Clear Aligners Research Articles

Effectiveness of dental arch expansion in the orthodontic treatment with clear aligners: a scoping review.

The clinical protocol and effectiveness of dental expansion with Clear Aligner Therapy (CAT), especially among adults is still unclear. There is a need to map and explore knowledge gaps of dental expansion with CAT among children and adults. This scoping review explores the extent and depth of the available literature regarding the effectiveness and predictability of CAT in performing orthodontic expansion in both children and adults. The following databases were consulted as sources of information: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, LILACS, COCHRANE Library, and ProQuest Dissertations & Thesis, in which the search was limited to studies on children or adults requiring transverse arch expansion and using clear orthodontic aligners. Two independent reviewers assessed the citations and extracted data, which was then synthesized in a narrative format. Over all, 698 citations were retrieved, and 33 were included. Among these, 3 were systematic reviews, 4 were cohort studies, 2 were case-control studies, and 24 were case series. Eighty-five percent of the included studies were published in the last 5 years. Despite different protocols and measurement methods, aligners were effective for arch expansion in adults and children, and the expansion predictability was greater for the lower arch than for the upper arch. The evidence suggests that arch width increment is more predictable in the premolar region and less predictable in the canine and second molar areas, with high variability across studies. Orthodontic aligners have demonstrated effectiveness in expanding arches in both adults and children. However, the literature suggests a decrease in arch width toward the posterior region, and there is no evidence of skeletal gains. To provide more conclusive evidence, randomized controlled clinical studies are warranted. This review was registered in the Open Science Framework database (DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/6EG8F).

Perception about Clear Aligner Therapy among Patients Seeking Orthodontic Treatment in Public Tertiary Care Dental Hospital-Cross-Sectional Survey

Aim: Aim of the study is to assess perception about clear aligner therapy among patients seeking orthodontic treatment in public tertiary care dental hospital.  Material and Methods: This cross-sectional survey was conducted using a questionnaire that had been framed and tested for reliability and validity. It was used to collect information on the socio-demographic profile and the perspectives of orthodontic patients regarding Clear Aligner Therapy. Participants had been informed about the study, and only those who had consented were administered the questionnaire. The structured questionnaire consisted of 23 closed-ended questions, and the data was collected using Google Forms.  Results: Data from 294 patients were assessed, comprising 159 females (54.1%) and 134 males (45.6%), all between the ages of 15 and 45. Of these, 92% were aware of Clear Aligner Therapy (CAT). 31.3% patients perceived CAT to be less effective than fixed appliance (FA) therapy, with only 19.3% being aware of the cost of CAT. Additionally, 30.4% believed that CAT would result in a longer treatment duration compared to fixed appliances. However, 59.6% preferred CAT over fixed appliances for aesthetic reasons, and 78.6% favored CAT for better oral hygiene maintenance.  Conclusion: As Clear Aligner Therapy (CAT) represents one of the latest advancements in orthodontics, there is a pressing need to increase education and awareness among the general population to improve their understanding of this treatment option.

Effects of clear aligners and traditional removable appliances on oral microbiome in mixed dentition: a comparative study

BackgroundThis prospective study aims to investigate the comparative effects of clear aligners (CA) and traditional removable appliances (RA) on the cariogenic risk of patients in mixed dentition, focusing on the oral microbiome.Methods25 children were included and assigned into CA and RA groups. Supragingival plaque and saliva samples were collected, and clinical parameters including Decay-missing-filled teeth index (DMFT), Plaque Index (PI) and Gorelick Index (GI) were recorded before treatment (T0) and after 6-month follow-up (T1). DNA was extracted from supragingival plaque and saliva and analyzed via 16S rDNA gene sequencing.ResultsClinical parameters showed no statistically significant difference between groups at each time point or within group over time (p > 0.05). In both RA and CA groups, saliva exhibited significantly higher alpha diversity compared to supragingival plaque at T1, as indicated by the significantly higher Chao1 and Shannon indexes (p < 0.05). Regarding beta diversity, significant difference was observed in saliva and supragingival plaque samples between T0 and T1 within group RA (p < 0.05, Adonis), whereas no such significance was noted in the CA group (p > 0.05, Adonis). At the genus level, Lactobacillus exhibited a statistically significant increase in saliva and supragingival plaque of group RA from T0 to T1 (p < 0.05), and an increasing trend in the group CA without statistical significance (p > 0.05). At T1, Lactobacillus levels were comparable between groups, whereas species-level analysis revealed distinct cariogenic species.ConclusionBoth clear aligners and traditional removable appliances resulted in elevated cariogenic risk of patients in mixed dentition at the microbial level. Distinct alterations in cariogenic species were observed to be induced by various orthodontic appliances.

