Prophylaxis Of Invasive Fungal Infections Research Articles

Real-World Experience with Isavuconazole in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Spain

Invasive fungal infections (IFI) pose a significant complication after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Isavuconazole (ISV) is a new generation azole with a favourable adverse effect and interaction profile approved for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis and mucormycosis. We analyzed the indications, effectiveness, adverse event profile and drug interaction management of ISV in the real-world setting in adults who received allogeneic-HSCT (allo-HSCT) within the Spanish Group of HSCT and Cell Therapy (GETH-TC). We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of all consecutive adult allo-HSCT recipients (≥18 years) who received ISV either for IFI treatment or prophylaxis, from December 2017 to August 2021, in 20 centers within the Spanish Group of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cell Therapy (GETH-TC). A total of 166 adult allografted patients who received ISV from 2017 to 2021 were included. Median age was 48 years with 43% females. In 81 (49%) patients, ISV was used for treatment of IFI, and in 85 (51%) for prophylaxis. Median duration of ISV administration for IFI treatment was 57 days (range 31-126) and 86 days (range 33-196) for prophylaxis. Most frequent indication for treatment was invasive aspergillosis (78%), followed by mucormycosis (6%). Therapeutic success (45%) was the most frequent reason for ISV withdrawal. In the prophylaxis group, the resolution of IFI risk factors was the most frequent reason for withdrawal (62%). Six (7%) breakthrough IFI were reported. The majority of patients (80%) presented pharmacologic interactions. Twenty-one patients (13%) reported adverse events related to ISV, mainly liver biochemistry abnormalities, which led to ISV withdrawal in 7 patients (4%). ISV was effective and well tolerated for IFI treatment and prophylaxis, with a manageable interaction profile.

Posaconazole in paediatric malignancy and haematopoietic stem cell transplant: dosing to achieve therapeutic concentration.

Posaconazole is increasingly used for the treatment and prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised children. We aimed to review evidence for paediatric posaconazole dosing regimens focusing on attainment of target concentrations and frequency of adverse effects. In May 2023, the Cochrane, Embase, MEDLINE and PubMed databases were searched for articles reporting posaconazole dosing in children with malignancy or post-haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Studies reporting the attainment of target serum concentrations were included. Overall, 24 studies were included. Eighteen studies of the oral suspension consistently reported poor attainment of target concentrations for prophylaxis (≥0.7 µg/mL, 12%-78%) despite high daily doses of 14-23 mg/kg/day (max. 1200 mg/day). Target attainment was significantly affected by gastric pH and food intake. Six studies of the delayed-release tablet (DRT) reported 58%-94% achieved concentrations ≥0.7 µg/mL, with the majority using lower doses of 4-12 mg/kg/day (max. 300 mg/day). Similarly, one study of powder for oral suspension found 67%-100% achieved target concentrations with a dose of 6 mg/kg/day (max. 300 mg/day). As expected, the IV formulation had high attainment of prophylaxis targets (81%-90%) with 6-10 mg/kg/day (max. 400 mg/day). All formulations were well tolerated, and no relationship between adverse effects and posaconazole concentrations was identified. The required posaconazole dose in immunocompromised children varies depending on the formulation. The IV infusion had the highest attainment of therapeutic concentration followed by the DRT and powder for suspension. By contrast, the oral suspension had low attainment of target concentrations despite higher daily doses.

Quantification of midostaurin in plasma and serum by stable isotope dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: Application to a cohort of patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Midostaurin is an oral multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Therapeutic drug monitoring of midostaurin may support its safe use when suspecting toxicity or combined with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors. A stable isotope dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method was developed and validated for the determination and quantification of midostaurin in human plasma and serum. Midostaurin serum concentrations were analyzed in 12 patients with FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3)-mutated AML during induction chemotherapy with cytarabine, daunorubicin, and midostaurin. Posaconazole was used as prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections. Linear quantification of midostaurin was demonstrated across a concentration range of 0.01-8.00 mg/L. Inter- and intraday imprecisions of the proposed method were well within ±10%. Venous blood samples were taken in nine and three patients in the first and second cycle of induction chemotherapy. Median (range) midostaurin serum concentration was 7.9 mg/L (1.5-26.1 mg/L) as determined in 37 independent serum specimens. In a real-life cohort of AML patients, interindividual variability in midostaurin serum concentrations was high, highlighting issues concerning optimal drug dosing in AML patients. A personalized dosage approach may maximize the safety of midostaurin. Prospective studies and standardization of analytical methods to support such an approach are needed.

