Intrathecal Drug Delivery Research Articles

Preferences of Patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis for Intrathecal Drug Delivery: Choosing between an Implanted Drug-Delivery Device and Therapeutic Lumbar Puncture.

Novel intrathecal treatments for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) may require delivery using lumbar puncture (LP). Implanted drug-delivery devices (IDDDs) could be an alternative but little is known about patients' preferences for intrathecal drug-delivery methods. We aimed to elicit preferences of patients with ALS for routine LP and IDDD use. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) and a threshold technique (TT) exercise were conducted online among patients with ALS in the US and Europe. In the DCE, patients made trade-offs between administration attributes. Attributes were identified from qualitative interviews. The TT elicited maximum acceptable risks (MARs) of complications from device implantation surgery. DCE data were analyzed using mixed logit to quantify relative attribute importance (RAI) as the maximum contribution of each attribute to a preference, and to estimate MARs of device failure. TT data were analyzed using interval regression. Four scenarios of LP and IDDD were compared. Participants (N = 295) had a mean age of 57.7 years; most (74.2%) were diagnosed < 3 years ago. Preferences were affected by device failure risk (RAI 28.6%), administration frequency (26.4%), administration risk (19.7%), overall duration (17.8%), and appointment location (7.5%). Patients accepted a 5.6% device failure risk to reduce overall duration from 2 h to 30 min and a 3.6% risk for administration in a local clinic instead of a hospital. The average MAR of complications from implantation surgery was 29%. Patients preferred IDDD over LP in three of four scenarios. Patients considered an IDDD as a valuable alternative to LP in multiple clinical settings.

Unlocking the Intrathecal Route: A Comprehensive Review

The intrathecal route of administration, which involves the direct delivery of therapeutic agents into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) via lumbar or cervical puncture, has gained increasing prominence in the field of healthcare and neurology. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the intrathecal route as a mode of drug delivery, focusing on its applications, advantages, challenges, and safety considerations. Intrathecal administration offers a unique advantage by bypassing the blood-brain barrier, allowing for precise and targeted drug delivery to the central nervous system. This approach has proven effective in managing a variety of conditions, including chronic pain, spasticity, infections, and neoplastic diseases. Furthermore, it has shown promise in the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and multiple sclerosis. Despite its potential benefits, intrathecal therapy presents challenges related to its invasive nature, the risk of infection, and the need for specialized equipment and personnel. Careful patient selection and ongoing monitoring are essential to mitigate these risks. In addition, ongoing research is focused on improving drug formulations and delivery techniques to enhance the safety and efficacy of intrathecal therapy1 . This review consolidates key findings from recent studies, clinical trials, and expert opinions, shedding light on the current state of intrathecal administration and its evolving role in medical practice. By exploring the latest advancements and addressing critical considerations, this review aims to provide valuable insights to healthcare professionals, researchers, and clinicians working with intrathecal drug delivery. Key words: Intrathecal therapy, Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), Drug delivery, Neurological disorders, Central nervous system, Blood-brain barrier.

Optimizing Preoperative Chronic Pain Management in Elective Spine Surgery Patients

» Chronic preoperative opioid use negatively affects outcomes after spine surgery, with increased complications and reoperations, longer hospital stays, decreased return-to-work rates, worse patient-reported outcomes, and a higher risk of continued opioid use postoperatively.» The definition of chronic opioid use is not consistent across studies, and a more specific and consistent definition will aid in stratifying patients and understanding their risk of inferior outcomes.» Preoperative weaning periods and maximum dose thresholds are being established, which may increase the likelihood of achieving a meaningful improvement after surgery, although higher level evidence studies are needed.» Spinal cord stimulators and intrathecal drug delivery devices are increasingly used to manage chronic back pain and are equivalent or perhaps even superior to opioid treatment, although few studies exist examining how patients with these devices do after subsequent spine surgery.» Further investigation is needed to determine whether a true mechanistic explanation exists for spine-related analgesia related to spinal cord stimulators and intrathecal drug delivery devices.