Efficacy of Clear Aligner Therapy for the Treatment of Anterior Open Bite in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The objective of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of clear aligner therapy (CAT) for the treatment of anterior open bite (AOB) in adults. The focused question was "Is CAT effective for the management of AOB in adults?". Databases were searched without time and language barriers up to and including August 2024 based on pre-specified eligibility criteria. Risk of Bias (RoB) assessment was performed using the Risk-of-Bias-In-Non-randomised-Studies-of-Intervention (ROBINS-I) tool. Meta-analyses were conducted using a random effects model (REM) for change in AOB and cephalometric measurements with an evaluation of the mean difference (MD) and/or standardised mean difference (SMD). The Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool was used to assess the quality of evidence. Publication bias was assessed using Funnel plots and Egger's regression test. There were 14 studies included in the qualitative assessment and 12 in the meta-analysis. The RoB was moderate in 13 studies and low in one. The meta-analysis showed significant AOB correction with CAT [(MD) = 2.76 mm, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.23-3.28] due to maxillary and mandibular incisor extrusion (MD = 0.85 mm, CI: 0.43-1.26 and MD = 0.86 mm, CI: 0.29-1.44, respectively). There were no significant changes identified for maxillary and mandibular molar intrusion or changes in the mandibular plane angle (MPA). The level of confidence was high for AOB correction, incisor extrusion, and molar intrusion and low for MPA. CAT leads to a significant correction of AOB of approximately 2.76 mm, which can be mainly attributed to incisor extrusion.

Comparison of acceptability of orthodontic appliances in children in mixed dentition treated with removable acrylic appliances and Invisalign first: a cross-sectional study

PurposeThis study aimed to compare the acceptability of removable acrylic appliances (RA) and Invisalign First (IF) clear aligners (Aligntech, USA) among children undergoing orthodontic treatment during the mixed dentition period, considering the severity of malocclusions.MethodsA total of 40 patients, aged 6 to 13 years, were recruited for the study. Malocclusion severity was evaluated using the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need-Dental Health Component (IOTN-DHC). Patients completed the "Acceptance of Orthodontic Appliance Scale (AOAS)" via a face-to-face Google survey. To assess the reliability of the AOAS, the survey was resent to five patients after three months for a second response, and reliability analysis was conducted. Additionally, inter-rater reliability was evaluated by having all patients independently assessed by a second researcher. Data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics version 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.ResultsAlthough no significant difference was found in IOTN-DHC scores, the IF group demonstrated significantly higher AOAS scores compared to the RA group (p = 0.014). Survey responses revealed noticeable distinctions between groups regarding speaking discomfort, preference for orthodontic appliances, and facial appearance comfort. A negative correlation (r = -0.477, p = 0.034) was observed between malocclusion severity and appliance acceptance.Clinical significanceThis study underscores the significant superiority and advantage of IF over RA among pediatric orthodontic patients during the mixed dentition period.

The Mechanical Properties of Orthodontic Aligners of Clear Aligner After Intraoral Use in Different Time Periods.

