Invasive Direct Anterior Approach Research Articles

In Situ Assembly of Dual Mobility Liners in Isolated Cup Revision in Hip Arthroplasty: A Technical Note

Objective: Isolated cup revisions to a dual mobility system through the minimally invasive direct anterior approach represent a major challenge in revision hip arthroplasty. Materials and Methods: We present 2 cases of isolated cup revision to a dual mobility system due to aseptic loosening, in which the dual mobility liners were assembled in situ. In the first case, a well-fixed cemented monobloc stem did not require revision; in the second, the collared prosthetic head could not be removed from the well-fixed stem. Results: In situ assembly of the polyethylene liner to the prosthetic head was performed using the standard press, designed for back-table assembly. Conclusion: In situ assembly of dual mobility liners is technically simple using standard instruments and can be performed through a direct anterior approach.

Comparison of postoperative outcomes between endoscopy assisted minimal invasive direct anterior approach and bikini direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty

Comparison of postoperative outcomes between endoscopy assisted minimal invasive direct anterior approach and bikini direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty

Complication rates after direct anterior vs posterior approach for hip hemiarthroplasty in elderly individuals with femoral neck fractures.

Dislocation rates after hemiarthroplasty reportedly vary from 1% to 17%. This serious complication is associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates. Approaches to this surgery are still debated, with no consensus regarding the superiority of any single approach. To compare early postoperative complications after implementing the direct anterior and posterior approaches (PL) for hip hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fractures. This is a comparative, retrospective, single-center cohort study conducted at a university hospital. Between March 2008 and December 2018, 273 patients (a total of 280 hips) underwent bipolar hemiarthroplasties (n = 280) for displaced femoral neck fractures using either the PL (n = 171) or the minimally invasive direct anterior approach (DAA) (n = 109). The choice of approach was related to the surgeons' practices; the implant types were similar and unrelated to the approach. Dislocation rates and other complications were reviewed after a minimum follow-up of 6 mo. Both treatment groups had similarly aged patients (mean age: 82 years), sex ratios, patient body mass indexes, and patient comorbidities. Surgical data (surgery delay time, operative time, and blood loss volume) did not differ significantly between the groups. The 30 d mortality rate was higher in the PL group (9.9%) than in the DAA group (3.7%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.052). Among the one-month survivors, a significantly higher rate of dislocation was observed in the PL group (14/154; 9.1%) than in the DAA group (0/105; 0%) (P = 0.002). Of the 14 patients with dislocation, 8 underwent revision surgery for recurrent instability (posterior group), and one of them had 2 additional procedures due to a deep infection. The rate of other complications (e.g., perioperative and early postoperative periprosthetic fractures and infection-related complications) did not differ significantly between the groups. These findings suggest that the DAA to bipolar hemiarthroplasty for patients with femoral neck fractures is associated with a lower dislocation rate (< 1%) than the PL.

Pain management after total hip arthroplasty: comparative study of analgesic efficacy and tolerability between oral tramadol/dexketoprofen and injectable paracetamol + tramadol.

Multimodal analgesia for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is increasingly employed to reduce early postoperative pain and promote fast patient discharge. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of tramadol/dexketoprofen (TRAM/DKP, Group A) versus paracetamol + tramadol (PARA+TRAM, Group B) in patients undergoing THA using minimally invasive direct anterior approach (DAA). A single-centre, randomised, single-blind, parallel, interventional study conducted in 323 patients undergoing primary THA with DAA was performed. Group A consisted of 188 patients and Group B of 135. The primary endpoints were the change from baseline (measured 2 hours postoperatively) in pain intensity (PI) during the treatment period (48 hours), assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS) at pre-specified postoperative time-points (2, 8, 24, 48 hours) and the total rescue medication (RM) use during the first 24 hours postoperatively. As early as 2 hours after baseline, Group A showed a greater PI reduction from baseline compared to Group B (-26.24% vs. -6.87%; p < 0.001). A lower mean PI (VAS) score was consistently found over the entire observation period following treatment with TRAM/DKP than with PARA+TRAM as well as more than 2-fold higher proportion of responders at the end of treatment period. More patients in Group B required RM in comparison to those in Group A (15.6% vs. 3.7%, p < 0.001). Both treatments were well tolerated. After THA, oral TRAM/DKP provides faster and greater pain relief when compared to intravenous PARA+TRAM with limited consumption of RM and favourable tolerability profile. Our study expands the use of TRAM/DKP in the setting of major orthopaedic surgeries. clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04178109).