The cost–utility analysis of antifungal prophylaxis for invasive fungal infections in acute myeloid leukaemia patients receiving chemotherapy: a study from a middle-income country

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) contribute to morbidity and mortality during acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) treatment. Without prophylaxis, IFI rate during AML treatment in Thailand is high and results in a high mortality rate and a prolonged hospital stay. To evaluate the cost-utility of antifungal therapy (AFT) prophylaxis during AML treatment. We assessed the cost-utility of AFT available in Thailand, including posaconazole (solution), itraconazole (solution and capsule), and voriconazole. A hybrid model consisting of a decision tree and the Markov model was established. The costs to prevent overall IFI using any AFT were all lower than the treatment cost of a non-prophylaxis group, resulting in a saving of 808-1507 USD per patient. Prevention with voriconazole prophylaxis showed the highest quality-adjusted life years (QALYs=3.51, incremental QALYs=0.23), followed by posaconazole (QALYs=3.46, incremental QALY=0.18) and itraconazole solution (QALYs=3.45, incremental QALYs=0.17). Itraconazole capsule reduced QALY in the model. For invasive aspergillosis prevention, posaconazole and voriconazole both resulted in better QALYs and life year savings compared with no prophylaxis. However, posaconazole prophylaxis was the only cost-saving option (976 USD per patient). Posaconazole, itraconazole solution and voriconazole were all cost saving compared with no prophylaxis for overall IFI prophylaxis, with voriconazole being the most cost-effective option. Posaconazole and voriconazole were both cost effective for invasive aspergillosis prevention but only posaconazole was cost saving. A change in reimbursement policy for the use of AFT prophylaxis during intensive AML treatment could provide both clinical benefits to patients and substantial economic benefits to healthcare systems.

The evaluation of atorvastatin as an adjunct to fluconazole for the anti-fungal prophylaxis in acute myeloid leukemia: a multicenter, triple-blinded, randomized clinical trial.

The development of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) is a serious complication in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who undergo an induction to remission chemotherapy. Given the increased mortality in AML patients with IFI despite prophylaxis, we need to address this problem. Statins have traditionally been employed in clinical settings as agents for reducing lipid levels. Nonetheless, recent investigations have brought to light their antifungal properties in animals, as well as in vitro studies. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of atorvastatin when added to the routine IFI prophylaxis regimen in patients diagnosed with AML. A randomized, multicenter, triple-blind study was conducted on 76 AML patients aged 18-70, who received either placebo or atorvastatin in addition to fluconazole. Patients were followed for 30days in case of developing IFIs, patient survival, and atorvastatin- related adverse drug reactions. Data were analyzed with SPSS version 26.0. A level of significance of 0.05 was utilized as the threshold for all statistical tests. The data were analyzed by adjusting for the effect of age, regarding that there was a significant difference between the two groups, and showed that atorvastatin reduced the development of both probable and proven IFI (based on EORTC/MSGERC criteria) compared to placebo. IFI-free survival was also significantly better in the atorvastatin group. The incidence of developing aspergillosis did not differ between the two groups. No serious adverse events related to atorvastatin were observed. The present investigation has substantiated the antecedent in vitro and animal research on the fungicidal impact of statins and has suggested the need for additional research involving larger sample sizes and an extended duration of follow-up. Trial registration: This study was registered on the Iranian registry of clinical trials as IRCT20210503051166N1 (Date of confirmation 2021.05.03).

Invasive fungal infection incidence and risk factors in patients receiving ibrutinib in real-life settings: A nationwide population-based cohort study.