Although the technique of orthodontic aligners has risen in popularity, their mechanical properties have not been thoroughly investigated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the mechanical properties of the orthodontic aligners Clear Aligner after intraoral use for 7, 10 and 14 days, and to compare them with as-received aligners (0 days). It was also sought to examine the properties of the unprocessed raw material (polyethylene glycol terephthalate) used to manufacture these aligners. Thirty-two aligners by four patients were evaluated and studied at 0, 7, 10, 14 days of use. Each aligner was divided into three segments (two posterior and one anterior), which resulted in 96 samples. Also, 16 samples of unprocessed material were studied. For all samples, elastic modulus, ultimate tensile stress (UTS) and yield stress were calculated by conducting tensile testing. Additionally, material hardness was tested. The two-tailed Mann-Whitney test was performed, having set the level of significance at p = 0.05. Analysis of the measurements indicated a statistically significant decrease in elastic modulus between days 0 and 14 of use, of UTS between days 0 and 7, 7 and 10, and of yield stress between days 0 and 7. For hardness, in every period, posterior segments demonstrated significantly higher values than anterior segments. All properties of the unprocessed material were statistically significantly higher than the processed samples. The unprocessed material presented significant differences in every property tested in comparison to the processed aligners. The processed material showed further deterioration over time during use. The present study provides evidence that thermoforming and ageing affect the mechanical properties of the aligners.

Home Biofilm Management in Orthodontic Aligners: A Systematic Review.

Background. Transparent aligners are recently introduced orthodontic devices considered promising for the improvement of oral health conditions, in terms of faster treatment times and enhanced comfort, especially if compared with traditional fixed orthodontic therapy. This systematic review aimed to evaluate at-home protocols for proper oral hygiene and aligners cleaning during orthodontic treatment. Methods. A search was conducted using the following four databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus. The systematic review (registered as CRD 42024562215) followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines and included prospective studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials, and in vivo and ex vivo studies; they had to assess treatment with invisible orthodontics compared to treatment with fixed orthodontics, home oral hygiene, or aligner disinfection protocols. The evidence in the studies was evaluated for risk of bias using the RoB-2 (for RCTs and randomized crossover studies) and ROBINS-I tools (for observational studies). Results. Eleven studies were included in this systematic review: four RCTs, four crossover studies, and three cross-sectional observational studies. Seven studies considered patients undergoing orthodontic treatment, whereas four examined orthodontic aligners. The cleaning protocols of the aligners were evaluated based on the analysis of residual biofilm on the thermoplastic surfaces. Studies included were characterized by a low level of certainty, thus further evidence is needed. Conclusions. The most effective protocols entailed a combination of mechanical and chemical agents, suggesting that it is fundamental for patients undergoing aligner treatment to focus on individually tailored home oral hygiene protocols.

Effect of endodontically treated teeth on prosthetically guided orthodontics with clear aligners: a case series

BackgroundProsthetically guided orthodontics (PGO) can correct the malocclusion for better prosthetic rehabilitation in esthetic rehabilitation. Unlike conventional orthodontic treatment, only minor tooth movement is designed in PGO according to the requirement of subsequent restoration. For better appearance during the treatment, PGO is often performed with clear aligners, which have no metal brackets. It has been proven that the PGO with clear aligners can achieve generally satisfactory outcomes. However, its risk has not been fully known due to the paucity of relevant studies.Case presentationThree patients who needed esthetic rehabilitation with mild malocclusion were included in this study. After evaluation, a prosthetic solution alone was considered insufficient to provide optimal outcomes. Thus, they were treated using PGO with clear aligners (Invisalign Go, Align Technology, Santa Clara, California, USA) and accomplished prosthetic rehabilitation subsequently. Dental history and X-ray examination revealed that endodontically treated teeth (ETT) existed in all the cases. Intraoral photographs were collected to compare the pre-treatment and post-treatment dentition. After PGO, posterior ETT did not maintain their position as scheduled and lost occlusal contacts, while all the anterior teeth, including anterior ETT, were moved to the designed position. Corresponding prosthetic rehabilitation was used to solve it after consulting with the patients.ConclusionsOcclusal contact loss of posterior ETT is a potential risk in PGO with clear aligners, affecting the orthodontic result.

Weight changes during the initial phase of orthodontic treatment with clear aligners versus fixed appliances: a pilot prospective cohort study.