Which patient benefit most from minimally invasive direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty in terms of perioperative blood loss? A retrospective comparative study from a cohort of patients with primary degenerative hips

IntroductionTotal hip arthroplasty (THA) is a successful surgery, but despite the advancements in anesthesiology and orthopedics, sometimes blood transfusions are required to manage the anemia due to the blood loss, involving a substantial number of patients. The aim of this retrospective comparative study is to define how the choice of the surgical approach, either direct anterior (DA) or posterolateral (PL), may influence the postoperative blood loss and the need for transfusion in THA.Materials and methodsData collection was carried out retrospectively of THAs performed between 2016 and 2021 on primary hip osteoarthritis treated by DA or with PL approach. Clinical and perioperative anesthetic data were collected. Preoperative hemoglobin levels were compared with the lowest detected level by calculating ΔHb (hemoglobin decrease). Then, data from the two groups were cross-checked: duration of surgery, whether premedication with tranexamic acid, duration of the hospitalization, rate of need for hemotransfusions, and amount of blood transfused. The two samples were subdivided into subgroups according to age, BMI, tranexamic acid prophylaxis, and chronic treatment with drugs that alter coagulative properties.ResultsTime of surgery was longer for patients treated with DA access (mean DA: 78.8 min; mean PL: 74.8 min; p: 0.05; 95% CI), but the length of hospitalization was shorter for patients treated with DA group with a mean time of 6.23 days versus 7.12 days for the PL group (p < 0.01). DA THA resulted advantageous mainly in patients between 66 and 75 years, showing a reduced postoperative transfusion requirement in the postoperative period (DA: 13.43%—mean: 1.33 units; PL: 26.82%—mean: 1.18 units; p: 0.044, 95% CI). Patients that assume blood-altering drugs showed a higher transfusion rate (p < 0.01), but comparison of the two subgroups showed that the choice of the surgical approach did not significantly affect the transfusion rate in these patients (p: 0.512). Prophylaxis with tranexamic acid reduced the transfusion rate (p < 0.01).ConclusionPatients treated by minimally invasive direct anterior approach undergo a significantly shorter hospitalization. From the analysis of patient’s subgroups those aged between 66- and 75-years benefit from the DA approach mainly for the minor blood loss with less frequent transfusion requirement.

Hybrid of Smith-Peterson and Watson-Jones minimally invasive direct anterior approach to the hip joint

BackgroundMuscle-sparing techniques, more consistent acetabular component positioning with fluoroscopy guidance, development in implants and instrumentation, expedited rehabilitation, and patients’ expectations have led to increased utilization of various direct anterior and anterolateral approaches to the hip joint.Methods and surgical techniqueIn this technical note, we demonstrate for the first time a hybrid modification of traditional Smith-Peterson and Watson-Jones approaches to the hip joint on a standard operating room (OR) table.ConclusionsAs demonstrated in this article, a precise knowledge of anatomy and clear goals in the surgical approach can minimize complications and facilitate visualization and instrumentation placement in the “direct anterior approach” to the hip joint.

