Invasive Resection Research Articles

Minimally invasive multivisceral resection in rectal cancer: Preparation or Precipitation?

Rectal cancer is a malignant neoplasm that constitutes a significant public health challenge due to its high incidence and associated mortality. In this editorial, we comment on the article by Chan et al. In recent years, there has been progress in the development of new treatments for initial and metastatic rectal cancer due to introduction of techniques of innovative and minimally-invasive surgery (MIS) such as laparoscopy and robotic surgery. However, only a few studies have analyzed the feasibility, safety, and results of MIS in relation to open surgery, thereby highlighting the promising and superior results of MIS in functional and oncological terms. The findings were corroborated by the comparative study of Chan et al which evaluated the feasibility and safety of minimally invasive multivisceral resection (miMVR). A comparison of postoperative outcomes between open MVR and miMVR showed that miMVR presented less blood loss, fewer postoperative complications, and less morbidity. This editorial article is focused specifically on analysis of the characteristics of new minimally-invasive surgical techniques in rectal cancer, particularly in advanced stages. The importance of future research is emphasized by progress in knowledge, training, and clinical practice in the application of these surgical procedures for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.

The Rate of Postoperative Bile Leak in Minimally Invasive Liver Resection in Comparison With Open Surgery: A Systematic Review

The Rate of Postoperative Bile Leak in Minimally Invasive Liver Resection in Comparison With Open Surgery: A Systematic Review

Reappraisal of safety and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy in patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: it is feasible for the pioneer surgical team

BackgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is prevalent in Taiwan, primarily due to the high incidence of hepatitis B and C infections, with high recurrence rates of 50–70% within five years after initial treatment. Treatment options for recurrent HCC include salvage liver transplantation, trans-arterial chemoembolization, re-hepatectomy, and radiofrequency ablation. Repeat hepatectomy exhibits superior oncological outcomes compared with alternative approaches. Although laparoscopic liver resection has demonstrated safety and feasibility for primary HCC resection, the persistence of intrahepatic recurrence necessitates effective intervention. However, repeat liver resection poses several challenges including adhesions from previous surgeries, limited access to recurrent tumors, altered liver structure post-regeneration, difficulties in obtaining hilar control, and compromised liver reserves. Suggesting a laparoscopic approach for recurrent HCC is typically based on the surgeons’ experience and confidence. In this study, we reconfirmed the safety, feasibility and oncological outcome of laparoscopic repeat liver resection and investigated the optimal timing for initiation of this procedure by a pioneering team in minimally invasive liver resection.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed our collective experience of 57 patients with recurrent HCC between January 2009 and December 2021.The patients were followed until June 30, 2024. Among them, 37 underwent laparoscopic approaches and 20 opted for open procedures.ResultsBoth groups exhibited similar operative times and perioperative outcomes, with significantly reduced hospital stays in the laparoscopic cohort (median: 5 vs. 7, p < 0.001). The median follow-up duration was 41.5 months (range, 2.8 to 112.6 months). Mortality occurred in 22 patients (38.6%) and recurrence occurred in 26 patients (45.6%) The overall survival and disease-free survival after the operation were similar in both groups and comparative to the literatures.ConclusionUsing a stepwise approach, laparoscopic repeat liver resection can be performed safely and effectively with a low incidence of conversion by an experienced surgical team with similar oncological outcomes. The introduction of laparoscopic techniques has also sparked a strategic shift in the surgical approach for recurrent HCC. This treatment option should be offered to patients by an experienced surgical team for minimally invasive liver resections.

Pushing boundaries: simultaneous minimal-invasive resection of complex colorectal liver metastases and its primary tumor.

