HomeStrokeVol. 52, No. 1Response by Pfaff et al to Letter Regarding Article, “Direct Transfer to Angio-Suite Versus Computed Tomography-Transit in Patients Receiving Mechanical Thrombectomy: a Randomized Trial” Free AccessLetterPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyRedditDiggEmail Jump toFree AccessLetterPDF/EPUBResponse by Pfaff et al to Letter Regarding Article, “Direct Transfer to Angio-Suite Versus Computed Tomography-Transit in Patients Receiving Mechanical Thrombectomy: a Randomized Trial” Johannes A.R. Pfaff, MD, Martin Bendszus, MD and Markus A. Möhlenbruch, MD Johannes A.R. PfaffJohannes A.R. Pfaff Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany. Search for more papers by this author , Martin BendszusMartin Bendszus Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany. Search for more papers by this author and Markus A. MöhlenbruchMarkus A. Möhlenbruch https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5075-704X Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany. Search for more papers by this author Originally published28 Dec 2020https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032798Stroke. 2021;52:e28In Response:We thank Goyal et al for their interest in our trial.1 We agree that “direct” does not necessarily imply ”faster“ or even “better.”The distance between the hospital door and the angiosuite is given by the hospital’s floor plan. Having an angiography system directly in the emergency room might be desirable, but it is not common practice in most hospitals, unlike computed tomography scanners which are usually located close to the emergency room. Future trials comparing a computed tomography–transit workflow, and a direct-to-angiosuite workflow must describe the local conditions precisely in order to interpret findings correctly. A multicenter trial on this subject may indicate under which conditions patients benefit from a direct transfer to the angiosuite.With reference to Pfaff et al,1 the somewhat greater distance from the emergency room to the angiosuite and the positioning of the patient and monitoring devices contributed to a delay in stroke imaging when patients were transferred directly to the angiosuite.1 However, this delay was not the only reason to stop the trial prematurely. Enrollment to the trial was stopped also because early ischemic changes could not be adequately assessed in some patients randomized to directly to the angiosuite. However, administration of intravenous tPA (tissue-type plasminogen activator) as approved therapy requires a reliable imaging basis due to the potential harm. New imaging technologies in the angiosuite will probably contribute to an even faster and more reliable imaging, hopefully providing the same level of safety and reliability in stroke imaging as we already have today with computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.Sources of FundingNone.DisclosuresDr Pfaff reports personal fees from Stryker outside the submitted work. Dr Bendszus reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, B. Braun, Vascular Dynamics, Bayer, Merck, Teva, Grifols, Springer, grants and personal fees from Novartis and Guerbet, grants from Siemens, Hopp Foundation, from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), European Union, Stryker, outside the submitted work. Dr Möhlenbruch has received grants from Balt, Medtronic, MicroVention, and Stryker outside the submitted work.FootnotesFor Sources of Funding and Disclosures, see page e28.Reference1. Pfaff JAR, Schönenberger S, Herweh C, Ulfert C, Nagel S, Ringleb PA, Bendszus M, Möhlenbruch MA. Direct transfer to angio-suite versus computed tomography-transit in patients receiving mechanical thrombectomy: a randomized trial.Stroke. 2020; 51:2630–2638. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029905LinkGoogle Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By Potreck A, Falbesaner A, Seker F, Weyland C, Mundiyanapurath S, Heiland S, Bendszus M and Pfaff J (2021) Accuracy and reliability of PBV ASPECTS, CBV ASPECTS and NCCT ASPECTS in acute ischaemic stroke: a matched-pair analysis, The Neuroradiology Journal, 10.1177/19714009211015771, 34:6, (585-592), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2021. January 2021Vol 52, Issue 1Article InformationMetrics © 2020 American Heart Association, Inc.https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032798PMID: 33370179 Originally publishedDecember 28, 2020 PDF download Advertisement SubjectsIschemic Stroke