Intravenous Anidulafungin Research Articles

Dual fungemia with Fusarium and Candida in a burns patient

Case report:A 31-year-old male admitted for extensive burns developed candidemia while an inpatient. Despite intravenous anidulafungin and line exchange, he remained febrile. Multiple sets of blood cultures were repeated, and one culture bottle flagged positive after three days. Gram stain revealed the presence of blastoconidia and pseudohyphae. The initial impression was a failure of candidemia clearance.

Experience with anidulafungin in patients with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and graft-versus-host disease.

It is well known that both acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) are associated with invasive fungal disease (IFD). Because the galactomannan antigen diagnostic test has low specificity and sensitivity outside of the neutropenic period, many institutions use posaconazole or voriconazole for IFD prophylaxis during GVHD treatment. Moreover, several factors, mainly hepatic impairment, can limit the use of extended spectrum azoles, both in prophylaxis or treatment. We retrospectively analyzed 25 patients with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and GVHD - grade III-IV acute GHVD (n = 15), progressive chronic GVHD (n = 7), and "overlap" GVHD (n = 3) - who received intravenous anidulafungin (200 mg on day 1, followed by 100 mg once daily). If necessary, anidulafungin treatment was followed by oral administration of 200 mg voriconazole twice a day or 200 mg posaconazole 3 times daily until patients were considered not at risk for IFD. Twenty-one patients (85%) received anidulafungin as prophylaxis and 5 patients (15%) received it as treatment. Median duration of intravenous anidulafungin administration was 8 days (range 6-17). Seven patients (28%) presented mild adverse effects, with no significant interactions with calcineurin inhibitors. Sequentially, 4 patients received voriconazole and 6 posaconazole. Two patients (8%) developed IFD after anidulafungin withdrawal: 1 with Candida albicans and the other with Mucor, 8 and 5 days after withdrawal, respectively. Our results are of interest owing to the absence of data in the literature on anidulafungin use in HSCT patients with GVHD, and suggest that anidulafungin, because of its spectrum, pharmacological profile, low toxicity, and absence of interactions with immunosuppressants, could be a drug of choice in this setting.

Evaluation of an early step-down strategy from intravenous anidulafungin to oral azole therapy for the treatment of candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis: results from an open-label trial

BackgroundHospitalized patients are at increased risk for candidemia and invasive candidiasis (C/IC). Improved therapeutic regimens with enhanced clinical and pharmacoeconomic outcomes utilizing existing antifungal agents are still needed.MethodsAn open-label, non-comparative study evaluated an intravenous (IV) to oral step-down strategy. Patients with C/IC were treated with IV anidulafungin and after 5 days of IV therapy had the option to step-down to oral azole therapy (fluconazole or voriconazole) if they met prespecified criteria. The primary endpoint was the global response rate (clinical + microbiological) at end of treatment (EOT) in the modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population (at least one dose of anidulafungin plus positive Candida within 96 hours of study entry). Secondary endpoints included efficacy at other time points and in predefined patient subpopulations. Patients who stepped down early (≤ 7 days’ anidulafungin) were identified as the "early switch" subpopulation.ResultsIn total, 282 patients were enrolled, of whom 250 were included in the MITT population. The MITT global response rate at EOT was 83.7% (95% confidence interval, 78.7–88.8). Global response rates at all time points were generally similar in the early switch subpopulation compared with the MITT population. Global response rates were also similar across multiple Candida species, including C. albicans, C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis. The most common treatment-related adverse events were nausea and vomiting (four patients each).ConclusionsA short course of IV anidulafungin, followed by early step-down to oral azole therapy, is an effective and well-tolerated approach for the treatment of C/IC.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00496197

Candida albicans Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection

Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) most often is caused by bacterial infection while a fungal source has been reported in immunosuppressed patients. Early wide surgical resection remains the mainstay of treatment. Split thickness skin grafts are both versatile and easy to harvest, thus making them a long-established option for soft tissue reconstruction. A 55-year-old man was admitted for gunshot wounds. Purulence was noted at the central catheter site. Cultures grew Candida albicans. Antifungal therapy was initiated and debridement for NF of the neck and upper chest was performed. The patient underwent reconstruction using a split thickness skin graft obtained from the anterolateral thigh. Necrotizing fasciitis secondary to Candida species infection is exceedingly rare. We report an unusual case of candidal NF in a patient with no past medical history of immunocompromise. Patients with this type of infection can be successfully treated with aggressive surgical debridement and intravenous anidulafungin.