微创直接前入路和传统后外侧入路全髋关节置换短期临床结果对比

微创直接前入路和传统后外侧入路全髋关节置换短期临床结果对比

Resection of Femoral Head–Neck Junction Osteoid Osteoma via Minimally Invasive Direct Anterior Approach: A Case Series and Review of Literature

AbstractOur aim was to introduce a new minimally invasive approach for surgical excision of femoral head–neck junction osteoid osteoma (FHNJOO) and review the available literature regarding its clinical manifestations and treatment methods. We included nine patients with FHNJOO in this series, who underwent resection via the minimally invasive direct anterior approach (DAA), from January 2010 to 2013. The functional outcomes were hip range of motion (ROM), visual analogue scale for pain (VAS), and Harris hip score (HHS), which were assessed pre- and postoperatively at 3 months at the last follow-up. We had nine patients with a mean age of 17.25 ± 6.75 years. The mean diagnosis delay was 23.56 ± 4.67 months. We had a mean follow-up of 93.67 ± 18.02 months. The hip ROM, VAS, and HHS were significantly improved from 97.78 ± 8.70 degrees to 121.11 ± 4.86 degrees, 63.93 ± 10.47 to 99.11 ± 1.76 degrees, and 7.3 ± 1.5 to 0.1 ± 0.3 degrees at 3-month and the last follow-up, respectively (p &lt; 0.001). We observed no recurrence or complications. The minimally invasive DAA approach for surgical resection of FHNJOO can provide immediate pain relief and improve hip functional scores with no complication or recurrence on long-term follow-up. It provides easy and complete access to the lesion and causes no morbidity due to minimal dissection.

Minimally invasive anterolateral approach versus direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty in the supine position: a prospective study based on early postoperative outcomes

BackgroundMinimally anterolateral approach (MAA) and direct anterior approach (DAA) have been reported as beneficial for total hip arthroplasty (THA) due to their ability to reduce postoperative pain and lead to quicker rehabilitation by preserving muscle insertions. As there is an ongoing debate on the effect of these two approaches on early postoperative outcomes, this prospective study aimed to assess the difference in early clinical, radiological, and patient-reported outcomes between the two minimally invasive approaches.MethodsA total of 98 patients, 50 in the MAA group and 48 in the DAA group, were included in the study. Patients with complete data were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively at 2, 6, and 12 weeks. Clinical measurements, including the ability to climb stairs and walk, 6-min walk test (6MWT), the Forgotten Joint Scale (FJS-12), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) Hip scores, radiological evaluation, and complications were analyzed.ResultsThere were no significant differences in clinical outcomes and implant alignments between MAA and DAA groups. In regards to patient-reported outcomes, the FJS-12 was significantly higher in the MAA group compared to group DAA at 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively. However, there was no significant difference in the FJS-12 between the two groups 12 weeks after surgery. The differences also included shorter operative times (62.4 ± 9.05 min vs. 71 ± 8.01 min), less blood loss (132.6 ± 43.31 ml vs. 159.23 ± 37.25 ml), lower Hb drop (29.56 ± 8.02 g/L vs. 36.4 ± 7.12 g/L), and fewer blood transfusions in the MAA group (4.0% vs. 18.8%). The incidence of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) neuropraxia after surgery was 7 (14.6%) in the DAA group and 0 in the MAA group. One fracture was found in each group and managed conservatively.ConclusionMAA and DAA approach yielded excellent and similar early clinical outcomes. However, better patient-reported outcomes could be achieved by MAA THA. The MAA resulted in a safer approach associated with shorter operative times, less blood loss, lower Hb drop, fewer blood transfusions, and LFCN neuropraxia than DAA. A longer follow-up is needed to further examine differences between these procedures.

Quantitative gait analysis after total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive direct anterior approach: A case control study

