P453 Background: CMV, EBV and Parvovirus (B19) status of transplant donors and recipients has important implications on post-transplantation antiviral therapy, morbidity, mortality, donor selection criteria and hospital stay. While relative risk for CMV serological positivity in patients with type 1 DM has been clearly established, no studies on CMV, EBV and B19 serological positivity have been reported. One patient who received a single islet cell infusion using a steroid free regimen at our institution developed B19 infection that led to severe anemia and graft failure. Immune Globulin (Gamimune) therapy was complicated by aseptic meningitis and conversion of immunosuppression failed to facilitate the clearance of the virus. This study compares the prevalence of positive CMV, EBV and B19 serology in type 1 diabetic patients listed for islet cell transplantation and tries to identify risk/protection factors for seropositivity in this group. Method: Serological status of CMV, EBV, and B19 was compared among type 1 diabetic patients screened for solitary islet cell transplantation at our institution. Age at onset of type 1 DM and time of screening, gender, HLA phenotype, ABO group, and auto-antibodies were investigated as risk factors. Results: CMV positivity was 39% in patients with type 1 diabetes (N=370), as compared to 98% for EBV (N=327; p<0.0001) and 64% for B19 (N=56; p<0.001). The mean age of patients was 40 +/-9.5 years, time of diabetes onset 14 +/-9.0 and duration 27 +/-10.4. Serostatus of CMV was not found to be significantly associated with serostatus of either EBV or B19 among these patients. CMV-negative patients were younger than CMV-positive patients at the time of screening (41.3 +/-9 vs. 45.3 +/-9 years; p<0.0001) and at the time of diabetes onset (13.6 +/- 8.5 vs. 15.7 +/- 10.4; p=0.03). The percentage of CMV positivity was higher in female than in male patients (69% vs. 62%; p=0.001). All other parameters studied had no significant impact on CMV, EBV and B19 positivity. Interestingly we have not observed CMV disease or infection despite positive donor to negative recipient combination in 22 of 29 subjects receiving intraportal islet infusions utilizing a steroid free regimen with daclizumab, sirolimus and sacrolimus in addition to gancyclovir or valgancyclovir prophylaxis for 90 days. Conclusions: These findings may suggest patients with type 1 diabetes either have factors that protect them from CMV primary infection, or are immunologically incompetent in their response to CMV infection and fail to produce detectable levels of anti-CMV antibodies. This peculiar characteristic is not observed within the same group of patients tested for EBV and B19 serology, demonstrating similar prevalence comparable to the general population. The discrepancy between CMV, EBV and B19 positivity in this group of potential transplant recipients and the donor population has important implications on tissue allocation as well as prophylactic/preemptive antiviral therapy in islet cell transplant recipients.
Read full abstract