Synchronous liver metastases occur in approximately 15-20% of patients with colorectal cancer. Optimal oncological treatment of oligometastatic disease combines surgical resection and systemic therapy. Open simultaneous resection of the primary and liver metastases is well described, but there is not much evidence for the increasing use of the minimally invasive approach. We here report the results of our experience of simultaneous minimally invasive resections. A prospective database of patients with resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) at the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin was used for retrospective data analysis. We report all patients undergoing simultaneous minimal invasive resection of colorectal cancer and its synchronous liver metastases between May 2015 and December 2021. Out of 281 patients undergoing resection of CRLM, 33 (11.7%) patients had simultaneous minimal invasive resection of the colorectal primary. The primary tumor was located mostly within the rectum (n = 17; 48.6%), followed by the descending colon (n = 6; 17.1%). CRLM were localized in both liver lobes in 69.7% (n = 23) of cases. Following resection of the colorectal tumor, an anastomosis was performed in 31 of 33 patients (93.9%), with no anastomotic leakage observed in the follow up. Simultaneous liver resections were performed mostly as subsegment (n = 20) or bisegment resections (n = 11). Mean IWATE-Score of all hepatic resections was 5.5 (± 2.4). Complication rates (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) were similar compared between low/intermediate and advanced/expert difficulty for liver resection (n = 4, 17.4% vs. n = 2, 20.0%; p = 1.0). In one case conversion to open resection was required. Our data indicate that simultaneous minimal invasive resection of CRLM and the primary tumor is a safe and feasible procedure. Complication rates were consistent across different levels of difficulty (low to expert) in liver resections. Therefore, indications for simultaneous resection may be expanded.

Gradual expansion of the indications for minimally invasive liver resection to include highly complex procedures may improve postoperative outcomes

Aim: Liver resection is performed in patients with benign and malignant liver tumors. Advancements in surgical instruments and improved perioperative management have enabled safe laparoscopic and robotic liver resections. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the patients who underwent minimally invasive liver resection (MISLR) and compare their short-term outcomes with those of patients who underwent open liver resection (OLR), according to surgical complexity. Methods: Data of patients who underwent liver resection at our institution from January 2011 to August 2023 were obtained from a prospectively maintained database. We gradually expanded the indications for MISLR from technically less demanding procedures to intermediate- and high-complexity MISLRs. The procedures were categorized into three grades (low, intermediate, and high) according to the liver resection complexity classification. Results: Of the 1,866 patients who underwent liver resection, 953 were included in the analysis. Of the 953 patients, 781 underwent OLR and 172 underwent MISLR. The operative time and estimated blood loss increased with the increase in surgical complexity in the MISLR group, which was similar to finding in the OLR group. The complication rate also increased with the increase in surgical complexity in the OLR group (low complexity vs. high complexity, 34.8% vs. 50.1%). However, the complication rate was steadily low and approximately 10% across all complexity grades in the MISLR group. Conclusion: Careful selection and gradual expansion of the indications of MISLR may facilitate improved postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing highly complex MISLRs.

Domains of four-step technique training program for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Many surgeons have begun learning about colorectal surgery using laparoscopy rather than laparotomy. The domains of four-step technique training program (DOF) for laparoscopic colorectal surgery have been designed and implemented by our institute since 2011, and they are expected to provide a safe and effective program for trainees with limited experience in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The DOF were established with standard surgical procedures, a four-step technique, and learning passports using point credits after the procedure was completed. Patients who underwent minimally invasive colorectal resection at the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital between January 2013 and April 2019 were enrolled. Overall, 2604 and 478 patients were enrolled in the non-training and training groups, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that the postoperative short-term outcomes were not significantly associated with the training or non-training groups. However, the training group had a significantly longer operative time than the non-training group in the linear regression model. Once the trainee passed the proficiency point (passed 100 points or 30 cases), no significant difference in postoperative short-term outcomes was found between the patients in the non-training and training groups that underwent the entire surgery performed by the trainee. When patients' safety was evaluated in the training cases under the DOF, no higher rates of postoperative morbidity and mortality were found compared to those in cases performed by experienced surgeons. Additionally, trainees who passed the proficiency point during DOF could safely perform the entire laparoscopic colorectal surgery under supervision without further adverse effects on the patients.

Long term outcomes from the early days of minimally invasive thymoma surgery for Myasthenia Gravis patients: a follow-up of 19 years.

Long-term survival outcomes are crucial for accurately determining the effectiveness of treatment in an indolent disease like thymoma. We aimed to analyze the clinical findings in terms of survival and relapse patterns with a median follow up of 105 months (8.7 years) in patients with thymoma and myasthenia gravis who underwent minimally invasive surgery between 2002 and 2015. A total of 59 pathologically confirmed Masaoka Stage I and II thymoma patients with Myasthenia Gravis (MG) who underwent minimally invasive thymoma resection were included in this study. Primary aim of this study is to evaluate recurrences, overall and disease free survival in patients with a thymoma and MG in the long run. We also aimed to study the changes in Myasthenia Gravis medication during the follow-up. The mean age of the patients was 47.6 +/13.5 years. Seventeen patients were at Masaoka Stage I and 42 were at Masaoka Stage II. The median follow-up time was 105 months. The mean size of the tumor was 3.6 cm +/16.2 cm. Twenty-one patients (35%) received adjuvant radiotherapy. There was no postoperative mortality and median length of hospital stay was 4 days. Two patients developed recurrences both presented with pleural metastases. Eight patients died because of non-oncologic pathologies. 10-year disease free survival and overall survival rates were calculated to 96.6% and 86.4% respectively. The 10-year survival analysis and current myasthenic status of stage I-II thymoma patients with myasthenia gravis who underwent minimally invasive surgery demonstrate that these procedures are both safe and effective.