IntroductionTotal Hip Arthroplasty (THA) leads to excellent clinical and functional results. The Minimally Invasive Anterior Approach (MIAA) theoretically allows rapid recovery and a reduction in the need for rehabilitation, but alterations in muscle and static balance have previously been demonstrated. Kinetic, kinematic and muscular alterations have been shown to persist up to 1year postoperatively but data beyond 1year postoperatively is lacking. Thus, the objective of this study was to compare the data from Quantitative Gait Analysis (QGA) coupled with electromyography (EMG), of patients one year postoperatively with THA through MIAA, compared to an asymptomatic control group. HypothesisWe hypothesized that QGA and EMG parameters would not normalize beyond one year postoperatively. Patients and MethodsTwenty-seven patients were recruited, including 15 subjects (64.6±6.6years) operated on by MIAA, who at 15.9±3.1months postoperatively, along with 12 asymptomatic control subjects (68.9±9.7years), who underwent QGA and maximal isometric muscle strength tests, coupled with EMG on the gluteus medius and maximus, Tensor Fascia Lata (TFL) and Sartorius muscles. The spatiotemporal parameters of walking (step length, walking speed, cadence, single leg support time), kinetics (vertical ground reaction forces, hip moments in the 3 planes) and kinematics (coxofemoral and pelvic amplitudes) were analyzed. ResultsThe walking speed was lower on the non-operated side of the experimental subjects (0.96ms−1 compared to 1.13ms−1 for asymptomatic [p=0.018]), as was the step length on the operated side (0.53m compared to 0.60m for asymptomatic [p=0.042]). Maximal isometric muscle strength was lower in subjects operated on for the gluteus maximus and medius (p=0.004), compared to asymptomatic subjects. Moments were lower in the subjects operated on in extension (0.72Nm on the operated side, 0.75Nm on the non-operated side compared to 1.06Nm for asymptomatic [p=0.007 and p=0.024]) and lateral rotation (0.09Nm on the operated side, 0.05Nm on the non-operated side compared to 0.16Nm for asymptomatic subjects [p=0.009 and p=0.0005]). Hip adduction amplitudes were lower on the operated side compared to asymptomatic subjects (3.93° versus 9.14° for asymptomatic [p=0.005]). Pelvic amplitudes in the frontal plane were lower amongst operated subjects (0.44° against 1.97° for asymptomatic [p=0.041]). Pelvic amplitudes in the sagittal plane were higher in the operated subjects (15.74° on the operated side, 15.43° on the non-operated side compared to 9.65° for asymptomatic [p=0.041 and p=0.032]). DiscussionOur initial hypothesis was validated, since walking deficits persisted beyond one year postoperatively after THA through MIAA. A decrease in maximal isometric muscle strength of the gluteus medius and gluteus maximus was observed, as well as an alteration of kinetic and kinematic parameters in the sagittal and frontal planes. The results were in agreement with the literature and reflected the establishment of compensatory mechanisms to overcome alterations in joint strength and range more than one year postoperatively. These results would allow rehabilitation programs to be more specific and would justify a study on the other approaches for THA. Level of evidenceIII; non-randomized control trial.

Direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: Hip biomechanics and muscle activation during three walking tasks

BackgroundTotal hip replacement with minimally invasive direct anterior approach using the “Smith Petersen” interval is an alternative technique to conventional surgery aimed at preserving the integrity of the muscles around the hip joint. This study aimed to observe hip biomechanics, gait variables, hip muscle activation and locomotor performance during three locomotor tasks (forward, lateral, and backward walking), in subjects who undergo total hip arthroplasty with direct anterior approach. MethodsFourteen patients with primary osteoarthritis who underwent direct anterior approach were included in the study. The optoelectronic 3-D motion analysis system integrated with an electromyography surface device was used to acquire the biomechanics of patients before surgery and at 3 and 6 months post-surgery. Spatio-temporal, dynamic, and hip muscle electromyographic parameters were analyzed and compared whit those of healthy controls. FindingsAlmost all gait parameters improved after surgery. The majority of gait variables neared to the control group at 6 months, while the hip joint range of motion did not. The abnormally increased activation of the muscles around the hip joint was reduced at 6 months post-surgery during all three locomotor tasks. Conversely, the altered gait phase-related electromyographic pattern did not change after the surgery. InterpretationOur results indicate that hip and gait function during several locomotor tasks improved after surgery, while simultaneously either preserve or restore the muscle activation around the hip joint. A full biomechanical evaluation of the hip function during locomotion may aid physicians and surgeons in optimizing the management of patients before and after hip replacement surgery.

