Intrasexual Contests Research Articles

SEXUAL SELECTION AND MALE CHARACTERISTICS IN THE BLUEHEAD WRASSE, THALASSOMA BIFASCIATUM: MATING SITE ACQUISITION, MATING SITE DEFENSE, AND FEMALE CHOICE.

Through a series of replacement experiments with the bluehead wrasse, Thalassoma bifasciatum, we have identified male morphological characteristics that appear to be under phenotypic sexual selection. We were particularly interested in whether the various sources of sexual selection (male-male competition for unoccupied mating sites, defense of mating sites against small males, and female choice of males) were (1) independently associated with different phenotypic characteristics; (2) jointly affected the same characteristic in the same way; or (3) jointly affected the same characteristic in an antagonistic fashion. We replaced the resident large, brightly colored Terminal Phase (TP) males on a reef with the same number of TP males from other reefs. When transplanted, these males contest with each other to take over mating sites. The transplanted group of males were then scored for three components of fitness: (1) the quality of the site obtained through competition with other large males; (2) the male's ability to defend arriving females from small intruding males; and (3) changes in female visits to the site once the new male takes over. The first and second components are part of intrasexual selection; the third represents intersexual selection. We measured the opportunity for selection by partitioning variance in mating success, and measured the direct effects of sexual selection by estimating the covariance between morphology and fitness components. Opportunities for selection: Because females generally remain faithful to particular mating sites, most (54%) of the explainable variation in male mating success is due to the acquisition of a particular mating territory, which is the outcome of competition among TP males. There was less variation in mating success due to shifts in site use by females and defense of females against the intrusions of smaller males, but all components were significant. Effects of selection: Success in male-male competition among TP males, estimated by the quality of the territory acquired, was positively associated with body length and the relative length of the pectoral fin. Success in territorial defense against small males was primarily related to body length, with lesser contributions from body depth and the area of a white band on the flank. Contribution to fitness through female choice of males was positively associated with white band area. In the two instances where a character was associated with two fitness components, the direction of selection was the same. While body length was positively associated with winning intrasexual contests, it was not correlated to any behavioral measures of aggression. Similarly, the white band associated with attractiveness was not correlated with any aspect of courtship or aggression. Parasite load was uncorrelated with other morphological characters, and did not appear to affect any aspect of sexual selection. There was no evidence for stabilizing selection or significant additional contributions from second-order effects to the fitness surfaces. Fitness functions calculated using cubic splines were generally linear except for body length, which appeared sigmoid in its effect on site acquisition ability; this same feature tended to plateau in its effect on site defense. Analyses of the interactions of selection gradients with reef or experiment indicated that the effect of particular male characters on estimates of fitness was generally homogeneous in both time and space.

SEXUAL DIMORPHISM, SEXUAL SELECTION, AND ADAPTATION IN POLYGENIC CHARACTERS.

Conspicuous sexual dimorphism is a feature of many species of higher animals. The genetic basis of variation in metrical characters, including that in sexual dimorphism between families or lines, is usually polygenic (Falconer, 1960; Frankham, 1968b; Wright, 1968, 1977; Bird and Schaffer, 1972; Ehrman and Parsons, 1976). Genetic experiments on mice, birds and Drosophila flies indicate that artificial selection practiced on a character of one sex causes not only a direct response of the character in the selected sex, but also a correlated response of the homologous character, if any, in the opposite sex (Shaklee et al., 1952; Harrison, 1953; Korkman, 1957; Becker et al., 1964; Eisen and Legates, 1966; Frankham, 1968a, 1968b; Eisen and Hanrahan, 1972). Such correlated selective responses are attributable to pleiotropy (and linkage) of genes affecting the characters of both sexes, that is, correlations between the additive effects of genes as expressed in males and females. The genetic correlation between homologous characters of the sexes is often quite high (op. cit.). As will be shown, this greatly restricts the rate of evolution of sexual dimorphism relative to that for the average phenotype of the two sexes. Sexual dimorphism may result from natural and/or sexual selection. Darwin (1874, Part 2) elucidated how natural selection operating differently on males and females arises from their distinctive roles in reproduction, or from competition between the sexes for resources such as food, leading to adaptive sexual dimorphism. He also reasoned that intrasexual contests for mates and intersexual mating preferences exert sexual selection, usually on the males, producing sexual dimorphism which is maladaptive with respect to natural selection. Comparisons within and between closely related species led Darwin to conclude that adult males typically are more modified than adult females or juveniles of either sex, but that females have often acquired male characters by transference. It was difficult for Darwin to believe that sex-limitation of characters could evolve by selection, but Fisher (1958, Ch. 6) outlined how divergent selection on the two sexes could accumulate genes with different effects in males and females, causing a character at first expressed equally in both sexes to become sexually dimorphic and finally sex-limited. The strength of sexual selection is enhanced by a polygamous mating system, but the possibility of sexual selection in monogamous systems of mating exists due to male competition for early-breeding females, and mate choice exercised by these females (Darwin, 1874; Fisher, 1958; O'Donald, 1977). Systems of mating are often thought to evolve in response to ecological pressures (reviewed by Selander, 1972; Brown, 1975; Emlen and Oring, 1977), although mating preferences may be self-reinforcing (Fisher, 1958; O'Donald, 1967, 1977; Lande, unpubl.). Darwin and Fisher described qualitative methods by which an observed sexual dimorphism could be attributed mainly to either natural or sexual selection. To assign natural selection as the primary cause requires ecological observations that males and females follow different ways of life and employ the dimorphic character(s) adaptively in their distinct modes of survival or reproduction. Darwin presented several such examples, mostly among the lower classes of animals. Selander (1972) 292