Invasive Surgery Group Research Articles

Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy of nonmetastatic pT4a colorectal cancer: a propensity score analysis.

The aim was to compare short-term and long-term oncological outcomes between minimally invasive surgery (MIS group) and laparotomy (lap group) in nonmetastatic pT4a colorectal cancer (CRC). The study retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 634 patients treated with radical operation from January 2015 to December 2021 for nonmetastatic pT4a CRC, with propensity score matching. The conversion rate from the MIS group to laparotomy is 3.5%. Intraoperative blood loss, time to first anal exhaust, defecation and drainage tube removal, and complication rate were significantly less in the MIS group. After 5 years, the outcomes of the MIS group were no inferior to laparotomy outcomes [overall survival (OS): 72.7 vs. 77.8%, P =0.285; disease-free survival (DFS): 72.2 vs. 75.0%, P =0.599]. And multivariate analysis showed that age greater than or equal to 60 years old, lymph node metastasis and the carcinoembryonic antigen levels were independent variables for OS, while lymph node metastasis and CA125 levels were independent variables for DFS. The results of the graph show the relationship between the sum of scores of sex, age, complications, BMI, carcinoembryonic antigen, age, CA125, tumor site, N stage and tumor length diameter and 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year mortality and DFS of patients. Among them, tumor length diameter and N stage are significantly correlated with long-term survival and disease-free of patients. MIS is safe and feasible for nonmetastatic pT4a CRC, with the added benefit of accelerated postoperative recovery. In oncology, MIS did not affect OS and DFS.

Evaluation of survival outcomes between minimally invasive and open surgery in the treatment of early-stage endometrial cancer: a population-based study in Osaka Japan.

To compare the oncological outcomes between Japanese women who underwent minimally invasive surgery and those who underwent open surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer. This population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the Osaka Cancer Registry from 2011 to 2018. Surgically treated patients for localized (uterine-confined) endometrial cancer were identified. Patients were classified into two groups according to the type of surgery (minimally invasive surgery group and open-surgery group), pathological risk factors (low-risk and high-risk), and year of diagnosis (Group 1, 2011-14; Group 2, 2015-18). Overall survival was compared between the minimally invasive surgery and open-surgery groups. In the analyses including all patients, there was no difference in overall survival between the minimally invasive surgery and open-surgery groups (P=0.0797). The 4-year overall survival rate was 97.1 and 95.7% in the minimally invasive surgery and open-surgery groups, respectively. When investigated according to pathological risks, there were no differences in overall survival between the minimally invasive surgery and open-surgery groups in both the low- and high-risk groups. In the low-risk group, the 4-year overall survival rates in the minimally invasive surgery and open-surgery groups were 97.7 and 96.5%, respectively. In the high-risk group, the 4-year overall survival rates in the minimally invasive surgery and open-surgery groups were 91.2 and 93.2%, respectively. Similarly, there were no differences in overall survival between the minimally invasive surgery and open-surgery groups in both Group 1 (P=0.4479 in low-risk and P=0.1826 in high-risk groups) and Group 2 (P=0.1750 in low-risk and P=0.0799 in high-risk groups). Our study provides epidemiological evidence that minimally invasive surgery is an effective alternative to open surgery in Japanese patients with early-stage endometrial cancer.

A study on the perioperative effects of obesity on minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting and its surgical techniques.

The aim of this study was to discuss the perioperative effects of obesity on minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and its surgical techniques. A total of 582 patients with multivessel lesion who underwent off-pump CABG by our medical group of Beijing Anzhen Hospital between January 2017 and January 2021 were divided into the minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) group and the conventional group (median sternotomy) according to the surgical method used. The body mass index of the patients was calculated, based on which both groups were divided into obese (≥28 kg/m2) and non-obese subgroups (<28 kg/m2). First, the perioperative data of the obese subgroups of both MICS and conventional groups were compared. Second, the obese and non-obese subgroups were compared in the MICS group. Despite a higher proportion of diabetes in the MICS group, there was no significant difference in preoperative baseline nor in the incidence of major complications within 30 days after surgery between obese subgroups of the MICS and conventional groups. The MICS group had a significantly lower rate of poor wound healing, along with a higher predischarge Barthel Index. Also, the preoperative baseline between the obese and non-obese subgroups of the MICS group exhibited no statistical differences. The obese subgroup had longer postoperative ventilator assistance, while other intraoperative data and postoperative observation indexes exhibited no significant differences. MICS CABG method is safe and feasible for obese patients with multivessel lesion. Minimally invasive surgery is beneficial to wound healing in obese patients. However, it requires a thorough preoperative evaluation and adequate surgical experience and skills.