Short-term efficacy of endoscope assisted arthroplasty for total hip replacement via a minimum invasive direct anterior approach

Objective: To present the surgical technique of endoscope assisted arthroplasty for total hip replacement via minimum invasive direct anterior approach and analyze its early clinical outcome. Methods: From November 2019 to May 2020, endoscopic total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach was performed on 30 patients (32 hips), including 12 males (13 hips) and 18 females (19hips), in the Department of Orthopedics of Fujian Provincial Hospital. The average age of patients was (63±14) years (ranged 32-87 years). The average body mass index (BMI) of the patients was (26.9±4.5) kg/m2. There were 12 cases whose BMI was higher than 28.0 kg/m2 and the maximum BMI was 35.2 kg/m2. The surgery was performed on supine position using a 5-6 cm proximal transverse incision and a distal selective percutaneous puncture incision to perform the acetabulum preparation and the prosthesis implantation with the novel designed split tool under the monitoring of endoscope; the lift-top tractor system was used to raise the femur in the transverse incision for femoral side preparation and prosthesis implantation. Relevant data such as the perioperative status, operation time, postoperative pain score assessed with visual analogue score (VAS), prosthesis position, joint function, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve function and patient satisfaction were recorded to analyze the short-term efficacy. Results: The average length of incision of the 30 cases(32 hips)was (5.9±0.4) cm. All patients in this study had I/A wound healing with no perioperative complications such as infection, poor wound healing and fractures of the proximal femur. The average operation time was (65±14) min, and the average amount of blood loss was (136±56) ml. The average acetabular abduction angle and acetabular antegrade inclinations was 41.4°±3.6° and 16.0°±5.3°, respectively. The resting-state VAS of pain at 6 h and 24 h after operation were all ≤2, and there was no significant difference between the VAS scores after exercise and the VAS scores at the resting state (both P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the VAS scores at the same state at different times (both>0.05). The weight-bearing exercise was applied in all patients within 12 h after surgery. The length of postoperative hospital stays varied from 1 to 3 days((2.0±0.9) days). At the 6th-month follow-up, the Harris score of the hip was 94.7±3.0, which significantly improved when compared with that before the operation (35.5±8.1)(P<0.01). No sensory abnormalities were observed. The satisfaction score of the patients was 9.3±0.5 (full score set to 10). Conclusions: The efficacy and safety of the endoscope assisted total hip arthroplasty for total hip replacement is acceptable. This procedure can help to reduce the compression of the muscles by the retractor in the conventional operation. It can be applied to obese and muscular patients.

Les marqueurs sériques sont-ils corrélés au caractère invasif de la procédure en arthroplastie primaire de hanche ? Étude prospective randomisée comparant les approches antérieures et latérales directes

BackgroundAdvantages of minimally invasive approaches for total hip arthroplasty are still matter of debate. Serum markers have been assessed as objective method to quantify muscle damage after surgery but in literature ambiguous results have been reported. The aim of this prospective randomized study was to: 1) compare serum markers elevation between a minimally invasive direct anterior approach (DAA) and a direct lateral approach (DLA), 2) to establish a correlation between serum markers increase and other peri-operative variables.Hypothesis A lesser elevation of markers could be found in patients who underwent a minimally invasive DAA. Patients and methodsSeventy patients were enrolled and randomly divided in two groups according to the type of the approach. All patients were treated with the same implant by the same surgeon and received the same rehabilitation protocol. Demographic data, pre-operative Harris Hip Score (HHS) and operative time were recorded. Myoglobin, creatine kinase MB (CK-MB), troponin I, C-reactive protein (CRP), haemoglobin (HB) and pain levels were measured pre- and post-operatively. ResultsMean post-operative rise were 524.9±134.6 and 667.8±409.5 for myoglobin, 4.8±2.5 and 6.6±3.7 for CK-MB, and 16.9±5.3 and 15.4±6.4 for PCR, in DAA and DLA groups respectively. In both groups, post-operatively values were significantly higher than pre-operatively (p<0.05). Comparing the two groups, no significant differences in serum markers elevations were found. A significantly lower post-operative pain was found in DAA group than in DLA group [2,9 vs. 4,2 and 2,7 vs. 3,6 in second and third day, respectively (p<0.05)]. No significant correlation was present between the serum marker elevations and age, BMI, HHS, operative time, HB or pain levels (p>0.05). ConclusionSerum markers of muscle damage and inflammation increased in the post-operative period without significant differences between DAA and DLA, even though overall trend was higher in DLA group. The DAA group had significantly lower levels of post-operative pain. No significant correlation between pain and serum markers levels was found. Level of evidenceI; randomized study.

