Intravitreal Corticosteroids Research Articles

Surgical Management of Diabetic Macular Edema

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the accumulation of fluid in the extracellular space within the macula and is a major cause of visual impairment among patients with diabetes. First-line treatment for DME includes pharmacotherapy with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor medications and intravitreal corticosteroids. Alternative therapeutic strategies include laser photocoagulation for non-center involving DME, and surgical options such as pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with or without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peel in cases with vitreoretinal interface anomalies or DME refractory to pharmacotherapy, and the Port Delivery System (PDS) for sustained release of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) medication. Our aim is to review the existing literature on surgical management of DME including imaging changes in chronic DME and the clinical relevance of surgical intervention. Imaging changes associated with DME and a worse prognosis include disorganization of the retinal layer, disruption of both the external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone, and vitreomacular interface abnormalities. Studies involving pars plana vitrectomy with and without ILM peel show anatomic improvement but may not always be associated with significant change in visual outcomes. Early studies lacked detailed imaging of the retinal layers and PPV was likely performed as a last resort. In addition, the novel PDS is surgically implanted into the pars plana and works as a drug reservoir with controlled release of drug. However, it has been recalled in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration due to issues with dislodgement. Surgical interventions for DME include pars plana vitrectomy with and without ILM peel and new surgical therapies for DME such as the PDS and subretinal gene therapy have the potential to reduce the risk of DME progression.

Purtscher-like Retinopathy in a Patient with Acute Pancreatitis: A Case Report and Literature Review

Purtscher-like retinopathy is a rare chorioretinopathy associated with a non-traumatic inciting event including acute pancreatitis, renal failure, long-bone injury, chest compression, connective tissue diseases and hematologic disorders. We present the case of a 33-year-old woman with abdominal pain and visual changes that was diagnosed with acute pancreatitis. Fundoscopic examination revealed bilateral diffuse flame hemorrhages and retinal whitening (Purtscher flecken), which were diagnostic of Purtscher-like retinopathy secondary to acute pancreatitis. The patient improved without intravenous or intravitreal corticosteroid administration. Follow up at 5 and 8 months revealed improved vision, complete resolution of the retinal pathology with residual inner retinal thickening on ocular coherence tomography (OCT), consistent with sustained retinal damage. Given that Purtscher-like retinopathy is associated with higher morbidity and mortality rates in patients with acute pancreatitis, high suspicion of this pathology and a thorough clinical assessment are imperative. Since half of the patients suffer life-long visual changes, further research is required for the development of efficacious treatment options.

A review of ten years of experience using dexamethasone intravitreal implants (Ozurdex) for uveitis.

Uveitis is a type of ocular inflammatory disease caused by various etiologies, for which corticosteroids are the main treatment. Dexamethasone Intravitreal implant (DEX-I) has been widely used in the treatment of uveitis across the world. Then, new indications and complications appeared. This review aims to summarize the use of DEX-I in uveitis in the past 10 years. We summarized the clinical data (baseline characteristics, efficacy and safety) and discussed controversies by retrospectively analyzing the articles and cases published in PubMed and Web of Science using the terms "Ozurdex", OR "intravitreal dexamethasone implant", AND "uveitis" from 2010 to 2022. DEX-I is effective in reducing edema, improving inflammation and improving vision when treating various conditions of uveitis including infectious, no-infectious, pediatric uveitis, and surgery-related applications. The efficacy of DEX-I as a monotherapy is related to the following: etiology and course of disease, treatment of systemic diseases, patients' toleration after multiple injections, economic situation, etc. In addition, intravitreal corticosteroids implantation may replace systemic therapy in some patients. In terms of safety, the incidence of high intraocular pressure is about 20.52%, and the incidence of cataract is about 15.51%. DEX-I can effectively treat non-infectious uveitis and some infectious uveitis such as suspected tuberculosis, and its safety is controllable. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the effect of monotherapy and to expand more indications.

AN ATYPICAL RETINAL VASCULITIS, ANEURYSMS AND NEURORETINITIS IRVAN: RARE CASE REPORT AND MANAGEMENT

Idiopathic retinal vasculitis, aneurysms, and neuroretinitis (IRVAN) syndrome is a rare and progressive disorder that predominantly affects both the eyes of young female individuals and can threaten visual function. Peripheral ischemia and macular exudation are regular ndings in patients. The treatment options include panretinal photocoagulation (PRP), systemic immunosuppression,and intravitreal antiangiogenic and corticosteroid therapy. Here we are presenting a case of old chronic IRVAN presenting as recurrent epiretinal membrane. Patient was underwent ERM removal and Dexamethasone implant to prevent recurrence in this case.

