systematically searched in April 2023. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or cluster RCTs that focused on interventions for community-dwelling older adults delivered by health and social care professionals with GPs were included. Two reviewers independently conducted the risk of bias assessment, applied the GRADE tool to quantify the certainty of evidence and used the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care taxonomy to describe the elements of integrated care used within studies. The primary outcome was functional status. Meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4. Results Twelve trials (14 reports) recruiting 8069 participants across 8 countries were included. Community-based multidisciplinary team (MDT) integrated care demonstrated significant improvements in functional status (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05-0.37; low certainty evidence), hospitalisation (risk ratio (RR) 0.77, 95% CI 0.63-0.95; very low certainty evidence) and participant satisfaction with care (SMD 0.46, 95%c CI 0.15-0.76; low certainty evidence) from 12-36 months. No statistically significant effects favouring community-based MDT interventions for functional status at 6-month follow-up, Emergency Department presentation, mortality, health-related quality of life, or nursing home admission were established. Conclusion Community-based MDT integrated care with GP participation improves clinical and process outcomes for community-dwelling older adults. Future research should focus on models of integrated care that respond to the needs and preferences of older adults.

Is general practitioner involvement in the initiation of opioids for chronic non-cancer pain associated with opioid dose and concurrent drug use?

Objective Is the involvement of the regular general practitioner (GP) in the decision to initiate opioid treatment for chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) associated with two main risk factors for serious adverse events: increased opioid dose and the concomitant use of prescribed benzodiazepines or benzodiazepine-related medications? Design and setting An anonymous web-based survey was conducted in the county of Rogaland, Norway, during the spring of 2021. Subjects GPs who self-reported applying at least once for reimbursement of opioids prescribed to treat CNCP. They were asked to answer the survey based on the last patient for whom they recalled submitting a reimbursement application. Main outcome measures 1) Total opioid dose in daily oral morphine equivalents (OMEQ). 2) Concurrent use of benzodiazepines and/or benzodiazepine-related drugs. Results The daily opioid dose was lower when the surveyed GPs initiated the opioid treatment (36 OMEQ, n = 25), than when others had initiated the treatment (108 OMEQ, n = 31, p = 0.001). For concurrent use of benzodiazepine or benzodiazepine-related drugs, no significant difference was found (33%, n = 9 with GP involvement vs. 47%, n = 16, p = 0.279 with no GP involvement). Conclusions GP involvement in the initiation of opioid medication for CNCP was associated with a lower opioid dose being prescribed. Implications GP involvement in the initiation of opioid prescriptions may facilitate safer prescribing.

Vécu de patients dans la prise en soin d’une néoplasie par leur médecin généraliste. Étude qualitative de narrations de cas

Little research has been done on the follow-up of patients in the active phase of treatment in primary care. This study aimed to build up a corpus of authentic clinical situations and carry out an inductive analysis of the data. Research in two stages: case study and qualitative analysis of verbatims. The authors conducted individual interviews using an interview guide. The questions targeted their experiences, focusing on their relationship with their general practitioner. Six themes were identified. The announcement of the diagnosis was a key moment. Patients emphasised their general practitioner's responsiveness and coordination, and stressed his involvement. They consulted him regularly during the active phase of treatment, and asked for information. They felt confident. The need to facilitate access to the general practitioner was noted, particularly in the event of a real or perceived emergency. The increase in the prevalence and incidence of cancer means that general practitioners need to be heavily involved. The authorities are advocating a strengthening of the general practitioner's "pivotal role", without clearly defining it. A perceived lack of skills may be an obstacle to general practitioner involvement. Training in cancer during the 3rd cycle of general medical studies is inadequate. By compiling and analysing a corpus of cases, it would be possible to redefine the training objectives and list the skills required to manage cancer patients.

Pooled analysis of the three trials of the TRIUMF series: efficacy of a triple fixed combination of antihypertensive drugs in the practice of physicians of different specialties in Ukraine

Study objectives – to compare the data obtained in the TRIUMF (antihyperTensive theRapy in UkraIne – BP optiMization in Focus) trials, in particular, TRIUMF-1, TRIUMF-2, TRIUMF-3, to determine possible patterns and significant factors affecting BP control in patients taking 2 or more antihypertensive drugs and switching to the original single pill combination (SPC) of perindopril arginine/indapamide/amlodipine.Materials and Methods. For the pooled analysis, data on 5960 patients obtained from the three trials of the TRIUMF series were selected. All the studies were multicenter prospective trials conducted at different times in Ukraine with the involvement of general practitioners (TR-1), cardiologists (TR-2), and family practitioners (TR-3). According to the inclusion criteria, patients over 18 years of age with hypertension and a history of taking 2 or 3 antihypertensive drugs for at least 1 month whose BP remained above 140/90 mm Hg could be included in the study. The drug of choice for further therapy was Triplixam (Servier, France) – a single pill combination (SPC) of perindopril arginine, amlodipine and indapamide. Each patient was observed for 3 months. Patients visited physicians in 1–2 weeks, 2 months after the start of the study and the corresponding therapy adjustment. The adherence rate was assessed before and after 2 months. The use of beta-blockers (BBs) in the treatment of the cohort of patients with hypertension was analyzed separately. The final analysis included a comparison of the data obtained in the TRIUMF trial series.Results and Discussion. The use of a SPC of perindopril arginine/indapamide/amlodipine allowed to achieve the target BP levels (140/90 or less) after 2 months of therapy in 84 % of patients with a history of taking a combination therapy (2 drugs – 65 %, 3 drugs – 35 %). One of the important criteria for choosing the dose of a triple SPC is the baseline BP values. The higher the degree of hypertension, the higher the dose prescribed by physicians. The minimum dose of the SPC of perindopril arginine, indapamide and amlodipine (5/1.25/5 mg) was prescribed for stage 1 hypertension in 62 %, stage 2 hypertension in 38 %, and stage 3 hypertension in 15 % of patients; the maximum dose (10/2.5/10 mg) was prescribed for stage 1 hypertension in 9 %, stage 2 hypertension in 15 %, and stage 3 hypertension in 43 % of patients included in the study (p<0.05). Therapy with the triple SPC of perindopril arginine, indapamide and amlodipine was well tolerated: adverse events were observed in 0.63 % (TR-1), 1 % (TR-3) and 1.86 % (TR-2) of cases, which was largely due to the previous use of two (65 %) or three (35 %) antihypertensive drugs comprising the SPC by the study patients. Beta-blockers (n=2012) were prescribed due to the presence of a comorbidity (coronary heart disease, angina pectoris – 33.5 %, heart failure – 28.3 %) rather than due to lowered BP. The combination of perindopril arginine/indapamide/amlodipine with BB was well tolerated and 83.9 % of patients achieved BP ≤ 140/90 mm Hg, while 9.36 % achieved ≤ 130/80 mm Hg after 2 months of treatment. There was a significant improvement in the adherence to treatment (TR-2, TR-3) in the majority of patients (75 and 70 %), due to high antihypertensive efficacy, convenience of pill’s administration (one pill instead of three) and good tolerability of the original SPC.Conclusions. Regular medical supervision (cardiologists, family practitioners, general practitioners), high antihypertensive efficacy of the SPC (84 % of patients reached the target BP levels after 2 months of therapy ), convenience of pill’s administration (one pill instead of three), high adherence to treatment confirmed in TR-2 and TR-3 in most patients, and good tolerability of the original SPC of perindopril arginine, indapamide and amlodipine led to a significant improvement in the effectiveness of treatment of patients with hypertension.

Emergency physicians' and nurses' perception on the adequacy of emergency calls for nursing home residents: a non-interventional prospective study.

A considerable percentage of daily emergency calls are for nursing home residents. With the ageing of the overall European population, an increase in emergency calls and interventions in nursing homes (NH) is to be expected. A proportion of these interventions and hospital transfers may be preventable and could be considered as inappropriate by prehospital emergency medical personnel. The study aimed to understand Belgian emergency physicians' and emergency nurses' perspectives on emergency calls and interventions in NHs and investigate factors contributing to their perception of inappropriateness. An exploratory non-interventional prospective study was conducted in Belgium among emergency physicians and emergency nurses, currently working in prehospital emergency medicine. Electronic questionnaires were sent out in September, October and November 2023. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the overall results, as well as to compare the answers between emergency physicians and emergency nurses about certain topics. A total of 114 emergency physicians and 78 nurses responded to the survey. The mean age was 38 years with a mean working experience of 10 years in prehospital healthcare. Nursing home staff were perceived as understaffed and lacking in competence, with an impact on patient care especially during nights and weekends. General practitioners were perceived as insufficiently involved in the patient's care, as well as often unavailable in times of need, leading to activation of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and transfers of nursing home residents to the Emergency Department (ED). Advance directives were almost never available at EMS interventions and transfers were often not in accordance with the patient's wishes. Palliative care and pain treatment were perceived as insufficient. Emergency physicians and nurses felt mostly disappointed and frustrated. Additionally, differences in perception were noted between emergency physicians and nurses regarding certain topics. Emergency nurses were more convinced that the nursing home physician should be available 24/7 and that transfers could be avoided if nursing home staff had more authority regarding medical interventions. Emergency nurses were also more under the impression that pain management was inadequate, and emergency physicians were more afraid of the medical implications of doing too little during interventions than emergency nurses. Suggestions to reduce the number of EMS interventions were more general practitioner involvement (82%), better nursing home staff education/competences (77%), more nursing home staff (67%), mobile palliative care support teams (65%) and mobile geriatric nursing intervention teams (52%). EMS interventions in nursing homes were almost never seen as necessary or indicated by emergency physicians and nurses, with the appropriate EMS level almost never being activated. The following key issues were found: shortages in numbers and competence of nursing home staff, insufficient primary care due to the unavailability of the general practitioner as well as a lack of involvement in patient care, and an absence of readily available advance directives. General practitioners should be more involved in the decision to call the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and to transfer nursing home residents to the Emergency Department. Healthcare workers should strive for vigilance regarding the patients' wishes. The emotional burden of deciding on an avoidable hospital admission of nursing home residents, perhaps out of fear for medico-legal consequences if doing too little, leaves the emergency physicians and nurses frustrated and disappointed. Improvements in nursing home staffing, more acute and chronic general practitioner consultations, and mobile geriatric and palliative care support teams are potential solutions. Further research should focus on the structural improvement of the above-mentioned shortcomings.

Perceptions and beliefs of general practitioners on their role in the cancer screening programmes in the Netherlands: a mixed-methods study

BackgroundIn the Netherlands, population-based cancer screening programmes (CSPs) are organized aiming at cervical, breast and colorectal cancer. For a CSP to be effective, high participation rates are essential; however, there is an alarming downward trend, including wide regional variation in screening uptake. General practitioner (GP) involvement can have a stimulating effect on screening participation. Current GP involvement is however, limited, varies between the programmes and has changed over time. Unexplored is what GPs think of their role(s) in the CSPs. The aim of this study was therefore to map the perceptions and beliefs of GPs regarding their current and future role in the Dutch CSPs.MethodsA mixed-methods sequential explanatory study was conducted in the Leiden/The Hague area of the Netherlands, between the end of 2021 and 2022. A questionnaire was developed and distributed among 110 GPs. The aggregated results obtained from the questionnaires served as starting points for conducting semi-structured interviews, with purposefully selected GPs. With this sequential approach we aimed to further enhance the understanding of the questionnaire data, and delved into the topics that emerged from the questionnaire responses.ResultsIn total, 46 GPs completed the online questionnaire (response rate 42%). Subsequent five semi-structured comprehensive interviews were conducted. GPs indicated that they frequently encounter the CSP in their daily practice and consider it important. They also emphasised it is important that GPs remain closely involved with the CSPs in the future. Nevertheless, GPs also repeatedly mentioned that they are not eager to take on more logistical/organizational tasks. They are however willing to empower CSPs in a positive manner.ConclusionGPs were generally positive about the CSPs and their current role within these programmes. Nevertheless, several options have been proposed to improve the CSPs, especially to increase screening uptake for populations in a socioeconomically disadvantaged position. Since it is of utmost importance to screen those who are most at risk of developing the screening-specific tumours, efforts should be made to achieve this goal.

Cancer follow-up in primary care after treatment with curative intent: Views of patients with breast and colorectal cancer

ObjectiveIncreased cancer survival leads to more patients requiring oncological follow-up. Debate about how best to coordinate this care has led to the proposed involvement of general practitioners (GPs) rather than continued reliance on hospital care. However, we still require patient opinions to inform this debate. MethodsThis qualitative interview study explored opinions about organization of follow-up care of patients treated curatively for breast and colorectal cancer. Thematic analysis was applied. ResultsWe interviewed 29 patients and identified three themes concerning care substitution: “benefits and barriers,” “requirements,” and “suitable patient groups.” Benefits included accessibility, continuity, contextual knowledge, and psychosocial support. Barriers included concerns about cancer-specific expertise of GPs and longer waiting times. Requirements were sufficient time and remuneration, sufficient training, clear protocols, and shared-care including efficient communication with specialists. ConclusionsAccording to patients with cancer, formal GP involvement appears feasible, although important barriers must be overcome before instituting care substitution. A possible solution are personalized follow-up plans based on three-way conversations with the specialist and the GP after the initial hospital care. Practice implicationsWith adequate training, time, and remuneration, formal GP involvement could ensure more comprehensive care, possibly starting with less complex cases.

Effectiveness of Community‐Based Multidisciplinary Integrated Care for Older Adults with General Practitioner Involvement: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Background. Changing demographics has led to healthcare systems reorientating healthcare delivery towards the community setting and implementing integrated models of care worldwide. This systematic review examines the effectiveness of community‐based multidisciplinary integrated care strategies with general practitioner (GP) participation for community‐dwelling older adults and describes the level of care integration in each study. Methods. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Central Register of Controlled Trials in the Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE were systematically searched in February 2024. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or cluster RCTs that focused on interventions for community‐dwelling older adults delivered by health and social care professionals with GPs were included. Two reviewers independently conducted the risk of bias assessment, applied the GRADE tool to quantify the certainty of evidence, and used the rainbow model of integrated care taxonomy to describe the elements of integrated care. Outcomes included functional status, healthcare utilisation, participant satisfaction with care, health‐related quality of life, mortality, nursing home admission, and adverse outcomes. Meta‐analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4. Results. Twelve trials recruiting 8069 participants across 8 countries were included. Community‐based multidisciplinary team (MDT) integrated care demonstrated significant improvements in functional status (standardised mean difference (SMD): 0.21; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.05–0.37; low certainty evidence), hospitalisation (risk ratio (RR): 0.77; 95% CI: 0.63–0.95; very low certainty evidence), and participant satisfaction with care (SMD: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.15–0.76; low certainty evidence) from 12 to 36 months. No statistically significant effects favouring community‐based MDT interventions for functional status at 6‐month follow‐up, emergency department presentation, mortality, health‐related quality of life, or nursing home admission were established. Conclusion. Community‐based MDT integrated care with GP participation improves functional status, reduces hospitalisations, and increases patient satisfaction among community‐dwelling older adults in the long term. Future research should focus on models of integrated care that respond to the needs and preferences of older adults. This trial is registered with CRD42022309744.

Cross-perspectives on telemedicine in nursing homes: a survey of professionals involved in the setting-up of teleconsultations in nursing homes in Rennes area

The practice of telemedicine in nursing homes is a solution to improve the quality of care for residents. Its application also seems to be beneficial for the professionals involved, but it faces obstacles. The objective of this study is to explore the effects of the implementation of teleconsultations in nursing homes on the professional practices of the stakeholders involved. A qualitative focus group study was conducted with professionals involved in the implementation of teleconsultations. The data was analyzed using an inductive approach similar to grounded theory. The 18 participants included in the study were unanimous and consensual about the benefits of telemedicine. They observed changes in work relationships, particularly the key role of caregivers in coordinating care. However, they feared a deterioration in doctor-patient relationships. The practice of telemedicine was considered time-consuming, which could hinder its dissemination. No general practitioner participated in this study, showing they had reservations about the practice. The Covid-19 pandemic had an impact on the development of teleconsultations within the institutions involved. Telemedicine is acclaimed by the nursing homes teams and the doctors required, particularly through the effects on training and the added value it can bring to their practice. Telemedicine also allows to provide care that is otherwise not available. However, the care process needs to be simplified. In addition, there are obstacles to the involvement of general practitioners, which should be studied in order to optimize the coordination of care for the residents of the nursing homes.

Dutch, UK and US professionals’ perceptions of screening for Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma: a concept mapping study

BackgroundNovel, less-invasive technologies to screen for Barrett’s esophagus (BE) may enable a paradigm shift in early detection strategies for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Understanding professionals’ perspectives on screening is important to determine how to proceed. We aimed to explore and compare professionals’ perceptions of screening for BE and EAC screening in three countries.MethodsIn this study, 29 Dutch, 20 British and 18 American health care professionals (clinicians, researchers and policy makers) participated in concept mapping: a mixed-methods consensus building methodology. Statements on perceived barriers, facilitators, advantages, disadvantages, implications or worries associated with screening for BE and EAC were collected in asynchronous digital brainstorm sessions. Subsequently, participants sorted the statements into groups according to thematic similarity and assessed the relevance of each statement in evaluating the acceptability of BE and EAC screening. Multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis were used to map the associations between generated statements.ResultsProfessionals across three countries identified eight consistent themes that relate to their perceptions of screening for BE and EAC: (1) Benefits, (2) Harms, (3) Clinical effectiveness concerns, (4) Screening population, (5) Screening modality, (6) Resources, (7) Ownership, and (8) Public communication. Dutch and American professionals prioritized the potential health benefits of screening but also questioned clinical impact. In contrast, British participants prioritized identification of the screening population and suitable test.ConclusionsMost professionals see potential in less-invasive screening tests for BE and EAC but underline the need to define the target screening population and determine benefits and harms before widely employing them. Successful implementation will require thoughtful consideration of the involvement of general practitioners, readiness of endoscopy and pathology services, balanced public communication, and country-specific regulations.

Barriers and facilitators to the involvement of general practitioners in the prescription of buprenorphine

IntroductionFrance has one of the highest opioid agonist treatment (OAT) coverage rates in the world. French general practitioners (GPs) are providing the majority of prescriptions. However, a fall in the number of GPs initiating buprenorphine has been observed over the last decade. MethodsThe objective of this study was to explore the obstacles and facilitators to the involvement of GPs in the prescription of buprenorphine. A qualitative study comprising 14 individual interviews and a focus group bringing together 5 GPs was conducted among GPs based in France between June 2021 and March 2022. We performed data analysis using a grounded theory methodology. ResultsThe interviews showed a great diversity in the level of involvement of GPs, depending on their experience, their representations of patients with OUD, their mode of exercise, and their personal preferences. The negative representations of the patients associated with the feeling of physical and ethical endangerment, the feeling of powerlessness, the fear of a disruption of the practice and the feeling of incompetence appeared at the forefront of the difficulties stated. Conversely, the strengthening of initial training and the facilitation of access to self-training tools and multidisciplinarity, the consideration of opioid use disorder (OUD) as a chronic illness with the application of a patient-centered motivational approach, as well as the defining and respecting one's own limits when prescribing buprenorphine seem to be the keys to a balanced and fulfilling practice. ConclusionRaising awareness of the frequency of OUD appeared to be an additional lever to enhance the interest of the GPs concerned. Additional studies focusing on the evolution of professional practices would be necessary to extend these findings.