Robotic versus laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy: A comparative single-center study of perioperative outcomes

PurposeA repeat liver resection is considered a technically challenging procedure and therefor an open approach is frequently preferred. With the introduction of minimally invasive liver surgery, laparoscopic repeat liver resection demonstrates favorable results, however, limited data on robotic repeat liver resections exists. Our aim is to compare the robotic approach with the laparoscopic one for a repeat liver resection. MethodsIn a single-center retrospective analysis, we report the data of all minimally invasive repeat liver resections performed between September 2011 and August 2023. Short-term outcomes – including procedure time, blood loss, conversion rate, morbidity and mortality – were compared for a laparoscopic and a robotic approach. ResultsA total of 136 minimally invasive repeat liver resections were performed, of which 56 robotic procedures and 80 laparoscopic procedures. Both groups were similar in baseline demographics, diagnosis and surgical procedure. While the mean procedure time was slightly longer in the robotics group by 15 min (145min and 130min, p = 0.04), the median blood loss was significantly lower in the robotic group (30 ml and 80 ml, p < 0.001). Additionally, there was a trend towards less conversions in the robotic group (n = 0 and n = 6, p = 0.42). Post-operative morbidity and mortality were similar in both groups. ConclusionThe robotic approach for minimally invasive repeat liver surgery is both safe and feasible, while also demonstrating favorable short-term outcomes. In our experience, the ‘tunnel technique’ – which avoids dissection of intra-abdominal adhesions – is a key advantage of this approach.

Application of through-the-scope twin clip for semicircumferential defect closure after rectal laterally spreading tumor transanal super minimally invasive surgery resection.

Application of through-the-scope twin clip for semicircumferential defect closure after rectal laterally spreading tumor transanal super minimally invasive surgery resection.

National Race and Socioeconomic Disparities in Access to Minimally Invasive Lung Resection for Early-Stage Lung Cancer: Impact on Mortality

National Race and Socioeconomic Disparities in Access to Minimally Invasive Lung Resection for Early-Stage Lung Cancer: Impact on Mortality

Enhanced Recovery With Aggressive Ambulation Decreases Length of Stay in Lung Cancer Surgery

ObjectiveThoracic Enhanced Recovery with Ambulation after Surgery (T-ERAS) protocol at our institution includes ambulation into the operating room and 250-feet ambulation within 1 hour of extubation. We compared the average length of stay (LOS) between T-ERAS patients and that predicted using a validated surgical risk calculator. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing lung cancer resection with minimally invasive approach from 2012 to 2022. Patients aged ≥ 18 were included if early ambulation was documented. Patient information were entered into the American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Risk Calculator (NSQIP) to obtain the predicted LOS. Descriptive statistics, comparisons of observed versus predicted LOS (O/P ratio), and nonparametric testing were conducted. ResultsOf 940 patients reviewed, 886 met eligibility. For the study cohort, average age was 68, and 514 (58.0%) were female. By procedure, there were 631(71.2%) lobectomy, 204(23.0%) wedge, 26(2.9%) segmentectomy, 20(2.3%) bilobectomy, and 5(0.6%) pneumonectomy. The average LOS observed for the entire cohort was 1.2 days (median 1.0 day) compared to the predicted LOS of 3.4 days with the NSQIP (median 4.0). Overall, 842 (95%) of patients had LOS better than predicted (O/P ratio < 1), 19 (2.1%) had LOS as predicted (O/P ratio = 1), and 25 (2.8%) had LOS longer than predicted (O/P ratio > 1). The mean O/P ratio was 0.34. ConclusionAverage LOS with T-ERAS protocol was 1.2 days compared to the predicted average of 3.6 days in patients undergoing minimally invasive lung cancer resections. Our study provides a potential protocol to shorten the LOS beyond what is predicted by NSQIP.

