Intravenous Thrombolysis Research Articles

Quality of life in acute ischaemic stroke patients treated with recanalisation

<p>Stroke is a serious health problem that has a significant impact on health-related quality of life. Despite the increasing popularity of measuring quality of life among patients, it is not routinely measured in clinical practice, and therefore little is known about how well clinical measures reflect quality of life after stroke. The aim of this study was to investigate the quality of life of patients with acute ischaemic stroke.</p>. <p>For the prospective study, patients diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke at the Neurology Clinic of the Clinical Center of the University of P&eacute;cs were selected through convenience sampling between June 2022 and May 2023. Based on the treatments, patients were divided into three groups: mechanical thrombectomy (MT), intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), and standard care (SC). Modified Rankin Scale (Pre-mRS, Follow-up mRS), NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions Scale (EQ-5D-5L) were used in the research. Descriptive statistics, paired T-tests, Wilcoxon tests, McNemar tests and Pearson correlation analysis were applied for the analysis (SPSS 25.0; p &lt;0.05).</p>. <p>A total of 198 participants (115 males, 83 females) took part in the study (MT: 50, IVT: 69, SC: 79). The Pre-mRS and follow-up mRS values indicate that the majority of patients in all three groups fell into the mild category (Pre-mRS: 176 participants; 88%, follow-up mRS: 158 participants; 80%). There was a significant improvement in NIHSS scores in all three groups (IVT: 4.36 vs. 1.57, p&lt;0.001; MT: 8.98 vs. 4.50, p&lt;0.001; SC: 4.38 vs. 2.84, p&lt;0.001). The EQ-5D-5L value also significantly increased for all groups (IVT: 0.82 vs. 0.88, p&lt;0.001; MT: 0.63 vs. 0.73, p&lt;0.001, SC: 0.76 vs. 0.80, p=0.014). Patients admitted with lower NIHSS values reported better quality of life at the end of our study (r: -0.43451).</p>. <p>At 30 days, significant improvement was observed in MT, IVT and SC groups when measured with EQ-5D-5L, but the extent of improvement was highest in the MT group.</p>.

Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Intravenous Thrombolysis in Distal Medium Vessel Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Multinational Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study.

The management of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to distal medium vessel occlusion (DMVO) remains uncertain, particularly in comparing the effectiveness of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) plus mechanical thrombectomy (MT) versus IVT alone. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy in DMVO patients treated with either MT-IVT or IVT alone. This multinational study analyzed data from 37 centers across North America, Asia, and Europe. Patients with AIS due to DMVO were included, with data collected from September 2017 to July 2023. The primary outcome was functional independence, with secondary outcomes including mortality and safety measures such as types of intracerebral hemorrhage. The study involved 1,057 patients before matching, and 640 patients post-matching. Functional outcomes at 90 days showed no significant difference between groups in achieving good functional recovery (modified Rankin Scale 0-1 and 0-2), with adjusted odds ratios (OR) of 1.21 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81 to 1.79; P=0.35) and 1.00 (95% CI 0.66 to 1.51; P>0.99), respectively. Mortality rates at 90 days were similar between the two groups (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.29; P=0.30). The incidence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage was comparable, but any type of intracranial hemorrhage was significantly higher in the MT-IVT group (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.63; P<0.001). The results of this study indicate that while MT-IVT and IVT alone show similar functional and mortality outcomes in DMVO patients, MT-IVT presents a higher risk of hemorrhagic complications, thus MT-IVT may not routinely offer additional benefits over IVT alone for all DMVO stroke patients. Further prospective randomized trials are needed to identify patient subgroups most likely to benefit from MT-IVT treatment in DMVO.

Thrombectomy Alone or Alongside Intravenous Thrombolysis in Managing Acute Ischemic Stroke Caused by Basilar Artery Occlusion: A Multicenter Observational Study.

It remains unclear whether the combination of endovascular treatment (EVT) with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) results in a more favorable functional outcome than EVT alone in managing cases of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by basilar artery occlusion (BAO). Thus, this study aimed to compare the outcomes of two approaches-direct EVT (DEVT) and bridging therapy (IVT plus EVT)-in acute BAO patients presenting within 4.5 hours of stroke onset. This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 153 acute BAO patients presenting within 4.5 hours of stroke onset. Of these patients, 65 (42.5%) and 88 (57.5%) underwent DEVT and bridging therapy, respectively. The primary outcome was defined as good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale, 0-3) at 90 days. Additionally, pre-operative clinical features, thrombectomy attempts, successful reperfusion rates, incidences of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and mortality were compared between the two groups. At 90 days, the rate of good functional outcome was comparable between the DEVT (44.6%) and bridging-therapy (39.8%) groups (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55-2.31; p = 0.753). The bridging-therapy group exhibited a lower percentage of patients requiring ≥ 3 attempts of stent retrieval (aOR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.16-0.93; p = 0.034). Pre-operative clinical features, rate of successful reperfusion, sICH, and mortality were similar between the two groups. In patients with BAO-induced AIS, DEVT demonstrates a comparable functional outcome to bridging therapy within 4.5 hours of symptom onset, but IVT reduces the number of thrombectomy attempts. AIS, acute ischemic stroke; LVO, large-vessel occlusion; EVT, endovascular treatment; IVT, intravenous thrombolysis; BAO, basilar artery occlusion; DEVT, direct endovascular treatment; sICH, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage; RCT, randomized controlled trial; IRIS, Improving Reperfusion Strategies in Ischemic Stroke; TOAST, Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment; mTICI, modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction; SD, standard deviation; IQR, interquartile range; ICAS, intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis.

The Changing Landscape of Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischaemic Stroke

Intravenous thrombolysis remains the most accessible and effective reperfusion therapy available to patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Treatment with intravenous thrombolysis improves the odds of favourable functional outcome with the unacceptably low risk of haemorrhagic complications. Even in the current era of endovascular thrombectomy, intravenous thrombolysis remains the backbone of acute stroke treatment due to its accessibility and relative ease of administration. Since intravenous alteplase was first approved for acute ischaemic stroke in the mid 1990s, there have been significant advances in expanding the indication and time window for treatment, in addition to transitioning towards tenecteplase use for stroke thrombolysis. In this review, we will provide a narrative on the use of thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke including an up-to-date discussion on recent advances in thrombolytic therapy.

Intravenous Thrombolysis with Urokinase for Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Intravenous thrombolysis is one of the most effective therapies for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS), with urokinase offering a cost-effective alternative to newer agents like alteplase and tenecteplase, especially in resource-limited settings. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the application of intravenous thrombolysis with urokinase for AIS in the clinical practice of stroke management, including the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of urokinase compared to other thrombolytic agents. Urokinase, a first-generation thrombolytic drug, is a non-specific plasminogen activator that offers a cost-effective alternative. It has been used in clinical practice for over two decades to improve neurological outcomes in patients with AIS if administered within 6 h of ictus. Numerous studies have indicated that urokinase remains a viable option for patients who cannot access alteplase or tenecteplase because of economic constraints, time window limitations, availability, or other reasons. In low- and middle-income countries, urokinase is a cost-effective alternative thrombolytic drug. High-level evidence-based medical research is therefore urgently needed to confirm that urokinase is not inferior to new-generation thrombolytic drugs, and to assess whether it may even be superior in some patient populations.

Prehospital computed tomography in a rural district for rapid diagnosis and treatment of stroke.

Early diagnosis and triage of patients with ischemic stroke is essential for rapid reperfusion therapy. The prehospital delay may be substantial and patients from rural districts often arrive at their local hospital too late for disability-preventing thrombolytic therapy due to prolonged transport times. Hallingdal District Medical Centre (HDMC) is located in a rural area of Norway and is equipped with a computed tomography (CT) scanner. We established emergency pathways of CT imaging and thrombolytic treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke at HDMC. During office hours these pathways were managed by a radiographer and a general physician supported by videoconference from the Primary Stroke Centre. Outside office hours we remotely controlled the CT exam and supported telestroke guided paramedics handling and examining the patients. With a primary aim of demonstrating the feasibility of this de novo concept we enrolled patients in the period 2017-2021 into a comparative cohort observational study. We compared patients treated at HDMC (the Rural CT group) to patients from two other rural regions in Norway with similar distances to their local hospital but without access to a rural CT scanner (the Reference group). A total of 86 patients were included in the Rural CT group (mean age 74, 52% male, 43% stroke mimics), and 69 patients were included in the Reference group (mean age 70, 42% male, 28% stroke mimics). Median time from onset of symptoms to completed CT examination was 93 min in the Rural CT group as compared to 240 min in the Reference group (p < 0.05). In patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis time from onset of symptoms to treatment was median 124 min in the Rural CT group and 213 min in the Reference group, p < 0.05. The frequency of thrombolysis for ischemic stroke did not significantly differ between the two groups. Combining prehospital rural CT examination with telestroke guided diagnosis and thrombolytic treatment by paramedics may facilitate earlier initiation of thrombolysis for patients with ischemic stroke.

Medical Management of Acute Stroke based on Japan Stroke Society Guidelines and the Japan Stroke Data Bank.

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability in Japan, necessitating standardized treatment guidelines. The Japan Stroke Society (JSS) periodically revises its guidelines to incorporate new research. This review provides a short overview of acute stroke management based on JSS Guideline 2021 (revised 2023) and the Japan Stroke Data Bank (JSDB), and discusses future directions in stroke management. Acute stroke management emphasizes systemic support and complication management. Risk factor control during acute hospitalization is also crucial for preventing recurrent strokes in the chronic phase.In ischemic stroke, super-acute recanalization therapies, including intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy, are the most important and effective. Antiplatelet therapy, particularly aspirin and clopidogrel, is recommended for noncardiogenic stroke and high-risk transient ischemic attack. In cardioembolic stroke, early initiation of direct oral anticoagulants might be considered according to stroke severity.For brain hemorrhage, early blood pressure management is recommended. Specific reversal agents are advised for patients on anticoagulant therapy. Minimally invasive hematoma removal may improve outcomes for intracerebral hemorrhage.Subarachnoid hemorrhage treatments reported from Japan include intravenous drugs to prevent vasospasm.The JSDB revealed improvements in functional outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke over the past 20 years, although patients with hemorrhagic stroke showed no clear improvement. The evolving guidelines and research underscore the importance of stratified and timely intervention in stroke care.

PRESET thrombectomy device outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Many devices are used to perform mechanical thrombectomy in the setting of large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke. We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pRESET stent-retriever systems. We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Relevant studies up to March 2024 were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases. A total of 8 papers met the inclusion/exclusion criteria comprising a total of 1140 participants (average age 72.4 ± 11.9, female percentage (50%). Preintervention intravenous thrombolysis was utilized in 46.5% (range 32.9-65.4) of patients, with a median National Institute of Health Stroke Scale at presentation of 15 (range 0-38). The middle cerebral artery was the most commonly affected artery, with a prevalence of 76.4% (range 62.8-100). The pRESET stent-retriever systems demonstrated a first-passing effect rate of 53.4% [95% confidence interval [CI] 44.8; 61.7] and a final thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2b-3 grade rate of 90.41% [95% CI 82.13; 95.08]. Ninety-day modified Rankin Scale (0-2) rate was 42.2% [95% CI 27.6; 58.4], and 90-day mortality rate was 15.1% [95% CI 9.8; 22.6]. Postintervention hemorrhage occurred at a rate of 28.6% [CI 17.2; 43.6]. Our systematic review and meta-analysis describes the efficacy of the pRESET stent retriever system in managing acute ischemic stroke patients. The pRESET device was found to have a similar safety and efficacy profile to other mechanical thrombectomy devices currently in use.

Some minutes matter more: Groin-to-recanalization is the main time-related predictor of outcome in acute ischemic stroke

Introduction Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is the standard of care for selected patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and large vessel occlusion (LVO), associated with intravenous thrombolysis, when indicated. While many studies focused on pre-hospital and in-hospital pathways, only few analyzed the relationship between groin-to-recanalization (GTR) time and functional outcome. Aim To explore whether GTR time is an independent predictor of outcome in patients undergoing EVT. Methods All patients with anterior circulation stroke treated with EVT at a high-volume center from January 2021 to December 2023 were included. The cohort was divided into two groups according to GTR time shorter or longer than 30 min. Regression analysis assessed the association between GTR time and 3-month good outcome, defined as modified Rankin Scale 0–2. Results The study included 419 patients. The groups had similar baseline characteristics and similar onset to recanalization (OTR) time. Regression analysis showed shorter GTR time is an independent predictor of favorable outcome (OR 2.49 [95% CI 1.26–4.94]). Age, baseline NIHSS, ASPECT score and bridging IVT were also found to be independently associated with outcome. Discussion and conclusions Our study showed GTR time is an independent predictor of good outcome in patients undergoing EVT with similar OTR time, emphasizing procedural time as a key prognostic factor, even greater than other well-known pre-hospital and in-hospital time-dependent variables. These findings may raise the issue of developing alternative approaches or early “rescue” strategies for complicated procedures.

Multi-Target and Multi-Phase Adjunctive Cerebral Protection for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Reperfusion Era.

Stroke remains the leading cause of death and disability in some countries, predominantly attributed to acute ischemic stroke (AIS). While intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy are widely acknowledged as effective treatments for AIS, boasting a high recanalization rate, there is a significant discrepancy between the success of revascularization and the mediocre clinical outcomes observed among patients with AIS. It is now increasingly understood that the implementation of effective cerebral protection strategies, serving as adjunctive treatments to reperfusion, can potentially improve the outcomes of AIS patients following recanalization therapy. Herein, we reviewed several promising cerebral protective methods that have the potential to slow down infarct growth and protect ischemic penumbra. We dissect the underlying reasons for the mismatch between high recanalization rates and moderate prognosis and introduce a novel concept of "multi-target and multi-phase adjunctive cerebral protection" to guide our search for neuroprotective agents that can be administered alongside recanalization therapy.

Platelet-to-neutrophil ratio predicts hemorrhagic transformation and unfavorable outcomes in acute ischemic stroke with intravenous thrombolysis.

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) retains a notable stance in global disease burden, with thrombolysis via recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) serving as a viable management approach, albeit with variable outcomes and the potential for complications like hemorrhagic transformation (HT). The platelet-to-neutrophil ratio (P/NR) has been considered for its potential prognostic value in AIS, yet its capacity to predict outcomes following rtPA administration demands further exploration. To elucidate the prognostic utility of P/NR in predicting HT and clinical outcomes following intravenous rtPA administration in AIS patients. Data from 418 AIS patients treated with intravenous rtPA at Thammasat University Hospital from January 2018 to June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The relationship between P/NR and clinical outcomes [early neurological deterioration (E-ND), HT, delayed ND (D-ND), and 3-mo outcomes] was scrutinized. Notable variables, such as age, diabetes, and stroke history, exhibited statistical disparities when comparing patients with and without E-ND, HT, D-ND, and 3-mo outcomes. P/NR prognostication revealed an optimal cutoff of 43.4 with a 60.3% sensitivity and a 52.5% specificity for 90-d outcomes. P/NR prognostic accuracy was statistically significant for 90-d outcomes [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.562], D-ND (AUC = 0.584), and HT (AUC = 0.607). P/NR demonstrated an association with adverse 3-mo clinical outcomes, HT, and D-ND in AIS patients post-rtPA administration, indicating its potential as a predictive tool for complications and prognoses. This infers that a diminished P/NR may serve as a novel prognostic indicator, assisting clinicians in identifying AIS patients at elevated risk for unfavorable outcomes following rtPA therapy.

Understanding physician preferences about combined thrombolysis and thrombectomy in patients with large vessel occlusion: An international cross-sectional survey

BackgroundA recently published individual participant-level meta-analysis found that EVT alone was not non-inferior to combined intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and EVT. Our aim was to determine factors that influence physicians’ treatment choice of IVT-alone versus EVT-alone versus a combined approach. MethodsWe performed an international, structured, invite-only survey among physicians treating patients presenting with AIS. Respondents were asked 16 multiple choice questions. Fourteen questions involved the respondent being provided with a clinical scenario. In each scenario, a patient was presenting with an AIS with LVO, varying a single clinical or imaging feature. ResultsA total of 282 stroke physicians (mean age 46 years, 75 % males) participated in the survey. In LVO stroke, eligible for both IVT and EVT, without other qualifiers, 220 (85.9 %) respondents chose to pursue a combined approach. For age over 80 years, 191 (74 %) participants opted for combined approach, which decreased to 121 (48.2 %) with dementia and 148 (57.4 %) if the patient was on dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT). Of respondents choosing combination therapy in a patient above the age of 80, only 105 (56.8 %) would pursue the same in a patient with dementia. For imaging factors, 177 (72.8 %) opted for a combined approach for intracranial carotid occlusion, which decreased to 160 (65.3 %) in tandem occlusions. Overall, 88 (38 %) respondents agreed to the statement “I am uncomfortable with uncertainty in patient care”. ConclusionsIn a typical patient with AIS due to LVO, most respondents still choose a combined revascularization approach but discrepancy in decision-making increases in complex scenarios.

Mediators of sex-specific differences in rates of stroke mimics among patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis: A nationwide analysis of 174,995 patients

IntroductionWomen are at higher risk of stroke mimics; however, the underlying reasons are unclear. MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study of the 2016–2020 National Inpatient Sample database, we identified patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). Demographic information, vascular risk factors, comorbidities, and presence of known risk factors for stroke mimics (seizures, migraines, demyelinating diseases, psychiatric illnesses, and functional neurological disorders [FND]) were identified using ICD-10 codes. Rates of no cerebral infarction (NCI) were compared between men and women. Mediation analyses were conducted to identify significant drivers of sex-specific differences in the rate of NCI. Results174,995 IVT-treated patients were identified; 41,605 (23.8 %) had NCI. Female patients had significantly higher rates of NCI compared to men (26.2 % vs. 20.9 %, p < 0.001). Women had significantly higher rates of stroke mimic risk factors (seizures, migraines, demyelinating disease, anxiety, depression, FND, and electrolyte derangements; all p < 0.001). Mediation analyses revealed that 39.8 %, 19.1 % of female sex's association with higher rates of NCI were mediated by higher rates of migraines and FND among women, respectively (both p < 0.001). ConclusionsIVT-treated women were more likely to have NCI than men. This relationship was largely mediated by higher rates of migraine and FND among women.

Stroke Measures Analysis of pRognostic Testing-Mortality nomogram predicts long-term mortality after ischemic stroke.

Predicting long-term mortality is essential for understanding prognosis and guiding treatment decisions in patients with ischemic stroke. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate the method for predicting 1- and 5-year mortality after ischemic stroke. We used data from the linked dataset comprising the administrative claims database of the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service and the Clinical Research Center for Stroke registry data for patients with acute stroke within 7 days of onset. The outcome was all-cause mortality following ischemic stroke. Clinical variables linked to long-term mortality following ischemic stroke were determined. A nomogram was constructed based on the Cox's regression analysis. The performance of the risk prediction model was evaluated using the Harrell's C-index. This study included 42,207 ischemic stroke patients, with a mean age of 66.6 years and 59.2% being male. The patients were randomly divided into training (n = 29,916) and validation (n = 12,291) groups. Variables correlated with long-term mortality in patients with ischemic stroke, including age, sex, body mass index, stroke severity, stroke mechanisms, onset-to-door time, pre-stroke dependency, history of stroke, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, cancer, smoking, fasting glucose level, previous statin therapy, thrombolytic therapy, such as intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular recanalization therapy, medications, and discharge modified Rankin Scale were identified as predictors. We developed a predictive system named Stroke Measures Analysis of pRognostic Testing-Mortality (SMART-M) by constructing a nomogram using the identified features. The C-statistics of the nomogram in the developing and validation groups were 0.806 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.802-0.812) and 0.803 (95% CI, 0.795-0.811), respectively. The SMART-M method demonstrated good performance in predicting long-term mortality in ischemic stroke patients. This method may help physicians and family members understand the long-term outcomes and guide the appropriate decision-making process.

The effect of intravenous thrombolysis in stroke patients with unsuccessful thrombectomy.

The benefit of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is well established. We aim to study the benefits of IVT in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) who underwent unsuccessful mechanical thrombectomy (MT). We included AIS patients who underwent MT for anterior circulation LVO with failed recanalization (modified treatment in cerebral ischemia [mTICI] score ≤ 2A). Patients who received IVT prior to MT were compared to those who received MT alone. Propensity score matching using demographic, clinical, radiographic and procedural variables was used to match patients with and without IVT. The primary outcome was favorable 90-day good functional outcome (defined as modified Rankin scale of 0-2), and secondary outcomes included intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic ICH (sICH), and 90-day mortality. Totally, 610 AIS patients with unsuccessful MT were included. After propensity matching, 219 patients were identified in each group. Median age was 70 years and 73 years in the IVT + MT and MT alone groups, respectively. In the IVT + MT group, final mTICI scores of 0, 1, and 2A were achieved in 92 (42.0%), 33 (15.1%), and 94 (42.9%) patients, respectively, versus 76 (34.7%), 29 (13.2%), and 114 (52.1%) in the MT alone group. The IVT + MT group had greater odds of 90-day good functional outcome (adjusted odds ratio 2.54, 95% confidence interval 1.53-4.32). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes. IVT is associated with improved functional outcomes in AIS patients with LVO despite unsuccessful MT.

Tenecteplase vs Alteplase for Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: The ORIGINAL Randomized Clinical Trial.

Tenecteplase is a bioengineered variant of alteplase with greater fibrin specificity and a longer half-life, allowing single-bolus administration. Evidence on the treatment effect of tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg in Chinese patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is limited. To establish the noninferiority of tenecteplase to alteplase in patients with AIS within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. The ORIGINAL study was a multicenter, active-controlled, parallel-group, randomized, open-label, blinded end point, noninferiority trial conducted between July 14, 2021, and July 14, 2023. Participants were recruited from 55 neurology clinics and stroke centers in China and were eligible if they had AIS with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 1 to 25 with measurable neurologic deficit and were symptomatic for at least 30 minutes without significant improvement. Patients were randomized (1:1) within 4.5 hours of symptom onset to receive intravenous tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg) or intravenous alteplase (0.9 mg/kg). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 or 1 (no symptoms or no significant disability) at day 90, tested for noninferiority (risk ratio [RR] margin, 0.937). Safety end points included symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (per European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study III definition) and 90-day all-cause mortality. Among the 1489 patients randomized, 1465 patients were included in the full analysis set (732 in the tenecteplase group; 733 in the alteplase group) and 446 (30.4%) were female. The primary outcome occurred in 72.7% (532/732) of patients receiving tenecteplase and 70.3% (515/733) receiving alteplase (RR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.97-1.09]; noninferiority threshold met). Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage occurred in 9 patients (1.2%) in each group (RR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.37-2.70]). The 90-day mortality rate was 4.6% (34/732) in the tenecteplase group and 5.8% (43/736) in the alteplase group (RR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.51-1.23]). In patients with AIS eligible for intravenous thrombolysis within 4.5 hours after stroke onset, tenecteplase was noninferior to alteplase with respect to excellent functional outcome (mRS score of 0 or 1) at 90 days and had a similar safety profile. Findings from this study support tenecteplase as a suitable alternative to alteplase in this setting. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04915729.

Role of Circadian Rhythm Changes on Functional Dependence Despite Successful Repercussion in Patients with Endovascular Treatment.

Increasing evidence of circadian biology may influence the physiopathologic mechanism, progression, and recovery of stroke. However, few data have shown about circadian rhythm on futile recanalization (FR) in patients treated with endovascular treatment (EVT). From 2017 to 2021, an observational cohort of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) underwent EVT was conducted. FR was defined as the failure to achieve functional independence in patients at 90 days after EVT, although the occluded vessels reached a recanalization. The effect of circadian rhythm on FR was investigated using the logistic regression model. Of 783 patients, there were 149 patients who had stroke onset between 23:00-6:59, 318 patients between 7:00-14:59, and 316 patients between 15:00-22:59. Patients suffered a stroke during 15:00-22:59 had shorter OTP (p =0.001) time, shorter OTR (p<0.001) time, higher rate of intravenous thrombolysis (p =0.001) than groups of other time intervals. The rate of FR post-EVT in patients who had a stroke between 15:00-22:59 was significantly higher than in those with stroke onset between 23:00-6:59 (p =0.017). After adjusting for confounding factors, the time of stroke occurring during 15:00-22:59 (adjusted OR [aOR], 1.652; 95%CI, 1.024-2.666, p =0.04) was an independent predictor of FR. Circadian rhythm can directly or indirectly affect the occurrence, development, and prognosis of AIS. More studies may be needed in the future to validate the results of our study and to explore the potential mechanisms behind the effects of circadian rhythms on FR.

Early statin use is associated with improved survival and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and recent ischaemic stroke: A propensity-matched analysis of a global federated health database.

Statins reduce recurrent stroke and cardiovascular events in patients with non-cardioembolic stroke. The benefits of statins in patients with AF and recent IS remain unclear. We aimed to investigate the benefits of statins in patients with AF and recent IS. This retrospective, cohort study was conducted using deidentified electronic medical records within TriNetX platform. Patients with AF and recent IS, who received statins within 28 days of their index stroke were propensity score-matched with those who did not. Patients were followed up for up to 2 years. Primary outcomes were the 2-year risk of recurrent IS, all-cause mortality and the composite outcome of all-cause mortality, recurrent IS, transient ischaemic attack (TIA), and acute myocardial infarction (MI). Secondary outcomes were the 2-year risk of TIA, intracranial haemorrhage (ICH), acute MI, and hospital readmission. Cox regression analyses were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Of 20,902 patients with AF and recent IS, 7500 (35.9%) received statins within 28 days of their stroke and 13,402 (64.1%) did not. 11,182 patients (mean age 73.7 ± 11.5; 5277 (47.2%) female) remained after propensity score matching. Patients who received early statins had significantly lower risk of recurrent IS (HR: 0.45, 95%CI: 0.41-0.48, p < 0.001), mortality (HR: 0.75, 95%CI: 0.66-0.84, p < 0.001), the composite outcome (HR: 0.48, 95%CI: 0.45-0.52, p < 0.001), TIA (HR: 0.37, 95%CI: 0.30-0.44, p < 0.001), ICH (HR: 0.59, 95%CI: 0.47-0.72, p < 0.001 ), acute MI (HR: 0.35, 95%CI: 0.30-0.42, p < 0.001) and hospital readmission (HR: 0.46, 95%CI: 0.42-0.50, <0.001). Beneficial effects of early statins were evident in the elderly, different ethnic groups, statin dose intensity, and AF subtypes, large vessel occlusion and embolic strokes and within the context of statin lipophilicity, optimal LDL-cholesterol levels, various cardiovascular comorbidities, treatment with intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular thrombectomy, and NIHSS 0-5 and NIHSS > 5 subgroups. Patients with AF and recent IS, who received early statins, had a lower risk of recurrent stroke, death, and other cardiovascular outcomes including ICH, compared to those who did not.

Prehospital stroke detection scales: A head-to-head comparison of 7 scales in patients with suspected stroke.

Several prehospital scales have been designed to aid paramedics in identifying stroke patients in the ambulance setting. However, external validation and comparison of these scales are largely lacking. To compare all published prehospital stroke detection scales in a large cohort of unselected stroke code patients. We conducted a systematic literature search to identify all stroke detection scales. Scales were reconstructed with prehospital acquired data from two observational cohort studies: the Leiden Prehospital Stroke Study (LPSS) and PREhospital triage of patients with suspected STrOke (PRESTO) study. These included stroke code patients from four ambulance regions in the Netherlands, including 15 hospitals and serving four million people. For each scale, we calculated the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for a diagnosis of stroke (ischemic, hemorrhagic or TIA). Moreover, we assessed the proportion of stroke patients who received reperfusion treatment with intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular thrombectomy that would have been missed by each scale. We identified 14 scales, of which seven (CPSS, FAST, LAPSS, MASS, MedPACS, OPSS, and sNIHSS-EMS) could be reconstructed. Of 3317 included stroke code patients, 2240 (67.5%) had a stroke (1528 ischemic, 242 hemorrhagic, 470 TIA) and 1077 (32.5%) a stroke mimic. Of ischemic stroke patients, 715 (46.8%) received reperfusion treatment. Accuracies ranged from 0.60 (LAPSS) to 0.66 (MedPACS, OPSS and sNIHSS-EMS), sensitivities from 66% (LAPSS) to 84% (MedPACS and sNIHSS-EMS), and specificities from 28% (sNIHSS-EMS) to 49% (LAPSS). MedPACS, OPSS and sNIHSS-EMS missed the fewest reperfusion-treated patients (10.3-11.2%), whereas LAPSS missed the most (25.5%). Prehospital stroke detection scales generally exhibited high sensitivity but low specificity. While LAPSS performed poorest, MedPACS, sNIHSS-EMS and OPSS demonstrated the highest accuracy and missed the fewest reperfusion-treated stroke patients. Use of the most accurate scale could reduce unnecessary stroke code activations for patients with a stroke mimic by almost a third, but at the cost of missing 16% of strokes and 10% of patients who received reperfusion treatment.

Evaluating Thrombolysis Rates and Emergency Department Time Targets in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Need for Personalized Medicine.

In the era of personalized medicine, standard protocols regarding the management of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) focus on time targets alone without tailoring the protocol to the specific patient and hospital characteristics to increase IV thrombolysis rates and improve outcomes for these patients by considering organizational differences and patient-related factors that influence adherence to target times at the emergency department level. With this in mind, we evaluate the effect of achieving ED time targets from standard protocol and patient-related risk factors on the intravenous (IV) thrombolysis rate in patients with AIS in the therapeutic window. For our research, we enrolled people who arrived at the ED with signs of recent AIS with an onset of less than 4.5 h. Initially, 355 patients were included in the study, but through careful screening, only 258 were considered eligible to participate. Of the final group of 258 patients, only 46 received intravenous thrombolysis treatment. In our study, when we are analyzing ED times in patients admitted with stroke symptoms in the therapeutic window, we found statistically significantly decreased ED times for patients that performed IV thrombolysis compared to patients not performing as follows: a median of 100 min in onset-to-ED door time (p < 0.001), a door-to-physician time (ED doctor) of 4 min (p = 0.009), door-to-blood-samples of 5 min (p = 0.026), a door-to-CT time of 15.5 min (p = 0.009), and door-to-CT results of 37 min (p < 0.001). In addition, patients who received intravenous thrombolysis were found to be significantly older (p < 0.001), with lower height and weight (p < 0.001 for both) and lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores (9 ± 4.94 vs. 13.85 ± 2.41, p < 0.001). The logistic regression analysis indicated that the onset-to-ED time (p < 0.001) and the door-to-physician time (p = 0.014) for emergency medicine physicians are significant predictors of the likelihood of administering thrombolysis. By analyzing the impact of comorbidities, we observed that dyslipidemia, chronic arterial hypertension, and diabetes mellitus are significant predictive factors for performing IV thrombolysis (the presence of dyslipidemia and diabetes mellitus are predictive factors for performing IV thrombolysis, while the presence of arterial hypertension is not). The ED time targets that significantly influenced IV thrombolysis in our study were the onset-to-ED door time and the time it takes for the ED doctor to assess the AIS patient (door-to-physician time). The IV thrombolysis rate for these patients was 17.83%, lower than expected despite achieving most ED time targets, with the presence of chronic arterial hypertension as a significant predictive patient-related factor for not performing it. Even though our reported hospital's thrombolysis rate is favorable compared to international reports, there is always room for improvement. Based on our study results, it is necessary that new protocols to customized standard protocols and ED time targets for increasing IV thrombolysis rate in patients with AIS in the therapeutic window, focusing more on patient-related factors and type of hospitals, granting personalized medicine its right. Based on our study results, it is necessary that new protocols customize standard protocols and ED time targets for increasing IV thrombolysis rate in patients with AIS in the therapeutic window, focusing more on patient-related factors and type of hospitals, granting personalized medicine its right.