It has been well documented in the literature that intra-abdominal space-occupying processes and enlarged intra-abdominal organs can displace the kidney in the same manner as do masses in retroperitoneal location (2, 6, 7, 17). Observations related to enlargement of the spleen (8, 10, 21), liver, and gallbladder (2, 15) have been reported in increasing numbers. Though the relative incidence of such displacement is less frequent than with retroperitoneal masses, it occurs more commonly than was believed previously. Also, it has been stated that tumor of the pancreas, which is a retroperitoneal structure, displaces the kidney only rarely (19). On the basis of these and related observations, there seems to be a general agreement that renal displacement cannot be used as a diagnostic sign for the differentiation between intra- and retroperitoneal masses (5, 22). Rotation commonly accompanies displacement of the kidneys and it may be the earliest manifestation of an abdominal space-occupying process. Except for rotation around the sagittal axis, which is easily recognized on the sagittal view, lateral pyelograms make the recognition of rotation easy; an excretory urogram in lateral projection may also be useful in this respect. Kidney Rotation as a Diagnostic Sign on Sagittal Urograms It is the purpose of this presentation to suggest that rotation of the kidneys with or without obvious displacement can be utilized in localization of abdominal masses. Emphasis will be placed on excretory urographic studies and on the value of sagittal (anteroposterior and postero-anterior) views. In excretory urography a lateral view is not ordinarily taken. If its indication is recognized during the procedure, it is commonly too late for adequate visualization; also, both the technic and interpretation may present some difficulties. The physical factors operating in rotation and displacement of the kidneys were found to be similar in the presence of both intraperitoneal and retroperitoneal masses, and there was no essential difference in this respect whether or not the mass was attached to the kidneys. Our diagnostic approach seeks to identify the direction of the space-occupying “force” and its effect on the position of the kidneys. The mechanism of rotation and its roentgenographic demonstration have been discussed in two previous papers and will not be presented here in detail (11, 12). For the purposes of the current study, masses are classified according to their topographic-anatomical relationship to the kidneys, as follows: (a) posterior or medial (or postero-medial); (b) anterior; (c) lateral; (d) proximal or distal. Masses Posterior or Medial (or Postero-Medial) to the Kidneys: Because of the oblique plane (with the hilus looking an-teromedially) in which the kidney is most commonly found, it seems more practical if masses posterior and medial to it are discussed together.
Read full abstract