Education and Experience in Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems (IDDS) During Pain Medicine Fellowships.

Targeted drug delivery (TDD) via intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS) exposure and clinical adoption remains low despite multiple well-designed trials that demonstrate safety, efficacy, reliability, and cost-saving benefits. This study aims to understand the possible contributing factors starting with Pain Medicine fellowship training. An internet-based, anonymous pilot survey was distributed to pain medicine fellows enrolled in an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accredited pain medicine training program during the 2021-2022 academic year. Fellowship programs were identified using published online ACGME accreditation data. The survey was distributed via email to fellowship program directors and coordinators and was made available through pain medicine societies. Seventy-one of four hundred and twenty-three pain medicine fellows (17% response rate) completed the survey. Nine percent of respondents evidence-informed opinion coincided with the most recent Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC) guidelines recommendations for IDDS treatment indications. Fifty-one percent of respondents felt there was an unmet need for IDDS training. About one-third of respondents felt that lack of curriculum, faculty, and cases were barriers to IDDS use, respectively. Thirty-one percent of fellows reported sufficient training for IDDS in their fellowship programs. The majority (70%) of respondents somewhat or strongly support direct training by IDDS manufacturers. A wide variability exists surrounding IDDS training during ACGME accredited pain medicine fellowship. Insufficient case exposure and lack of a standardized curriculum may play a role in future therapy adoption. The results from this study call for a more standardized training approach with an emphasis on adequate clinical exposure, utilization of peer reviewed educational curriculum and supplemental material to aid pain medicine fellows' education.

Intrathecal cervical analgesia for cancer pain: a 12-year follow-up study in a comprehensive cancer center

BackgroundIntrathecal analgesia plays a key role for patients suffering refractory cancer pain. Nevertheless, intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS), requiring a cervical catheter tip implantation, have been poorly described in medical...

DDEL-01. UTILIZING SENSOR ARRAYS FOR INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE (ICP) RESPONSE TO CEREBROSPINAL FLUID (CSF) DRUG ADMINISTRATION, AND POTENTIAL IMPLICATIONS FOR PERSONALIZED CARE IN CNS METASTASES PATIENTS

Abstract BACKGROUND Patients with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) may have elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) due to LC cancer cells having the potential to obstruct the arachnoid granulations.,Given that LC treatment may involve intrathecal (IT) drug delivery, monitoring ICP may be important for safe IT drug delivery. The EnClear device is a novel CNS drug delivery device with both intracranial and intralumbar CSF access and single-use sensing arrays that measure ICP in these dual locations. METHODS This is a non-human primate (NHP) study on three healthy NHP subjects undergoing IT gene therapy via intracerebroventricular (ICV). The sensor arrays measured ICP before, during, and after ICV infusion in both intracranial and lumbar locations. Our goal was to compare individual subject pressure response to drug administration as well as to compare lumbar and cranial pressure waveforms for concordance. Pressure response was quantified as change in pressure (ΔP) following volume (ΔV) administration, known as intracranial elastance (ΔP/ΔV). RESULTS Significant correlations were observed between ventricular and lumbar ICP waveforms with an average of 0.88 correlation coefficient. Pressure measurements between subjects demonstrated variable response to identical infusion volumes, with maximum pressures ranging from 20 mmHg to 40 mmHg. Intracranial elastance was calculated for each subject during infusions and resulted in a range of 12 to 36 mmHg/mL, a 3-fold difference in elastance between subjects. CONCLUSION In healthy NHPs, changes to cranial volume and pressure response can be measured in the lumbar space with good correlation between the two measurement locations. Despite this consistency between these two locations on the same subject, intersubject variability was seen despite identical drug administration. Pressure waveform sensing systems can be incorporated in the future to enable clinicians to understand individual patient brain compliance and leverage this knowledge for personalized drug delivery, particularly in patients with LC.