Percutaneous versus open posterior stabilization and decompression in AOSpine-type A3 thoracolumbar fractures with neurological deficit

BackgroundThis retrospective cohort study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between two treatment strategies focusing on non-osteoporotic AOSpine-type A3 fractures of the thoracolumbar spine with neurological deficits at levels T11 to L2.MethodsIn total, 67 patients between 18 and 60 years of age who were treated operatively with either of the two treatment strategies were included. One treatment strategy included open posterior stabilization and decompression, whereas the other was based on percutaneous posterior stabilization and decompression via a tubular retraction system. Demographic data, surgical variables, and further parameters were assessed. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment score, were measured to assess functional outcomes. The regional Cobb angle (CA), the anterior height ratio of the fractured vertebrae (AHRV), and the degree of canal encroachment (DCE) were assessed. The ASIA score was used to assess neurological function recovery. The follow-up period was at least 12 months.ResultsSurgical time and postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter in the minimally invasive surgery (MIS) group. Intraoperative blood loss was significantly less in the MIS group. Regarding radiological outcome, CA and AHRV at the time of follow-up did not show a significant difference. DCE at the time of follow-up was significantly improved in the MIS group. Lower VAS scores and better ODIs were observed in the MIS group at the 6-month follow-up, but similar outcomes were observed at the 12-month follow-up. The ASIA score was similar between both groups at the 12-month follow-up.ConclusionsBoth treatment strategies are safe and effective; however, MIS could provide earlier pain relief and better functional outcomes compared with OS.

Clinical Effect and Aesthetic Evaluation of Minimally Invasive Implant Therapy.

To explore the clinical effect and aesthetic evaluation of minimally invasive implant in the treatment of dentition defect. From April 2020 to May 2021, 60 patients who received implant restoration were collected as the research objects. Randomly divided into minimally invasive surgery group (30 patients) and routine surgery group (30 patients). The postoperative antibiotic use time, pain disappearance time, swelling degree, and pain degree of the two groups were compared. Follow-up for one year, record and compare the success rate of implants and aesthetic evaluation of restoration between the two groups. The evaluation of patients' satisfaction with restoration was collected and compared. The operation time and antibiotic use time of patients in minimally invasive surgery group were significantly shorter than those in conventional surgery group, and the swelling degree rating was significantly better than that in conventional surgery group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). The number of patients with no pain (0 degree) and mild pain (degree) in minimally invasive surgery group was significantly higher than that in routine surgery group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). One year after the repair, the success rate of implants in minimally invasive surgery group was 100.00% compared with that in routine surgery group (93.33%), and the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The aesthetic effect scores of patients in minimally invasive surgery group were higher than those in routine surgery group in seven items: proximal gingival papilla, distal gingival papilla, labial gingival margin curvature, labial gingival margin height, root convexity, soft tissue color, and soft tissue texture, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). The satisfaction scores of the patients in minimally invasive surgery group in chewing function, comfort, aesthetics, retention function, and language function were higher than those in conventional surgery group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Minimally invasive implant can achieve the same effect as conventional implant, and it has the advantages of lower postoperative swelling, shorter pain time, better aesthetic effect, and higher satisfaction after restoration.

Evaluation of (Wet) and (Dry) Mediastinal Chest Drainage in Minimally Invasive and Conventional Cardiac Surgery.

