Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems Research Articles

Evaluation of an Intrathecal Drug Delivery Protocol Leads to Rapid Reduction of Systemic Opioids in the Oncological Population.

Objective: The article that follows is purposed at demonstrating how IT opioid plus bupivacaine achieves sustained acceptable pain relief while simultaneously rapidly reducing oral morphine equivalents (OME). Background: Cancer patients represent a population with significant morbidity, pain, and limited life expectancy. It is, therefore, vital to achieve satisfactory analgesia quickly and safely. To date, there is limited data in the literature that discusses efficacy of combined intrathecal (IT) medication therapy in reducing systemic opioids in the oncological population. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis that reviewed cancer pain patients from day of IT pump implantation through the six-month postoperative time point. A cohort of 50 oncological patients who had intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDSs) implanted at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 2017 and 2019 were studied. Median OMEs were the primary modality of analysis for this review. Mean visual analogue scale scores were secondarily reviewed. Results: Median OMEs decreased from 503 preoperative to 105 at six months postoperative time point. Median time to discharge was 6.5 days. Unfortunately, due to malignant mortality, 27 patients did not make it to the 6-month postoperative time point. Discussion: IDDSs with opioid plus bupivacaine represent a safe and efficient route toward expeditious pain relief and decreased OMEs in the cancer pain population.

From Cancer Treatment to Cancer Survivorship: A Case Report Demonstrating the Dynamic Roles of Intrathecal Drug Delivery System in Various Phases of Cancer Care

Background: Until the continued improvements in cancer diagnosis and treatment, many cancers were once considered terminal illnesses. Opioid-based therapy is frequently utilized from the armamentarium for cancer pain treatment since the immediate goals of acute cancer pain management are focused on alleviating pain severity and improving quality of life during this limited time – despite the risks of chronic opioid therapy. However, now, with an expanding cancer survivor population, we lack guidance and tools to assist health care providers and patients in pivoting the focus of cancer pain management from acute relief toward improving function, rehabilitation, and limiting the long-term adverse effects of pain and opioid therapy. Case Report: Here, we present a case exemplifying the ability of intrathecal drug delivery systems to serve a multitude of roles during the various phases of cancer care: from treating acute cancer-related pain, acting as a tool to wean systemic opioid therapy, to being clinically dormant in situ but ready to serve again in the event of cancer recurrence. Conclusion: Intrthecal drug delivery systems are effective tools in managing acute cancer pain and can also be adapted to help manage chronic pain in cancer survivors. Key words: Cancer pain, intrathecal drug delivery system, intrathecal pump, opioid weaning

Intrathecal delivery of hydromorphone vs morphine for refractory cancer pain: a multicenter, randomized, single-blind, controlled noninferiority trial.

Hydromorphone is an alternative to morphine for intrathecal drug delivery system to treat refractory cancer pain; however, there is not enough clinical evidence to prove it. In our study, 233 patients from 12 different pain management centers across China were enrolled, 121 and 112 in the intrathecal hydromorphone (ITHM) and intrathecal morphine (ITMO) groups, respectively. The primary outcome was the clinical success rate, which was defined as ratio of patients achieving ≥50% pain relief. The noninferiority margin was defined as -0.15. Other outcomes included daily visual analogue scale score, breakthrough pain (BTP) incidence, intrathecal dose change, and patient-controlled analgesia bolus count change, GAD-7/PHQ-9. Clinical success was achieved in 85 and 79 of the 121 ITHM patients (70.2%) and 112 ITMO patients (70.5%), respectively. Compared to the corresponding baseline findings, significantly decreased visual analogue scale scores and BTP incidence were noted in both groups. The dose change rate decreased and increased with time in the ITHM and ITMO groups, respectively (ITHM -3.33% vs ITMO 35.4%, P < 0.01, t test) from the third week. The patient-controlled analgesia bolus change rate was lower in the ITHM group than in the ITMO group (ITHM -19.88% vs ITMO 7.79%, P < 0.01, t test) from first week. Our result shows that ITHM is noninferior to ITMO on pain relief to treat refractory cancer pain, however, at different doses and that the doses of morphine tended to increase, whereas those of hydromorphone decreased over time. Hydromorphone offers advantage over morphine in controlling BTP.