Technique of Distal Tendon Excision for the Treatment of Chronic Pain Caused by Isolated Proximal Gracilis Tears

Proximal gracilis tear is a rare sports-related injury that can easily lead to misdiagnosis and underdiagnosis. Clinical manifestations are dominated by localized pain, tenderness, and dysfunction. Here, we report a therapy of proximal segmental tear of the gracilis and demonstrate its treatment process and clinical outcome. This Technical Note describes in detail the minimally invasive distal gracilis resection technique for the treatment of chronic proximal gracilis ruptures, focusing on the most important technical aspects and thus attempting to introduce this procedure and make it more widely used in the treatment of similar muscle injuries.

Long-Term Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Versus Sternotomy Surgical Resection of Primary Cardiac Tumors.

Primary cardiac tumors are uncommon, often benign, but can be potentially life threatening. Minimally invasive endoscopic (ENDO) techniques have been shown to be a feasible alternative for tumor resection compared with conventional sternotomy (CS). This study compared the clinical and surgical outcomes of a small series of patients undergoing cardiac tumor resection operations. Between November 2009 and December 2022, 34 consecutive patients underwent cardiac tumor resection using either ENDO (n = 21) or CS (n = 13) techniques. We compared early perioperative outcomes, echocardiographic outcomes, and long-term clinical and tumor recurrence outcomes. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups; however, the ENDO group included younger patients (56 ± 16 vs 62 ± 17 years) and more female patients (83% vs 53%). The tumor was located in the left atrium (n = 19, 56%), right atrium (n = 5, 15%), or either ventricle (n = 4, 12%). In-hospital mortality and stroke frequency were similar for both groups (n = 0). There was no significant difference in cardiopulmonary bypass or cross-clamp times, respiratory or renal failure, or intensive care unit or hospital lengths of stay. At follow-up (ENDO, 42 [2 to 131] months vs CS, 54 [1 to 156] months), there were no deaths in the ENDO group and 2 patients died in the CS group (P = 0.21). No patients in either group experienced tumor recurrence. In selected patients, both ENDO and CS approaches to primary cardiac tumor resection were safe, effective, durable, and associated with similarly good early and late results.

Early result of minimally invasive cardiac myxoma resection at University Medical Center, Ho Chi Minh City

Objective: The study aimed to evaluate various clinical and paraclinical characteristics, as well as early surgical outcomes of minimally invasive cardiac myxoma resection at University Medical Center HCMC. Subjects and methods: This is a retrospective descriptive case series study involving all patients diagnosed with cardiac myxomas who underwent minimally invasive surgery at University Medical Center HCMC from January 2020 to June 2024. Results: There were 31 patients, consisting of 22 females and 9 males. The mean age was 56,2 ± 10,7 years old (from 37 to 77 years old). The clinical manifestations were diverse: asymptomatic (45,2%), cerebral embolism (6,4%), fatigue (29,0%), dyspnea (35,5%), palpitations (12,9%), and dizziness (12,9%). Echocardiographic results: 90,3% left atrial myxoma, 9,7% right atrial myxoma. The tumor attachment sites: interatrial septum (93,6%), left atrial wall (6,4%). The average tumor size was 36,3 ± 15,1 mm. All tumors were completely resected (100%). Additional surgical procedures: mitral valve repair (3,2%), interatrial septum repair (6,4%). Cardiopulmonary bypass time was 82,4 ± 31,1 minutes (from 49 to 199 minutes), cross - clamp time was 39,2 ± 17,6 minutes (from 18 to 85 minutes), with 3 cases not requiring cardiac arrest. Ventilation time was 13,2 ± 6,3 hours (from 6,7 to 32,4 hours), intensive care unit stay was 52,6 ± 28,1 hours (from 13 to 113,7 hours), postoperative recovery time was 6,9 ± 2,3 days (from 4 to 16 days). Early outcomes: 3 cases of atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response, treated medically (9,7%), 1 case of acute kidney injury (3,2%), 4 cases of pleural effusion (12,9%), 3 cases of pneumothorax (9,7%), 1 case of right external iliac artery thrombosis requiring surgical thrombectomy (3,2%), and 2 cases of deep vein thrombosis (6,4%). No surgical site infections, cerebrovascular accidents, or mortality within 30 days post-surgery were reported. Conclusion: Minimally invasive cardiac myxoma resection demonstrates a low complication rate, with no reported tumor recurrence or early postoperative mortality. This technique offers a safe and effective alternative to traditional median sternotomy and may be gradually adopted and implemented in lower - level healthcare facilities.

Large nonpedunculated colorectal polyp management through the lens of an interventional endoscopist.

SummaryMinimally invasive endoscopic resection techniques are now the first-line management strategy for most large (> 20 mm) nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs). Appropriate technique selection depends on optical evaluation to predict lesion histopathology alongside the presence of and depth of malignant invasion. We review the indications and performance of endoscopic mucosal resection, cold snare resection, and endoscopic submucosal dissection. These complementary techniques, bolstered by site-specific technical modifications and ancillary techniques, are an effective, efficient, and safe alternative to surgery. An understanding of the role of minimally invasive endoscopic resection techniques is crucial for all endoscopists and surgeons involved in LNPCP management.

Thoracoscopic minimally invasive surgical treatment with the same incisions in a patient with uremia complicated with large thymoma and right upper lobe lung cancer: a case report

A 41 year old female with stage 5 chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis was admitted to the hospital. Chest CT scan revealed a large mass lesion of approximately 6.0 × 3.5x4.9 cm in size in the anterior superior mediastinum and a ground glass nodule in the upper lobe of the right lung, which increased in size from 9 × 7 mm 1 year and 9 months ago to 11mmx9mm before surgery. We designed a localization method to accurately locate the pulmonary nodule and successfully performed thoracoscopic minimally invasive resection of both thymoma and lung cancer through a subxiphoid approach with the same incision for this patient. With the support of perioperative hemodialysis, the patient's outcome is good. The pathological diagnosis of the anterior mediastinal mass is thymoma (b1 type), and the pathological diagnosis of the right upper lobe nodule is invasive lung adenocarcinoma (acinar type). This report describes the diagnosis and treatment process of the case.

Oncological Outcomes of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Surgery for Ductal Adenocarcinomas of Pancreatic Head: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Minimally invasive pancreatic resections (MIPRs) have been shown to be safe and feasible, but there is still a lack of high-level evidence on oncological outcomes for cephalic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The aim of this study was to compare the oncological outcomes of patients undergoing MIPR and open pancreatic resection (OPR) for pancreatic head cancer in a single high-volume center. Data from a prospectively collected database of patients who underwent radical-intent surgery for resectable and borderline resectable PDAC of the head at our institution between January 2013 and May 2023 were retrieved and analyzed, comparing the surgical and oncological outcomes of MIPR and OPR, using a propensity score matching analysis. In the study period, 220 patients were selected. After matching, a total of 81 MIPRs and 81 OPRs were compared. No difference was found regarding R0 rate (OPR 83.9% vs. MIPR 74.1%, p = 0.122). Median overall survival (24 and 31 months for the OPR and MIPR groups, respectively; log rank p = 0.665) and disease-free survival (12 and 21 months for the OPR and MIPR groups, respectively; log rank p = 0.118) did not differ between the groups. The MIPR group was associated with a greater number of harvested lymph nodes (22 vs. 16, p = 0.0008), longer operative time (565 vs. 420 min, p < 0.0001), and shorter length of stay (12 vs. 18 days; p = 0.0001). No differences between the groups were found regarding all other postoperative and pathological outcomes. Regarding oncological outcomes, MIPR appeared to be comparable to OPR for treating patients with PDAC of the head. Despite an increased operative time, MIPR was associated with a greater number of LNs harvested and a shorter length of stay.

Comparing Open, Laparoscopic and Robotic Liver Resection for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer-A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) can be surgically managed through open resections (OLR), laparoscopic resections (LLR), or robotic liver resections (RLR). However, there is ongoing uncertainty regarding the safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive approaches like LLR and RLR. This study aims to clarify these issues by conducting a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare outcomes across OLR, LLR and RLR for patients with CRLM. Following the PRISMA-NMA guidelines, the meta-analysis included 13 studies with a combined total of 6582 patients. Of these, 50.6% underwent LLR, 45.3% underwent OLR, and 4.1% underwent RLR. The analysis found no significant differences in R0 resection rates between LLR (odds ratio [OR] 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.84-1.26) and RLR (OR 1.57, 95% CI: 0.98-2.51) when compared to OLR. Additionally, there were no significant differences in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) at 1, 3, and 5 years. Despite these findings, both LLR and RLR were associated with reduced postoperative complication rates (RLR: OR 0.52, 95% CI: 0.32-0.86; LLR: OR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.37-0.68). However, patients undergoing LLR were more likely to require conversion to open surgery compared to those undergoing RLR (OR: 12.46, 95% CI: 2.64-58.67). Furthermore, RLR was associated with a reduced need for blood transfusions (OR: 0.13, 95% CI: 0.05-0.32), and LLR resulted in shorter hospital stays (mean difference: -6.66 days, 95% CI: -11.6 to -1.88 days). This study demonstrates the oncological safety of LLR and RLR approaches for CRLM relative to OLR, with enhanced perioperative outcomes anticipated following minimally invasive resections of CRLM.