Data on the risk of invasive fungal infections (IFI) with ibrutinib treatment are scarce. This study aimed to determine IFI incidence and risk factors in ibrutinib-treated patients in real-life settings. We constituted a cohort of ibrutinib incident users in the French National Healthcare Database. All patients ≥18 years with a first dispensing of ibrutinib between 21 November 2014 and 31 December 2019 were included. Patients were followed from the cohort entry date until IFI, ibrutinib discontinuation, death, or 31 December 2020, whichever came first. The cumulative incidence function method was used to estimate the probability of IFI accounting for competing risk of death. A multivariate cause-specific Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess independent IFI risk factors. Among 6937 ibrutinib-treated patients, 1-year IFI cumulative incidence was 1.3%, with invasive aspergillosis being the most frequent. Allogenic or autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) (hazard ratio [HR] 3.59, 95% confidence interval [1.74; 7.41]), previous anticancer treatment (HR 2.12, CI 95% [1.34; 3.35]) and chronic respiratory disease (HR 1.66, [1.03; 2.67]) were associated with higher risk of IFI. Besides neutropenia and corticosteroids, use of anti-CD20 agents was significantly more frequent in patients having experienced IFI (HR 3.68, [1.82; 7.45]). In addition to patients with ASCT history, severe neutropenia or treated with corticosteroids, our findings support active surveillance of IFIs in those with chronic respiratory disease, previously treated, or treated with anti-CD20 agents in combination with ibrutinib. Further studies are needed to optimise IFI prophylaxis in these patient subgroups.

Isavuconazole-tacrolimus drug-drug interactions in HSCT patients.

Because tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic window and exhibits both intraindividual and interindividual variability, we attempted to establish the percentage of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) dose reduction to prevent toxicity and ensure stem cell engraftment when using this immunosuppressant with the antifungal isavuconazole (ISA). By calculating the tacrolimus concentration/dose (C/D) ratio, we expected to demonstrate the magnitude of change in the C/D ratio from baseline after ISA administration. We evaluated the interaction between ISA, a new triazole antifungal used in prophylaxis for invasive fungal infections, and the CNI class of immunosuppressive drugs, specifically tacrolimus, in 11 blood samples from HSCT recipients. The mean tacrolimus C/D ratio increased 1.44-fold from baseline 48 h after ISA administration (P = 0.001). Although further investigation is needed, the results of this study suggest that a reduction of 18% in tacrolimus may be recommended.

Association of adverse effects with high serum posaconazole concentrations.

Posaconazole therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is widely utilized to assess therapeutic efficacy and safety; however, clinical effects of very high serum concentrations are unknown. A retrospective review of 90 patients receiving posaconazole for treatment or prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections with serum concentrations ≥3000ng/mL from 1/1/2019 to 4/30/2021 evaluated the incidence and type of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Symptomatic ADRs were very common in patients with posaconazole concentrations of ≥5000ng/mL and 3000-4999ng/mL (80% vs. 58.8%; P=0.31). Posaconazole TDM should be performed for both treatment and prophylaxis indications and dose decrease for serum concentrations >3000ng/mL should be considered.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of isavuconazole for the treatment and prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections.

Isavuconazole is a novel triazole antifungal agent. However, the previous outcomes were highlighted by statistical heterogeneity. This meta-analysis aimed to validate the efficacy and safety of isavuconazole for the treatment and prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) compared with other antifungal agents (amphotericin B, voriconazole and posaconazole). Scopus, EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL and Ichushi databases were searched for relevant articles that met the inclusion criteria through February 2023. Mortality, IFI rate, discontinuation rate of antifungal therapy and incidence of abnormal hepatic function were evaluated. The discontinuation rate was defined as the percentage of therapy discontinuations due to adverse events. The control group included patients who received other antifungal agents. Of the 1784 citations identified for screening, 10 studies with an overall total of 3037 patients enrolled. Isavuconazole was comparable with the control group in mortality and IFI rate in the treatment and prophylaxis of IFIs, respectively (mortality, odds rate (OR) 1.11, 95% confidential interval (CI) 0.82-1.51; IFI rate, OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.49-2.12). Isavuconazole significantly reduced the discontinuation rate in the treatment (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.26-3.07) and incidence of hepatic function abnormalities in the treatment and prophylaxis, compared with the control group (treatment, OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.41-3.78; prophylaxis, OR 3.63, 95% CI 1.31-10.05). Our meta-analysis revealed that isavuconazole was not inferior to other antifungal agents for the treatment and prophylaxis of IFIs, with substantially fewer drug-associated adverse events and discontinuations. Our findings support the use of isavuconazole as the primary treatment and prophylaxis for IFIs.

