Intravitreal Dexamethasone Research Articles

United Kingdom Database study of Intravitreal Dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex®) for Macular Edema related to Retinal Vein Occlusion.

To study the treatment patterns, visual outcomes and safety profile of intravitreal dexamethasone implant (IDI) used for the treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (ME-RVO). Up to 2 years of routinely collected anonymized data within electronic medical record systems were remotely extracted from 16 centers. The outcome measures include visual outcome, number of injections, and safety measures, including the rate of IOP rise, frequency of IOP-lowering medication usage and cataract surgery rates. The study included 688 eyes (44.4%) with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and 862 eyes (55.6%) with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO); 1250 eyes (80.6%) were treatment-naïve and 28% (275/989) had high IOP or were on IOP-lowering medications before IDI use. we found that 31% (476) of eyes received 2 injections, 11.7% (182) and 3.7% (58) of eyes received 3 and 4 injections, respectively. The mean baseline Snellen VA improved from 20/125 to 20/40 after the first injection. The probability of cataract surgery was 15% at 24 months. The proportion of eyes with ≥ 10 mmHg change from baseline was higher in phakic (14.2%) compared to pseudophakic eyes (5.4%, p=0.004). Three eyes required IOP filtering surgery (0.2%). The visual results of IDI in eyes with ME-RVO in the real world are comparable to the clinical trial setting. Increased IOP in eyes with pre-existing ocular hypertension or glaucoma can be controlled with additional medical treatment. IOP rise with IDI may be more frequent in phakic than pseudophakic eyes.

Effect of Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant Injection in a Patient with Recurrent Nodular Anterior Scleritis

Purpose: To report the use of intravitreal dexamethasone implant injection in a patient with recurrent nodular anterior scleritis.Case summary: A 16-year-old patient presented with persistent eye pain and conjunctival injection in the left eye, which were diagnosed as nodular anterior scleritis. The clinical features improved with topical and systemic steroid treatment, but the patient developed side effects related to steroid use, including elevated intraocular pressure and skin rash. The steroid dose was reduced which led to frequent recurrence. Immunosuppressive agents were added to the treatment regimen, but there was no improvement; the patient developed intermediate uveitis and vitreous hemorrhage. Scleritis and intermediate uveitis continued despite vitrectomy; therefore, intravitreal dexamethasone implant injection was performed. There was no scleritis recurrence within 1 year after injection, which allowed tapering of steroids and immunosuppressive drugs.Conclusions: Intravitreal dexamethasone implant injection may be effective for recurrent nodular anterior scleritis in patients who exhibit complications, such as intermediate uveitis.

Intravitreal dexamethasone to manage post endothelial keratoplasty cystoid macular oedema refractory to topical therapy.

To describe the visual and clinical outcomes of patients with post endothelial keratoplasty (EK) cystoid macular oedema (CMO) refractory to topical treatment with intravitreal sustained-release dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex). 131 eyes from 111 patients undergoing solitary or combined EK (52 DSAEK (40.0%) and 79 DMEK (60.0%)) at Southend University Hospital between January 2020 and February 2022 with a minimum follow-up of 6 months were evaluated. Patients suspected of having CMO underwent spectral-domain macular optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) Patients with diabetes were not included in this series. CMO was identified in 5.3% (n = 7) of cases, with 2 of these patients responding to topical corticosteroid treatment. The remaining 5 patients underwent intravitreal dexamethasone implant, with 1 patient requiring repeat implant due to CMO recurrence. All presented within 2 months postoperatively. 4 out of 5 eyes treated with intravitreal dexamethasone achieved a Snellen BCVA ≤6/9.5. 1 patient had an uncontrolled rise in intraocular pressure (IOP) despite maximal medical treatment requiring an urgent PreserFlo Ab-Externo MicroShunt. The use of intravitreal sustained-release dexamethasone implant in the management of post EK CMO refractory to topical therapy is effective and safe in most cases, but patients should be monitored and treated promptly for any secondary IOP response.

