Intrarater Intraclass Correlation Coefficients Research Articles

Periocular Asymmetry Index in Caucasian Populations Using Three-dimensional Photogrammetry Assessment.

To quantitatively assess the periocular asymmetry and investigate its sex and age-related differences in a Caucasian population using three-dimensional (3D) stereophotogrammetry. Standardized 3D photos of the periocular region of 301 Caucasians were taken using the VECTRA M3 3D Imaging System. Standardized landmarks were positioned, and data measurements in the periocular region were obtained from these images using VAM software and assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for reliability. Absolute differences and asymmetry index between the right and the left periocular region were calculated with a focus on gender and age-related differences. Fissure height asymmetry was positively correlated with age (p < 0.01). Furthermore, reflex distance asymmetry was positively correlated with age in the elderly group (p < 0.05). Absolute differences of upper eyelid crease were 0.65 ± 0.79 mm for females and 0.90 ± 0.94 mm for males (p < 0.05). In the elderly group, the absolute differences of reflex distance were 0.664 ± 0.471 mm for males and 0.470 ± 0.408 mm for females (p < 0.05), while the absolute differences of fissure height were 0.619 ± 0.469 mm and 0.436 ± 0.372 mm, respectively (p < 0.05). All measurements had an inter-rater ICC and intra-rater ICC between 0.761 and 0.957. Periocular asymmetry is more prominent in older and male people. 3D photogrammetry is a reliable tool to detect periocular asymmetry and might provide an accurate and effective reference for periocular cosmetic, plastic, and reconstructive surgery in the clinical routine. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors. www.springer.com/00266 .

Measurement properties of the falls efficacy scale in patients on hemodialysis

BackgroundThe measurement properties of the falls efficacy scale have not been evaluated in patients on hemodialysis. This study determined the inter- and intrarater reliability, standard error of measurement, minimal detectable change, and limits of agreements of the falls efficacy scale in patients on hemodialysis.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted with 65 patients (57.5 ± 13.9 years, 63.1% male) on hemodialysis. The fear of falling was assessed by two previously trained raters using the falls efficacy scale. The intraclass correlation coefficient, standard error of measurement, minimal detectable change, and Bland–Altman plot were calculated to assess the inter- and intrarater reliability of the falls efficacy scale.ResultsThe interrater intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.91, and the intrarater intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.78, representing excellent interrater and good intrarater reliability. The standard error of measurement for inter- and intrarater assessments were 2.99 and 4.46, and the minimal detectable change for inter- and intrarater assessments were 9.26 and 12.33, respectively. The interrater mean difference score was 0.26 (95% limits of agreement: − 8.01 to 8.53), and the intrarater mean difference score was − 1.06 (95% limits of agreement: − 13.39 to 11.27).ConclusionIn patients on hemodialysis, the falls efficacy scale showed excellent and good inter- and intrarater reliability, respectively. Additionally, standard error of measurement, minimal detectable change, and limits of agreements of the falls efficacy scale score were satisfactory.

Deep-learning reconstructed lumbar spine 3D MRI for surgical planning: pedicle screw placement and geometric measurements compared to CT.

To test equivalency of deep-learning 3D lumbar spine MRI with "CT-like" contrast to CT for virtual pedicle screw planning and geometric measurements in robotic-navigated spinal surgery. Between December 2021 and June 2022, 16 patients referred for spinal fusion and decompression surgery with pre-operative CT and 3D MRI were retrospectively assessed. Pedicle screws were virtually placed on lumbar (L1-L5) and sacral (S1) vertebrae by three spine surgeons, and metrics (lateral deviation, axial/sagittal angles) were collected. Vertebral body length/width (VL/VW) and pedicle height/width (PH/PW) were measured at L1-L5 by three radiologists. Analysis included equivalency testing using the 95% confidence interval (CI), a margin of ± 1mm (± 2.08° for angles), and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs). Across all vertebral levels, both combined and separately, equivalency between CT and MRI was proven for all pedicle screw metrics and geometric measurements, except for VL at L1 (mean difference: - 0.64mm; [95%CI - 1.05, - 0.24]), L2 (- 0.65mm; [95%CI - 1.11, - 0.20]),and L4 (- 0.78mm; [95%CI - 1.11, - 0.46]). Inter- and intra-rater ICC for screw metrics across all vertebral levels combined ranged from 0.68 to 0.91 and 0.89-0.98 for CT, and from 0.62 to 0.92 and 0.81-0.97 for MRI, respectively. Inter- and intra-rater ICC for geometric measurements ranged from 0.60 to 0.95 and 0.84-0.97 for CT, and 0.61-0.95 and 0.93-0.98 for MRI, respectively. Deep-learning 3D MRI facilitates equivalent virtual pedicle screw placements and geometric assessments for most lumbar vertebrae, with the exception of vertebral body length at L1, L2, and L4, compared to CT for pre-operative planning in patients considered for robotic-navigated spine surgery.