Drainage of fluid and evacuation of air from the pericardial and pleural spaces after cardiothoracic surgery is necessary to prevent effusion, tamponade, and pneumothorax, and also to detect hemorrhage. For this purpose, negative-pressure drains are placed in the mediastinum and pleural cavities. We compared the efficacy and safety of two systems wet and dry drainage for the management and monitoring of negative pressure and anti-reflux valve safety systems, to promote healing of the pleural and pericardial cavities. Two devices for mediastinal chest drainage [Venice PAS (Wet) and Rome PAS (Dry); both Eurosets SRL, Medolla, Italy] were evaluated in terms of safety, efficacy and clinical outcomes in a cohort of 60 patients who underwent elective cardiac surgery procedures. The patients were divided into a minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) group [n=30; mitral valve surgery (MVS) by right anterolateral mini-thoracotomy] and a conventional cardiac surgery (CCS) group [n=30; coronary arterial bypass grafting (CABG) in full sternotomy] at a single institution (Anthea Hospital GVM Care & Research, Bari, Italy). Negative pressure was managed with a target value of -20 cmH2O measured in the chest tube and was related to the device: deviation of ± 1 cmH2O for the Venice PAS (Wet) and 0 cmH2O for the Rome PAS (Dry) in the MICS group; deviation of 1 ± 0.8 cmH2O for the Venice PAS (Wet) and 0.8±0.2 cmH2O for the Rome PAS (Dry) in the CCS group. A constant volumetric air leak meter (VALM) value and the absence of air-leak bubbling were correlated with the absence of air in the pleural cavity and complete pulmonary re-expansion to restore normal respiratory dynamics in the MICS group for both models of chest drainage. The maximum total pericardial blood drained was 1104 ± 302 ml with Venice PAS (Wet) and 1530 ± 230 with Rome PAS (Dry) in the CCS group. There were no reports of cardiac tamponade in either group. The two mediastinal chest drainage devices [Venice PAS (Wet) and Rome PAS (Dry)] in this study were effective, accurate for measuring the applied negative pressure, and safe in their application after cardiac surgery procedures via minimally invasive and conventional approaches for blood and liquid drainage, prevention of cardiac tamponade, and restoration of normal respiratory dynamics after surgical pneumothorax. Both systems are equipped with anti-reflux valves to prevent air and blood from entering the drainage, and no adverse events were reported.

Less correction with minimally invasive surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis compared to open surgical correction.

In this study, we investigated the relationship between the results of thoracic curve correction using minimally invasive surgeries in 35 patients and open surgical correction in 47 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The correlations between the Cobb's angle of the primary and postoperative curves, angle of thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis, correction percentage, derotation values, estimated blood loss, duration of surgery, and period of hospitalization after surgery were assessed by calculating the mean and standard deviation. Calculation and comparison were performed using Pearson correlation. The Cobb's angle correction ranged from 53.4° ± 11.8° to 6.7° ± 5.2° (p < 0.001) in the open surgical correction group and from 51.2° ± 11.4° to 11.7° ± 5.8° (p < 0.001) in the minimally invasive surgery group before and after surgery, respectively. The percentage of curvature correction was 88.2% ± 8.0% and 77.7% ± 10.7% (p < 0.001) in the open surgical correction and minimally invasive surgery groups, respectively. The estimated blood loss was higher in the open surgical correction group than in the minimally invasive surgery group (208.7 ± 113.4 vs 564.3 ± 242.7 mL). Axial rotation was changed from 29.1°± 7.5 to 17.1°± 6.8 (p < 0.001) in the open surgical correction group and from 28.9°± 7.8 to 19.4°± 6.4 (p < 0.001) in the minimally invasive surgery group. The duration of surgery was shorter in the open surgical correction group than in the minimally invasive surgery group (266.6 ± 64.3 vs 346.2 ± 70.5 min). A positive correlation between time of operation and Cobb's angle correction (in °) in open surgical correction (r = 0.37) and minimally invasive surgery (r = 0.43) was found. The open surgical correction procedures were more effective than minimally invasive surgery in correcting the spinal curve. The increase in the duration of open surgical correction increases the estimated blood loss, but it also more significantly improves the correction of Cobb's angle. III.

Hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage: Which one should we choose between laser navigation and 3D navigation mold?

Hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH) is a severe life-threatening disease, and its incidence has gradually increased in recent years. Due to the particularity and diversity of its bleeding sites, the early treatment of hematoma needs to be more meticulous and accurate, and minimally invasive surgery is often one of the measures that are commonly adopted now. The lower hematoma debridement and the navigation template created by 3D printing technology were compared in the external drainage of a hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage. Then the effect and feasibility of the two operations were explicitly evaluated. We performed a retrospective analysis of all eligible patients with HICH who underwent laser-guided hematoma evacuation or hematoma puncture under 3D-navigated molds at the Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University from January 2019 to January 2021. A total of 43 patients were treated. Twenty-three patients were treated with laser navigation-guided hematoma evacuation (group A); 20 patients were treated with 3D navigation minimally invasive surgery (group B). A comparative study was conducted between the two groups to evaluate the preoperative and postoperative conditions. The preoperative preparation time of the laser navigation group was significantly shorter than that of the 3D printing group. The operation time of the 3D printing group was better than that of the laser navigation group (0.73 ± 0.26 h vs. 1.03 ± 0.27 h P = 0.00070). In the improvement in the short-term postoperatively, there was no statistically significant difference between the laser navigation group and the 3D printing group (Median hematoma evacuation rate P = 0.14); And in the three-month follow-up NIHESS score, there was no significant difference between the two (P = 0.82). Laser-guided hematoma removal is more suitable for emergency operations, with real-time navigation and shortened preoperative preparation time; hematoma puncture under a 3D navigation mold is more personalized and shortens the intraoperative time course. There was no significant difference in therapeutic effect between the two groups.

Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy in women with high risk endometrial cancer: A multi-center study performed in Argentina

ObjectiveCompare the perioperative outcomes and disease-free survival between minimally invasive and open surgery in women with stage I–II high-risk endometrial cancer. MethodsA retrospective, cohort study was performed involving twenty-four centers from Argentina. Patients with grade 3 endometrioid, serous, clear cell, undifferentiated carcinoma or carcinosarcoma who underwent hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and staging between January 2010–2018 were included. Cox hazard regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves evaluated the association of surgical technique with survival. ResultsOf 343 eligible patients, 214 (62 %) underwent open surgery and 129 (38 %) underwent laparoscopic surgery. No significant differences were seen between the two groups with respect to greater or equal grade III Clavien-Dindo postoperative complications (11 % in the open surgery group vs 9 % minimally invasive surgery group; P = 0.34) Minimally invasive surgery was not associated with worse disease-free survival at four years (79.14 % [95 % CI 69.42– 86.08] vs 78.80 % [95 % CI 70.61–84.96]), (p = 0.25), even after creating a Cox proportional model (hazard ratio [HR] 1.08 95 % CI 0.63–1.84); (p = 0.76). ConclusionThere was no difference between postoperative complications nor oncologic outcomes comparing minimally invasive and open surgery among patients with high-risk endometrial cancer.

Role of minimally invasive secondary cytoreduction in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer

ObjectiveRetrospective series have shown minimally invasive secondary cytoreductive surgery is a feasible approach in selected cases of recurrent ovarian cancer. However, no predictors of minimally invasive secondary cytoreductive surgery feasibility...