Comparison of the efficacy of intravitreal Anti-VEGF versus intravitreal dexamethasone implant in treatment resistant diabetic Macular Edema

PurposeComparison of the efficacy of monthly anti-VEGF versus dexamethasone (DEX) implant in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) whose macular edema persists despite three doses of anti-VEGF therapy.Materials and methodsThis retrospective study included 94 eyes of 94 patients with central macular thickness (CMT) > 300 μm despite previously receiving three doses of anti-VGEF (aflibercept or ranibizumab) injections between January 2014 and January 2019. The patients were divided into four groups. The first and second groups were the patients who received three more doses of initial anti-VGEF treatment after the initial anti-VGEF treatment. The third and fourth groups were patients switched to intravitreal dexamethasone implants. Patients were followed up every month for six months after the injection. The primary outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and intraocular pressure (IOP) at six months.ResultsThe mean age of the patients included in the study was 64.64 ± 7; there were 58 men (61.7%) and 36 women (38.3%). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding age, stage of retinopathy, and lens status. When CMT, BCVA, and IOP were assessed among the four groups at the end of the sixth month, no statistical difference between the groups was found. There was no need for medical intervention despite the statistically significant increase in IOP at the end of the sixth month compared to the third month in the dexamethasone implanted groups. In contrast to the decrease in CMT, which was statistically significant in all four groups at the end of the sixth month compared to the third month, the increase in BCVA was not statistically significant in any of the four groups at the end of the sixth month.ConclusionAccording to the results of our study, there is no superiority between continuing with existing anti-VEGF or switching to a dexamethasone implant after three doses of anti-VEGF.

Combined intravitreal dexamethasone and bevacizumab injection for the treatment of persistent diabetic macular edema (DexaBe study): a phase I clinical study

PurposeThe aim of this study is to investigate the safety of combined intravitreal injection of dexamethasone aqueous-solution (IVD) and bevacizumab (IVB) in patients with refractory diabetic macular edema (DME) and its effect on intraocular pressure (IOP), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfield thickness (CSFT).MethodsThis prospective study included 10 patients (10 eyes) with DME refractory to laser photocoagulation and/or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy. A complete ophthalmological examination was performed at baseline, during the first week of treatment, and monthly through week 24. Therapy consisted of monthly injections of combined IVD and IVB “pro re nata” (PRN) if CST > 300 µm. We investigated the impact of the injections on intraocular pressure (IOP), cataract development, Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and central sub-foveal thickness (CSFT) measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT).ResultsEight patients (80%) completed 24 weeks of follow-up. Compared to baseline, mean IOP increased significantly (p < 0.05) and anti-glaucomatous eye drops were necessary for 50% of the patients, CSFT was significantly reduced at all follow-up visits (p < 0.05), although mean BCVA showed no significant improvement. One patient developed dense cataract progression and another showed vitreoretinal traction at week 24. No inflammation or endophthalmitis was observed.ConclusionTreatment of DME refractory to laser and/or anti-VEGF therapy with combined PRN IV dexamethasone aqueous solution and bevacizumab was associated with adverse effects related to the use of corticosteroids. However, there was a significant improvement in CSFT meantime best-correct visual acuity remained stable or improved in 50% of patients.

"Macular Toxoplasmosis: Treatment with Intravitreal Clindamycin and Dexamethasone"

"Macular Toxoplasmosis: Treatment with Intravitreal Clindamycin and Dexamethasone"

Optical Coherence Tomography Angiographic Evaluation of Macular Vessel Density in Diabetic Macular Edema After Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implants: A Prospective Interventional Trial.