Influence of chest wall conformation on reproducibility of main echocardiographic indices of left ventricular systolic function.

The possible influence of chest wall conformation, as noninvasively assessed by Modified Haller Index (MHI, the ratio of chest transverse diameter over the distance between sternum and spine), on reproducibility of both left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) has never been previously investigated. Two equal groups of healthy individuals, matched by age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors and categorized according to MHI in those with concave-shaped chest wall (MHI>2.5) and those with normal chest shape (MHI≤2.5), who underwent transthoracic echocardiography implemented with echocardiographic deformation imaging between June 2018 and May 2019, were retrospectively analyzed. LVEF and GLS were measured twice by the two echocardiographers in a double blinded manner. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs), bias and limits of agreement determined with Bland-Altman analysis were calculated for repeated measurements of both LVEF and GLS. Thirty-four healthy individuals with MHI>2.5 (54.9±6.4 years, 58.8% females) and 34 matched controls with MHI≤2.5 (52.5±8.1 years, 50% females) were separately analyzed. In comparison to MHI≤2.5 group, the MHI>2.5 group was found with significantly smaller cardiac chambers and significantly lower GLS magnitude (-15.8±2.5 vs. -22.2±1.3%, P<0.001), despite similar LVEF (61.3±6.4 vs. 61.1±3.6%, P=0.87). In the MHI>2.5 group, intra-rater and inter-rater ICCs were ≤0.5 for both LVEF and LV-GLS, whereas in the MHI≤2.5 group intra-rater and inter-rater ICCs values indicated good reliability for LVEF and excellent reliability for GLS. The greatest bias and largest limits of agreement were detected for LVEF assessment (bias ranging from -1.09 to 2.94%, with the 95% limits of agreement ranging from -13.9 to 21.3%) in individuals with MHI>2.5. On the other hand, the smallest bias and narrowest limits of agreement were obtained for GLS measurement (bias ranging from -0.26 to 0.09%, with the 95% limits of agreement ranging from -1.4 to 1.4%) in participants with normal chest wall conformation (MHI≤2.5). The test reliability of LVEF and GLS is strongly influenced by the chest wall conformation. MHI might represent an innovative approach for selecting the best echocardiographic method for LV systolic function estimation in the individual case.

Measuring Ultrasonographic Thickness of the Achilles Tendon Insertion Is Less Reliable Than the Midportion in Healthy Tendons and Patients With Tendinopathy.

Ultrasound is the preferred imaging method in the diagnostic process of Achilles tendinopathy (AT). Ultrasound tissue characterization (UTC) is a frequently used, standardized and valid method to assess tendon geometry in AT patients. It is unknown whether UTC is reliable for measuring Achilles tendon thickness. The aim of the study was to assess intra- and inter-rater reliability of Achilles tendon thickness measurements using UTC in both asymptomatic individuals and patients with AT, and to evaluate if the reliability of thickness measurements differs between the midportion and insertional area. Exactly 50 patients with AT and 50 asymptomatic individuals were included. Using the conventional US and standardized UTC procedure maximum thickness was measured in the midportion and insertion region. To determine inter- and intra-rater reliabilities, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used. The ICC values for inter- and intra-rater reliability were classified as "excellent," for the AT group (0.93 [95% CI: 0.88-0.96] and 0.95 [0.92-0.97]) and asymptomatic participants (0.91 [0.87-0.94] and 0.94 [0.92-0.96]). The reliability of measuring tendon thickness in the midportion region was "excellent," with both inter-rater (0.97 [0.95-0.98]) and intra-rater (0.98 [0.96-0.99]) ICC values indicating high levels of agreement. In the insertional region, ICC values for inter-rater (0.79 [0.69-0.87]) and intra-rater (0.89 [0.84-0.93]) reliability were "moderate to good." We showed excellent reliability for measuring the US thickness of the midportion and good reliability of measuring the insertional region in patients with AT. Significantly lower ICCs were observed for the reliability of thickness measurements in the insertional region when compared with the midportion.