Do serum markers correlate with invasiveness of the procedure in THA? A prospective randomized study comparing direct anterior and lateral approaches

BackgroundAdvantages of minimally invasive approaches for total hip arthroplasty are still matter of debate. Serum markers have been assessed as objective method to quantify muscle damage after surgery but in literature ambiguous results have been reported. The aim of this prospective randomized study was to: 1) compare serum markers elevation between a minimally invasive direct anterior approach (DAA) and a direct lateral approach (DLA); 2) to establish a correlation between serum markers increase and other perioperative variables. HypothesisA lesser elevation of markers could be found in patients who underwent a minimally invasive DAA. Patients and methodsSeventy patients were enrolled and randomly divided in two groups according to the type of the approach. All patients were treated with the same implant by the same surgeon and received the same rehabilitation protocol. Demographic data, preoperative Harris Hip Score (HHS) and operative time were recorded. Myoglobin, creatine kinase MB (CK-MB), troponin I, C-reactive protein (CRP), haemoglobin (HB) and pain levels were measured pre- and postoperatively. ResultsMean postoperative rise were 524.9±134.6 and 667.8±409.5 for myoglobin, 4.8±2.5 and 6.6±3.7 for CK-MB, and 16.9±5.3 and 15.4±6.4 for PCR, in DAA and DLA groups, respectively. In both groups, postoperatively values were significantly higher than preoperatively (p<0.05). Comparing the two groups, no significant differences in serum markers elevations were found. A significantly lower postoperative pain was found in DAA group than in DLA group (2.9 vs. 4.2 and 2.7 vs. 3.6 in second and third day, respectively (p<0.05)). No significant correlation was present between the serum marker elevations and age, BMI, HHS, operative time, HB or pain levels (p>0.05). ConclusionSerum markers of muscle damage and inflammation increased in the postoperative period without significant differences between DAA and DLA, even though overall trend was higher in DLA group. The DAA group had significantly lower levels of postoperative pain. No significant correlation between pain and serum markers levels was found. Level of evidenceI; randomized study.

The bikini incision anterior cemented total hip arthroplasty: Assessment of radiological and clinical outcomes - A mid-term review.

Introduction: There has been an increased interest in minimally invasive direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty (THA) to provide greater patient satisfaction, improve pain relief, and reduce the duration of hospitalisation. A direct anterior approach hybrid cemented THA, utilising a bikini line incision, can be technically challenging. We aimed to undertake radiological analysis of femoral stem cementation, clinical outcomes, and component survivorship. Methods: Over a 5-year period, 215 primary elective bikini anterior THA conducted by a single surgeon were included. All procedures were performed using a cemented collarless polished stem. The operation was performed on a standard operating table. Patients undergoing posterior approach, revision procedures, and fractured neck of femurs were excluded. Post-operative radiographs were analysed for femoral cementation quality using the Barrack grading system. Harris hip scores (HHS) were determined at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, annually thereafter and the difference in HHS was noted. Results: In total, 215 anterior bikini THA (R = 101, L = 114) were performed in 199 patients (M = 89, F = 110) with a mean age of 77 and mean follow up of 2.9 years (range = 0.5–5). Radiographic analysis of femoral cementation showed 189 femoral stems (88%) were either Barrack A or B cementation grade, suggesting optimal cementation. Lucency in the cement-bone interface occurred mainly in Gruen Zone 1 (43%) and Zone 13(46.9%). At the most recent follow-up (mean 2.9 years), component survivorship was at 99.54% (stem). Significant improvement was noted in Harris hip scores at final follow-up (from 54 preoperatively to 92.7 at 2.9 years postoperatively). Conclusion: Our results suggest that a bikini incision direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty can be safely employed to perform cemented femoral stems on a standard operating table.