The goal of this study was to assess macular vascular density evolution, macular thickness, and functional outcomes after intravitreal dexamethasone implants for diabetic macular edema. Vascular density was evaluated with optical coherence tomography (OCT) angiography in 21 eyes. Macular thickness was evaluated with structural OCT. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were evaluated before and after treatment, and these functional outcomes were analyzed for association with anatomic outcomes. Macular vessel density in the superficial capillary plexus was evaluated with OCT angiography and quantified in areas with no fluid, allowing a more accurate measurement and eliminating the segmentation bias in areas with intra-retinal fluid. Such a methodology was possible by positioning the scans only in areas with no fluid before and after the implant. The absence of fluid in these areas was confirmed by three experienced evaluators using both the B-scan and the en face. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were evaluated before and after treatment, and these functional outcomes were analyzed for association with anatomic outcomes. At 30, 60, and 90 days after implantation, there was improvement in macular perfusion in areas without fluid after intravitreal dexamethasone implantation, accompanied by reduced macular thickness and improved visual acuity (P < .001). However, there was no improvement in contrast sensitivity after treatment. Improved macular perfusion after treatment with intravitreal dexamethasone implantation may be associated with modulation of leukostasis, when the release of cytokines leads to capillary endothelial damage and obstruction of the micro-vasculature, leading to impaired capillary perfusion and ischemic damage. Despite the anatomical and functional findings demonstrated, further studies are needed to prove the relationship between the inflammatory mechanisms of diabetic macular edema and its relationship with macular perfusion and functional aspects. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2023;54(3):174-182.].

A review of ten years of experience using dexamethasone intravitreal implants (Ozurdex) for uveitis.

Uveitis is a type of ocular inflammatory disease caused by various etiologies, for which corticosteroids are the main treatment. Dexamethasone Intravitreal implant (DEX-I) has been widely used in the treatment of uveitis across the world. Then, new indications and complications appeared. This review aims to summarize the use of DEX-I in uveitis in the past 10 years. We summarized the clinical data (baseline characteristics, efficacy and safety) and discussed controversies by retrospectively analyzing the articles and cases published in PubMed and Web of Science using the terms "Ozurdex", OR "intravitreal dexamethasone implant", AND "uveitis" from 2010 to 2022. DEX-I is effective in reducing edema, improving inflammation and improving vision when treating various conditions of uveitis including infectious, no-infectious, pediatric uveitis, and surgery-related applications. The efficacy of DEX-I as a monotherapy is related to the following: etiology and course of disease, treatment of systemic diseases, patients' toleration after multiple injections, economic situation, etc. In addition, intravitreal corticosteroids implantation may replace systemic therapy in some patients. In terms of safety, the incidence of high intraocular pressure is about 20.52%, and the incidence of cataract is about 15.51%. DEX-I can effectively treat non-infectious uveitis and some infectious uveitis such as suspected tuberculosis, and its safety is controllable. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the effect of monotherapy and to expand more indications.

Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant at the Time of Silicone Oil Removal to Treat Persistent Macular Edema after Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair

An intravitreal dexamethasone implant (DEX-I) was found to be effective and safe for the treatment of cystoid macular edema (CME) after vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) and in silicone oil (SO)-filled eyes. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of DEX-I at the time of SO removal for the treatment of recalcitrant CME after successful RRD repair. A retrospective review of the medical records was performed on 24 consecutive patients (24 eyes) with recalcitrant CME after RRD repair who were treated with a single 0.7-mg DEX-I at the time of SO removal. The main outcome measures were changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT). A regression model was performed to assess the relationship between BCVA and CMT at 6 months and independent variables. In all 24 patients, CME occurred after RRD repair and remained despite topical therapy. The mean time of CME onset was 27.4 ± 7.7 days after vitrectomy. The mean time between vitrectomy and DEX-I was 106.8 ± 10.1 days. The mean CMT was significantly decreased from 429.6 ± 59.1 µm at baseline to 294 ± 46.4 µm at month 6 (p < 0.0001). The mean BCVA significantly improved from 0.99 ± 0.3 at baseline to 0.60 ± 0.3 at month 6 (p < 0.0001). An elevation of intraocular pressure was observed in one (4.1%) eye, which was medically managed. A univariate regression model revealed a relationship between month-6 BCVA after DEX-I and gender (β = -0.27; p = 0.03) and macular status (β = -0.45; p = 0.001) when RRD occurred. No relationship between month-6 CMT and independent variables was found. DEX-I at the time of SO removal had an acceptable safety profile and achieved favorable outcomes in eyes affected by recalcitrant CME that occurred after RRD repair. RRD-related macular status is significantly associated with visual acuity after DEX-I.