An open‐label study of anidulafungin for the treatment of candidaemia/invasive candidiasis in Latin America

Incidence and mortality of candidaemia/invasive candidiasis (C/IC) is relatively high in Latin America versus North America and Europe. To assess efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) anidulafungin in Latin American adults with documented C/IC. All patients in this open-label study received initial IV anidulafungin with optional step-down to oral voriconazole after 5days; total treatment duration was 14-42days. The primary endpoint was global response (clinical+microbiological response) at end of treatment (EOT); missing/indeterminate responses were failures. The study enrolled 54 patients; 44 had confirmed C/IC within 96h before study entry and comprised the modified intent-to-treat population. Global response at EOT was 59.1% (95% CI: 44.6, 73.6), with 13 missing/indeterminate assessments. Thirty-day all-cause mortality was 43.1%. Fourteen patients (31.8%) were able to step-down to oral voriconazole; these patients had lower baseline acute physiological assessment and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II scores and were less likely to have solid tumours or previous abdominal surgery. Anidulafungin was generally well tolerated with few treatment-related adverse events. Anidulafungin was associated with relatively low response rates influenced by a high rate of missing/indeterminate assessments and mortality comparable to other recent candidaemia studies in Latin America. In a subset of patients with lower APACHE II scores, short-course anidulafungin followed by oral voriconazole was successful.

Intravenous anidulafungin followed optionally by oral voriconazole for the treatment of candidemia in Asian patients: results from an open-label Phase III trial

BackgroundCandidemia is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients, particularly in Asia. Anidulafungin has been reported to be an effective treatment for candidemia in Western populations, but little is known about its efficacy in Asian patients, where the clinical presentation and epidemiology may be different.MethodsAn open-label study of anidulafungin for the treatment of candidemia was recently conducted in several Asian countries. Treatment was initiated with intravenous anidulafungin, given for at least 5 days, with the option to complete treatment with oral voriconazole. The primary endpoint was global (clinical and microbiological) response, and the primary analysis was the proportion of patients in the modified intent-to-treat population with successful global response at the end of therapy. Secondary analyses included proportion with successful global response in clinically relevant patient subgroups. The safety and tolerability profile of anidulafungin and voriconazole in this population was also investigated.ResultsForty-three patients were studied, including 42 in the modified intent-to-treat population. Eighteen patients were > 65 years, the largest age subgroup, and 21 had central venous catheters. The most common Candida species causing infection were C. tropicalis (n = 18) and C. albicans (n = 10). In the primary analysis, 73.8% had a successful global response at end of therapy. Success rates in subgroups were: 72.2% for C. tropicalis and 71.4% for C. albicans infection, 58.8% for patients > 65 years, and 81.0% for patients with central venous catheters. Safety and tolerability were comparable with the known profiles for anidulafungin (and voriconazole).ConclusionsAlthough the epidemiology of Candida infections was different in this open-label study, the efficacy of anidulafungin in Asian patients with documented candidemia was consistent with previous studies in Western populations. No new safety concerns were identified.Trial registrationhttp://www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00537329

Pharmacokinetics of Anidulafungin in Critically Ill Patients with Candidemia/Invasive Candidiasis

The pharmacokinetics of intravenous anidulafungin in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients were assessed in this study and compared with historical data from a general patient population and healthy subjects. Intensive plasma sampling was performed over a dosing interval at steady state from 21 ICU patients with candidemia/invasive candidiasis. All patients received the recommended dosing regimen (a 200-mg loading dose on day 1, followed by a daily 100-mg maintenance dose), except for a 54-year-old 240-kg female patient (who received a daily 150-mg maintenance dose instead). Plasma samples were assayed for anidulafungin using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Pharmacokinetic parameters in ICU patients were calculated by a noncompartmental method. With the exclusion of the 240-kg patient, the median (minimum, maximum) age, weight, and body mass index (BMI) of 20 ICU patients were 57 (39, 78) years, 65 (48, 106) kg, and 23.3 (16.2, 33.8) kg/m(2), respectively. The average anidulafungin area under the curve over the 24-hour dosing interval (AUC(0-24)), maximum concentration (C(max)), and clearance (CL) in 20 ICU patients were 92.7 mg · h/liter, 7.7 mg/liter, and 1.3 liters/h, respectively. The exposure in the 240-kg patient at a daily 150-mg dose was within the range observed in ICU patients overall. The average AUC(0-24) and Cmax in the general patient population and healthy subjects were 110.3 and 105.9 mg · h/liter and 7.2 and 7.0 mg/liter, respectively. The pharmacokinetics of anidulafungin in ICU patients appeared to be comparable to those in the general patient population and healthy subjects at the same dosing regimen.