Model Based Estimation of Posaconazole Tablet and Suspension Bioavailability in Hospitalized Children Using Real-World Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Data in Patients Receiving Intravenous and Oral Dosing.

Invasive fungal infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality for immunocompromised patients. Posaconazole is approved for treatment and prophylaxis of invasive fungal infection in adult patients, with intravenous, oral suspension, and gastroresistant/delayed-released tablet formulations available. In Europe, until very recently, posaconazole was used off-label in children, although a new delayed-release suspension approved for pediatric use is expected to become available soon. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed which uses posaconazole therapeutic drug monitoring data following intravenous and oral dosing in hospitalized children, thus enabling estimation of pediatric suspension and tablet oral bioavailability. In total, 297 therapeutic drug monitoring plasma levels from 104 children were included in this analysis. The final model was a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and nonlinear elimination. Allometric scaling on clearance and volume of distribution was included a priori. Tablet bioavailability was estimated to be 66%. Suspension bioavailability was estimated to decrease with increasing doses, ranging from 3.8% to 32.2% in this study population. Additionally, concomitant use of proton pump-inhibitors was detected as a significant covariate, reducing suspension bioavailability by 41.0%. This is the first population pharmacokinetic study to model posaconazole data from hospitalized children following intravenous, tablet, and suspension dosing simultaneously. The incorporation of saturable posaconazole clearance into the model has been key to the credible joint estimation of tablet and suspension bioavailability. To aid rational posaconazole dosing in children, this model was used alongside published pharmacodynamic targets to predict the probability of target attainment using typical pediatric dosing regimen.

Antifungal Stewardship Programs in Children: Challenges and Opportunities.

Antifungal Stewardship Programs in Children: Challenges and Opportunities.

Isavuconazonium or posaconazole for antifungal prophylaxis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Invasive fungal infection (IFI) prophylaxis is recommended in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) during induction chemotherapy. Posaconazole (POSA) is the recommended agent of choice; however, this medication can be associated with QTc prolongation, hepatotoxicity, and drug-drug interactions. Furthermore, there is conflicting evidence for the role of isavuconazole (ISAV) in this setting as an alternative to POSA. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the use of ISAV prophylaxis for primary IFI prevention in patients with AML undergoing induction. Additionally, the study investigated the use of ISAV trough concentration monitoring and compared these results to the efficacy of POSA therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Other secondary objectives included assessing the rates of toxicities associated with either prophylactic agent. This study analyzed the impact these toxicities had on patient outcomes by examining the need to hold or discontinue therapy. The final endpoint considered the efficacy associated with multiple dosing strategies employed at the study institution. Specifically, this included the use of loading doses or foregoing these when initiating prophylaxis. This was a retrospective, single-center, cohort study. Patients included in this study were adults with AML admitted to Duke University Hospital between June 30, 2016 and June 30, 2021, who received induction chemotherapy and primary IFI prophylaxis for at least 7 days. Exclusion criteria included patients who received concomitant antifungal agents and patients who received antifungal agents as secondary prophylaxis. 241 patients met inclusion criteria with 12 (4.98%) participants in the ISAV group and 229 (95.02%) participants in the POSA group. The IFI incidence in the POSA group was 14.5%, while the ISAV group did not have any occurrences of IFI. No significant difference was found in the rate of IFI occurrence between the two treatment groups (p = 0.3805). Furthermore, it was demonstrated that the use of a loading dose when initiating prophylaxis could impact rates of IFI for this patient population. Due to no difference in incidence, patient specific factors such as concomitant medications and baseline QTc should influence the choice between prophylactic agent.