The need of a comprehensive approach in a condition of poorly opioid-responsive cancer pain.

Spinal analgesia is often claimed as an effective strategy for patients with a poor response to systemic opioids. Despite the optimistic data reported in literature with intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS) for cancer pain, a critical analysis showed modest benefit. Indeed, intrathecal therapy may be potent means to be used in a very selected population. However, ability to manage spinal therapy combined with the use of opioids and other drugs in the general perspective of a comprehensive palliative care treatment may allow to resolve refractory cancer pain in a patient with a clinical profile of poor pain prognosis, according to the Edmonton staging system. A long-term management of patient who underwent different therapeuthic approaches, including multiple opioid lines, intrathecal analgesia, and a comprehensive palliative care treatment, is described. The case reported describes how the management of cancer pain may be complex, requiring a high level of expertise on using opioids, conversion ratios, different routes, particularly the intrathecal one, as well as providing a comprehensive palliative care treatment. No evidence-based treatment can be taken into consideration for such extreme conditions, where only experience and knowledge can guide to an effective course of treament along a period of about six months. Timely therapeutic strategies are needed to be performed in each challenging clinical situation along the course of disease.

Peripheral Nerve Stimulation with High-Frequency Electromagnetic Coupling (HF-EMC) at the Posterior Tibial and Common Peroneal Nerves for the Treatment of Chronic Lower Limb Pain: Case Report

BACKGROUND: Chronic lower limb pain due to mononeuropathy can be highly debilitating, affecting quality of life both physically and psychosocially. Attention around peripheral nerve stimulation has heightened in recent years due to increasing data demonstrating positive outcomes in chronic pain management. This study discusses a case of chronic lower limb pain managed effectively with peripheral nerve stimulation of 2 key nerves in the lower extremity: the posterior tibial and common peroneal. CASE REPORT: A 68-year-old man presented with squeezing and crushing pressure encasing the entire left foot and ankle, with paresthesias along the heel and arch while walking and sharp radiating pain at the medial ankle and along the arch when sitting. In addition, 3 to 4 evenings per week, episodes of sharp radiating pain between the calf and ankle would occur for several hours. The average foot and ankle pain was 7 of 10 on the Verbal Rating Scale (VRS), with the evening calf episodes averaging 10 of 10. Previous therapies included nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), nerve blocks, nerve ablation, opioids, spinal cord stimulation (SCS), and intrathecal drug delivery, all of which resulted in minimal, temporary relief. After successful diagnostic nerve blocks, peripheral nerve stimulators were placed at the posterior tibial and common peroneal nerves providing significant relief. CONCLUSION: Subthreshold peripheral nerve stimulation at the posterior tibial and common peroneal nerves has proven successful for a patient suffering from chronic, debilitating lower limb pain due to mononeuropathy; results included decreased chronic pain and fewer pain episodes as well as increased activity, better socialization, and a significantly improved quality of life. KEY WORDS: Ankle, chronic pain, common peroneal, foot, lower limb, mononeuropathy, peripheral nerve stimulation, posterior tibial

Implanted intrathecal drug delivery systems may be associated with improved survival in patients with cancer.

Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems (IDDS) are underused in the management of cancer-related pain despite evidence of both efficacy and survival benefit. There is currently limited evidence to indicate which patients might benefit most from IDDS. The aim of the study was to describe the baseline characteristics and survival outcomes of patients who accepted IDDS, patients who declined IDDS and patients who wished to go ahead with IDDS but whose condition deteriorated before they could do so. The survival data for 75 consecutive patients who had been offered intrathecal drug delivery were examined as part of a retrospective cohort study. Survival data was compared between three groups: those who accepted intrathecal drug delivery and went on to receive it (n = 41), those who accepted it but whose condition deteriorated before it commenced (n = 17) and those who declined this treatment modality (n = 17). Patients who received IDDS survived significantly longer after assessment compared to those who declined IDDS (hazard ratio (HR) for the IDDS group relative to the declined group 0.29 (95% CI 0.16 to 0.53), and 0.23 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.44) after adjustment for gender and baseline functional status. In patients who accepted IDDS but who were unable to commence treatment, survival after assessment was not significantly different from those who declined the IDDS (HR for the deteriorated group relative to the declined group 1.28 (95% CI 0.65 to 2.53), and 0.80 (95% CI 0.65 to 2.53) after adjustment for gender and baseline functional status). In this retrospective analysis, an improvement in survival may be associated with patients who accept ongoing pain management with an implanted intrathecal drug delivery system compared to those patients who either declined intrathecal drug delivery or deteriorated before it could be commenced.

Determination of spinal tracer dispersion after intrathecal injection in a deformable CNS model.

Background: Traditionally, there is a widely held belief that drug dispersion after intrathecal (IT) delivery is confined locally near the injection site. We posit that high-volume infusions can overcome this perceived limitation of IT administration. Methods: To test our hypothesis, subject-specific deformable phantom models of the human central nervous system were manufactured so that tracer infusion could be realistically replicated in vitro over the entire physiological range of pulsating cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amplitudes and frequencies. The distribution of IT injected tracers was studied systematically with high-speed optical methods to determine its dependence on injection parameters (infusion volume, flow rate, and catheter configurations) and natural CSF oscillations in a deformable model of the central nervous system (CNS). Results: Optical imaging analysis of high-volume infusion experiments showed that tracers spread quickly throughout the spinal subarachnoid space, reaching the cervical region in less than 10min. The experimentally observed biodispersion is much slower than suggested by the Taylor-Aris dispersion theory. Our experiments indicate that micro-mixing patterns induced by oscillatory CSF flow around microanatomical features such as nerve roots significantly accelerate solute transport. Strong micro-mixing effects due to anatomical features in the spinal subarachnoid space were found to be active in intrathecal drug administration but were not considered in prior dispersion theories. Their omission explains why prior models developed in the engineering community are poor predictors for IT delivery. Conclusion: Our experiments support the feasibility of targeting large sections of the neuroaxis or brain utilizing high-volume IT injection protocols. The experimental tracer dispersion profiles acquired with an anatomically accurate, deformable, and closed in vitro human CNS analog informed a new predictive model of tracer dispersion as a function of physiological CSF pulsations and adjustable infusion parameters. The ability to predict spatiotemporal dispersion patterns is an essential prerequisite for exploring new indications of IT drug delivery that targets specific regions in the CNS or the brain.

Intrathecal drug-infusion system for treating pain in advanced cancer: Newresearch in patient management.

Currently, the treatment of cancer pain in China mainly follows the three-step pain relief principles formulated by the World Health Organization. As research on subarachnoid drug diffusion has intensified, intrathecal drug delivery has been gradually applied in the treatment of diseases, and improved analgesia can be achieved via the continuous infusion of small doses of morphine-derived drugs. This method can not only effectively relieve pain and enhance quality of life but also significantly reduce the incidence of nausea, vomiting, constipation, and other adverse reactions caused by the long-term intensive use of drugs in patients with cancer pain. This study summarizes the development of the intrathecal drug-infusion system for treating cancer pain in patients with advanced cancer and describes the drugs used, the advantages in pain treatment, and key nursing factors before and after device placement to provide a basis for alleviating pain in patients with cancer.

More time in a community setting: A service evaluation of the impact of intrathecal drug delivery systems on place of care of patients with cancer pain.

Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems are underutilised in the management of refractory cancer pain despite evidence of their efficacy. Not all patients who are offered this treatment modality accept it. There is no current evidence that indicates if the use of intrathecal drug delivery systems impacts on place of care for patients with cancer related pain. This service evaluation compared place of care, place of death and morphine equivalent daily dose at end of life for patients in whom Intrathecal Drug Delivery was successfully established versus those who chose comprehensive medical management. A retrospective longitudinal cohort study of 45 patients with cancer pain comparing those who had ongoing analgesia successfully delivered via an implanted Intrathecal Drug Delivery System (n = 28) with those who continued to receive comprehensive medical management (n = 17). There was a markedly greater time spent in the community in the intrathecal group than the medical management group (median 126.5vs 25.5 days; p = 0.002) and a lower morphine equivalent daily dose at end of life (median 127.5vs 440.0 p = 0.022). In patients with advanced cancer, the successful establishment of intrathecal analgesia is associated with more time in the community and a lower morphine equivalent daily dose at end of life. The study has low numbers, and the sample was retrospectively selected. Nevertheless, these findings suggest the initial investment of time in an inpatient setting may be beneficial. Further research is required, using larger, prospective studies of patient outcomes in this setting.

BSLD-01 DYNAMIC CONTROL OF CSF FOR PERSONALIZED CNS DRUG DELIVERY FOR LEPTOMINGEAL DISEASE

Abstract BACKGROUND Appropriate drug distribution is needed for effective treatment of brain metastases and leptomeningeal disease. Lack of proper drug bioavailability in the CNS contributes to the poor outcome in these patients. EnClear Therapies has developed a device delivering intrathecal therapeutics utilizing the dynamic control of CSF flow through an external pump. Herein, we look at intrathecal drug delivery of methotrexate with EnClear’s system and its impact of drug concentration in CNS tissue in sheep and non-human primates. METHODS EnClear’s system utilizes two implantable catheters (lateral ventricle and lumbar thecal sac) and an extracorporeal pump that controls the speed and direction of CSF flow. Software continuously monitors and reports the output from sensor arrays for pressure, respiration, and heart rate. Imaging studies were used to track the CSF flow characteristics during the use of EnClear’s system. Data from administration of methotrexate followed by the use of EnClear’s system was compared to the current standard of delivery, intracerebroventricular or lumbar intrathecal administration. Methotrexate levels were measured with LC/MS in CSF, blood, and multiple CNS and peripheral tissues. RESULTS There was a two-fold increase in methotrexate levels in multiple regions of the brain including deeper brain structures including the striatum using EnClear's system, compared to traditional lumbar intrathecal and intracerebroventricular delivery. Higher peak levels of methotrexate were reached in the CSF with the use of EnClear’s system, with simultaneous reduction in the peripheral nerves and systemic tissues – a potential source of toxicity. CONCLUSIONS In large animal studies, EnClear’s system has for the first time, demonstrated increased brain parenchymal drug levels via intrathecal delivery. Drug delivery with this novel device has shown improved distribution throughout the CNS and leptomeninges as compared to traditional intrathecal drug delivery and decreased peripheral distribution.

Managing intractable pain with neuraxial infusion at home.

A case study of a 9-year-old child with complex pain secondary to metastatic liver cancer, who eventually required intrathecal drug delivery (ITDD) of analgesia. Multi-modal symptom control strategies were deployed to achieve the child's and parental wishes for end-of-life care (EoLC) at home using ITDD. The following recommendations are made for nursing practice in paediatric palliative care (PPC); rigorous risk assessment, exemplary communication with the identification of a coordinating team, timely training needs assessment and the delivery of training from hospital based experts in ITDD practice, comprehensive symptom management plan and 24/7 access to specialist palliative care teams were essential for safe nursing practice. In this case, robust risk assessment and mitigations enabled challenges to be safely addressed with a successful outcome, extending the boundaries of PPC home care.