Vasoproliferative retinal tumors: Clinical presentation and treatment outcome.

To study the clinical presentation and treatment outcomes of patients with vasoproliferative retinal tumor (VPRT) in India. Retrospective study of 50 eyes in 47 patients. Of the 50 eyes, 25 (50%) were primary and 25 (50%) were secondary. Common ocular pathologies related to secondary VPRT included retinal detachment (n = 8, 32%) and Coats disease (n = 7, 28%). Overall, the mean age at presentation was 35 years (range; 3-74 years) and included 30 (64%) males and 17 (36%) females. The lesions were unilateral in 44 (94%) patients. Secondary retinal features included intra/subretinal exudation (n = 41, 82%), vascularity (n = 32, 64%), subretinal fluid (n = 21, 42%), retinal neovascularisation (n = 9, 18%) and vitreous hemorrhage (n = 8, 16%). Thirty-four eyes (68%) underwent cryotherapy, of which 16 eyes (47%) received adjunct intravitreal anti-VEGF (12 eyes) or corticosteroid injection (4 eyes). Primary surgery included vitrectomy with/without encirclage and cryotherapy (n = 12, 24%) and plaque brachytherapy (n = 3, 6%). At last follow-up (mean 9.7 months, range 3-67 months), 42 eyes (84%) had complete tumor regression with no improvement in visual outcomes when comparing presenting and final best corrected visual acuity. Comparing primary versus secondary VPRT, secondary VPRT presented a decade earlier (31 vs 40 years), needed surgical intervention (48% vs 20%), had poor tumor control (72% vs 92%) and worse visual outcomes (p < 0.05). VPRTs commonly present as a unilateral lesions in the adult population with equal prevalence of primary and secondary variants. Compared with primary VPRT, secondary VPRTs require surgical treatment and are associated with poor visual outcome.

Intravitreal Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant (FAc, 0.19mg, ILUVIEN®) in the Treatment of Patients with Recurrent Cystoid Macular Edema After Pars Plana Vitrectomy.

Postoperative cystoid macular edema (PCME) is a complication of several ocular procedures, including pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), due to the activation of the inflammatory cascade. The purpose of this case series is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant (FAc, 0.2μg/day; ILUVIEN®) in the treatment of refractory PCME after successful PPV. This retrospective observational case series includes consecutive eyes of patients with recurrent PCME after PPV and treated with a single FAc implant at Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal. Previous treatments, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, ETDRS letters), central macular thickness (CMT, μm), intraocular pressure (IOP, mmHg), and IOP-lowering medication needed were recorded at baseline and during follow-up. Total macular edema resolution was defined as CMT less than 300μm or a reduction of greater than 20%, and partial macular edema resolution was defined as a reduction of greater than 10%. Nine eyes from nine patients were included. Before FAc implant, all eyes received intravitreal short-action corticosteroids (triamcinolone and dexamethasone implant), with a good response but relapse 1-5months later. At baseline, BCVA was 55.0 ± 10.6 letters, CMT was 514.9 ± 165.6μm, and IOP was 15.4 ± 2.4mmHg with four eyes under IOP-lowering medication. After FAc implant, all eyes achieved edema resolution (eight total and one partial) with a peak gain of 17.2 letters and a maximum decrease of 208.2μm in CMT. During follow-up (44.0 ± 14.8months), 66.7% of the eyes kept their macula dry and three showed recurrence after 11, 14, and 28months, respectively. The maximum IOP registered was 17.0 ± 6.0mmHg. IOP-lowering regimen was increased in one eye and two additional eyes started hypotensive drops. FAc implant can be considered a therapeutic alternative in PCME refractory to other therapies in vitrectomized eyes, reducing the need for repeated treatments.

Therapeutic Effects of Combination Therapy and Photobiomodulation Therapy on Retinal Regeneration.