New Perspectives on Primary Prophylaxis of Invasive Fungal Infection in Children Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A 10-Year Retrospective Cohort Study

Allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (a-HCT) remains a therapeutic treatment for many pediatric hematological diseases. The occurrence of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) is a complication for which ECIL-8 recommends primary antifungal prophylaxis. In this study, we evaluated the impact of our local strategy of not systematically administering primary antifungal prophylaxis in children undergoing a-HCT on the occurrence and mortality of IFIs. We performed a retrospective monocentric study from 2010 to 2020. We retained all proven and probable IFIs diagnosed during the first year post a-HCT. 308 patients were included. Eighteen patients developed twenty IFIs (thirteen proven, seven probable) (6.5%) among which aspergillosis (n = 10, 50%) and candidosis (n = 7, 35%) were the most frequently diagnosed infections. Only 2% of children died because of an IFI, which represents 14% of all deaths. Multivariate analysis found that age > 10 years (OR: 0.29), the use of a therapeutic antiviral treatment (OR: 2.71) and a low neutrophil count reconstitution (OR: 0.93) were significantly associated with the risk of IFI occurrence. There was also a trend of malignant underlying disease and status ≥ CR2 but it was not retained in multivariate analysis. IFI occurrence was not higher in our cohort than what is reported in the literature with the use of systematic antifungal prophylaxis, with a good survival rate nonetheless. Thus, a prophylaxis could be considered for children with a high risk of IFI such as those aged over 10 years.

Incidence of breakthrough fungal infections on isavuconazole prophylaxis compared to posaconazole and voriconazole.

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are a common infectious complication during the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or post hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). For these patients, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends posaconazole or voriconazole for IFI prophylaxis. In clinical practice, however, there has been increased use of isavuconazole due to favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters despite limited data for this indication. The comparative prophylactic efficacy of antifungals in this patient population has not been reported, and an analysis is warranted. This retrospective, matched cohort, single-center study, included AML, MDS, or HCT patients who began treatment or underwent transplant between January 1, 2015 and July 31, 2021. Isavuconazole patients were matched 1:2 with patients receiving posaconazole or voriconazole prophylaxis. A total of 126 patients were included, 42 received isavuconazole, 81 received posaconazole, and three received voriconazole. The majority of patients were male receiving secondary IFI prophylaxis while receiving steroids for treatment of GVHD. The incidence of possible, probable or proven IFI was 16.7% in the isavuconazole group compared to 10.7% in the posaconazole and voriconazole group (OR 1.28, 95% CI -0.9-1.4; p = .67). Hepatotoxicity occurred in 16 total patients, 14 receiving posaconazole and two receiving isavuconazole. Patients who received isavuconazole prophylaxis during AML induction therapy or post-HCT experienced a similar incidence of breakthrough fungal infections compared to those who received posaconazole or voriconazole. These results suggest no difference in antifungal prophylactic efficacy; however larger prospective comparative studies are needed.

Practical aspects of the use of ventoclax in combination with azacitidine for the treatment of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia in patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapy

The aim of treating elderly patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) ineligible for intensive chemotherapy is to extend survival, but treatment results are often unsatisfactory. Therapy with venetoclax combined with azacitidine allowed remission in two-thirds of patients and significantly prolong the median overall survival. The treatment is increasingly used in clinical practice and establishes a new medical standard. The use of venetoclax in treating AML requires knowledge of drug use rules and their individualization. This review summarizes critical elements of the clinical practice of venetoclax use in combination with azacitidine regarding the dosing regimen, management of cytopenias during therapy and treatment adjustments to prevent drug-to-drug interactions. Treatment with venetoclax can cause the risk of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS), and therefore step-wise dose ramp-up is required with the prophylaxis of TLS and reduction in leucocyte count. Cytopenias that occur during the therapy affect most of the patients; nevertheless, it is not recommended to modify the treatment until the remission of the disease. In haematologic toxicity after disease remission, it is recommended to delay the next cycle and shorten the treatment while maintaining the dose. Knowledge about venetoclax drug-to-drug interactions is necessary for an efficacious and safe therapy. It is essential to reconsider the rationale behind using some agents, e.g., azole derivatives commonly used in the prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections, as well as to be aware of the rules of venetoclax dosing. Detailed knowledge of the above aspects of therapy is essential to ensure the continuity, safety, and efficacy of venetoclax with azacitidine.