The aim was to assess adult patients' weight changes during the initial phase of orthodontic treatment (OT) with clear aligner therapy (CAT) versus fixed bracket systems (FBS). This pilot prospective cohort study included systemically-healthy adults who were treated with CAT or FBS. Participants with eating disorders and/or undergoing dietary programs were excluded. Weight was assessed using a calibrated digital scale at the start of OT (T1), 6-8 weeks (T2), and 12-16 weeks (T3) after starting OT. A questionnaire was used to record demographic variables, diet and exercise habits, self-reported compliance and discomfort during OT, and use of analgesics. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to assess the association between treatment type (FBS versus CT) and time-period (T1, T2, T3) on participants' weight while adjusting for baseline covariates such as age, gender, height, and weight. Forty-two participants (CAT group: 22 and FBS group: 20) were analysed. In the CAT group, there was a slight initial mean weight gain of 0.2 Kg (~ 0.4 pounds) (T2-T1), and 0.8 Kg (~ 1.7 pounds) overall mean weight loss between T1 and T3. For the FBS group, there was a slight initial weight loss of 0.3 Kg (~ 0.7 pounds) (T2-T1) and no overall change between T1 and T3. Treatment type (CAT versus FBS) was not significantly associated with weight changes during the initial phase of OT. There were no significant differences in the weight changes during the initial phase of OT with CAT compared with FBS. Clear aligner therapy should not be advertised as a weight loss strategy.

Vertical Dimension Control in Two Different Treatment Protocols: Invisalign First and Bite Block-A Retrospective Study.

The aim of the present study was to compare the vertical dimension changes, before and after treatment, in two groups of growing patients, one group treated with clear aligner therapy versus a group treated with Quad-helix and bite-block therapy. The studied sample was composed of n. 40 patients (20 females and 20 males with a mean age of 8.6 ± 1.8 years), enrolled from the Department of Orthodontics at Policlinico of Rome Tor Vergata. The original sample was randomly divided into two groups: Group IF (Invisalign First) and Group BB (Quad-helix and bite block). Pre- (T0) and post-treatment (T1 after 12 months) lateral cephalograms were collected from all the selected patients. Nine cephalometric parameters, both angular and linear, were measured and recorded for each cephalogram. No statistically significant changes were found between both the IF and BB groups at T0, while statistically significant changes were observed in both groups (BB and IF) between T0 and T1 (after 12 months of active therapy), p < 0.005. Both therapies were able to control the patient's vertical condition. To date, the use of conventional appliances seems to have slightly better efficacy in controlling the vertical dimension than aligner therapy.

Preadolescents’ Smile Outcomes after Two Different Orthodontic Treatments: Traditional Interceptive Therapy with Rapid Maxillary Expansion (RME)/Schwarz Plate and Clear Aligners

Preadolescents’ Smile Outcomes after Two Different Orthodontic Treatments: Traditional Interceptive Therapy with Rapid Maxillary Expansion (RME)/Schwarz Plate and Clear Aligners

Anchorage loss of the posterior teeth under different extraction patterns in maxillary and mandibular arches using clear aligner: a finite element study