Clinical-Therapeutic Orientation in Retinal Venous Obstruction

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is a retinal vascular disease that can affect the central retinal vein in central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) or branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), which causes decreased vision (the second leading cause of blindness after diabetic retinopathy). CRVO is accompanied by retinomacular edema and retinal / peripapillary / iris neovascularization that cause serious complications: absolute neovascular secondary glaucoma, vitreous hemorrhage, retinal traction detachment, possibly present in both forms of CRVO. Branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) is often asymptomatic and can be diagnosed accidentally or by retinal control, and is 5 times more common than CRVO. CRVO prophylaxis is done by identifying and appropriate treatment of risk factors (multiple): hypertension, diabetes, smoking, obesity, Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG), hypercoagulability. RVO treatment, the non-ischemic form, requires the treatment of macular edema with: intravitreal AntiVEGF - Ranibizumab, Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, repeatedly, cortisone therapy with intravitreal Triamcinolone or Dexamethasone implant, focal / grid laser photocoagulation and / or panretinal photocoagulation. In all cases of RVO, the non-ischemic form, the following are required: clinical surveillance, fluorescein angiography (FA), OCT for immediate detection of progression to the ischemic form. The treatment of RVO, ischemic form, is the treatment of macular edema with repeated intravitreal antiVEGF treatment, corticosteroids, focal laser photocoagulation, grid, pan-photocoagulation indicated in the treatment of exudative ischemic areas with neovessels proliferation. Panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) is an effective treatment for iris peripapillary retinal neovascularization and secondary complications. The current prognosis of RVO is improved by regular examination of OCT-SD, antiVEGF medication, intravitreal cortisone and laser photocoagulation that provide prophylactic and curative treatment of RVO and complications: vitreous hemorrhage, neovascular glaucoma, retinal traction detachment.

Prognostic Imaging Biomarkers in Diabetic Macular Edema Eyes Treated with Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant

The aim was to evaluate predictive value of baseline optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography (OCTA) parameters in diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with dexamethasone implant (DEXi). OCT and OCTA parameters were collected: central macular thickness (CMT), vitreomacular abnormalities (VMIAs), intraretinal and subretinal fluid (mixed DME pattern), hyper-reflective foci (HRF), microaneurysms (MAs) reflectivity, ellipsoid zone disruption, suspended scattering particles in motion (SSPiM), perfusion density (PD), vessel length density, and foveal avascular zone. Responders' (RES) and non-responders' (n-RES) eyes were classified considering morphological (CMT reduction ≥ 10%) and functional (BCVA change ≥ 5 ETDRS letters) changes after DEXi. Binary logistic regression OCT, OCTA, and OCT/OCTA-based models were developed. Thirty-four DME eyes were enrolled (18 treatment-naïve). OCT-based model combining DME mixed pattern + MAs + HRF and OCTA-based model combining SSPiM and PD showed the best performance to correctly classify the morphological RES eyes. In the treatment-naïve eyes, VMIAs were included with a perfect fit for n-RES eyes. The presence of DME mixed pattern, a high number of parafoveal HRF, hyper-reflective MAs, SSPiM in the outer nuclear layers, and high PD represent baseline predictive biomarkers for DEXi treatment responsiveness. The application of these models to treatment-naïve patients allowed a good identification of n-RES eyes.

Correction to: Prognostic value of choroidal vascular index in determining response to intravitreal dexamethasone implant treatment used in refractory diabetic macular edema

Correction to: Prognostic value of choroidal vascular index in determining response to intravitreal dexamethasone implant treatment used in refractory diabetic macular edema

Systemic Outcomes of Intravitreal Injections of Dexamethasone and Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor.