Pulmonary sequestration in adult patients: a single-center retrospective study

BackgroundPulmonary sequestration (PS) is a rare congenital lower airway malformation. This study presents the clinical and imaging features and surgical outcomes of PS in adults, and compare the safety and feasibility of minimally invasive surgery versus open thoracotomy for PS.MethodsAdult patients with PS treated at our center from July 2011 to September 2021 were included. Information regarding the patient demographics, clinical and CT features, arterial supply and venous drainage, and surgical outcomes were collected.ResultsNinety seven patients were included. The most common CT findings were mass lesions (50.5%) and cystic lesions (20.6%). The vast majority of the lesions (96 out of 97) were located close to the spine in the lower lobes (left vs. right: 3.6 vs. 1). Arterial supply was mainly provided by the thoracic aorta (87.4%) and abdominal aorta (10.5%). Intralobar and extralobar PS accounted for 90.7% and 9.3% of the patients, respectively. Three (4.5%) patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery were converted to open thoracotomy due to dense adhesions. Though no significant differences regarding operative time (P = 0.133), the minimally invasive surgery group was significantly better than the open thoracotomy group regarding intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.001), drainage volume (P = 0.004), postoperative hospital days (P = 0.017) and duration of chest drainage (P = 0.001). There were no cases of perioperative mortality. Only four (4.1%) patients developed postoperative complications, and no significant difference existed between the two groups.ConclusionOur study revealed PS can present with a variety of different clinical and radiologic manifestations. Clinicians should consider the possibility of PS when diagnosing a lesion in the lower lobes close to the spine. Moreover, minimally invasive surgery is a safe and effective treatment modality for the treatment of PS in an experienced center.

Ethiopia's first minimally invasive surgery program: A novel approach in global surgical education

ObjectiveComplex lung diseases are among the leading causes of death in Ethiopia. Access to thoracic surgery is limited, and before 2016 no thoracic surgeons were trained in minimally invasive surgery. A global academic partnership was formed between the University of Toronto and Addis Ababa University. We describe implementation of the first minimally invasive surgery training program in sub-Sahara Africa and evaluate its safety. MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort analysis of open versus minimally invasive thoracic and upper gastrointestinal procedures performed at Addis Ababa University from January 2016 to June 2021. Baseline demographic, diagnostic, operative, and postoperative outcomes including length of stay and complications were compared. ResultsIn our bilateral model of surgical education, training is provided in Ethiopia and Canada over 2 years with a focus on capacity building through egalitarian forms of knowledge exchange. Program features included certification in Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery, high-fidelity lobectomy simulation, and hands-on training. Overall, 41 open and 56 minimally invasive surgery cases were included in the final statistical analysis. The average length of stay in the minimally invasive surgery group was 5.2 days versus 11.0 days in the open group (P < .001). The overall complication rate was 18% in the minimally invasive surgery group versus 39% in the open group (P = .020). ConclusionsWe demonstrated the successful initiation of sub-Sahara Africa's first minimally invasive surgery program in thoracic and upper gastrointestinal surgery and characterize its patient safety. We envision the minimally invasive surgery program as a template to continue expanding global partnerships and improving surgical care in other resource-limited settings.

Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy without using uterine manipulator for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy has been reported to increase the risk of cancer relapse and death compared with open surgery in women with early-stage cervical cancer. The use of a uterine manipulator is considered one of the risk factors. To investigate whether women with early-stage cervical cancer treated with minimally invasive radical hysterectomy without using uterine manipulator have oncological outcomes similar to those of open surgery. Searches were performed in MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL from their inception until 31 March 2022. Inclusion criteria were: (1) randomised controlled trials or observational cohort studies published in English, (2) studies comparing minimally invasive radical hysterectomy without using a uterine manipulator with open radical hysterectomy in women with early-stage cervical cancer, and (3) studies comparing survival outcomes. Two authors independently conducted data extraction and assessed study quality. We calculated the hazard ratios (HR) and the 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the inverse variance approach for survival outcome. Six observational studies with 2150 women were included. The minimally invasive surgery group had a significantly higher risk of cancer relapse compared with open surgery group (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.15-2.10). Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy without using a uterine manipulator resulted in an inferior recurrence-free survival compared with open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of women with early-stage cervical cancer.

Does Minimally Invasive Surgery Provide Better Clinical or Radiographic Outcomes Than Open Surgery in the Treatment of Hallux Valgus Deformity? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Does Minimally Invasive Surgery Provide Better Clinical or Radiographic Outcomes Than Open Surgery in the Treatment of Hallux Valgus Deformity? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of Two Reduction Methods for the Treatment of Irreducible Unilateral Subaxial Cervical Facet Joint Dislocation