Effects of Bupivacaine on Opioid Patient-Controlled Intrathecal Analgesia in Chronic Pain Patients Implanted with Drug Delivery Systems.

Combining neuraxial opioids and local anesthetics in acute pain results in improved duration of analgesia and reduced dosages and adverse effects. Although commonly used in intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS) for chronic pain, the effectiveness of this admixture has not been examined specifically in relation to patient-controlled intrathecal analgesia (PCIA). IDDS-implanted chronic noncancer pain patients receiving opioids with bupivacaine (O + B) were randomized to receive either opioids without bupivacaine (O) or O + B in a double-blind manner, at IDDS refills, for one week and then crossed over to the other solution for another week. Primary outcome measures included numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores before and within 30 minutes after PCIA boluses. Secondary outcome measures included average NRS scores and functional outcome measures. Seventeen patients were enrolled, and 16 patients completed the study. There were no differences in NRS scores before and after PCIA boluses between the O and O + B conditions, though pain scores improved significantly (average decrease in NRS scores: O 1.81 ± 1.47 vs O + B 1.87 ± 1.40, P = 0.688). No differences were noted in speed of onset or duration of analgesia. Although more patients subjectively preferred the O + B treatment, the difference was not statistically significant. No differences were noted in secondary outcome measures, with the exception of global impression of change having higher scores in O compared with O + B. Acutely removing bupivacaine from a chronic intrathecal infusion of opioids and bupivacaine in patients with chronic noncancer pain did not adversely affect PCIA effectiveness, nor did it affect speed of onset or duration of effect. These findings are divergent from those in acute pain and may have to do with study conditions and pain phenotypes.

Arachnoiditis with Intrathecal Morphine 12 Months Following Implantation of an Intrathecal Pump: A Case Report

Abstract: The utilization of intrathecal pumps is increasing as more practitioners are becoming familiar with their use, and as the applications of continuous intrathecal infusions increase. There are many potential risks with intrathecal pump implantation, which include the risk of infection, bleeding, nerve damage, as well as other potential issues. After prolonged usage, granuloma formation, medication tolerance, disease progression, mechanical failure, and arachnoiditis can also occur. Arachnoiditis has been associated with spinal disease, contrast media, preservatives in medications, infectious causes, hemorrhage, and more. The potential causes of arachnoiditis are many; however, it is infrequently associated with intrathecal pump infusates. Morphine is commonly used in intrathecal pumps, either as a sole agent or in combination with other medications. Its role in arachnoiditis and catheter granuloma formation can be extrapolated from its effects on inflammation. In particular, it is well known that morphine causes mast cell activation and subsequent release of substance P and tryptase. In addition, morphine can sensitize the central nervous system to inflammatory effects as it can enhance the release of substance P from the dorsal root ganglia as well. Lastly, activation of μ receptors on lymphocytes can result in lymphocyte proliferation. When arachnoiditis occurs in the setting of an intrathecal pump, there are several important considerations. These include the appropriate diagnosis of the cause as well as evaluation of potential treatment options. We report a case of intrathecal morphine-associated arachnoiditis that was diagnosed using both clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings. This case describes a successful exchange of intrathecal morphine for intrathecal hydromorphone, with the subsequent improvement of the patient’s symptoms of arachnoiditis. Key words: Adhesive arachnoiditis, arachnoiditis, cancer pain, complications, intrathecal catheter, intrathecal drug delivery system, intrathecal hydromorphone, intrathecal inflammation, intrathecal morphine, intrathecal pump, intrathecal opioid, intrathecal ziconitide

Treatment of restless legs syndrome with a pump; efficacy and complications.