BackgroundExtracting the premolars is an effective strategy for patients with bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion. Clear aligners (CAs) close the extraction spaces through shortening the length of aligners. The contraction force generated by the terminal of aligners makes the posterior teeth tip mesially, which is known as the roller coaster effect. This phenomenon is even worse in the 2nd premolar extraction cases. Posterior anchorage preparation is commonly used to protect the angulation of molars, taking the form of presetting distal tipping value. However, the distal tipping design aggravates the anchorage loss of anterior teeth simultaneously. This study aimed to explore the different anchorage loss of the posterior teeth when the 1st or 2nd premolars were extracted using CAs, respectively in maxillary and mandibular arches, further providing guidance for anchorage preparation design in clinical practice.MethodsTwo bimaxillary finite element models with different extraction patterns were established to simulate the anterior en-masse retraction process of the CAs. In Model 1, the maxillary and mandibular 1st premolars were extracted, while in Model 2, the 2nd premolars were extracted. Finite element analysis methods were utilized to analyze the tipping angle of the anterior and posterior teeth.ResultsCompared between two models, the anterior teeth exhibited a greater lingual inclination tendency and the posterior teeth exhibited a slighter mesial tipping tendency in Model 1 regarding individual tooth. The closer to the extraction spaces, the greater the tip, and the distal tipping tendency of the 1st premolars was more evident than the mesial tipping tendency of the 1st molars in Model 2. Compared between the maxillary and mandibular arches, the mesial tipping tendency of individual posterior tooth was more evident in the maxilla. In addition, the highest hydrostatic stress of the periodontal ligaments was concentrated on the cervical and apical parts directly adjacent to the extraction spaces, and it exhibited relatively uniform distribution in Model 1.ConclusionsThe individual posterior tooth showed the same mesial tipping direction but to different degree when the 1st or the 2nd premolars were extracted during clear aligner treatment. Presetting anchorage preparation design for the posterior teeth is essential to alleviate the roller coaster effect, especially in the 2nd premolar extraction cases. Furthermore, larger anchorage preparation value should be proposed for the maxillary posterior teeth.

Three-dimensional analysis of force distribution on maxillary dentition while distalization of first and second molars simultaneously with clear aligners

Objective: To explore the force distribution on the maxillary dentition when the first and second molars distalized simultaneously with different step sizes using clear aligners in vitro in order to provide a theoretical basis for the rational design of molar distalization. Methods: Clear aligners were designed to simultaneously distalize the maxillary first and second molars bilaterally, with rectangular attachments placed on the buccal surfaces of the first and second premolars, as well as the second molars. Based on different step sizes, the aligners were divided into three groups: Group A (0.15 mm per step), Group B (0.20 mm per step), and Group C (0.25 mm per step). Ten aligners were fabricated for each group using 0.76 mm thick polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PET-G) sheets. A three-dimensional force measurement system was used to measure the forces exerted on each tooth by the aligners, the first and second molars served as the target teeth and the remaining teeth as anchorage teeth. The three-dimensional force data were compared among the three groups. Results: In the mesiodistal direction, the forces on the central and lateral incisors were relatively small among all three groups, with no statistically significant differences (P>0.05). However, significant differences were observed in the forces on the canines, first premolars, second premolars, first molars, and second molars (P<0.05). The distal forces on the second molars in Groups B and C were (6.13±1.45) N and (6.83±1.58) N, respectively, significantly higher than that in Group A [(3.51±1.01) N] (P<0.05). The distal force on the first molars in Group C [(6.62±0.89) N] was significantly higher than that in Groups A and B (P<0.05). The mesial reactive forces on the first and second premolars in Groups B and C were significantly higher than those in Group A (P<0.05). The mesial reactive force on the canines in Group C [(-2.98±1.33) N] was significantly higher than that in Group A [(-1.69±0.68) N] (P<0.05), while there were no significant differences between Groups B and C in the forces on the canines, first premolars, and second premolars (P>0.05). In the buccolingual direction, there were no statistically significant differences in the forces on the central and lateral incisors among three groups (P>0.05), but significant differences were observed in the forces on the canines, second premolars, and second molars (P<0.05). The buccolingual forces on the canines, second premolars, and second molars in Group B were (-0.56±0.54), (-2.07±0.95), (1.13±0.55) N, respectively, significantly higher than those in Group A (P<0.05), but there were no significant differences compared to Group C (P>0.05). Compared to the mesiodistal and buccolingual forces, the vertical forces on the target and anchorage teeth were relatively small in all three groups. Conclusions: When using 0.76 mm thick PET-G sheets to fabricate clear aligners for simultaneous molar distalization, a step size of 0.20 mm per step is recommended. To prevent buccal tipping of the molars during distalization, it is advisable to design lingual displacement for the molars and buccal displacement for the adjacent anchorage teeth to counteract the unfavorable forces, with attachments placed on the primary anchorage teeth.