180 - Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of Liposomal Amphotericin B Followed By Micafungin Prophylaxis of Invasive Fungal Infections in Pediatric Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Recipients with Hematological Malignancies

180 - Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of Liposomal Amphotericin B Followed By Micafungin Prophylaxis of Invasive Fungal Infections in Pediatric Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Recipients with Hematological Malignancies

Prophylaxis of Invasive Fungal Infection in Neonates: A Narrative Review for Practical Purposes

Candida albicans is the most frequent cause of invasive fungal disease in preterm and/or low birth weight neonates, followed by Candida parapsilosis, whilst infections from other species are rare. Considering the severity of the disease, associated with poor clinical signs and diagnostic difficulties, primary prophylaxis becomes relevant. This paper summarizes the pathogenesis and clinical presentation of invasive candidiasis in neonates, focusing on prophylaxis. For late onset invasive disease, e.g., those occurring after the 3rd (or 7th according to some definitions) day of life possible approaches are the use of fluconazole, recommended in case of weight <1000 g or <1500 g if the local incidence of invasive candidiasis is higher than 2%, or the use of nystatin (for patients < 1500 g). Micafungin must be used in case of colonization by Candida auris, or in centers with a high prevalence of this pathogen. Concurrently, correct management of the central venous catheter and isolation procedures, with special regard to patients colonized by resistant strains, are fundamental. Other approaches such as reduced use of H2 blockers and broad-spectrum antibiotics (e.g., 3rd generation cephalosporins or carbapenems) and promotion of breast feeding proved useful. Reduction of early-onset infections (those occurring in the first 3 days of life) can also be obtained by treating maternal vulvo-vaginal candidiasis, which can represent a fastidious problem during pregnancy. In this case, topic azoles (the only recommendable treatment) can represent a kind of "prophylaxis" of early neonatal candidiasis. However, it must always be remembered that prophylaxis reduces the risk of invasive candidiasis but can not completely eliminate its occurrence, with the parallel risk of selecting for antifungal-resistant strains. Clinicians must maintain a high level of suspicion to start an appropriate therapy and strict epidemiological surveillance to identify the occurrence of clusters and the appearance of strains resistant to prophylaxis.

Prophylaxis of Fungal Infections in Transplant Patients:What has Changed in Recent Years?

Objective: The present work aimed to review the invasive fungal infections (IFIs) and antifungal prophylaxis used in the last 20 years in transplant patients to identify the changes that occurred in this period and discuss the most current conducts. Methods: This is a systematic review in which the PubMed database was used, in which scientific articles from the last 20 years were selected, covering clinical trials, randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews of the literature and meta-analyses. Results: According to the present study, posaconazole and voriconazole are the antifungal drugs of choice for IFI prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, as posaconazole is not available in the public health system in Brazil, the most viable option remains voriconazole. Regarding IFI prophylaxis in solid organ transplantation (SOT), it was observed that there are variations depending on the transplanted target organ, and there is no evidence of its need in kidney transplantation. Although azoles are also the most used and bring clear benefits in liver and lung transplantation, some current studies have placed echinocandins on the same level, encouraging their use to prevent IFI in these patients. Conclusion: In the last five years, there has been a great shortage of clinical trials comparing different antifungal prophylaxis. New studies are needed to establish the most appropriate protocols for each condition and profile of the transplanted patient.

Central Nervous System Toxicity of Voriconazole: Risk Factors and Threshold - A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Voriconazole (VRC) is an antifungal agent which is used for treatment and prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections. The common clinical adverse reactions mainly include central nervous system (CNS) toxicity and abnormal liver function. These adverse reactions limit the clinical use of voriconazole to a certain extent. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the risk factors of voriconazole neurotoxic side effects and to determine the plasma trough concentration (C min) threshold of voriconazole-induced CNS toxicity, so as to improve the safety of voriconazole treatment. This study retrospectively collected the clinical data of 165 patients who received voriconazole and underwent therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). CNS toxicity was defined using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) criteria, logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors of CNS toxicity, classification and Regression tree (CART) model was used to determine the C min threshold for CNS toxicity. Voriconazole-related CNS toxicity occurred during treatment in 34 of 165 patients (20.6%) and the median time from administration to onset of CNS toxicity was 6 days (range, 2-19 days). The overall incidence of CNS toxicity was 20.6% (34/165), including visual disturbances in 4.8% (8/165) and nervous system disorders in 15.8% (26/165). C min significantly affects the occurrence of CNS toxicity and the threshold of C min for voriconazole CNS toxicity was determined to be 4.85 mg/L, when C min >4.85 mg/L and ≤4.85 mg/L, the incidence of CNS was 32.9% and 11.6%, respectively. Voriconazole trough concentration of C min is an independent risk factor for CNS toxicity, and the threshold of C min for CNS toxicity is 4.85mg/L. TDM should be routinely performed in patients with clinical use of voriconazole to reduce the occurrence of CNS toxicity of voriconazole.