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) has a prevalence of 2.5%-15% in the general population. For those who suffer from a medically refractory RLS, intrathecal morphine treatment has been shown to be effective. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate efficacy, complications and side effects in patients treated over several years with an implantable pump. A comparison was done to a group of patients treated with a similar pump system due to spasticity. The charts of ten patients with severe or very severe RLS have been reviewed. These patients have received an intrathecal drug delivery system during 2000-2016. To compare the rate of complications, a control group of 20 patients treated with intrathecal baclofen due to spasticity was included in the study. Their time of treatment corresponded to the RLS patients. The severity of symptoms related to RLS decreased significantly after treatment. Doses required ranged from 68 to 140µg/d. Two cases of side effects were detected; one case with nausea and dizziness and one case with headache and fatigue. The rate of mechanical, infectious and other complications was similar between the two groups. In light of the decrease in symptom severity and the low rate of side effects, intrathecal morphine can be considered an adequate treatment for those suffering from medically refractory RLS. The occurrence of complications did not differ between subjects with RLS and spasticity.

Malfunctioning sufentanil intrathecal pain pump: a case report

BackgroundSufentanil is a potent opioid uncommonly used to manage pain and is rarely administered via an intrathecal pain pump system.Case presentationThis case illustrates the use of intrathecal sufentanil in a 50-year-old Caucasian man for the management of chronic pain; however, the intrathecal drug delivery system experienced a malfunction which led to 1/100th output of the correct dosage. Interesting aspects of this case report include the uncommon choice of sufentanil use for an intrathecal drug delivery system, as well as the unusual pharmacokinetics of this drug. Specifically, this patient did not experience the major withdrawal that would be expected given significant under dosing of opioid, and this may be explained by the lipophilicity and context-sensitive half-times of sufentanil.ConclusionsBecause of the absence of a clinically significant withdrawal in this case report, clinicians must be aware of relevant pharmacokinetic properties and unusual intrathecal drug delivery system technologies that influence a patient’s response when device malfunction occurs.

Usefulness of Imaging for Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems: An update

Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems are invasive pain treatment techniques that require bypassing the blood-brain barrier in order to implant a catheter inside the CSF. Imaging is a key element before and during implantation as well as in the diagnosis of complications. The understanding of delivery mechanisms has been greatly improved using MRI. Drug diffusion can now be modeled according to infusion level and flow rate for each individual patient. MRI and CT are useful in diagnosing the patient, targeting spinal level, and accurately evaluating implantation concerns or contraindications. Imaging is a key tool during the implantation of the device. Catheter positioning is essential as the treatment diffusion is limited, and the tip of the catheter must be set behind the spinal cord. Currently, fluoroscopy is the gold standard for catheter placement. Biplane Interventional Imaging and surgical CT scan will soon be able to help with more accurate positioning. An ultrasound-guided technique is helpful to localize a recessed septum in challenging pump refill procedures where pumps are deeply situated. Imaging is also essential for device malfunction diagnosis. Plain radiology is currently limited as new catheters have a poor opacity, but it remains useful for confirming motor stall of the peristaltic pump and is appropriate for the diagnosis of pump rotation. High-resolution three-dimensional Computer Tomography reconstruction allows accurate control of catheter positioning and the diagnosis of dislodgment, kinking, and breaking. MRI is the most accurate imagery to diagnose spinal cord injuries following implantation or as an adverse effect of IT treatment such as granuloma. Diffusion control requires dynamic imaging which can be performed by TC99 scintigraphy. This allows for the visualization of drug diffusion and velocity. In the near future, novel techniques such as PET- CT scan could be useful for testing the distribution of intrathecal drugs

Use of Color Flow Doppler Ultrasonography to Increase the Safety of Intrathecal Drug Delivery System Refills

Intrathecal drug delivery systems are effective tools in the treatment of chronic pain or spasticity. Using intrathecal drug delivery systems, drugs are directly infused into the cerebrospinal fluid and gain access to critical receptors in the central nervous system. This delivery method allows for the use of markedly reduced doses of medications to produce the same effects as seen with higher orally administered doses. Reduced dosing produces fewer side effects, creating a more favorable treatment course for patients already suffering from chronic pain or spasticity. Complications with intrathecal drug delivery systems can occur during both the implantation process and the postoperative maintenance of the device. The most common procedure carried out during postoperative maintenance of these devices is the intrathecal pump refill. This procedure must be performed by experienced practitioners in a systematic way in order to prevent complications. The most dreaded of these complications is inadvertent injection of medication into the subcutaneous space as opposed to into the device, commonly referred to as a “pocket fill.” This paper describes and recommends the routine use of color flow doppler ultrasonography as an easy, safe, and effective tool to reduce the chance of a catastrophic “pocket fill.” Routine utilization of live color flow ultrasound guidance during pump refills allows the practitioner to carefully document flow of medication into the pump under the silicone septum. It also allows for demonstration of no leakage from, or fluid increase superficial to, the septum. Additionally, 2 ultrasound images are obtained to document color flow deep to the septum and no color flow/leak/fluid superficial to the septum. Although this complication is rare, it can lead to severe complications including oversedation, respiratory depression, and death. As such, we believe that the utilization of color phase doppler ultrasonography could further reduce this incidence. Key words: Analgesics, opioids, chronic pain, drug overdose, infusion pumps, implantable, injections, spinal, medication errors, spasticity, ultrasonics, methods, ultrasonography, interventional