Intravitreal dexamethasone and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) medications have revolutionized ocular disease management and favorable ocular safety profiles, but few studies have compared their systemic adverse events (SAEs). This study investigated the SAEs of intravitreal dexamethasone and anti-VEGFs by using real-world data. This retrospective cohort study sourced medical records from the largest multi-institutional database in Taiwan. Patients who received intravitreal dexamethasone (n = 137) or anti-VEGFs (n = 10,345) between 2014 and 2019 were enrolled. Propensity score matching was performed to achieve homogeneity between the two groups. Subdistribution hazard ratios (SHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the Fine-Gray model. Systemic as well as ocular clinical events and systemic biomarkers after 1-year follow-up were compared. Both groups demonstrated comparable risks of major cardiac adverse events (SHR 1.57, 95% CI 0.29-8.55), heart failure (SHR 0.62, 95% CI 0.07-5.33), major bleeding (SHR 0.23, 95% CI 0.03-1.77), all-cause admission (SHR 0.73, 95% CI 0.41-1.30), and all-cause death (SHR 2.11, 95% CI 0.35-12.71). There were no significant differences in longitudinal changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, glycated hemoglobin, low-density lipoprotein, estimated glomerular filtration rate, or alanine aminotransferase between the groups. Both groups had a similar incidence of cataract surgery. Although the dexamethasone group exhibited a relatively high prevalence of antiglaucomatous medication use, there was not a significantly higher incidence of glaucoma surgery. Intravitreal dexamethasone and anti-VEGF medications had comparable systemic safety profiles in our study. Both drugs represent efficacious and safe therapies for ocular diseases.

Treatment of Non-Infectious Posterior Uveitis with Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implants in a Real-World Setting.

The present study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety associated to the treatment of patients with non-infectious posterior uveitis with intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implants in a real-world clinical setting. This is a retrospective, single center analysis of the data from 29 patients with non-infectious posterior uveitis in whom 38 eyes were treated with dexamethasone intravitreal implants in routine clinical practice between January 2012 and October 2017. The parameters of visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP) and central retinal thickness (CRT) were recorded 6 weeks after the first implant was administered, in accordance with the clinical guidelines for the use of these implants, and after a 6-month follow-up period. In addition, the formation of cataracts was evaluated at 12 months. Treatment with the DEX implant caused a significant improvement in the VA from baseline at 6 weeks in eyes treated with 2-6 implants and for eyes without cataracts. A significant decrease in CRT was observed relative to the baseline at 6 weeks for eyes treated with 1 and 2-6 implants, which was maintained at 6 months for those eyes treated with 2-6 implants. This significant improvement in CRT at 6 weeks and 6 months was evident in eyes with and without cataracts. During the study period, the IOP was found to increase significantly from baseline at 6 weeks in some eyes but this was managed topically, and no surgical intervention was necessary. Intravitreal DEX implants represent an effective and safe therapy for the treatment of non-infectious uveitis in routine clinical practice, producing favorable visual and anatomical outcomes after the administration of just 2-6 DEX implants.

Prognostic value of choroidal vascular index in determining response to intravitreal dexamethasone implant treatment used in refractory diabetic macular edema