Effectiveness of an Antifungal Stewardship Program in a Hematology Ward at a Madrid Teaching Hospital: The Time Is Now

BACKGROUND: Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are a leading infectious cause of morbidity, mortality, and Health Care Resource Utilization (HCRU) in patients with hematological malignancies. Patients with at higher risk of acquiring IFIs are those with acute leukemia (AL), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Needed to optimize antifungal use, Guidelines rarely include this group of patients, and more effort is needed to optimize the use of antifungal. AIMS: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the potential benefits of the implementation of an antifungal stewardship (AFS) program in a Spanish Hematology-Oncology Department, in a tertiary care center. To test the long-lasting effects of a 2 years antifungal stewardship (AFS) pilot project, we analyzed and compared antifungal prescriptions regarding efficacy, IFI incidence, adaptation of prescriptions to current protocols, antifungal consumption and costs saving before and during the project METHODS AND PATIENTS: This single-center comparative study included 156 inpatients ≥ 18 years, receiving systemic antifungals for prophylaxis or therapy of IFI for over four years: 85 in a phase 1 (December 2017- December 2019) and 71 in a phase 2 (January 2020-June 2022). In January 2020, we have designed a protocol for the use of antifungals in hospitalized patients based on the ECIL guidelines and according to local susceptibility patterns and, approved by the antimicrobial therapy team. First line antifungal prophylaxis for high-risk patients on our unit is nebulized Liposomal Amphotericin B 20 mg 3/weekly combined with fluconazole 400 mg po/iv qd (salvage therapy: Posaconazole 300 mg tablet qd). Patients undergoing an autologous-HSCT and other medium risk patients receive fluconazole monotherapy 400 mg po/iv qd as primary prophylaxis during the neutropenic period. Front-line therapy for possible (empirical antifungal therapy) and proven/probable IFI (targeted therapy) is Voriconazole 2x6 mg/kg on day 1 then 2x4 mg/kg (salvage therapy: Liposomal Amphotericin B 3 mg/kg/day). A comprehensive mould-directed diagnostic approach was established combining microbiological work-up (cytology, culture & Galactomannan screening) and CT imaging. From that date on, AFS included medical training (short sessions), a poster with main recommendations regarding antifungal treatment, and daily pharmaceutical counselling onwards. RESULTS: In total, 156/1670 (9.4%) patients received antifungals. In phase 1, 182 antifungals were prescribed (76% for prophylaxis, 21.2% for empirical and 2.8% for targeted therapy) and 150 in phase 2 (72% for prophylaxis, 24.7% for empirical and 3.3% for targeted therapy). The number of prescriptions classified as inappropriate decreased from 47.2% to 10.7% during implementation of the AFS-period Antifungal prophylaxis main reasons for the inappropriate prescriptions were (phase 1/phase 2): lack of indication (44.5%/1.3%), wrong dose (4.4%/1.3%), and potential severe drug-drug interaction (12.1%/4%). Regarding antifungal therapy: drug choice (7%/0%), dosage (5%/1%) and potential severe drug-drug interactions with concomitant therapy (7%/2.7%) were the main reason for inadequate prescriptions (details are showed in table 1). Associated costs for antifungals accounted in phase 1 for 92.664€ (65.192€ for prophylaxis and 27.472€ for therapy) while in phase 2, from January 2020 to January 2022, were 58.274€ (33.883€ for prophylaxis and 24.391€ for therapy). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that the implementation of a regulated protocol would lead to a decrease of inappropriate prescriptions of antifungals with a drastic reduction of prescriptions associated to potential severe drug-drug interactions and medication errors or lack of indication. In addition, we could show economic savings, a total of 34.390€ in two years, without a significant increase in the diagnosis of IFI in critically ill patients (0.5% in phase 1 versus 6% in phase 2). Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal