This study explored the effects of four different surgical methods in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP). In this multicenter retrospective analysis of 359 patients, the surgical indices, the time taken for the serum human chorionic gonadotropin level to return to normal, the recovery time of menstruation, and the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions were comparatively analyzed. The clinical efficacies of various preoperative treatment methods to block the blood supply to CSP tissues and those of four different surgical methods to treat CSP, namely, curettage, hysteroscopic surgery, laparoscopic surgery, and vaginal surgery, were evaluated in this study. Hysteroscopic pregnancy tissue removal in patients with typeI CSP was found to be associated with low cost, rapid postoperative recovery, and a low incidence of postsurgical complications. Among patients with typeII-III CSP, the operation success rate (96.97% for typeII and 88.46% for typeIII) in those who underwent uterine artery embolization + curettage was lower than that in patients from the other groups (all 100%). Among patients with typeIII CSP who underwent transvaginal ligation of the descending uterine artery + hysteroscopic removal of the pregnancy tissues, three patients (12.5%) underwent hysteroscopic surgery under transumbilical single-port laparoscopic surveillance so as to avoid uterine perforation considering that the pregnancy tissue was only 1mm away from the uterine plasma membrane layer. Hysteroscopic surgery without pretreatment can be adopted for patients with typeI CSP. In contrast, patients with typeII and III CSP should be initially pretreated with vascular ligation to prevent intraoperative bleeding, followed by laparoscopic or vaginal surgery. Clinical Trial Registry Number ChiCTR2000040357.
Read full abstract