Lung ultrasound score in dogs and cats: A reliability study.

Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a noninvasive tool for examining respiratory distress patients. The lung ultrasound score (LUSS) can be used to quantify and monitor lung aeration loss with good reliability. Assess the reliability of a new LUSS among raters with different levels of experience and determine how well the same raters agree on identifying patterns of LUS abnormalities. Forty LUS examinations of dogs and cats and 320 videos were reviewed from a digital database. Retrospective reliability study with post hoc analysis. Protocolized LUS were randomly selected; intrarater and interrater reliability of the LUSS and pattern recognition agreement among 4 raters with different levels of experience in LUS were tested. The intrarater intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) single measurement, absolute agreement, and 2-way mixed effects model was 0.967 for the high-experience rater (H-Exp), 0.963 and 0.952 for the medium-experience raters (M-Exp-1; M-Exp-2), and 0.950 for the low-experience rater (L-Exp). The interrater ICC average measurement, absolute agreement, and 2-way random effects model among the observers was 0.980. The Fleiss' kappa (k) values showed almost perfect agreement (k = 1) among raters in identifying pleural effusion and translobar tissue-like pattern, strong agreement for A-lines (k = 0.881) and B-lines (k = 0.806), moderate agreement (k = 0.693) for subpleural loss of aeration, and weak agreement (k = 0.474) for irregularities of the pleural line. Our results indicate excellent intra- and interrater reliability for LUS scoring and pattern identification, providing a foundation for the use of the LUSS in emergency medicine and intensive care.

Validity and reliability of a new hip flexor muscles flexibility assessment tool: The reactive hip flexor (RHF) test

BackgroundThe modified Thomas test is the most used and most reliable test to assess the hip flexors’ flexibility. However it does not evaluate the interaction of both legs. The objective of this study is to propose a new assessment tool for hip flexor flexibility, the Reactive Hip Flexion (RHF) Test. MethodsAn observational, intra-test, and test-retest study with repeated measures was carried out with the aim of assessing the validity and reliability of the RHF Test. The participants were males and females aged between 18 and 35 years old who had a training schedule of at least 2 days a week, without a musculoskeletal lower limb or lumbopelvic pathology. The reliability of the test was examined using the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) by a two-way random model to establish inter-rater reliability and a two-way mixed model to assess intra-rater reliability. The precision was measured by the standard error of measurement (SEM). In addition, the minimum detectable change (MDC95%) was calculated. ResultsTwenty-six participants (52 hips) (47% female) completed the study. No correlations were observed between anthropometric variables and RHF peak force or active knee extension (AKE) measurements. There was an excellent intra-rater and inter-rater ICC in the hip flexors’ reactive peak force and the AKE measurements, with a low SEM. ConclusionsThis study demonstrated that the proposed RHF test technique is valid and reliable when used in healthy youth population.

Feasibility of Cerebellar Measurements with Phased Array Sonography through the Anterior Fontanelle in Comparison to MRI.

Cerebral sonography (CS) through the anterior fontanelle is a neonatal brain imaging method that has become an integral part of modern neonatal bedside care for both screening and diagnostic purposes. Premature infants with cognitive delay have a reduction in cerebellar size at term corrected age on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We aimed to determine the level of agreement between postnatal MRI and CS for cerebellar biometry and to determine the level of agreement within one and between different examiners. Cerebellar sonography and MRI measurements of the cerebellum from 30 term infants was assessed by Bland-Altman plots. Measurements between both modalities were compared using Wilcoxon's signed rank test. A p-value < 0.01 was considered statistically significant. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for intra- and interrater reliabilities of CS measurements were calculated. There was no statistically significant difference between CS and MRI for linear measurements, but the measurements of perimeter and surface area differed significantly between the two techniques. There was a systematic bias between both modalities for most measurements except for anterior-posterior (AP) width and vermis height (VH). For measurements that were not statistically different from MRI, we found excellent intrarater ICC for the AP width, VH, and cerebellar width. The interrater ICC was excellent for the AP width and VH, but poor for the transverse cerebellar width. With a strict imaging protocol, cerebellar measurements of the AP width and the VH can be used as an alternative to MRI for diagnostic-screening purposes in a neonatal department where multiple clinicians perform bedside CS. · Abnormal cerebellar growth and injuries affect neurodevelopmental outcome.. · Cerebral sonography through the anterior fontanelle is used for bedside imaging.. · Postnatal sonographic cerebellar measurements are not validated against MRI.. · Measuring vermis height and anterior-posterior width are reliable.. · Measuring transverse cerebellar width through anterior fontanelle is unreliable..

Reliability of Ultrasound Measurement of Plantar Fascia Thickness: A Systematic Review.

Because ultrasound measurement of plantar fascia thickness is widely used in the diagnosis and evaluation of plantar fasciitis, it is important to understand and minimize the errors that occur with this measurement. The aim of this systematic review was to identify and synthesize studies reporting on intrarater and interrater reliability of ultrasound measurement of plantar fascia thickness. After comprehensive searches in the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases, 11 studies involving 238 healthy participants and 68 patients with pathologic foot disorders were included. Seven of 11 studies revealed a low risk of bias. Most of the studies reported good to excellent intrarater and interrater reliability for ultrasound measurement of plantar fascia thickness (intrarater intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.77-0.98; interrater ICC, 0.76-0.98). In addition, two studies on intrarater reliability and one study on interrater reliability showed moderate reliability (ICCs, 0.65, 0.67, and 0.59, respectively). Overall, the standard error of measurement was less than 5% and did not exceed 7%. The findings of this review suggest that ultrasound measurement of plantar fascia thickness is reliable in terms of both relative and absolute reliability. Reliability can be optimized by using the average of multiple measurements and an experienced operator.

Intra- and inter-rater reliability, agreement, and minimal detectable change of the handheld dynamometer in individuals with symptomatic hip osteoarthritis.

The handheld dynamometer has been validated to measure muscle strength in different muscle groups. However, to date, it has not been tested in individuals who experience pain induced by hip osteoarthritis. The current study aimed to evaluate the intra- and inter-rater reliability, agreement, and minimal detectable change of the Lafayette handheld dynamometer, model 1165, to assess the peak force (Pk) and average peak force (Af) of hip muscles in individuals with symptomatic hip osteoarthritis. Twenty participants with hip osteoarthritis (mean ± SD age: 58.7±15.3 years; body mass index: 28.8±4.2 kg/m2) and pain intensity on the Visual Analogue Scale ≥ 4 (8.05±1.2) were recruited to participate in this study. Pk and Af of hip flexors (seated position), abductors and adductors (supine position), and extensors (prone position) were collected in a single day by two independent raters, each one obtaining test and retest in randomly ordered separate sessions. The intra-rater intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was classified as good (>0.75) or excellent (≥0.90) for all muscle groups and all inter-rater ICCs were classified as excellent. Rater A had a lower standard error of measurement compared to rater B, ranging from 0.15 to 0.58 kilogram-force (Kgf) compared with 0.34 to 1.25 kg, respectively. However, the inter-rater comparison showed a minimal detectable change (MDC) of < 10% for all Pk and Af measures for hip adductors and extensors. Finally, the inter-rater Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated good agreement for abductors, adductors, and extensors. Despite pain and dysfunction related to hip osteoarthritis, the mean of two measures using a handheld dynamometer was shown to be a reliable tool to assess hip muscle strength, with good to excellent intra- and inter-rater ICCs, satisfactory agreement, and small values for MDC.

The Sacro-femoral-pubic Angle Is Unreliable to Estimate Pelvic Tilt: A Meta-analysis.

The accurate measurement of pelvic tilt is critical in hip and spine surgery. A sagittal pelvic radiograph is most often used to measure pelvic tilt, but this radiograph is not always routinely obtained and does not always allow the measurement of pelvic tilt because of problems with image quality or patient characteristics (such as high BMI or the presence of a spinal deformity). Although a number of recent studies have explored the correlation between pelvic tilt and the sacro-femoral-pubic angle using AP radiographs (SFP method), which aimed to estimate pelvic tilt without a sagittal radiograph, disagreement remains about whether the SFP method is sufficiently valid and reproducible for clinical use. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the correlation between SFP and pelvic tilt in the following groups: (1) overall cohort, (2) male and female cohort, and (3) skeletally mature and immature cohorts (young and adult groups, defined as patients older or younger than 20 years). Additionally, we assessed (4) the errors of SFP-estimated pelvic tilt angles and determined (5) measurement reproducibility using the intraclass correlation coefficient. This meta-analysis was reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (record ID: CRD42022315673). PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were screened in July 2022. The following keywords were used: sacral femoral pubic, sacro femoral pubic, or SFP. The exclusion criteria were nonresearch articles such as commentaries or letters and studies that only investigated relative pelvic tilt rather than absolute pelvic tilt. Although the included studies had different patient recruitment strategies, study quality-wise, they all used an adequate amount of radiographs for landmark annotation and applied a correlation analysis for the relationship between the SFP angle and pelvic tilt. Thus, no risk of bias was found. Participant differences were mitigated via subgroup and sensitivity analyses to remove outliers. Publication bias was assessed using the p value of a two-tailed Egger regression test for the asymmetry of funnel plots, as well as the Duval and Tweedie trim and fill method for potential missing publications to impute true correlations. The extracted correlation coefficients r were pooled using the Fisher Z transformation with a significance level of 0.05. Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis, totaling 1247 patients. Four studies were used in the sex-controlled subgroup analysis (312 male and 460 female patients), and all nine studies were included in the age-controlled subgroup analysis (627 adults and 620 young patients). Moreover, a sex-controlled subgroup analysis was conducted in two studies with only young cohorts (190 young male patients and 220 young female patients). The overall pooled correlation coefficient between SFP and pelvic tilt was 0.61, with high interstudy heterogeneity (I 2 = 76%); a correlation coefficient of 0.61 is too low for most clinical applications. The subgroup analysis showed that the female group had a higher correlation coefficient than the male group did (0.72 versus 0.65; p = 0.03), and the adult group had a higher correlation coefficient than the young group (0.70 versus 0.56; p < 0.01). Three studies reported erroneous information about the measured pelvic tilt and calculated pelvic tilt from the SFP angle. The mean absolute error was 4.6° ± 4.5°; in one study, 78% of patients (39 of 50) were within 5° of error, and in another study, the median absolute error was 5.8º, with the highest error at 28.8° (50 female Asian patients). The intrarater intraclass correlation coefficients ranged between 0.87 and 0.97 for the SFP angle and between 0.89 and 0.92 for the pelvic tilt angle, and the interrater intraclass correlation coefficients ranged between 0.84 and 1.00 for the SFP angle and 0.76 and 0.98 for the pelvic tilt angle. However, large confidence intervals were identified, suggesting considerable uncertainty in measurement at the individual radiograph level. This meta-analysis of the best-available evidence on this topic found the SFP method to be unreliable to extrapolate sagittal pelvic tilt in any patient group, and it was especially unreliable in the young male group (defined as patients younger than age 20 years). Correlation coefficients generally were too low for clinical use, but we remind readers that even a high correlation coefficient does not alone justify clinical application of a metric such as this, unless further subgroup analyses find low error and low heterogeneity, which was not the case here. Further ethnicity-segregated subgroup analyses with age, sex, and diagnosis controls could be useful in the future to determine whether there are some subgroups in which the SFP method is useful. Level III, diagnostic study.

Reliability of a new computerized equinometer based on Silfverskiöld test to measure gastrocnemius tightness.

Several tools exist to measure tightness of the gastrocnemius muscles; however, few of them are reliable enough to be used routinely in the clinic. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the intra- and inter-rater reliability of a new equinometer. The secondary objective was to determine the load to apply on the plantar surface of the metatarsal heads to achieve the highest reliability when measuring gastrocnemius tightness. The equinometer consisted of a goniometer and an electronic dynamometer, hooked up to a computer. Three raters carried out three trials of passive dorsiflexion by applying controlled pressure to the metatarsal heads of both ankles in 29 healthy subjects under two experimental conditions: knee extended (KE) and knee flexed at 30 degrees (KF). The equinometer continuously recorded the ankle dorsiflexion values (in °) corresponding to each 1 N interval of plantar pressure between 4 N and 20 N. The intra- and inter-rater reliability of the ankle dorsiflexion were evaluated through the intra-class correlation (ICC) coefficients in each of the pressure intervals. The intra-rater ICC in KE and KF was between 0.84 and 0.98. The inter-rater ICC in KE and KF was between 0.59 and 0.92. The pressure interval between 14 N and 15 N had the highest intra-rater (ICC = 1) and inter-rater reliability (0.87≤ICC≤0.99). A more refined analysis of this interval found that a load of 14.5 N yielded the best reliability. This compact equinometer has excellent intra-rater reliability and moderate to good inter-rater reliability. Since this reliability is optimal in the 14-15 N range, this load should be used going forward in clinical practice, especially when aiming to define a pathological threshold for tightness of the gastrocnemius muscles.