Educating sports people about CPR and first aid in general practice: the Savtember project.

During an exercise-related sudden cardiac arrest, bystander automated external defibrillator use occurred in a median of 31%. The present study conducted in France evaluated the feasibility and impact of a brief intervention by general practitioners (GPs) to increase awareness about first aid/CPR training among amateur sportspeople. In 2018, 49 French GPs proposed a brief intervention to all patients who attended a consultation in order to obtain a medical certificate attesting their fitness to participate in sports. The brief intervention included two questions (Have you been trained in first aid? Would you like to attend a first aid course?) and a flyer on first aid. The GPs' opinion of the feasibility of the brief intervention was evaluated during a subsequent interview (primary objective). The percentage of sportspeople who started a first aid/CPR course within three months was used as a measure of the effectiveness of the brief intervention (secondary objective). Among 929 sportspeople, 37% were interested in first aid training and received the flyer (4% of these started a training course within three months of the brief intervention, a training rate that was 10 times greater than among the general French population), 56% were already trained, and 7% were not interested. All GPs found the brief intervention feasible and fast (<3min for 80% of GPs). We conclude the brief intervention to promote first aid/CPR awareness is easy to use and may be an effective although limited means of promoting CPR training. It opens a previously unexplored avenue for GP involvement in promoting training.

Hausärztliche Palliativversorgung in Westfalen-Lippe im Vergleich mit anderen Bundesländern – sekundäre Auswertung einer Befragungsstudie

IntroductionIn palliative home care frictional loss at the interface between primary palliative care (PPC) and specialised palliative home care (SPHC) is repeatedly pointed out. PPC and SPHC appear to be insufficiently interlinked. The model implemented in Westphalia-Lippe differs from others in Germany: it relies on close cooperation between general practitioners (GPs) and palliative consultancy services (PCS), an early start of the palliative care process and comprehensive/widespread collaboration. We hypothesize that the framework conditions applying in Westphalia-Lippe have positive effects on the uptake of palliative care activities by GPs. The objective of this study therefore is to compare GPs' attitudes and their willingness to provide palliative care between GPs in Westphalia-Lippe and GPs in other federal states/Associations of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (ASHIPs) in order to empirically test our hypothesis. MethodsSecondary evaluation of a nationwide paper-based survey from 2018 for national data acquisition of GPs’ palliative care activities at the interface of SPHC. Answers of the participating GPs from Westphalia-Lippe (n=119) are contrasted with the answers of the GPs from seven other federal states (n=1,025). ResultsGPs from Westphalia-Lippe have a consistently higher self-perception of being responsible for palliative care of their patients, more often take responsibility for palliative care activities and feel more confident in carrying them out. GPs from Westphalia-Lippe are more likely to know other palliative care facilities/actors and they find them to be more likely available for GPs. They rate the quality of the overall palliative infrastructure higher. For GPs from Westphalia-Lippe the involvement of PCS/SPHC providers is less important than for GPs from other regional ASHIPs. If they are involved in the palliative treatment of a patient, GPs from Westphalia-Lippe feel more frequently involved in the course of treatment. DiscussionOur study indicates that the special framework conditions for palliative care provided by GPs in Westphalia-Lippe have positive effects on their uptake of palliative care activities. An essential factor could be the PPC- and SPHC-integrated approach to palliative care in Westphalia-Lippe. ConclusionWestphalia-Lippe may provide orientation for other regions regarding the involvement of GPs at the interface to specialized palliative care. Whether the type of palliative home care in Westphalia-Lippe also produces advantages in terms of quality and costs of care compared to the rest of Germany is something that needs to be investigated in the future.