Plasma levels of progranulin, a tumorigenic protein, are persistently elevated during the first month after minimally invasive colorectal cancer resection.

Progranulin (PGRN), also identified as Precursor cell-derived growth factor (PCDGF), is a glycoprotein that is expressed and released ubiquitously. PGRN is plays a crucial role in regulating cell proliferation, differentiation, and pathological pathways. PGRN overexpression has been noted in many cancers and plays an important role in wound healing. Surgery's impact on PGRN levels is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the levels of plasma PGRN before during the first month after minimally invasive colorectal resection (MICR) for colorectal cancer (CRC) resection. CRC patients who were enrolled in a data/plasma bank approved by an Institutional Review Board and underwent MICR for whom adequate plasma samples were available were studied. Blood samples were obtained before surgery and at different time intervals after the operation and late samples were grouped into 7-day blocks and considered as single time points. PGRN levels (pg/mL) were determined in duplicate via ELISA and reported as median and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) values. The paired t-test was used for statistical analysis. Preoperative and 1 or more late postoperative plasma sample were available for 93 MICR CRC patients. The distribution of cancer stages in the final analysis was: stage I accounted for 37% of cases, stage II for 27%, stage III for 32%, and stage IV for 4%. The median preoperative PGRN level was 50.69 pg/mL, 95% CI: 47.71-56.30, n=93. When compared to preoperative levels, significantly elevated (P<0.001) median levels (pg/mL) were noted on postoperative day (POD) 1 (64.78, 95% CI: 60.86-68.83, n=92), POD 3 (69.15, 95% CI: 66.43-74.32, n=85), POD 7-13 (63.93, 95% CI: 59.62-68.35, n=68), and POD 14-20 (68.19, 95% CI: 60.12-73.37, n=26), POD 21-27 (67.38, 95% CI: 60.30-76.65, n=20) and on POD 28-41 (75.13, 95% CI: 54.02-83.16, n=22; P<0.01). Following surgery for CRC, plasma PGRN levels showed a significant increase compared to baseline levels, persisting for a duration of one month. This initial surge post-operation could potentially be attributed to the transient acute inflammatory response. The elevation observed in weeks 2 and 4 could potentially be attributed to the process of wound healing, as PGRN has been shown to enhance the accumulation of fibroblasts and facilitate angiogenesis within wounds. Additional investigation is warranted.

The efficacy of loco-regional ropivacaine analgesia via intercostal catheters after lung resection: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, superiority study.

Postoperative pain remains a burden for patients after minimally invasive anatomic lung resection. Current guidelines recommend the intraoperative placement of intercostal catheters to promote faster recovery. This trial aimed to determine the analgesic efficacy of continuous loco-regional ropivacaine application via intercostal catheter and establish this method as a possible standard of care. Between December 2021 and October 2023, patients were randomly assigned to receive ropivacaine 0.2% or a placebo through an intercostal catheter with a flow rate of 6-8 ml/h for 72 h after surgery. Patients were undergoing anatomic VATS lung resection under general anaesthesia for confirmed or suspected stage I lung cancer (UICC, 8th edition). The sample size was calculated to assess a difference in numerical rating scale associated with pain reduction of 1.5 points. Fourteen patients were included in the ropivacaine group, whereas the placebo group comprised 18 participants. Patient characteristics and preoperative pain scores were similar in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative pain scores and morphine consumption between the 2 groups. The mean numerical rating scale when coughing during the first 24 h postoperatively was 4.9 (SD: 2.2) in the ropivacaine group and 4.3 (SD: 2.4); P = 0.47 in the placebo group. We were unable to determine any effect of administered ropivacaine on the postoperative pulmonary function (FEV1, PEF). Our preliminary results suggest that continuous loco-regional ropivacaine administration via surgically placed intercostal catheter has no positive effect on postoperative pain scores or morphine requirements. NCT04939545.