Population Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Analysis of Anidulafungin in Adult Patients with Fungal Infections

To evaluate the exposure-response relationships for efficacy and safety of intravenous anidulafungin in adult patients with fungal infections, a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) analysis was performed with data from 262 patients in four phase 2/3 studies. The plasma concentration data were fitted with a previously developed population PK model. Anidulafungin exposures in patients with weight extremities (e.g., 40 kg and 150 kg) were simulated based on the final PK model. Since the patient population, disease status, and efficacy endpoints varied in these studies, the exposure-efficacy relationship was investigated separately for each study using logistic regression as appropriate. Safety data from three studies (n = 235) were pooled for analysis, and one study was excluded due to concomitant use of amphotericin B as a study treatment and different disease populations. The analysis showed that the same dosing regimen of anidulafungin can be administered to all patients regardless of body weight. Nonetheless, caution should be taken for patients with extremely high weight (e.g., >150 kg). There was a trend of positive association between anidulafungin exposure and efficacy in patients with esophageal candidiasis or invasive candidiasis, including candidemia (ICC); however, adequate characterization of the effect of anidulafungin exposure on response could not be established due to the relatively small sample size. No threshold value for exposure could be established, since patients with low exposure also achieved successful outcomes (e.g., area under the curve < 40 mg · h/liter in ICC patients). There was no association between anidulafungin exposure and the treatment-related adverse events or all-causality hepatic laboratory abnormalities.

Management of a recalcitrant candidal chorioretinal abscess.

To describe a case of endogenously acquired Candida albicans chorioretinitis that was unresponsive to aggressive local and systemic therapy. Single retrospective case report and review of pertinent literature. A 42-year-old woman with metastatic colon cancer acquired endogenous C. albicans chorioretinitis secondary to total parenteral nutrition after a small-bowel resection. A lesion involving the left fovea progressed despite systemic antifungal therapy with intravenous anidulafungin followed by oral fluconazole, intravenous Ambisome, and 11 total intravitreal injections of either Amphotericin B (5 mg each) or voriconazole (50-100 mg each). The patient underwent pars plana vitrectomy with subfoveal aspiration and removal of infectious material using submacular surgery, resulting in resolution of the infection. Postoperatively the patient's visual acuity was the same as before surgery (20/200 in the left eye). When treating endogenous fungal chorioretinitis, attention should be paid to both systemic treatment that has good intraocular penetration and early local therapy with intravitreal antifungals for sight-threatening lesions. Surgical intervention may also be warranted.

Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Multiple-Dose Anidulafungin in Infants and Neonates

Candida infections are common and often fatal in infants and neonates. Anidulafungin has excellent activity against Candida species, but the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of the drug in infants and neonates are unknown. The object of our study was to determine the PK and safety of anidulafungin in infants and neonates at risk for invasive candidiasis. Intravenous anidulafungin (1.5mg/kg/day maintenance dose) was administered to 15 infants and neonates over 3 to 5 days. Plasma samples were collected after the first dose and again after the third to fifth doses. The pharmacokinetic parameters of the drug were determined by noncompartmental analysis. Safety was assessed using National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria. The study showed that drug exposure levels were similar between neonates and infants; the median areas under the concentration-time curve (range) was 75 (30-109) µg·h/ml and 98 (55-278) µg·h/ml (P = 0.12) for neonates and infants, respectively. No drug-related serious adverse events were observed. The study results indicate that neonates and infants receiving 1.5mg/kg/day have anidulafungin exposure levels similar to those in children receiving similar weight-based dosing and in adult patients receiving 100mg/day.

Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of anidulafungin during continuous venovenous haemofiltration

Clinical studies support a role for anidulafungin as first-line treatment of invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients and postulate no need for dose adjustments in mild to severe renal failure. Although intensive care patients requiring renal replacement therapy are at particular risk of invasive fungal infection, no pharmacokinetic data on anidulafungin during continuous venovenous haemofiltration (CVVHF) are available. Ten patients with CVVHF due to acute renal failure were included. Anidulafungin was infused on 3 consecutive days starting with a loading dose of 200 mg on day 1, followed by doses of 100 mg on each of days 2 and 3. During the 72 h study phase of CVVHF, blood and ultrafiltrate samples were collected at corresponding times. Anidulafungin concentrations were determined by HPLC. Peak plasma concentrations were reached 3 h after the start of infusion and were 8.5±3.6 mg/L at the pre-filter port. The mean arterial area under the curve (AUC0-24) of the study population was 109.9±49.82 mg·h/L, the total clearance was 1.08±0.41 L/h, the volume of distribution was 41.97±22.64 L and the elimination half-life was 28.78±10.40 h. Anidulafungin was not filtered, but CVVHF resulted in a substance loss of ∼20%, due to adherence to synthetic surfaces. Pharmacokinetics of anidulafungin during CVVHF resembled findings in healthy adults and adults with fungal infections. Therefore we recommend a loading dose of 200 mg intravenous anidulafungin on the first day and 100 mg on consecutive treatment days in patients during CVVHF.