Introduction: Many systemic and ocular diseases cause macular edema (ME). Macular edema is seen in two primary forms; the first is diffuse thickening of the macula, and the other is a macula with a distinct petaloid (cloverleaf) appearance called cystoid macular edema. Macular edema has a known role in the reduction of visual equity, and many options have been proposed for the reversal of this condition. Methods: Articles on the effects of macular laser grid photocoagulation on diabetic macular edema (DME) or cystoid macular edema published between 2000 and 2022 were collected from PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. The following keywords were used for the search: "macular laser photocoagulation", "macular edema", "cystoid macular edema", "intravitreal pharmacotherapies", and "antivascular endothelial growth factor". Two hundred nineteen articles were found in google scholar and 165 articles in PubMed, and a total of 58 articles were included in the study after applying the exclusion criteria. Results: We investigated the effects of various lasers photocoagulation such as Focal and/or grid macular laser, subthreshold micropulse laser (SMPL), as well as intravitreal pharmacotherapies with triamcinolone acetonide, and fluocinolone, and extended released intraocular implants such as Ozurdex, Retisert, Iluvien, and anti-vascular endothelial growth factors such as bevacizumab (Avastin), Eyela, and Lucentis. Corticosteroids were more effective than lasers, although some researchers have found that lasers and combined lasers and corticosteroids are more effective. In addition, some studies have shown that the frequency and concentrations of intravitreal pharmacotherapies are effective in increasing visual outcomes. Conclusion: The results of the studies showed that the combined intravitreal corticosteroids are much more effective in improving visual acuity (VA) than a single corticosteroid, and the low concentration of the drug is safer. Still, corticosteroids have side effects such as increased intraocular pressure and glaucoma. Therefore, combining the medication with a laser is much more reasonable than each alone. Also, the subthreshold photocoagulation laser (670 nm) is better at reducing the central macular thickness (CMT) and improving VA than the micro pulse yellow laser and pan-retinal photocoagulation (PRP).

Association between Obstetric Complications and Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Agents or Intravitreal Corticosteroids.

This nationwide population-based cohort study aimed to describe the use of intravitreal injections (IVTs) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents and corticosteroids in pregnant women in France and to report on the incidence of obstetric and neonatal complications. All pregnant women in France who received any anti-VEGF or corticosteroid IVT during pregnancy or in the month preceding pregnancy from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2018 were identified in the national medico-administrative databases. Between 2009 and 2018, there were 5,672,921 IVTs performed in France. Among these IVTs, 228 anti-VEGF or corticosteroid IVTs were administered to 139 women during their pregnancy or in the month preceding their pregnancy. Spontaneous abortion or the medical termination of pregnancy occurred in 10 women (16.1%) who received anti-VEGF agents and in one (3.1%) of the women who received corticosteroids (p = 0.09). This is the first national cohort study of pregnant women treated with anti-VEGF or corticosteroid IVTs. We found a high incidence of obstetric complications in pregnant women treated with anti-VEGF or corticosteroid IVTs but could not demonstrate a statistically significant association between the intravitreal agents and these complications. These agents should continue to be used with great caution in pregnant women.

The Role of Intravitreal Corticosteroids in the Treatment of DME: Predictive OCT Biomarkers.

This work aims to summarize predictive biomarkers to guide treatment choice in DME. Intravitreal anti-VEGF is considered the gold standard treatment for centers involving DME, while intravitreal steroid treatment has been established as a second-line treatment in DME. However, more than 1/3 of the patients do not adequately respond to anti-VEGF treatment despite up to 4-weekly injections. Not surprisingly, insufficient response to anti-VEGF therapy has been linked to low-normal VEGF levels in the serum and aqueous humor. These patients may well benefit from an early switch to intravitreal steroid treatment. In these patients, morphological biomarkers visible in OCT may predict treatment response and guide treatment decisions. Namely, the presence of a large amount of retinal and choroidal hyperreflective foci, disruption of the outer retinal layers and other signs of chronicity such as intraretinal cysts extending into the outer retina and a lower choroidal vascular index are all signs suggestive of a favorable treatment response of steroids compared to anti-VEGF. This paper summarizes predictive biomarkers in DME in order to assist individual treatment decisions in DME. These markers will help to identify DME patients who may benefit from primary dexamethasone treatment or an early switch.

Intraocular Pressure Changes After Intravitreal Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant: Results from Four European Countries.