The Effect of Initial Orthodontic Therapy with Clear Aligners and Fixed Appliances on Microbial Profiles and Clinical Parameters

The Effect of Initial Orthodontic Therapy with Clear Aligners and Fixed Appliances on Microbial Profiles and Clinical Parameters

Conformal Iontronic Sensing Clear Aligner

AbstractThe clear aligner, commonly utilized in orthodontic treatment for malocclusion, necessitates the quantification of orthodontic forces, which is highly demanded by doctors for enhancing risk management and treatment efficiency. However, the current technology still faces obstacles in achieving conformal integration of pressure sensors onto clear aligners with large curvature for the quantification and real‐time monitoring of orthodontic forces. In this paper, a conformal iontronic sensing clear aligner (CSA) is proposed based on flexible iontronic sensing mechanism, which conformally integrates the sensor with the aligner to quantify orthodontic forces throughout the treatment process while preserving the aligner's original function. Specifically, the ionic coating is seamlessly integrated onto the diaphragm by applying a layer of ionic paint before molding the clear aligner, while the sensing electrode array, designed using a kirigami‐based structure, is seamlessly adhered to the ionic coating. By integrating the CSA into a dental model, its exceptional sensitivity and precise pressure mapping capabilities have been demonstrated. This enables the identification of various tooth movement patterns, discernment of orthodontic force magnitude, and continuous monitoring of forces throughout the orthodontic treatment. Consequently, this research is expected to significantly advance risk management, outcome prediction, and treatment efficiency in orthodontic treatments.

Clear aligners for patients with severe gingival recession: A case report

Fixed appliances are an excellent treatment approach for mild to severe malocclusions. Increasingly, aligner-based treatments are being provided as a treatment option. The latter may be preferable to fixed appliances in selected cases. A young adult with severe gingival recession is presented who was treated successfully with aligner-based treatment with minimal deterioration of the gingival tissue levels. However, limits should be applied to the buccal and labial movement of teeth to reduce the risk of worsening of the gingival recession. CPD/Clinical Relevance: Aligner-based treatment may be preferable for orthodontic patients with severe gingival recession.

Effects on Sleep Bruxism Activity of Three Different Oral Appliances: One Year Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Different oral appliances (OAs) have been proposed to control sleep bruxism (SB) detrimental effects on the stomatognathic system. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of different OAs on SB activity and masticatory muscle activity (sMMA) measured by EMG. This longitudinal cohort study was conducted on 51 patients (21 M, 30 F, mean age 26,5 ± 3,5) suffering from SB diagnosed with a validated portable EMG-ECG holter and wearing different OAs: occlusal splints, functional appliance with metallic bites and clear aligners followed after 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months from delivery. A control group of 16 non-treated SB patients (6 M, 10 F mean age 27,1 ± 1,4) was used as a reference. A multiple regression analysis was performed to estimate the differences between groups. The level of significance was set as P value <0,05. Occlusal splint reduced sleep bruxism index after 1 week, 3, 6 and 12 months from delivery while functional appliance only after 12 months. Occlusal splints reduced general phasic contractions only in the first week and sleep bruxism-related phasic contractions at 1 week, 3 and 6 months after delivery with no significant reductions after 12 months. Patients wearing clear aligners showed a reduction in general tonic contractions after 6 and 12 months. Resin and metal bites can reduce sleep bruxism index, while resin bites can reduce sleep bruxism-related phasic contractions. Clear aligners do not influence sleep bruxism index but can reduce tonic contractions.

Comparative evaluation of alveolar bone remodeling and root length changes in fixed appliances versus clear aligners: A retrospective cohort study on skeletal Class III malocclusion treatment