Comparison of clinical and economic outcomes between the direct anterior approach and the posterolateral approach for primary total hip arthroplasty

IntroductionTotal hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures in orthopedics. The most commonly employed approaches are the posterolateral approach (PLA) and the lateral approach. Minimally invasive techniques such as direct anterior approach (DAA) and MIS DAA (minimal invasive surgery direct anterior approach) are used more and more often. The aim of the study was to compare the two approaches DAA and PLA in terms of length of stay, economic outcomes, quality of life, hip joint function and hip joint awareness.Material and methodsThe study was performed as a retrospective analysis of 52 cementless total hip arthroplasty procedures performed by MIS DAA and 56 cementless THA performed by classic standard PLA. The evaluation of hip joint awareness, quality of life, hip joint fitness assessment and economic indicators were evaluated.ResultsThe mean duration of the anterior approach procedure (48.96 minutes) was found to be around half that of the posterior approach (102.52 minutes) (Levene’s test: F = 2.37; p &gt; 0.005). The mean durations of the two types of approaches were found to be significantly different (Student’s t test: t (106) = –16.15; p &lt; 0.005). The shorter mean duration of stay and shorter procedure duration associated with the anterior approach result in mean savings of PLN 5465.96 per procedureConclusionsThe MIS DAA procedure is a safe and less traumatizing surgical approach for hip arthroplasty which allows faster post-operative primary mobilization, shorter procedure time and sooner discharge from hospital than standard PLA. Significant reduction in costs of hospitalization was observed in the MIS DAA procedure.

Minimally invasive direct anterior approach versus standard lateral approach in the management of tumors of the femoral neck

BackgroundTo compare the clinical outcomes of patients with benign or aggressive tumors of the femoral neck who underwent surgical curettage with the use of the direct anterior approach (DAA) and a standard lateral approach. MethodsThose patients from 2010 to 2017 were retrospectively enrolled. The patients were divided into two groups: group A, consisting of patients who had undergone surgery via the lateral approach; and group B, consisting of patients who had undergone the same procedure via the DAA. ResultsFifty-eight patients were divided into group A (n = 46) and group B (n = 12). The median follow-up was 43 months (15–97 months). There was no significant difference in the 1-year and 3-year recurrence rates (p = 0.74). Group B had comparable operation time and a significantly shorter incision length, less intraoperative blood loss, less postoperative drainage, a shorter hospital stay and less pain on the first postoperative day. Group B also had better hip function as assessed by the Harris Hip Score one month and one year postoperatively. One patient in group B experienced intraoperative incomplete fracture of the femoral neck, which was treated conservatively. ConclusionsSurgical curettage for patients with benign or aggressive tumors of the femoral neck via the DAA had a comparable local control rate and a better perioperative and functional outcome than via the lateral approach. Certain quality of the femoral neck should be required to avoid pathological fracture, which is difficult to treat by internal fixation in the DAA.

Simultaneous Bilateral Minimally Invasive Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty with fast track Protocol.

Advanced degenerative hip joint disease is bilateral in approximately 20% of cases, prompting questions of whether it is necessary to perform two separate surgical procedures, whether simultaneous bilateral hip replacement makes the surgical treatment too extensive, and whether it significantly affects the postoperative course. The study analysed the duration of hospitalisation, perioperative complications, and the need for blood transfusion in 30 patients (27 men and 3 women) with bilateral hip osteoarthritis who underwent simultaneous bilateral total hip replacement from a minimally invasive direct anterior approach followed by a fast track protocol for optimisation of perioperative management between 2014 and 2017. The mean age of patients was 60.2 years (range 43 to 77 years) and the mean follow-up period was 28 months (range 18 to 48 months). Mean duration of hospitalisation was 4.5 days (range 3 to 9 days). A total of 4 patients (13%) required allogeneic blood transfusion. No patient developed thromboembolic or infectious complications or implant dislocation after surgery. Apart from one case where the acetabulum was not selected correctly, which resulted in postoperative loosening, there were no other significant medical events potentially related to the surgical treatment. Simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty using a minimally invasive direct approach and a fast track protocol for optimisation of perioperative management does not increase the need for perioperative blood transfusion or the number of surgical complications and constitutes a safe, effective, and recommendable method of treatment in patients with advanced bilateral degenerative disease of the hip joints.

Bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures with minimally invasive anterior approach in elderly

ObjectivesThe purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of hemiarthroplasty with minimally invasive direct anterior approach (DAA) for the treatment of femoral neck fracture in elderly patients. We aimed to compare the DAA and the standard anterolateral approach (ALA), assessing multiple peri‑ and post-operative parameters. Design and settingBetween December of 2015 and May of 2017, patients operated with medial femoral neck fractures using bipolar hemiarthroplasty with DAA or ALA were evaluated. The volume of bleeding and transfusion, postoperative level of pain, mobilisation and functional outcome were assessed retrospectively. ParticipantsPatients between the age of 75 and 85, suffering Garden Type III Pauwels Type III and Garden Type IV medial femoral neck fractures were entered to the study. Patients had no history of anticoagulant therapy; the operation was performed in the first 48 h. All patients received similar postoperative pain management and physiotherapy. The type of implants was determined by the patients’ bone morphology and quality. Main outcome measuresThe outcomes of interest were the level of postoperative pain, blood loss, rate of recovery and physiotherapy, altered gait pattern and accuracy of leg length, related to DAA and ALA techniques. ResultsThe 51 patients operated with DAA showed significantly less pain, based on VAS (visual analogue scale), starting of the first postoperative day. Those patients who were subjected to DAA met with the criteria of hospital discharge 1.68 days earlier, compared to ALA patients. The length of leg was accurately set in 21% of ALA vs 54.9% of DAA patients. On the 12th week follow-up, limping was detected only 5.9% of DAA vs 46% of ALA groups. On the postoperative 2nd and 6th weeks, the HHS (Harris Hip Score) was significantly better in patients with DAA, compared to ALA (77 vs 65 and 91 vs 77, p < .05). ConclusionThe bipolar hemiarthroplasty with DAA allows earlier mobilisation, reduced postoperative pain and need for rehabilitation with an overall better functional outcome, compared to ALA. DAA is proven a reliable choice for femoral neck fractures, offering good outcome and faster recovery, similarly to total hip arthroplasties with degenerative arthritis.

Direct anterior approach and dual mobility cup: the "head-first" reduction technique: a technical note and early case series.

Less invasive direct anterior approach (DAA) and dual mobility cup (DMC) are increasingly adopted in practice over the last decade. Their use aims to reduce, as much as possible, soft tissue dissection and dislocation rate. This study aims to present a novel surgical technique to reduce a DMC prosthesis during a DAA easily. A mildly modified version of the direct anterior approach is proposed. When leg lengths, stability, impingement, and tension have been checked, the trial stem is disassembled in situ, dislocated, and removed, leaving the space to exchange the trial double mobility head with the definitive one. When the definitive stem is inserted, the surgeon guides and helps the assistant to match the trunnion in the double mobility head. As soon as the components are matched, the traction is released, and the unit is impacted by an alternation of axial traction and release. Of 164 patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (December 2016-May 2017) by a single surgeon, a double mobility cup through DAA and the "head-first" technique was performed in 26 patients (15.8%). The mean operative time was 130min (85-220min; SD 34.28). No significant complications occurred during the mean follow-up of 23.6months. Specific difficulties can be anticipated when pairing dual mobility cup and direct anterior approach. The "head-first" technique is a useful technique in reducing the possible difficulties related to the reduction of double mobility cup through a less invasive direct anterior approach.