IntroductionThe 0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) intravitreal implant delivers a continuous intravitreal corticosteroid dose for the treatment of refractory diabetic macular oedema (DMO). The aim of this study was to assess the impact of an FAc intravitreal implant on intraocular pressure (IOP).MethodsWe retrospectively collected anonymised data on the patients’ characteristics, DMO treatment, and IOP and IOP-lowering treatments before and after the FAc intravitreal implant between September 2013 and March 2020 in several European centres.ResultsA total of 221 eyes from 179 patients were included. The mean follow-up duration was 13.4 (± 12.5, range 2.4–33.5) months. Overall, 194 eyes (88.2%) had received an intravitreal dexamethasone injection before the FAc intravitreal implant. For 25 eyes (11.3%) there was a history of glaucoma, and 52 eyes (23.5%) had previous IOP-lowering treatment. Mean IOP before injection was 14.7 (3.4) mmHg and increased to 16.9 (3.7) mmHg 12 months after injection (P < 0.0001). During follow-up, 55 eyes (24.9%) required the addition or initiation of topical IOP-lowering medication, only one patient (0.5%) had laser trabeculoplasty and one patient (0.5%) a minimally invasive glaucoma surgery, and no patient required incisional IOP-lowering surgery.ConclusionThe FAc intravitreal implant led to substantial IOP elevation. This elevation was monitored most of the time with addition or initiation of topical IOP-lowering medication.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40123-022-00504-z.

Effect of Extended Release Steroid Implants on the Contralateral Eye

PurposeTo investigate the contralateral effect of extended release steroid implants on cystoid macular edema (CME).MethodsRetrospective study of patients with bilateral CME receiving intravitreal injections of long-acting intravitreal corticosteroid implants in one eye. Changes in CME and central subfield thickness (CST) in the contralateral eye on optical coherence tomography (OCT) were compared to an untreated control group. The main outcome measures were the change in central subfield thickness (CST) and the change in the macular volume.ResultsThirteen study patients and 14 controls were included in the study. There was no difference in the baseline LogMAR visual acuity (0.32 ± 0.35 vs 0.43 ± 0.26, p = 0.37) or the baseline central subfield thickness (341.4 ± 76.6 vs 296.5 ± 65.0 µm, p = 0.12) between groups. In the treatment group CST remained stable in 92.3% of the patients. Of the controls, CST worsened in 21.4% and remained stable in 78.6%. The mean change in CST (6.3 ± 30.3 vs. 27.5 ± 66.1 µm, p = 0.2) and the mean change in macular volume (0.08 ± 0.34 vs. -0.05 ± 0.21 mm3, P = 0.8) were not statistically different between the treatment group and control group. In the post-hoc analysis restricting the treatment group to patients who had not received intravitreal injections in the study eye within 6 months, CST decrement was not statistically significant (p = 0.11).ConclusionIn this study there was no statistically significant effect on CME of contralateral intravitreal corticosteroid implants.

Characterization of Poor Visual Outcomes of Diabetic Macular Edema: The Fight Retinal Blindness! Project

To investigate the incidence, characteristics, and baseline predictors of poor visual outcomes in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) receiving intravitreal therapy in routine clinical practice. Observational study. Treatment-naïve eyes starting intravitreal therapy for DME between 2014 and 2018 tracked in the Fight Retinal Blindness! registry. We examined 2 groups with poor visual outcomes: (1) those with sustained vision loss of > 10 letters from baseline without recovery of visual acuity (VA); and (2) those with a VA of < 55 letters at 2 years. Respective controls were eyes that did not experience poor visual outcomes. Kaplan-Meier curves analyzed the proportion of eyes that experienced poor outcomes. Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the potential baseline predictors of poor outcomes. The proportion of eyes that experienced poor visual outcomes within 2 years of treatment initiation and its baseline predictors. The proportion of eyes with sustained VA of ≥ 10 letter loss was 14% at 2 years; 16% of eyes had VA of ≤ 55 letters 2 years after starting intravitreal therapy. Initial treatment with intravitreal corticosteroid was independently associated with a higher incidence of ≥ 10 letter loss (hazard ratio [HR], 3.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.60-6.44; P < 0.01). No improvement in the VA at 3 months after starting treatment was associated with ≥ 10 letter loss (HR, 6.81; 95% CI, 4.11-11.27; P < 0.01) and VA of ≤ 55 letters at 2 years (HR, 4.28; 95% CI, 2.66-6.89; P < 0.01). The other factors related to higher risk of VA of ≤ 55 letters were older age (HR, 1.02 per year; 95% CI, 1-1.04; P = 0.04) and poor baseline VA (HR, 0.68 per 5 letters; 95% CI, 0.65-0.72, P < 0.001). Fourteen percent of eyes managed with intravitreal therapy in routine clinical care experienced ≥ 10 letter loss and 16% had VA of ≤55 letters 2 years after starting the treatment for DME. The identification of the incidence and predictors of poor outcomes provides a more accurate assessment of the potential benefit from intravitreal therapy.

