ONTROVERSY continues to surround use of the sitting position for neurosurgical procedures. 1–3 The seated position, while presenting a number of challenges for the anesthesiologist, offers many surgical advantages for patients undergoing posterior fossa and cervical spine procedures. Specifically, the upright position improves operator orientation and surgical access to midline lesions in many posterior fossa cases. Gravitational drainage of venous blood from the surgical field and lowering of intracranial pressure increases technical ease and allows more rapid access to bleeding points. 4 An unobstructed view of the face allows motor responses to cranial nerve stimulation to be directly observed in the sitting position, and access to the anterior chest wall is facilitated in the event of cardiovascular collapse. Despite the many advantages offered from the surgical perspective, the sitting position presents unique physiological challenges for the anesthesiologist with the potential for serious complications. 1,5 Venous air embolism, with or without paradoxical air embolism, is a major concern in relation to the use of this position. 2,6 Hemodynamic instability with hypotension and potential compromise of cerebral and myocardial perfusion may occur. Reduction of inhaled volatile anesthetic agent and decreasing depth of anesthesia may predispose the seated patient to the risk of intraoperative awareness. Peripheral neuropathy 1 tension pneumocephalus, 7 and quadriplegia 1,2 are additional reported associated complications. The hemodynamic effects of anesthesia in the sitting position may be influenced by choice of ventilatory technique. Spontaneous ventilation with a volatile anesthetic agent in nitrous oxide/oxygen was popular in the 1960’s to provide signs of surgical encroachment on vital medullary and pontine structures. 8 The problems of cardiovascular instability and arterial hypotension associated with the upright position may be aggravated by the depressant effects of intravenous induction and volatile agents on myocardial contractility during general anesthesia and changes in venous return following intermittent positive pressure ventilation. 9 The volume of blood accumulating in the venous system may be influenced by patient factors - body mass index, intravascular volume status, pre-existing hypertension and mode of ventilation. As much as 1500 mL may be sequestered in the venous system of the lower limbs due to the effect of gravity 10 and increased diffusion through the capillary walls and venous dilatation associated with the use of volatile anesthetic agents. 11 Indicator dilution technique studies have confirmed a 14% redistribution of blood volume from the intra- to the extrathoracic compartment in anesthetized patients after a change from the supine to the sitting position. 12 Concomitant changes in arterial pressure and stroke volume index were thus attributed to alterations in cardiac preload. A number of techniques have been advocated to attenuate the hemodynamic effects of patient placement in the sitting position. Colloid preloading (10 mL·kg –1 ) 30 min before starting general anesthesia was reported to prevent decreases in systolic and central venous pressures during sitting patient positioning without adverse effects. 13 Compensatory mechanisms, perhaps mediated by the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system or the sympathetic nervous system, may be operative in the awake or anesthetized state to attenuate adverse hemodynamic changes associated with the sitting position. Wrapping of the legs, application of anti-gravity suits and positioning of the knees at right heart level may all have potential benefits.