CURRENT ADVANCEMENTS AND COMPLICATIONS IN INTRATHECAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM

Intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS) have emerged as a valuable treatment option for patients with chronic pain who have failed to achieve adequate relief with conventional therapies. These systems provide targeted delivery of medications directly to the cerebrospinal fluid, resulting in improved pain control and reduced systemic side effects. However, the use of IDDS is not without potential complications and considerations that must be addressed to ensure optimal patient outcomes. This comprehensive review examines the various complications associated with IDDS and the considerations that healthcare providers and patients need to be aware of. Surgical complications, such as infection, bleeding, spinal fluid leaks, and nerve damage, are discussed, along with strategies to minimize these risks. Device malfunctions, including pump failure, catheter issues, and electronic problems, are explored, highlighting the importance of regular monitoring and maintenance. Medication-related side effects, such as nausea, sedation, and respiratory depression, are addressed, emphasizing the need for close monitoring and appropriate dosage adjustments. Long-term considerations, including tolerance to medication, physical dependence, and withdrawal symptoms, are also examined, emphasizing the significance of gradual tapering and proper discontinuation protocols. The review underscores the importance of regular follow-up appointments to assess the system's functionality, medication dosages, and patient response to treatment. By proactively managing and addressing complications, healthcare providers can optimize pain relief and minimize adverse effects, ensuring the long-term effectiveness and safety of IDDS.

How I do it: weaning strategy for intrathecal drug delivery systems for chronic non-cancer pain: sublingual buprenorphine-naloxone microdosing schedule

How I do it: weaning strategy for intrathecal drug delivery systems for chronic non-cancer pain: sublingual buprenorphine-naloxone microdosing schedule

Intrathecal Drug Delivery System in Chronic Low Back Pain: Case Series

Background: Modern science says that persistent low back pain is the main cause of years lived in disability. Among pain management approaches, we highlight the intrathecal drug delivery system (IDDS). The aim of this observational study was to assess pain intensity in a series of cases of patients with chronic low back pain using IDDS. Case Series: This is a series of cases with 14 patients affected by chronic degenerative spinal disease using IDDS. Regarding age, an average of 81.57 (SD ± 7.44) was obtained, in addition, everybody reported being retired, having at least completed high school, with failure of conservative treatment, and none were smokers. Conclusion: Patients with chronic degenerative spine disease responded successfully to the IDDS treatment, obtaining pain relief in 100% of patients through the Numeric Rating Scale, which enabled a moderate quality of life on average and mild/moderate disability in most of the sample. Key words: Drug delivery systems, indicators of quality of life, low back pain

Cost-Effectiveness and Cost–Utility Analyses in Thailand of Continuous Intrathecal Morphine Infusion Compared with Conventional Therapy in Cancer Pain: A 10-year Multicenter Retrospective Study

ABSTRACT Background Because of the high initial cost of intrathecal drug delivery (ITDD) therapy, this study investigated the cost-effectiveness and cost–utility of ITDD therapy in refractory cancer pain management in Thailand over the past 10 years. Methods The retrospective study was conducted in patients with cancer pain who underwent ITDD therapy from January 2011 to 2021 at three university hospitals. Clinical outcomes included the numerical rating scale (NRS), Palliative Performance Scale, and the EQ-5D. The direct medical and nonmedical as well as indirect costs were also recorded. Cost-effectiveness and cost–utility analyses were performed comparing ITDD therapy with conventional therapy (extrapolated from costs of the same patient before ITDD therapy) from a societally oriented economic evaluation. Results Twenty patients (F:M: 10:10) aged 60 ± 15 years who underwent implantation of an intrathecal percutaneous port (IT port; n = 15) or programmable intrathecal pump (IT pump; n = 5) were included. The median survival time was 78 (interquartile range = 121–54) days after ITDD therapy. At 2-month follow-up, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)/pain reduction of an IT port (US$2065.36 (CA$2829.54)/2-point NRS reduction/lifetime) was lower than for patients with an IT pump (US$5479.26 (CA$7506.58)/2-point NRS reduction/lifetime) compared with continued conventional therapy. The ICER/quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained for an IT port compared with conventional treatment was US$93,999.31(CA$128,799.06)/QALY gained, which is above the cost-effectiveness threshold for Thailand. Conclusion The cost-effectiveness and cost–utility of IT port therapy for cancer pain was high relative to the cost of living in Thailand, above the cost-effectiveness threshold. Prospective cost analysis studies enrolling more patients with diverse cancers that investigate the benefit of early ITDD therapy with devices over a range of prices are warranted.

Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems for Cancer Pain Control: Insights on Current Contemporary Practices in the US

ObjectivesAmong patients with cancer with moderate to severe, intractable pain, intrathecal drug delivery using an intrathecal drug delivery system (IDDS) offers effective pain control. In this study, we evaluate the trends of IDDS therapy among patients with cancer, associated comorbidities, complications, and outcomes, using a large representative US administrative inpatient data base. Materials and MethodsThe Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) data base contains data from 48 states and the District of Columbia. The NIS was used to identify patients with cancer who underwent IDDS implantation between 2016 and 2019. Patients with cancer with intrathecal pumps for the treatment of chronic pain were identified using administrative codes. Baseline demographics, hospital characteristics, type of cancer associated with IDDS implantation, palliative care encounters, hospitalization costs, length of stay, and prevalence of bone pain were evaluated in the study. ResultsA total of 22,895 (0.32%) individuals with hospital admission for IDDS surgery were included for analysis among 7.06 million individuals with cancer in the final cohort. The IDDS cohort consisted of patients predominantly in the 65-to-79 years age group (40.49%), female sex (50.42%), and Caucasian ethnicity (75.82%). The top five cancers in patients receiving IDDS were lung (27.15%), colorectal (24.9%), liver (16.44%), bone (8.01%), and liver (7.99%) cancer. In addition, the length of stay was six days (interquartile range [IQR] four–nine days) and the median cost of hospital admission was $29,062 (IQR $19,413–$42,261) in the patients who received an IDDS. These factors were greater than those in patients without IDDS. ConclusionsA very few patients with cancer received IDDS in the US during the study period. Despite recommendations supporting its use, there are significant racial and socioeconomic disparities in IDDS use.

Role of Interventional Techniques in the Management of Cancer Pain

Pain is the major cause of morbidity in cancer patients. Interventional techniques should be considered for the management of pain that is refractory to traditional analgesics or when patients are unable to tolerate opioids. Interventional techniques are intended to stop pain signals through neural pathways from the periphery to the brain. This article deals with major interventional pain management techniques such as central neuraxial block, sympathetic block, peripheral nerve block, percutaneous cordotomy, percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, radiofrequency ablation, and cryoablation. Besides this, the role of radiotherapy and radionuclides in cancer pain have also been discussed. Central neuraxial block can effectively reduce pain while preventing opioid toxicity. It involves a percutaneous epidural or intrathecal catheter, an external syringe pump, or a fully implanted intrathecal drug delivery system to give medication. Sympathetic blocks such as celiac plexus and superior hypogastric block have role in patients with visceral abdominal pain. Peripheral nerve blocks may be employed when the distribution of somatic pain is restricted to a single nerve or plexus. Percutaneous cordotomy could be useful for any unilateral cancer pain below C4 dermatome. Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) treatment is used to alleviate axial back pain due to osteoporotic wedge fracture or malignant vertebral body disease. RFA and cryoablation techniques are now widely used for back pain due to osteoporotic and malignant vertebral collapse that are resistant to conservative treatment. External beam radiotherapy and radionuclides are useful in relieving cancer pain due to bone metastasis. This article aims at summarizing the indications, mechanisms, drug agents, contraindications, and complications of interventional pain management techniques that may offer benefits to patients coping with cancer and its terrible symptoms. Even though there is some risk involved with the techniques discussed in this article, the advantages of reduced pain and enhanced quality of life usually outweigh the risk.