To investigate the effect of intravitreal dexamethasone (IVD) implant injection, which was used in the treatment of DME, on CVI and to investigate whether CVI can be used as a prognostic marker in the treatment of anti-VEGF resistant DME. A retrospective observational and comparative study. Twenty-five eyes of 25 patients with refractory diabetic macular edema who underwent intravitreal dexamethasone (IVD) implant and 50 eyes of 50 healthy patients were included in the study. Central macular thickness (CMT), subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), luminal choroidal area (LCA), total choroidal area (TCA), stromal choroidal area (SCA), and choroidal vascularity index (CVI) were measured on optical coherence tomography. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of age and gender. When the pre-treatment values in the IVD group were compared with the healthy group, LCA and SCA values were higher, and CVI ratios were lower in the IVD group compared to the control group. When baseline, 1st, and 3rd months after injection were compared, it was determined that there was a significant decrease in CMT and LCA. There was no statistically significant difference in SFCT, TCA, and CVI. There was a significant negative correlation between baseline CVI and 3rd month CMT after IVD (rho: - 0.643, p: 0.001). It was observed that the baseline and 1st month LCA values were significantly higher than the 3rd month. The choroidal vascular structure may be affected by IVD treatment. CVI may also have value as a prognostic marker in monitoring the response to treatment.

Intravitreal slow-release dexamethasone alleviates traumatic proliferative vitreoretinopathy by inhibiting persistent inflammation and Müller cell gliosis in rabbits.

To evaluate the effects of intravitreal slow-release dexamethasone on traumatic proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) and Müller cell gliosis and preliminarily explored the possible inflammatory mechanism in a rabbit model induced by penetrating ocular trauma. Traumatic PVR was induced in the right eyes of pigmented rabbits by performing an 8-mm circumferential scleral incision placed 2.5 mm behind the limbus, followed by treatment with a slow-release dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex) or sham injection. Left eyes were used as normal controls. The intraocular pressure (IOP) was monitored using an iCare tonometer. PVR severity was evaluated via anatomical and histopathological examinations every week for 6wk; specific inflammatory cytokine and proliferative marker levels were measured by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, Western blot, protein chip analysis, or immunofluorescence staining. During the observation period, PVR severity gradually increased. Intense Müller cell gliosis was observed in the peripheral retina near the wound and in the whole retina of PVR group. Ozurdex significantly alleviated PVR development and Müller cell gliosis. Post-traumatic inflammation fluctuated and was persistent. The interleukin-1β (IL-1β) mRNA level was significantly upregulated, peaking on day 3 and increasing again on day 21 after injury. The expression of nod-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) showed a similar trend that began earlier than that of IL-1β expression. Ozurdex suppressed the expression of IL-1β, NLRP3, and phosphorylated nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB). The average IOP after treatment was within normal limits. The present study demonstrates chronic and fluctuating inflammation in a traumatic PVR rabbit model over 6wk. Ozurdex treatment significantly inhibites inflammatory cytokines expression and Müller cell gliosis, and thus alleviates PVR severity. This study highlights the important role of IL-1β, and Ozurdex inhibites inflammation presumably via the NF-κB/NLRP3/IL-1β inflammatory axis. In summary, Ozurdex provides a potential therapeutic option for traumatic PVR.

Intravitreal Ranibizumab and Dexamethasone Implant Injections as Primary Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema: The Month 24 Results from Simultaneously Double Protocol

