We commented on the emergence of knowledge science, including epistemology, knowledge engineering, management science with knowledge management, sociological (soft) systems science, technology management, and technological (hard) systems science. As opposed to philosophic macro-theories of knowledge creation on long historical scale, many new micro-theories of knowledge creation for today and tomorrow emerged since 1990. All such micro-theories take into account the interplay of intuitive and emotional, tacit aspects of knowledge with rational and explicit aspects. A contemporary theory of intuition explains rationally why intuitive and emotive aspects are much stronger sources of creative ideas. There is a qualitative difference between group-oriented organizational processes of knowledge creation in industrial and market organizations and individual-oriented academic processes of knowledge creation; the latter can be described by a Triple Helix of academic knowledge creation. Combining both organizational and academic processes of knowledge creation is the prescriptive Nanatsudaki model of seven creative processes. The importance of diverse elements of these models was empirically supported by the results of a survey of creativity conditions in a Japanese university, using multiple criteria decision making for knowledge acquisition from large data bases.