Changing the Scene: Lessons Learned and Actioned into General Practice from Australian Flood Fire Drought &amp; Heat through Primary Health Networks

Introduction:General Practitioners (GPs) manage the majority of usual healthcare needs in a community. These healthcare needs do not cease in disasters; they increase and expand. However, inclusion of GPs in disaster healthcare systems is only just beginning. Systematic review of the health effects of disasters over days, months, and years, shows the major burden of healthcare needs associated with disasters is within the realm of usual general practice. In Australia, Primary Health Networks (PHNs) represent local GPs in each region. They offer the best option for systematic linkage of GPs to the broader DHM system.Method:A systematic review of the literature on the health effects of disasters and three qualitative studies reviewing the current experiences, barriers and facilitators to GP involvement in DHM systems were undertaken through a PhD at the Australian National University in 2022. A knowledge to action framework was developed and utilized to provide a systematic strategy to guide efforts to diffuse, disseminate, and implement the research as it emerged, with a focus on sustaining those changes through integration of PHNs into Australian DHM systems.Results:Integration of GPs, through PHNs, is evolving, through systematic inclusion in planning and policy in local health districts. Over time, evidence-based knowledge of disaster healthcare needs has been incorporated into GP disaster planning and preparedness, and resource development, and utilized by GPs during the recent 2019 Black Summer Bushfires, and East coast Floods.Conclusion:As our knowledge of the healthcare needs of disasters continues to reflect our increasingly challenging and complex world, the proven benefit of active involvement in holistic, comprehensive continuity of healthcare through General Practice in DHM systems through PHN linkage becomes more urgent.

Survey on the management of childhood epilepsy among general practitioners in the area of Marrakech

BackgroundEpilepsy is a common chronic neurological disorder in the pediatric population and its evolution can be fatal. It represents a major public health problem as well as an economic burden for the families of affected children, health systems and the overall economies of countries. This further accentuates the role that general practitioners can play in the management of childhood epilepsy in the face of the persistent lack of neurologists and neuro-pediatricians in our country.MethodsIn order to assess the knowledge and therapeutic habits of general practitioners, we carried out a descriptive and cross-sectional study with general practitioners practicing in the two healthcare sectors: public and private, and in two settings: urban and rural, during the year 2018. The data was collected through a pre-established survey.ResultsIn total, 155 general practitioners responded to the survey. For 85.2% of physicians, the diagnosis of childhood epilepsy was based on interrogation, physical examination, and EEG. While brain imaging would be systematic regardless of the type of epilepsy for 45.2% of doctors. Only 6 doctors (3.9%) had knowledge of the latest classifications of the “ILAE”. For treatment, the majority of physicians (65.5%) adopted first-line monotherapy with valproate in leading position. Almost half of the doctors (48.4%) found that education of parents and children was always necessary. None of the GPs interviewed in our series assessed the academic impact of epilepsy. Only 32% of doctors had received continuing education on epilepsy.ConclusionThe data from our study demonstrates that continuing education on the management of childhood epilepsy and the greater involvement of general practitioners were essential elements in improving care.

Patients’ acceptance of a shared cancer follow-up model of care between general practitioners and radiation oncologists: A population-based survey using the theoretical Framework of Acceptability

IntroductionInternational and national guidelines highlight the need for general practitioner involvement during and after active cancer treatment and throughout long-term follow-up care. This paper aimed to evaluate patients’ acceptance of radiation oncology shared follow-up care using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA).MethodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted at two cancer care centres in the Illawarra Shoalhaven region of Australia. A sample of patients scheduled for a radiation oncology follow-up consultation in 2021 were sent a 32-point self-complete paper-based survey. Data were analysed using descriptive, parametric and non-parametric statistical analysis. This paper followed the Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS).ResultsOf the 414 surveys returned (45% response rate), the acceptance for radiation oncology shared cancer follow-up care was high (80%). Patients treated with only radiotherapy were 1.7 times more likely to accept shared follow-up care than those treated with multiple modalities. Patients who preferred follow-up care for fewer than three years were 7.5 times more likely to accept shared care than those who preferred follow-up care for five years. Patients who travelled more than 20 minutes to their radiation oncologist or to the rural cancer centre were slightly more likely to accept shared care than those who travelled less than twenty minutes to the regional cancer centre. A high understanding of shared care (Intervention Coherence) and a positive feeling towards shared care (Affective Attitude) were significant predictive factors in accepting shared radiation oncology follow-up care.ConclusionHealth services need to ensure patient preferences are considered to provide patient-centred cancer follow-up care. Shared cancer follow-up care implementation should start with patients who prefer a shorter follow-up period and understand the benefits of shared care. However, patients’ involvement needs to be considered alongside other clinical risk profiles and organisational factors. Future qualitative research using the TFA constructs is warranted to inform clinical practice change.