To compare the clinical efficacy of the minimally invasive technique and the open method in the treatment of irreducible unilateral subaxial cervical facet joint dislocation (SCFD). From March 2015 to September 2018, 62 patients with unilateral SCFD were studied. The cases were divided into 2 groups based on different surgery strategies. Thirty-one patients were enrolled in the minimally invasive surgery (MIS) group, and 31 patients were enrolled in the open surgery group. The duration of prone position operation, blood loss, and total hospitalization costs were recorded. The clinical effects were evaluated using visual analogue scale scores, the Oswestry Disability Index, and Japanese Orthopedic Association scores at each follow-up. In addition, the segmental Cobb angle and intervertebral height were recorded and compared. The amount of intraoperative blood loss, prone position operation duration, and total hospital costs in the MIS group were significantly lower than in the open surgery group. The visual analogue scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and Japanese Orthopedic Association scores of the 2 groups significantly improved after the operation. A satisfactory fusion rate was obtained in both groups, and the segmental Cobb angle and intervertebral height scores in both groups improved significantly. Minimally invasive reduction had equal clinical efficacy to posterior open surgery. However, MIS was less invasive and had lower costs. Therefore, it is a potential option in the treatment of SCFD.

Comparison of the Effects of Open Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery on the Achilles Tendon Rupture Healing Based on Angiogenesis.

Objective To compare the effect of three different surgical methods on rabbit Achilles tendon rupture. Methods The Achilles tendon transection model was constructed by cutting off the inner half of the Achilles tendon. Rabbits were divided into 4 groups: model group, open surgery (OS) group, minimally invasive surgery (MS) group, and conservative treatment (CT) group. Biomechanical evaluation, H&E, and Picrosirius Red staining were applied to evaluate the histological changes and healing. RT-qPCR, Western blot, ELISA, and IHC staining were used to detect the expression of COLIII, IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, CD31, VEGF, bFGF, and TGF-β1. Results Different surgery treatments significantly alleviated the histological changes in rabbits. The tension and elasticity of the Achilles tendon were significantly increased after surgery. In addition, surgery treatments notably alleviated the inflammatory responses in vivo via downregulation of IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-6 and promoted the tube formation in tissues through upregulating VEGF, bFGF, TGF-β1, and CD31. Furthermore, MS exhibited best therapeutic efficiency on Achilles tendon rupture healing, compared with OS or CT. Conclusions Our research revealed the superiority of MS in Achilles tendon rupture treatment at the molecular level compared with OS or CT.

Minimal Invasive Surgery by Wongsiri Technique versus Standard Open Carpal Tunnel Release: A Randomized Trial

Objective: To study the results of carpal tunnel release in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome with Minimal invasive surgery by Wongsiri technique compared to the standard open technique. Materials and Methods: Randomized trial in patients who released carpal tunnel into two groups with 20 patients each. The study group underwent minimally invasive surgery using the Wongsiri technique while the other group had the standard open surgery. Postoperative results at one month were compared for time to return to work, residual numbness, wound satisfaction, and complication such as hand stiffness, pillar pain, painful scar, and infection. Results: There were no statistically significant difference between the two groups of patients in gender, age, occupation, and duration of preoperative symptoms. The results one month after surgery showed that patients in the minimally invasive surgery group returned to work faster than the standard open surgery at 7.32±1.85 and 17.45±5.45 days, respectively (p&lt;0.001). There was no difference in residual numbness at 1.80±0.57 and 1.69±0.49 (p=0.170). Patients in the minimally invasive surgery group were more satisfied with the wound cosmetic at 4.78±0.50 and 3.90±0.32 (p&lt;0.001). Hand stiffness was found less in patients with minimally invasive surgery at 1 and 5 (p&lt;0.001). There was no difference in pillar pain, with one and two cases (p=0.556). There was no painful scar, or infection. Conclusion: Minimally invasive carpal tunnel released by the Wongsiri technique is a surgical method that reduces hand stiffness. The patients returned to work quicker and were more satisfied with the wound cosmetic. Keywords: Carpal tunnel syndrome; Standard open carpal tunnel release; Minimally invasive carpal tunnel released; Wongsiri technique

Assessment of length of stay and cost of minimally invasive versus open thymectomies in patients with myasthenia gravis in Florida.

