Background: Alternative routes of fluid administration such as intravenous access can deliver fluids directly to the vascular system for hospitalised patients who might have a reason for not tolerating oral intake. Too much or too little fluid can have a negative impact on patient outcomes; hence, careful titration of fluid administered is required. Previous studies have shown that majority of fluid balance records were incorrectly calculated or poorly documented. Aim: To investigate nurses’ practices of input/output monitoring of patients on intravenous fluid (IVF) therapy in the medical and surgical wards in hospitals within Fako Division, Cameroon. Methods: This study employed a retrospective and cross sectional design, data was collected using a structured questionnaire to assess nurses’ knowledge of fluid input/output monitoring from May to June 2021. In addition, a checklist was used to conduct an audit of 671 patients’ files and 76 nurses took part in the study. Data was analysed with the aid of SPSS 25. A multi-linear regression analysis was done for knowledge and practices using demographic variables and factors affecting monitoring of patients to test relationships between categorical variables. All statistics were set at 95% confidence interval with a 5% margin of error. Results were presented using frequency distribution, mean and standard deviation to describe different characteristics. Results: 77.63% nurses’ could identify methods of assessing patients on IVF therapy. However, they lacked knowledge on laboratory indications of fluid overload (5.26%), fluid loss (1.32), symptoms of fluid gain (3.9%) and fluid depletion (2.26). Their overall practice was 128(19.08%). Factors affecting monitoring of patients on intravenous fluid therapy were mainly workload 55(72.4%) and lack of measuring equipment 46(60.5%). Conclusion: Nurses’ in the medical and surgical wards in Fako Division lacked knowledge in certain areas of patients’ assessment about input/output monitoring of patients on IVF therapy and their practices were generally unsatisfactory. Qualification had a significant impact on nurses’ practices (P<0.05).
Read full abstract