Purpose To compare efficacy of simultaneously administered intravitreal dexamethasone implant (DEX implant) and ranibizumab (simultaneous double protocol) injections with ranibizumab monotherapy for diabetic macular edema (DME) at month 24. Methods This is a prospective, consecutive, clinical interventional study. Naïve eyes with DME were randomized into two groups: 34 eyes received simultaneous double-protocol therapy and 34 eyes received ranibizumab monotherapy. The primary efficacy endpoint was change in visual acuity in month 24. The secondary efficacy endpoints were to evaluate gain of ≥15 letters, morphological changes and central foveal thickness. Decreased vision from DME (study eye BCVA, 20/40 or worse Snellen equivalent using ETDRS testing), the presence of DME with ≥300 μm foveal intraretinal cystoid spaces (within 1000 μm of the centre of the fovea), subfoveal neuroretinal detachment (SND), intraretinal hyperreflective foci (HRF, within 500 μm of the centre of the fovea) or foveal lipid exudates and external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) disruption (within 500 μm of the centre of the fovea) on SD-OCT were eligible to enrol. Results The mean baseline BCVA was 48 ± 23 letters in double protocol group and 52 ± 14 letters ranibizumab monotherapy group (p = 0.416). The mean number of ETDRS letters changed from baseline at 12 months versus change from baseline at month 24 in double protocol group and ranibizumab monotherapy group were +21.6 versus +20.2 and +9.6 versus +9.1, respectively. At the month 24 time point, 65.4% of patients in double protocol group and 26.2% of patients in ranibizumab monotherapy group had gained ≥15 ETDRS letters in BCVA from baseline (p < 0.001). The external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) integrity were better in the double protocol group in comparison to ranibizumab monotherapy group at month 24. In addition, there was no statistically significant increase in the proportion of patients with epiretinal membrane in double protocol group at month 24, by the contrast with ranibizumab monotherapy group (p = 0.06 and p = 0.04 in the double protocol and ranibizumab monotherapy groups, respectively). From baseline to month 24, the mean central foveal thickness (CFT) was 672 ± 293 μm reduced to 278 ± 84 μm in double protocol group and was 631 ± 279 μm reduced to 356 ± 108 μm in ranibizumab monotherapy group (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). From baseline to month 24, 38% (13/34) of eyes in double protocol group and 18% (6/34) of eyes in ranibizumab monotherapy group had at least 5 mmHg of IOP elevation (p = 0.012). Two grades or more increased cataract density were detected 27% (6/22) of eyes in the double protocol group and in 12.5% (3/24) of eyes in the ranibizumab monotherapy group from baseline to month 24 (p = 0.032). Conclusion According to the improvements in visual acuity and morphological changes achieved at month 24, the simultaneous double protocol therapy can be an effective treatment option for DME with inflammatory biomarkers on OCT or/and decreased visual acuity.

Comparison of Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant with Aflibercept for Treatment of Macular Edema (Me) in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion (BRVO)

Comparison of Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant with Aflibercept for Treatment of Macular Edema (Me) in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion (BRVO)

Safety and effectiveness of intravitreal dexamethasone implant in patients with ocular toxocariasis

AimsTo evaluate the safety and effectiveness of intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implant in patients with active uveitis due to ocular toxocariasis (OT).MethodsSeventy-eight patients with OT were recruited in this retrospective study,...

Comparison of Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant and Intravitreal Ranibizumab Efficacy in Younger Patients with Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion.

This study aimed to compare the effects of dexamethasone (DEX) implants and ranibizumab (RAN) injections in younger patients with macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion (RVO) in a 6-month follow-up. The treatment-naive patients with macular edema secondary to branch RVO were included retrospectively. Medical records of patients who were treated with intravitreal RAN or DEX implant were evaluated before and at the 1st, 3rd, and 6th months after the injection. Primary outcome measures were the change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness. The level of statistical significance was set at 0.05/3=0.016, according to the Bonferroni correction. Thirty-nine eyes of 39 patients were included in the study. The mean age of the study population was 53.82±5.08 years. Median BCVA in the DEX group (n=23) at baseline, 1st, 3rd, and 6th month was 1.1, 0.80 (p=0.002), 0.70 (p=0.003), and 1 (p=0.018) logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (log-MAR), respectively (p<0.05). Median BCVA in the RAN group (n=16) at baseline, 1st, 3rd, and 6th months was 0.90, 0.61, 0.52, and 0.46 logMAR, respectively (p<0.016 for all comparisons). Median central macular thickness (CMT) in the DEX group at baseline, 1st, 3rd, and 6th months was 515, 260, 248, and 367 μm, respectively (p<0.016 for all comparisons). Median CMT in the RAN group at baseline, 1st, 3rd, and 6th months was 432.5 (p<0.016), 275 (p<0.016), 246 (p<0.016), and 338 (p=0.148) μm. There is no significant difference in treatment efficacies in both visual and anatomical outcomes at the end of the 6th month. However, RAN can be considered the first choice in younger patients with macular edema secondary to branch RVO because of the lower side effect profile.