Effect of Long-Term Intrathecal Bupivacaine Infusion on Blood Pressure

The local anesthetic bupivacaine is a common analgesic adjuvant medication used in combination with opioids in intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDSs). While the acute effects of spinal bupivacaine injection on blood pressure (BP) have been studied, there is a dearth of data regarding long-term effects of continuous intrathecal bupivacaine infusion. A retrospective review of all noncancer pain patients receiving bupivacaine through IDDSs from January 2013 to November 2017 was performed. Blood pressure values before implantation, and after implant at the 1-week, 3-month, 6-month and 1-year time points are recorded as well as corresponding bupivacaine and opioid doses in the IDDS. Eighty-two patients were included in the study; median patient age was 64 years and intrathecal catheter tips were located predominantly in the lower thoracic spine. Significant decreases in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) relative to baseline occurred in patients receiving chronic lower thoracic intrathecal bupivacaine delivery at 3, 6, and 12 months post-implant (-12.96 ± 18.21; p < 0.001 and - 6.38 ± 12.04; p < 0.001, respectively). The only significant decrease in DBP was observed at 1 year post-implant (-3.09 ± 11.76; p < 0.05). Similar decreases in BP values occurred in patients with or without hypertension. Long-term thoracic intrathecal infusion of bupivacaine likely exerts a lowering effect on BP, primarily because of a significant decrease in SBP. This effect is likely due to efferent sympathetic blockade by bupivacaine.

Refill Procedures of Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems With a Recessed Fill Port on the Pump Surface: A Prospective Comparison Study of Ultrasound-Guided vs. Blind Refill Technique

Structural differences of implantable drug delivery systems (IDDSs) might have an impact on the efficiency of needle access to the reservoir fill port (RFP). The aim of this study was to assess the efficiency of RFP needle access with an ultrasound (US)-guided vs. a blind refill technique in IDDSs with a Recessed RFP (Recessed-RFP-IDDS). The primary outcome was the number of attempts needed to enter the RFP with a needle comparing the US-guided technique vs. the blind refill technique. The time to enter the RFP with the needle was a secondary outcome. We compared the amount of attempts between both techniques with the non-parametric Wilcoxon rank sum test. Fourteen adult patients underwent a total of 75 refills of their Recessed-RFP-IDDS during a period of 24 months. The median number of attempts to enter the RFP did not differ significantly between the US-guided technique and the blind refill technique (2.0 (IQR: 1-5) vs. 1.5 (IQR: 1-5.0), p = 0.572). The median time to enter the RFP with the needle did not differ significantly between both techniques (35.0 sec (IQR: 26.0-58.0) vs. 41.0 sec (IQR: 25.5-46.8), p = 0.878). The results of this study suggest that there is no difference in the RFP needle access efficiency between the US-guided and the blind refill technique in superficially located Recessed-RFP-IDDSs, if performed by experienced practitioners. However, the study did not address efficiency of the RFP needle access in IDDSs with aberrancy in pump location or refills performed by inexperienced staff.

Physician Guidance on the Use of Off-Labeled Drugs in Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems for Chronic Pain

Physician Guidance on the Use of Off-Labeled Drugs in Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems for Chronic Pain

Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems for Cancer Pain: An Analysis of a Prospective, Multicenter Product Surveillance Registry.