Non-Expert Markings of Active Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease Photographs: Optimal Metrics of Training Effects.

Lack of reliable measures of cutaneous chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) remains a significant challenge. Non-expert assistance in marking photographs of active disease could aid the development of automated segmentation algorithms, but validated metrics to evaluate training effects are lacking. We studied absolute and relative error of marked body surface area (BSA), redness, and the Dice index as potential metrics of non-expert improvement. Three non-experts underwent an extensive training program led by a board-certified dermatologist to mark cGVHD in photographs. At the end of the 4-month training, the dermatologist confirmed that each trainee had learned to accurately mark cGVHD. The trainees' inter- and intra-rater intraclass correlation coefficient estimates were "substantial" to "almost perfect" for both BSA and total redness. For fifteen 3D photos of patients with cGVHD, the trainees' median absolute (relative) BSA error compared to expert marking dropped from 20 cm2 (29%) pre-training to 14 cm2 (24%) post-training. Total redness error decreased from 122 a*·cm2 (26%) to 95 a*·cm2 (21%). By contrast, median Dice index did not reflect improvement (0.76 to 0.75). Both absolute and relative BSA and redness errors similarly and stably reflected improvements from this training program, which the Dice index failed to capture.

Reliability of Radiographic Imaging Characteristics for Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Capitellum

Background: A primary challenge in the treatment of capitellar osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) is accurate imaging assessment. Radiographic classification consensus is not available in the current literature, and correlation of radiographs with lesion stability and resultant best treatment is lacking. Purpose: To determine the inter- and intrarater reliability of the presence or absence and common radiographic characteristics of capitellar OCD lesions. Study Design: Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Anteroposterior, lateral, and oblique radiographs for 29 cases were reviewed by 7 orthopaedic surgeons. Images were assessed for elbow anthropometry and morphology, OCD presence, lesion characteristics, the presence of progeny bone and progeny features, and radial head abnormalities. Intra- and interrater reliability was assessed using Fleiss and Cohen kappa for nominal variables and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for continuous variables. Results: Surgeons demonstrated substantial to excellent inter- and intrarater reliability when assessing elbow characteristics: anthropometric (interrater ICC, 0.94-0.99; intrarater ICC, 0.82-0.96) and morphologic (Fleiss, 0.61-0.76; Cohen, 0.68). When the OCD lesion was assessed, fair to moderate interrater agreement was found for classifying the absence or presence of a lesion (Fleiss, 0.28-0.46) and the location of the OCD (Fleiss, 0.24-0.52), poor agreement for assessing the contour of the lesion (Fleiss, 0.00-0.09), and excellent agreement for measuring the size of the lesion (ICC, 0.82-0.94). Poor to fair interrater agreement was found for radial head abnormalities (Fleiss, 0.00-0.27). Progeny bone visualization and fragmentation demonstrated moderate interrater agreement (Fleiss, 0.43-0.47) where displacement of the bone demonstrated poor interrater agreement (Fleiss, 0.11-0.16). Intrarater agreement for OCD lesion characteristics, progeny bone visualization, and progeny bone features was moderate to excellent. Conclusion: Given only the fair to moderate agreement among raters for identifying OCD on radiographs, this imaging modality may not serve as a dependable screening tool in isolation. Additional imaging should be obtained if the clinical presentation suggests capitellar OCD and a definitive diagnosis is not possible with radiographs. However, clinicians can reliability measure the size of radiographically apparent OCD, suggesting that radiographs may serve as an appropriate imaging modality for follow-up care.

Development of the Auburn Induction Scale for evaluating induction quality in dogs