Efficacy of Combined Vitrectomy with Intravitreal Corticosteroid Injection for Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane Removal on Anatomical and Functional Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis

Background: Macular edema can be a cause of visual loss in eyes undergoing vitrectomy with epiretinal membrane (ERM) peeling. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of combined vitrectomy with intravitreal corticosteroid injection for ERM. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review by searching PubMed, Embase, and Medline up to December 2020 for studies that evaluated the effect of intravitreal corticosteroid injection during vitrectomy for ERM. Follow-up data on postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were collected and pooled using the standard mean deviation (SMD) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was statistically quantified using I² statistics, and a meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. Results: Eight studies provided data on a total sample of 443 eyes. The meta-analysis revealed that concomitant intravitreal corticosteroid administration during vitrectomy contributed to a significant reduction in CMT than vitrectomy alone at 3 months after operation (pooled SMD = −0.353; 95% CI: −0.594 to −0.111; p = 0.004). However, between the two groups, no significant difference was found in CMT reduction at 1 and 6 months after operation and in postoperative BCVA improvement at 1, 3, and 6 months after operation. Conclusion: Combined treatment with vitrectomy and intravitreal corticosteroid injection may accelerate CMT reduction 3 months after ERM surgery. However, it did not result in a significant change in CMT and BCVA compared with vitrectomy alone at the end of follow-up.

Prospective for Diagnosis and Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy.

Diabetic retinopathy is a posterior eye disorder in which damage occurs to the light sensitive retina due to diabetes mellitus. This disorder specifically affects people aged between 18-64 with type ІІ diabetes. This disease progresses through different pathophysiological pathways, which include oxidative stress, inflammation, stimulation of the growth factor in the eye's vasculature, isoforms of protein kinase C, and also the activation of the hexosamine pathway. It starts as micro aneurysms and advances in complicated stage, which results in retinal detachment. Treatment of posterior eye diseases has complications due to the structural design of the eye and physiological barriers present. The current treatment approach involves the use of intravitreal anti- VEGFs, corticosteroids implants, laser and surgery; these treatment methods have drawbacks attributed to them despite their benefits. The development of a robust delivery system with minimal or no invasion to tackle the issues of diabetic retinopathy will be of considerable benefit to patients having diabetic retinopathy; the dependency on ophthalmologists for multiple injections will significantly reduce and provide a promising approach in drug delivery. In this review article, the authors provided information related to existing treatment methods available for diabetic retinopathy, the most significant among which is nanotechnology approach through which local delivery via the ocular route to posterior eye can be achieved. It also possesses the various carriers studied for the non-invasive approach for retinal delivery of medicaments. Non-invasive approach for delivery of drugs can be considered as potential for the treatment of diabetic retinopathy.

Intravitreal Corticosteroid Implantation in Diabetic Macular Edema: Updated European Consensus Guidance on Monitoring and Managing Intraocular Pressure.

Intravitreal therapy for diabetic macular edema can, in susceptible patients, increase intraocular pressure (IOP). As uncontrolled IOP can potentially be sight threatening, monitoring is an essential component of patient management. It can be challenging for retina specialists to ensure that monitoring is rigorous enough to detect and resolve any potential problems at the earliest opportunity without it also being overburdensome for patients who have the lowest risk of developing an IOP rise. We have developed dynamic algorithms that: (1) tailor the frequency and extent of monitoring according to individual susceptibility and current IOP and (2) assist retina specialists in deciding when they should consider a referral to a glaucoma specialist. One algorithm is for patients with a relatively low susceptibility to developing an IOP rise (those whose baseline IOP is < 22 mmHg and who do not have a history of IOP events). Depending on their first post-implantation IOP check, the algorithm classifies them as: low risk if IOP remains < 22 mmHg; medium risk if IOP is 22–25 mmHg and any rise from baseline is < 10 mmHg; or high risk if IOP is > 25 mmHg or any rise from baseline is ≥ 10 mmHg. Thereafter, the algorithm guides on the frequency and extent of monitoring required in each of these groups and, if IOP rises or falls during treatment, patients may move up or down the risk groups accordingly. A different algorithm is provided for patients who are more susceptible to developing an IOP rise (those with a baseline IOP of ≥ 22 mmHg or a prior history of an IOP event). These patients need monitoring more closely so this algorithm has only medium- or high-risk classifications. These algorithms update the previous monitoring guidance by Goñi et al. (Goñi et al. in Ophthalmol Ther 5:47–61, 2016).Graphical