BACKGROUND:The safety and efficacy of intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDSs) for the treatment of cancer-related pain have been demonstrated in randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs). Despite positive evidence for this therapy, IDDS remains underutilized to treat cancer pain. Real-world registry data augment existing safety and effectiveness data and are presented here to broaden awareness of this therapeutic option, needed for adequate cancer-related pain treatment, and as a viable tool addressing concerns with systemic opioid use.METHODS:This prospective, long-term, multicenter (United States, Western Europe, and Latin America) registry started in 2003 to monitor the performance of SynchroMed Infusion Systems. Patient-reported outcomes were added in 2013. Before data acquisition, all sites obtained Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board approval and written patient consent. The study was registered (NCT01524276 at clinicaltrials.gov) before patients were enrolled. Patients who provided informed consent were enrolled in the registry at initial IDDS implant or replacement.RESULTS:Through July 2017, 1403 patients with cancer pain were enrolled and implanted. The average (minimum/maximum) age of patients was 59 years (13/93 years), with 56.6% female. The most frequent cancer types were lung, breast, colon/rectal, pancreatic, and prostate. The majority of patients whose registry follow-up ended (87%; 1141/1311) were followed through death, with 4.3% (n = 57) exiting due to device explant or therapy discontinuation; the remaining 113 (8.6%) discontinued for reasons such as transfer of care, lost to follow-up, and site closure. Pain scores within the cohort of patients providing baseline and follow-up data improved significantly at 6 (P = .0007; n = 103) and 12 (P = .0026; n = 55) months compared to baseline, with EuroQol with 5 dimensions (EuroQol-5D) scores showing significant improvement at 6 months (P = .0016; n = 41). Infection requiring surgical intervention (IDDS explant, replacement, pocket revision, irrigation and debridement, etc) was reported in 3.2% of patients.CONCLUSIONS:Adequate and improved pain control in patients with cancer, even in advanced stages, with concurrent quality of life maintenance is attainable. Results from this large-scale, multicenter, single-group cohort supplement existing RCT data that support IDDS as a safe and effective therapeutic option with a positive benefit–risk ratio in the treatment of cancer pain.

Intrathecal Drug Delivery.

Targeted intrathecal (IT) drug delivery systems (IDDS) are well established as an effective treatment of patients with chronic nonmalignant or malignant pain, and as a tool for management of patients with severe spasticity. The risk to benefit ratio of IDD makes it a relatively safe therapy for both cancer- and noncancer-related pain, but it is not free of risks, so it should be managed at specific centers. Recent technological advances, new therapeutic applications, reported complications, and the costs as well as maintenance required for this therapy require the need to stay up to date about new recommendations that may improve outcomes. This chapter reviews all technological issues regarding IDDS implantation with follow-up and pharmacological recommendations published during recent years that provide evidence-based decision-making process in the management of chronic pain and spasticity in patients.

Intrathecal therapy for pain in cancer patients.

Intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS) for cancer pain remain little employed despite a high level of efficiency even though the technique is widely recommended. This review aims to summarize recent advances in IDDS for cancer patients. The respective roles of catheter positioning, volume and flow rate in diffusion of intrathecal treatments, as well as the individual roles of blood pressure, heart rate, and amplitude of the respiratory movements in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) treatment dispersion, are now well established. Models are available using MRI data. Morphine has long been the gold standard in first line treatment, but recent publications conclude that ziconotide has largely proven its efficiency and that adverse effects are controllable. Four recent publications have evaluated cohorts of cancer patients treated by IDDS in 315 patients. All found a great efficiency of intrathecal treatment for cancer pain. Technical innovations include new catheters and anchorage devices for easier placement and a lower rate of complication. Three-dimensional (3D) CT scan appears to be a noninvasive technique for the diagnosis of catheter complications. Ultrasound should be used to locate pump septum for refill. All recent recommendations highlight the efficiency of IDDS and propose to use it sooner.