The retrospective study examined changes in the root length and alveolar bone surrounding maxillary incisors in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion treated by surgical orthodontic treatment with either fixed appliances (FAs) or clear aligners (CAs). A total of 60 subjects were divided based on appliance type used. Cone beam computed tomography scans were taken at three stages: before treatment, after presurgical orthodontic treatment, and post-treatment for both groups. Vertical alveolar bone level and horizontal alveolar bone thickness (ABT) were measured at four heights (3, 6, and 9 mm from the cementoenamel junction, and the root apex), along with root length, at these time points. Both groups showed a decrease in root length, with the CA group experiencing a significantly smaller reduction (0.4 ± 0.79 mm) compared with the FA group (0.64 ± 0.8 mm; P = 0.02). The FA group demonstrated more significant reduction in palatal ABT (P < 0.05) and greater root resorption, whereas the CA group exhibited considerable labial marginal bone resorption (P = 0.007) and a notable decrease in labiolingual inclination (P = 0.042). The findings suggest that FA and CA might lead to decreased ABT and significant root resorption, with FA therapy likely resulting in more pronounced effects. Both modalities led to notable vertical bone loss, particularly, on the labial side of the maxillary incisors in the CA group during postsurgical orthodontic treatment. Preventing iatrogenic deterioration of periodontal support surrounding the incisors is crucial during presurgical and postsurgical phases.

How environmentally friendly is the disposal of clear aligners? A gas chromatography-mass spectrometry study

Used clear aligner trays are often indiscriminately disposed of with general plastic waste and incinerated. This study aimed to analyze the smoke composition from incinerating 2 common aligner materials: glycol-modified polyethylene terephthalate (PET-G) and polyurethane. Each of the 2 materials in triplets was thermoformed. The thermoformed trays were shredded and subjected individually to open-fire combustion, ignited using a methane torch, in a specially designed combustion chamber. The resultant smoke was collected and analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry to study its in-depth composition. A total of 20 peaks, corresponding to 20 compounds, were identified from each of the 2 material samples. O-xylene (21.06%) showed the maximum concentration in the PET-G sample, whereas 1,4-dimethyl-1,3-cyclohexadiene in polyurethane (18.88%). The first peak in the PET-G sample corresponded to benzene with a relative concentration of 5.18%. Four compounds were common to both samples: 1,4-dimethyl-1,3-cyclohexadiene; 1,3-cyclohexadiene, 2,3-dimethyl-; 1-hydroxymethly-4-methylenecyclohexane; and cyclohexanemethanol, 4-methylene-. Benzene, a group 1 carcinogen, was identified in the PET-G smoke sample, whereas tetrahydrofuran, a suspected carcinogen, was found in the polyurethane sample. Some compounds were hazardous, whereas most were skin, eye, and respiratory irritants. Possible mitigation strategies include proper case selection, efficient manufacturing, direct 3-dimensional printing, and developing biodegradable materials. Clinicians can set up 'used aligner collection points' to ensure responsible disposal. Proper disposal guidelines and stringent regulations are the need of the hour.

Effects of Attachment Design and Aligner Material on Mandibular Canine Distal Bodily Movement in Aligner Treatment

Abstract Purpose Dental crowding is a result of a mismatch between tooth size and arch dimensions, which leads to malocclusion; treatment often involves premolar extraction before orthodontic alignment. Clear aligners are limited in their ability to achieve canine distal bodily movement, a common orthodontic maneuver. This study investigated the impacts of attachment design and aligner material on the efficacy of canine distal bodily movement. Methods A finite element analysis was conducted to examine the impact of various attachment designs and two aligner materials, thermoplastic polyurethanes/polycarbonate (TPU/PC) and polyethylene terephthalate glycol-modified (PETG), on mandibular canine distal bodily movement. The investigation focused on the biomechanical responses in the periodontal ligament (PDL) and surrounding alveolar bone. Results Attachment configuration exerted a strong influence on mandibular canine movement. Vertically oriented attachment pairs positioned mesially (mesial occlusal–mesial cervical) resulted in the most effective canine distal bodily movement, followed by a rectangular attachment. TPU/PC aligners induced slightly higher principal stresses in the PDL and von Mises stress and strain in the surrounding alveolar bone compared with PETG aligners; however, the difference was negligible, amounting to less than 6%. Conclusion Attachment design, specifically vertically oriented pairs positioned mesially (mesial occlusal–mesial cervical), was determined to be the crucial factor influencing the efficacy of canine distal bodily movement. The choice of aligner material (TPU/PC or PETG) has minimal impact on this orthodontic procedure.