Thymectomy has become a standard component in treatment for myasthenia gravis. The best surgical approach is still subject to debate. Minimally invasive surgery may have a lower mortality and morbidity rate, improved cosmetic results, and equivalent efficacy at improving neurologic symptoms to open approaches. We compared the perioperative outcomes and cost between the two techniques. We queried Florida Inpatient Discharge Dataset for patients who underwent thymectomy and had a primary diagnosis of non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis using International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 and ICD-10 codes to carry out this retrospective cohort study. The dates ranged between January 1st, 2013, to December 31st, 2018. We compared outcomes of patients who underwent minimally invasive thymectomy versus those who had open thymectomy. An open approach was used in 108 patients, whereas a minimally invasive approach was used in 40 patients. Minimally invasive surgery group had a shorter length of stay (3.0 vs. 6.0 days, P<0.001) and had a non-significant lower total cost ($18.4K vs. $22.1K, P=0.186). After adjusting for age and Elixhauser score, length of stay for minimally invasive group was 32% (P=0.01) lower compared to the open surgery group. Patients who underwent minimally invasive thymectomy for Myasthenia gravis had a significantly shorter length of stay and a lower, although not significant, overall cost.

Prognostic data analysis of surgical treatments for intracerebral hemorrhage

Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a commonly occurring disease in neurosurgery, yet its surgical treatment is controversial. This paper pertains to the study of the effects of different treatment regimens on the outcome of ICH population. Based on a globally shared third-party MIMIC-III database, the researchers firstly described the dissimilarities in survival probability, mortality, and neurological recovery among mainstream treatments for ICH; secondly, patient classification was determined by important clinical features; and outcome variations among treatment groups were compared. The 28-day, 90-day, and in-hospital mortality in the craniotomy group were significantly lower than minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and non-surgical group patients; and, the medium/long-term mortality in MIS group was significantly lower than the non-surgical group. The craniotomy group positively correlated with short-term GCS recovery compared with the MIS group; no difference existed between the non-surgical and MIS groups. The craniotomy group 90-day survival probability and short-term GCS recovery were superior to the other two treatments in the subgroups of first GCS 3-12; this tendency also presented in the MIS group over non-surgical group. For milder patients (first GCS > 12), the three treatment regimens had a minimal effect on patient survival, but the non-surgical group showed an advantage in short-term GCS recovery. Craniotomy patients have a lower mortality and a better short-term neurological recovery in an ICH population, especially in short-to-medium term mortality and short-term neurological recovery over MIS patients. In addition, surgical treatment is recommendable for patients with a GCS ≤ 12.

Nonoperative or Surgical Treatment of Acute Achilles’ Tendon Rupture

BackgroundWhether surgical repair of an acute Achilles’ tendon rupture by an open-repair or minimally invasive approach is associated with better outcomes than nonsurgical treatment is not clear.MethodsWe performed a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial that compared nonoperative treatment, open repair, and minimally invasive surgery in adults with acute Achilles’ tendon rupture who presented to four trial centers. The primary outcome was the change from baseline in the Achilles’ tendon Total Rupture Score (scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health status) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of tendon rerupture.ResultsA total of 554 patients underwent randomization, and 526 patients were included in the final analysis. The mean changes in the Achilles’ tendon Total Rupture Score were −17.0 points in the nonoperative group, −16.0 points in the open-repair group, and −14.7 points in the minimally invasive surgery group (P=0.57). Pairwise comparisons provided no evidence of differences between the groups. The changes from baseline in physical performance and patient-reported physical function were similar in the three groups. The number of tendon reruptures was higher in the nonoperative group (6.2%) than in the open-repair or minimally invasive surgery group (0.6% in each). There were 9 nerve injuries in the minimally invasive surgery group (in 5.2% of the patients) as compared with 5 in the open-repair group (in 2.8%) and 1 in the nonoperative group (in 0.6%).ConclusionsIn patients with Achilles’ tendon rupture, surgery (open repair or minimally invasive surgery) was not associated with better outcomes than nonoperative treatment at 12 months. (Funded by the South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority and Akershus University Hospital; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01785264.)