Attitudes of Hospice Providers Regarding Intrathecal Targeted Drug Delivery for Patients With Cancer

Pain is one of the most commonly experienced and feared symptoms faced by patients with a serious illness. For these patients, intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDSs) provide greater potency and/or few systemic side effects. However, despite these benefits, the integration and management of IDDS for patients receiving hospice care has not been previous studied. An electronic, 18-question survey was sent to 200 hospice practitioners (physicians, nurse practitioners and nurses) in the state of Minnesota to explore their experience, confidence, and the perceived barriers to caring for patients with IDDS while being cared for on hospice. Providers were identified though mailing lists from the Minnesota Network of Hospice and Palliative Care organization. The survey was administered by the Mayo Clinic Survey Research Center with institutional review board approval. Slightly more than 50% of respondents have ever cared for a patient with an intrathecal pump. If a patient had a pump in place, only 28% of providers expressed confidence in managing their pain. Additionally, only 3 of 10 respondents felt that adjusting an intrathecal pump should be the first option when a patient with an IDDS in place had increased pain. Indeed, the vast majority (over 80%) of respondents preferred the use of systemic therapies for primary pain management. Access to IDDS vendors for changes/refills in the home is identified as another barrier with over 50% of respondents either unaware of an available vendor or reporting no vendor available. There are numerous self-reported barriers to ongoing use of IDDS with patients receiving hospice care.

Indented intrathecal drug delivery system with loss of reservoir volume

ObjectivesWe report two patients who underwent elective revision surgery were found to have reduced reservoir volumes and indented bottom shield of intrathecal drug delivery system (IDDS).Case reportsCase #1: A 59-year-old...

Optimizing Initial Intrathecal Drug Ratio for Refractory Cancer-Related Pain for Early Pain Relief. A Retrospective Monocentric Study.

Intrathecal (IT) drug delivery has shown its efficiency in treating refractory cancer pain, but switching opioids from the systemic to the intrathecal route is a challenging phase. Moreover, associations are widely used and recommended. Few data deal with the initial dosage of each drug. Analyzing conversion factors and initial dosages used in intrathecal therapy seems essential to decreasing the length of titration and to delivering quick pain relief to patients. We retrospectively analyzed data from consecutive adult patients implanted with an intrathecal device for cancer pain and treated at the Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, in Angers, France, for four years. The main goal was to identify factors associated with early pain relief after intrathecal drug delivery system (IDDS) implantation. Of the 220 IDDS-treated patients, 70 (32%) experienced early pain relief (EaPR) and 150 (68%) delayed pain relief (DePR). Performance Status stage and initial IT ropivacaine:IT morphine ratio were the variables independently associated with EaPR. The best IT ropivacaine:IT morphine ratio to predict EaPR was 5:1, with a 73% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 64.8% to 79.6%) sensitivity and a 67.1% (95% CI = 54.9% to 77.9%) specificity. EaPR subjects experienced better pain relief (-84% vs -60% from baseline pain score, P < 0.0001), shorter length of hospitalization (7 vs 10 days, P < 0.0001), and longer survival (155 vs 82 days, P = 0.004). Local anesthetic:morphine ratio should be considered when starting IDDS treatment. EaPR during the IT analgesia titration phase was associated with better pain relief and outcomes in patients with refractory cancer-related pain.

Multiple Fibrin Glue Use in a Complicated Case of Postdural Puncture Headache Following Intrathecal Drug Delivery System Placement: A Case Report

A postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is a well-described complication after implantation of an intrathecal drug delivery system (IDDS). Treatment is typically with supportive management with the occasional need for an epidural blood patch. We describe a case of a patient with refractory muscle spasticity secondary to cerebral palsy that required a baclofen IDDS implantation and subsequently developed a PDPH. After failing conservative therapy as well as an epidural blood patch, the decision was made to attempt an epidural fibrin patch, which transiently improved her headache. Upon return of the patient’s symptoms, computed tomography myelogram demonstrated an extensive cerebrospinal fluid leak with ventral spread into the retroperitoneal space. Using a novel technique, a second epidural fibrin glue patch was administered just adjacent to the IDDS catheter insertion point, which was then successful in resolving her symptoms. Key words: Intrathecal drug delivery system, postdural puncture headache, dural tear, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, fibrin glue, epidural blood patch

Suspected transcutaneous cerebral spinal fluid leakage without postural headache after implantable intrathecal drug delivery system removal - A case report -

Suspected transcutaneous cerebral spinal fluid leakage without postural headache after implantable intrathecal drug delivery system removal - A case report -