ObjectiveTo develop and begin establishing evidence for validity of an instrument to assess the quality of induction in dogs. Study designCross-sectional survey and video scoring. Animals and populationA total of 51 veterinary anesthesia personnel, four board-certified anesthesiologists and videos of induction of anesthesia in 18 dogs. MethodsIn Part 1, an online survey was sent to veterinary anesthesia personnel to solicit expressions and words that they associate with induction of anesthesia. These expressions were evaluated by four anesthesiologists to create a composite scale (Auburn Induction Scale). In Part 2, 18 videos were reviewed by the same four anesthesiologists on two separate occasions. The videos were scored using the Auburn Induction Scale, a simple descriptive scale (SDS) and a visual analog scale (VAS). Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability was measured using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Significance was set at p < 0.05. ResultsThe survey yielded 51 responses that were condensed into 133 expressions. The four anesthesiologists created 18 items incorporating the 133 expressions. The mean ± standard deviation intra-rater reliability ICC was 0.81 ± 0.08 for the Auburn Induction Scale, 0.71 ± 0.02 for the SDS and 0.71 ± 0.08 for the VAS for all raters. The mean ± standard deviation inter-rater reliability ICC was 0.69 ± 0.04 for the Auburn Induction Scale, 0.61 ± 0.05 for the SDS and 0.60 ± 0.06 for the VAS. Conclusions and clinical relevanceIn a research setting, widespread use of this scale may be helpful in increasing the accuracy of data and improving agreement between studies assessing induction of anesthesia in dogs. The results of this study have yielded a composite scale that is more reliable between and among raters than a unidimensional scale.

Reliability of point-of-care ultrasound for measuring quadriceps femoris muscle thickness.

Point-of-care ultrasound can be used to assess muscle thickness. However, its reliability has not been fully evaluated. This study aimed to assess the intrarater and inter-rater reliability of point-of-care ultrasound for the estimation of quadriceps and rectus femoris thickness in patients from a rehabilitation setting. This is a cross-sectional study. This study was conducted at the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation of a tertiary care hospital. Twenty-nine inpatients consecutively selected after admission. Four observers, two trained and two untrained, used point-of-care ultrasound to measure quadriceps femoris and rectus femoris thickness. Each observer performed two measurements followed by a second set of two measurements three hours later. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were then calculated. Both intrarater and inter-rater ICC were higher than 0.888 for both quadriceps and rectus femoris measurements. Reliability was highest when ICC were calculated based on the average of two measurements, with the intrarater ICC being of 0.956 (95% CI: 0.937-0.970) for rectus femoris and of 0.966 (95% CI: 0.951-0.976) for quadriceps femoris; and with the inter-rater ICC being of 0.919 (95% CI: 0.863-0.957) for rectus femoris and 0.945 (95% CI: 0.907- 0.971) for quadriceps femoris. Trained and untrained observers did not have significantly different ICC values. These results suggest that point-of-care ultrasound is a reliable option to measure muscle thickness of knee extensors by the same or different observers. Measuring knee extensors thickness may aid to adequately modulate treatment choices in patients with disability. This study suggests that quadriceps and rectus femoris muscle thickness measured after a short training course, by either an experienced or inexperienced clinician, presents high reliability. Reliability can be increased if the average of two measurements is used. Besides being inexpensive and portable, point-of-care ultrasound is a reliable tool for measuring knee extensors' thickness, rendering it potentially adequate to be used in clinical practice.

Point-of-care application of diaphragmatic ultrasonography in the emergency department for the prediction of development of respiratory failure in community-acquired pneumonia: A pilot study

BackgroundEarly recognition of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) at risk of poor outcomes is crucial. However, there is no effective assessment tool for predicting the development of respiratory failure in patients with CAP. Diaphragmatic ultrasonography (DUS) is a novel technique developed for evaluating diaphragmatic function via measurements of the diaphragm thickening fraction (DTF) and diaphragm excursion (DE). This study evaluated the accuracy of DUS in predicting the development of respiratory failure in patients with CAP, as well as the feasibility of its use in the emergency department (ED) setting.Materials and methodsThis was a single-center prospective cohort study. We invited all patients with ED aged ≥ 20 years who were diagnosed with CAP of pneumonia severity index (PSI) SIe diagnosed with CAP of pneumonia severe with respiratory failure or septic shock were excluded. Two emergency physicians performed DUS to obtain DTF and DE measurements. Data were collected to calculate PSI, CURB-65 score, and Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society severity criteria. Study endpoints were taken at the development of respiratory failure or 30 days post-ED presentation. Continuous variables were analyzed using T-tests, while categorical variables were analyzed using chi-square tests. Further logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed to examine the ability to predict the development of respiratory failure. Intra- and inter-rater reliability was examined with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).ResultsIn this study, 13 of 50 patients with CAP enrolled developed respiratory failure. DTF was found to be an independent predictor (OR: 0.939, p = 0.0416). At the optimal cut-off point of 23.95%, DTF had 69.23% of sensitivity, 83.78% of specificity, 88.57% of negative predictive value, and 80% of accuracy. Intra- and inter-rater analysis demonstrated good consistency (intra-rater ICC 0.817, 0.789; inter-rater ICC 0.774, 0.781).ConclusionDUS assessment of DTF may reliably predict the development of respiratory failure in patients with CAP presenting to the ED. Patients with DTF > 23.95% may be considered for outpatient management.