A Qualitative Study of Rural and Remote Australian General Practitioners’ Involvement in High-Acuity Patients

This study aimed to understand the experiences, barriers, and facilitators of rural general practitioners' involvement with high-acuity patients. Semi-structured interviews with rural general practitioners in South Australia who had experience delivering high-acuity care were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed through content and thematic approaches incorporating Potter and Brough's capacity-building framework. Eighteen interviews were conducted. Barriers identified include the inability to avoid high-acuity work in rural and remote areas, pressure to handle complex presentations, lack of appropriate resources, lack of mental health support for clinicians, and impacts on social life. Enablers included a commitment to community, comradery in rural medicine, training, and experience. We concluded that general practitioners are a vital pillar of rural health service delivery and are inevitably involved in disaster and emergency response. While the involvement of rural general practitioners with high-acuity patients is complex, this study suggested that with the appropriate system, structure and role supports, rural general practitioners could be better empowered to manage high-acuity caseloads locally.

Machine learning in general practice: scoping review of administrative task support and automation

BackgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to support general practice in the early detection of disease and treatment recommendations. However, AI systems aimed at alleviating time-consuming administrative tasks currently appear limited. This scoping review thus aims to summarize the research that has been carried out in methods of machine learning applied to the support and automation of administrative tasks in general practice.MethodsDatabases covering the fields of health care and engineering sciences (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL with full text, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore) were searched. Screening for eligible studies was completed using Covidence, and data was extracted along nine research-based attributes concerning general practice, administrative tasks, and machine learning. The search and screening processes were completed during the period of April to June 2022.Results1439 records were identified and 1158 were screened for eligibility criteria. A total of 12 studies were included. The extracted attributes indicate that most studies concern various scheduling tasks using supervised machine learning methods with relatively low general practitioner (GP) involvement. Importantly, four studies employed the latest available machine learning methods and the data used frequently varied in terms of setting, type, and availability.ConclusionThe limited field of research developing in the application of machine learning to administrative tasks in general practice indicates that there is a great need and high potential for such methods. However, there is currently a lack of research likely due to the unavailability of open-source data and a prioritization of diagnostic-based tasks. Future research would benefit from open-source data, cutting-edge methods of machine learning, and clearly stated GP involvement, so that improved and replicable scientific research can be done.

General practitioners' perceptions of the provision of direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C within Australian private general practice: an exploratory qualitative study.

There is a need to increase the involvement of Australian general practitioners (GPs) working in private practice to realise the potential of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatments for people with the hepatitis C virus. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in 2018 with seven GPs and two practice nurses working in private general practice to elicit the experiences and perceptions of their involvement in providing care for patients with hepatitis C virus in this setting. The interviews were recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed to inform interventions to maximise the provision of DAA in private general practice. Participants described individual GPs purposely limiting their scope of clinical practice (SOCP) and expressed an expectation that DAA provision would not be included in all GP's SOCP. When GPs delineate their SOCP, their confidence to competently provide quality health care to their patients and GPs' professional special interests are important considerations. Providing DAA training, skill development, support and resources to GPs is necessary, but may not ensure that individual private GPs will provide this care. Where GPs do not include DAA in their SOCP, care pathways need to be developed for patients who will benefit from DAA, including GP-to-GP referral. These findings may be applicable to other areas of unmet need that rely on GPs including provision of care in their SOCP.