Minimally invasive direct anterior approach versus standard lateral approach in the management of tumors of the femoral neck

Abstract

BackgroundTo compare the clinical outcomes of patients with benign or aggressive tumors of the femoral neck who underwent surgical curettage with the use of the direct anterior approach (DAA) and a standard lateral approach. MethodsThose patients from 2010 to 2017 were retrospectively enrolled. The patients were divided into two groups: group A, consisting of patients who had undergone surgery via the lateral approach; and group B, consisting of patients who had undergone the same procedure via the DAA. ResultsFifty-eight patients were divided into group A (n = 46) and group B (n = 12). The median follow-up was 43 months (15–97 months). There was no significant difference in the 1-year and 3-year recurrence rates (p = 0.74). Group B had comparable operation time and a significantly shorter incision length, less intraoperative blood loss, less postoperative drainage, a shorter hospital stay and less pain on the first postoperative day. Group B also had better hip function as assessed by the Harris Hip Score one month and one year postoperatively. One patient in group B experienced intraoperative incomplete fracture of the femoral neck, which was treated conservatively. ConclusionsSurgical curettage for patients with benign or aggressive tumors of the femoral neck via the DAA had a comparable local control rate and a better perioperative and functional outcome than via the lateral approach. Certain quality of the femoral neck should be required to avoid pathological fracture, which is difficult to treat by internal fixation in the DAA.