Eales\u2019 disease: epidemiology, diagnostic and therapeutic concepts

BackgroundTo describe the epidemiological traits, clinical characteristics, diagnostic procedures, therapeutic interventions and evolution in a large series of patients with diagnosis of Eales’ disease.MethodsA clinical retrospective review of patients with Eales’ disease, evaluated and treated between April 2009 and April 2018, with a 1-year minimum follow-up. Thirty patients (59 eyes), were included. Age, sex, laboratory results (CBC, glycemia, protein electrophoresis, ACE levels) immunological profile and a Quantiferon-TB Gold Plus test were recorded. The patients were divided into groups according to their evolution, medical or surgical treatment, and visual outcomes.ResultsSeventeen male patients and 13 female patients were included, and their ages ranged from 14 to 35 years. The Quantiferon-TB Gold Plus test was positive in 25 patients. Twenty-eight patients had unilateral vitreous hemorrhage, 10 of whom presented with vasculitis and non-perfusion areas in the contralateral eye, 9 presented contralateral peripheral neovascularization and 9 had contralateral fibrovascular proliferation. The remaining 2 patients presented with a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. In 6 patients, conservative treatment with intravitreal anti-VEGF injections and photocoagulation was performed after the hemorrhage cleared. Twenty-two patients, required vitrectomy, with good visual outcomes. Macular edema was found in 16 eyes, which responded to periocular and/or systemic corticosteroid therapy, except for 9 eyes that required intravitreal bevacizumab, with complete resolution in 7 eyes and partial resolution in 2 eyes.ConclusionsEales’ disease is a pathology of significant prevalence in our country. The distribution according to sex, tends to be equivalent. The etiology, even when it is not specifically determined, according to laboratory tests, confirms the probable immunologic response in the presence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens. This is still a diagnosis of exclusion, and therefore, it is advisable to perform a complete laboratory work-up in each case. Timely application of laser and other medical treatments, help to avoid progression to more advanced stages and their complications. The surgical treatment of vitrectomy for vitreous hemorrhage, and/or tractional vitreous detachment yields good primary anatomical and functional outcomes. Secondary macular edema responds to periocular and intravitreal corticosteroids, and in refractory cases, the use of anti-VEGF therapy leads to an effective resolution.

Elevated intraocular pressure‐induced interlamellar keratitis in a patient with LASIK surgery 14 years ago

AbstractPurposeTo describe a case of interlamellar keratitis induced by elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) in a patient with a history of LASIK surgery and the importance of having a strong diagnostic suspicion for establishing adequate treatment.MethodsIntraocular pressure‐induced interlamellar keratitis is one of the potential complications of LASIK refractive surgery. The cases described generally occur a few months after surgery although there are some cases that have been described several years after surgery, usually in a context of uveitis and corticosteroid treatment or silent glaucoma. We present a case of 43‐year‐old woman who came to the emergency room with visual acuity (VA) impairment in the left eye in the setting of elevated intraocular pressure‐induced interlamellar keratitis secondary to the intravitreal corticosteroid implant in her left eye due to a diabetic retinopathy. She underwent LASIK surgery 14 years ago.ResultsThe treatment was based on lowering the intraocular pressure. Oral acetazolamide and topical timolol, bimatoprost and brinzolamide were used. The patient recovered her baseline VA and the IOP were properly controlled posteriorly.ConclusionsThis case shows the importance of considering this diagnosis in patients with corneal haze, elevated intraocular pressure and a history of LASIK surgery to establish an adequate treatment. A full recovery is expected.Bibliography1. Galal A, Artola A, Belda J, (2006) Interface corneal edema secondary to steroid‐induced elevation of intraocular pressure simulating diffuse lamellar keratitis. Journal of refractive surgery.2. Lee V, Sulewski M, Zaidi A (2010) Elevated Intraocular Pressure–Induced Interlamellar Stromal Keratitis Occurring 9 Years After Laser In Situ Keratomileusis. Corneal Journal.3. Lyle W, Jin G, Jin Y (2003) Interface fluid after laser in situ keratomileusis. Journal of refractive surgery.4. Tourtas T, Kopsachilis N, Meiller R, et al. (2010). Pressure‐Induced Interlamellar Stromal Keratitis After Laser In Situ Keratomileusis. Corneal Journal.

Intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide implant for the treatment of persistent post-surgical cystoid macular edema in vitrectomized eyes.

Cystoid macular edema (CME) is the most common cause of decreased visual acuity after both vitrectomy and cataract surgery. Various strategies have been used for its treatment, such as intravitreal corticosteroids. The intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide implant (Iluvien®) is approved for the treatment of persisting diabetic macular edema and for the prevention of recurrence of non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment. There are very few reports about its off-label use for post-surgical CME. We present four clinical cases of post-surgical CME (three following vitrectomy and one following cataract surgery in a vitrectomized eye 2 years ago). All of them had been previously treated with an average of four injections of intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex®), with repeated recurrence of CME. After treatment with Iluvien, three cases showed improvement of both visual acuity and macular anatomy, with resolution of the macular edema. One patient required additional treatment with Ozurdex during follow-up, further improving CME. Two of the cases required topical pressure lowering treatment, and none required filtering surgery. Iluvien could be an effective therapeutic option for persistent non-diabetic macular edema after vitrectomy or cataract surgery refractory to other intravitreal therapies, with the benefit of being able to provide longer recurrence-free periods.

Infrared reflectance image-guided laser photocoagulation of telangiectatic capillaries in persistent diabetic macular edema

This study aimed to assess detection rate of telangiectatic capillaries (TelCaps) with infrared reflectance (IR) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) images and to evaluate the clinical efficacy of IR image-guided focal laser photocoagulation of TelCaps in persistent diabetic macular edema (DME). This retrospective case series included 28 eyes of 28 patients with TelCap and persistent DME refractory to intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor or corticosteroids. The presence of TelCaps was confirmed using IR and OCT images. All patients were followed up for more than 12 months after direct focal laser photocoagulation of the TelCaps. The TelCap closure rate, changes in best-corrected visual acuity, and central subfield thickness were analyzed. On IR imaging, TelCap appeared as a characteristic hyperreflectivity within a hyporeflective spherical lesion in 85.7% of the eyes. After focal laser photocoagulation, the TelCap closure rate was 57.1% at 3 months and 71.4% at 12 months. A significant improvement in visual acuity and reduction in central subfield thickness were observed at three and 12 months after focal laser photocoagulation (all p < 0.05). The characteristic hyperreflectivity within hyporeflective lesions on the IR image in conjunction with OCT helps identify the TelCap. Our results suggest that IR imaging and OCT-guided focal laser photocoagulation of TelCaps can improve functional and anatomical outcomes in persistent DME.

Combined therapy with intravitreal aflibercept and subtenon corticosteroids in eyes with severe diabetic papillopathy: two case reports

BackgroundDiabetic papillopathy is a rare diagnosis of exclusion characterized by unilateral or bilateral optic disc edema with variable degrees of visual loss. Although the visual prognosis has been generally reported as favorable, the presence of severe disc edema associated with macular edema prompts the need for treatment. We present a specific and unreported therapeutic approach consisting of intravitreal aflibercept and subtenon triamcinolone acetonide injections in two patients with evidence of diabetic papillopathy and macular edema.Case presentationIn the first case, a 60-year-old Caucasian woman affected by type II diabetes mellitus presented with fundoscopic evidence of sequential bilateral optic disc edema associated with acute severe visual loss in both eyes. The second patient, a diabetic 57-year-old Caucasian male, presented with sudden painless visual loss in his left eye. Multimodal imaging and systemic findings correlated towards an infrequent diagnosis of diabetic papillopathy. In a period of 5–7 weeks after treatment, both patients experienced almost full visual and anatomical recovery. A steady situation was observed at 12 months of follow-up.ConclusionsBoth our cases displayed a severe grade of optic disc edema, which was optimally reversed with intravitreal aflibercept and subtenon triamcinolone acetonide leading to a relatively rapid and safe improvement in visual acuity.