A Phase 2, Open-Label Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Anidulafungin as a Treatment for Azole-Refractory Mucosal Candidiasis

Azole-refractory mucosal candidiasis is a debilitating disease frequently seen in patients who are immunosuppressed as a result of HIV, malignancy, posttransplant immunosuppressive therapy, persistent neutropenia, steroid use, or diabetes. Anidulafungin has potent activity against a broad spectrum of Candida species, including strains resistant to azoles and amphotericin B. We performed an open-label, noncomparative study to examine efficacy and safety of anidulafungin in patients with azole-refractory oropharyngeal and esophageal candidiasis. Patients enrolled met diagnostic criteria for azole-refractory mucosal candidiasis. They received intravenous anidulafungin 100 mg on day 1 followed by daily 50-mg doses on day 2 through day 14 or for a maximum of 21 days. Primary efficacy variables were clinical response (for oropharyngeal candidiasis) and endoscopic and clinical response (for esophageal candidiasis) at the end of therapy. Nineteen patients were enrolled; 89% had advanced HIV infection. Clinical success was observed in 95% of patients at end of therapy, and endoscopic success was observed in 92% of patients with esophageal candidiasis. At follow-up, clinical success was maintained in 47% of patients. The most common adverse event, experienced by 4 patients, was nausea and/or vomiting. Anidulafungin was well tolerated and efficacious in the treatment of patients with azole-refractory esophageal and oropharyngeal candidiasis.

Anidulafungin versus Fluconazole for Invasive Candidiasis

Anidulafungin, a new echinocandin, has potent activity against candida species. We compared anidulafungin with fluconazole in a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial of treatment for invasive candidiasis. Adults with invasive candidiasis were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous anidulafungin or intravenous fluconazole. All patients could receive oral fluconazole after 10 days of intravenous therapy. The primary efficacy analysis assessed the global response (clinical and microbiologic) at the end of intravenous therapy in patients who had a positive baseline culture. Efficacy was also assessed at other time points. Eighty-nine percent of the 245 patients in the primary analysis had candidemia only. Candida albicans was isolated in 62% of the 245 patients. In vitro fluconazole resistance was infrequent. Most of the patients (97%) did not have neutropenia. At the end of intravenous therapy, treatment was successful in 75.6% of patients treated with anidulafungin, as compared with 60.2% of those treated with fluconazole (difference, 15.4 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.9 to 27.0). The results were similar for other efficacy end points. The statistical analyses failed to show a "center effect"; when data from the site enrolling the largest number of patients were removed, success rates at the end of intravenous therapy were 73.2% in the anidulafungin group and 61.1% in the fluconazole group (difference, 12.1 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.1 to 25.3). The frequency and types of adverse events were similar in the two groups. The rate of death from all causes was 31% in the fluconazole group and 23% in the anidulafungin group (P=0.13). Anidulafungin was shown to be noninferior to fluconazole in the treatment of invasive candidiasis. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00056368 [ClinicalTrials.gov]).

Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Anidulafungin in Children with Neutropenia at High Risk for Invasive Fungal Infections

Anidulafungin is an echinocandin with activity against Candida species and Aspergillus species. Adult dosages under study are 50 mg/day for esophageal candidiasis and 100 mg/day for invasive candidiasis and aspergillosis. Little is known, however, about the safety and pharmacokinetics of anidulafungin in children. A multicenter, ascending-dosage study of neutropenic pediatric patients was therefore conducted. Patients were divided into two age cohorts (2 to 11 years and 12 to 17 years) and were enrolled into sequential groups to receive 0.75 or 1.5 mg/kg of body weight/day. Blood samples were obtained following the first and fifth doses. Anidulafungin was assayed in plasma, and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined. Safety was assessed using National Cancer Institute (NCI) common toxicity criteria. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined for 12 patients at each dosage (0.75 mg/kg/day or 1.5 mg/kg/day). Concentrations and drug exposures were similar for patients between age cohorts, and weight-adjusted clearance was consistent across age. No drug-related serious adverse events were observed. One patient had fever (NCI toxicity grade of 3), and one patient had facial erythema, which resolved with slowing the infusion rate. Anidulafungin in pediatric patients was well tolerated and can be dosed based on body weight. Pediatric patients receiving 0.75 mg/kg/day or 1.5 mg/kg/day have anidulafungin concentration profiles similar to those of adult patients receiving 50 or 100 mg/day, respectively.