Validationof the Spanish version of the Sunnybrook facial grading system.

The Sunnybrook facial grading system (SFGS) is one of the most widely employed tools to assess facial function. The present study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the Spanish language version of the SFGS. Forward-backward translation from the original English version was performed by fluent speakers of English and Spanish. Videos from 65 patients with facial paralysis (FP) were evaluated twice by five otolaryngologists with experience in FP evaluation. Internal consistency and intra- and inter-rater reliability were assessed. The House-Brackmann scale was used to display concurrent validity which was established by Spearman's rho correlation. The Cronbach's α score exceeded 0.70. The intra-rater intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was nearly perfect for the composite score (0.96-0.99), voluntary movements (0.97-0.99), and synkinesis (0.91-0.98), and important to almost perfect for symmetry at rest (0.79-0.97). In both evaluations, the inter-rater ICC was higher than 0.90 for the composite score (0.92-0.96) and voluntary movements (0.91-0.96) and slightly lower for symmetry at rest (0.66-0.85) and synkinesis (0.72-0.87). A strong negative correlation was found between the H-B scale and SFGS (Spearman's rho coefficient = -0.92, p < 0.001) in both evaluations. The Spanish version of the SFGS is a reliable and valuable instrument for the assessment of facial function in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with FP.

A new understanding of radiographic landmarks of the greater trochanter that indicate correct femoral rotation for measurement of femoral offset

ObjectivesTo establish and validate a novel method for aligning femoral rotation to accurately measure femoral offset for preoperative templating and component sizing, and to identify the physical location of two radiographic lines utilized in the described method.Materials and methodsCadaveric proximal femurs were skeletonized and mounted to a biaxial load frame. Two radiographic lines along the greater trochanter were identified fluoroscopically. The femurs were rotated, and images were taken when the lines appeared superimposed, then in 2-degree increments to 10° of internal and external rotation, and at 30°. Radiographic femoral offset was calculated at each angle, and the maximum and aligned offsets were compared. Bone was removed until the radiographic lines disappeared, then a metal wire was inserted in place of the bone to confirm that the lines reappeared.ResultsThe physical locations of the radiographic landmarks were on the anterior and posterior aspects of the greater trochanter. The mean true femoral offset was 38.2 mm (range, 30.5–46.3 mm). The mean aligned femoral offset was 37.3 mm (range, 29.3–46.3 mm), a 2.4% underestimation. The mean angle between aligned and true offset was 3.6° of external rotation (range, 10°ER-8°IR). Intra-rater intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.991.ConclusionAlignment of the radiographic lines created by the anterior and posterior aspects of the greater trochanter is a reliable and accurate rotational positioning method for measuring true femoral offset when using plain films or fluoroscopy, which can aid surgeons with preoperative templating and intraoperative component placement for total hip arthroplasty.

Handheld dynamometer reliability to measure knee extension strength in rehabilitation patients-A cross-sectional study.

IntroductionThe Handheld Dynamometer (HHD) has the potential to overcome some of the logistic and economic limitations of isokinetic dynamometers for measuring knee extension muscle strength. However, its reliability has not been fully assessed. The purpose of this study is to measure intra and inter-rater reliability of HHD for knee extension strength in patients receiving rehabilitation treatment, as well as to understand in which conditions is the reliability higher.MethodsTwenty-nine patients admitted in an inpatient Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation unit were consecutively included in this cross-sectional study. Two experienced and two inexperienced physicians made two assessments of knee extension strength with HHD, separated by three hours. Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC), absolute differences between assessments, and correlations between strength and functional variables were calculated.ResultsIntra and inter-rater ICC were overall high (≥ 0.950 and 0.927, respectively). Higher values were found when average of two measurements were made for estimating intra-rater ICC (ICC = 0.978; 95%CI = 0.969–0.985) but not for inter-rater ICC. ICC were not statistically significantly different when calculated based on measurements performed by inexperienced physicians and experienced ones. There was a moderate correlation between strength and functional variables.ConclusionHandheld Dynamometer seems to be a reliable option to measure knee extension muscle strength, particularly when two measurements are performed and their average is reported.