Calcification Of Intraocular Lenses Research Articles

Material Analysis and Optical Quality Assessment of Opacified Hydrophilic Acrylic Intraocular Lenses After Pars Plana Vitrectomy

Explanted hydrophilic intraocular lenses (IOLs) with clinically significant opacification after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) were assessed for material change and optical quality, in an invitro laboratory study. Retrospective observational case series. Ten opacified IOLs after PPV with intraocular gas injection were analyzed in a laboratory setting. Analyses included evaluation of patients' medical history, optical quality assessment, light microscopy, histologic staining, scanning electron microscopy, and energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy. In all 10 IOLs a thin layer of calcium phosphate that had accumulated underneath either the anterior or posterior optical surface in a central circular area of the IOL optic caused the opacification. The calcifications lead to deterioration of the modulation transfer function (MTF) across all spatial frequencies. PPV with instillation of gas into a pseudophakic eye with an acrylic hydrophilic lens seems to increase the risk for secondary calcification irrespective of the manufacturer. In these cases, IOL exchange is the only treatment option available. Since IOL exchange is associated with a high intraoperative complication rate, our results suggest to consider the risk of IOL calcification when implanting hydrophilic acrylic IOLs.

Topography, Wettability, and Electrostatic Charge Consist Major Surface Properties of Intraocular Lenses

ABSTRACTPurpose: To quantify potential relevant factors that affect the biocompatibility and functionality of intraocular lenses (IOLs) by analyzing the surface properties of various IOL materials.Methods: Eleven IOL models with the same dioptric power made by different manufacturers were studied. The IOLs were made of poly-methyl methacrylate (PMMA), hydrophobic acrylate, hydrophilic acrylate, and silicone. The IOL surface topography was evaluated using atomic force microscopy (AFM). Surface potential was measured by electric force microscopy (EFM). Surface wettability was assessed with the water contact angle using the sessile drop method.Results: The PMMA IOLs had statistically significant surface irregularities with the highest surface roughness values while the silicone and hydrophilic acrylic IOLs had the lowest values. Surface potentials on IOLs revealed that all IOL models made of PMMA had positive charge. The hydrophobic acrylic IOL had a significantly higher positive charge (6.2v ± 0.1v), while the hydrophobic acrylic with blue blocker exhibited negative charge. Negative charge was also observed on hydrophilic acrylic IOLs (–72mv ± 5mv) and silicone IOLs (–5.06v ± 0.02v). Contact angle values of PMMA IOLs ranged from 49° to 64°. Heparin modification resulted in significant reduction of the contact angle value. IOL models made of hydrophobic acrylate had contact angle values between 78° and 89°. The silicone IOL appeared to be significantly hydrophobic with the highest mean value of 107°.Conclusions: The variance of the parameters of surface roughness, contact angle, and electrostatic charge on the surfaces of PMMA, hydrophobic acrylic, hydrophilic acrylic, and silicone IOLs is useful to the interpretation of the differences in clinical behaviors of these materials. The negative surface charge of silicone and hydrophilic IOLs might account for the occurrence of IOL calcification.

Optical and material analysis of opacified hydrophilic intraocular lenses after explantation: a laboratory study.

BackgroundThe opacification of hydrophilic intraocular lenses (IOLs) is a very rare complication in terms of absolute numbers. We report on the analyses of opacified Euromaxx ALI313Y and ALI313 IOLs (Argonoptics, Germany) using light and scanning electron microscopy, X-ray spectroscopy and optical bench analysis.MethodsOpacified Euromaxx ALI313Y and ALI313 IOLs were explanted after patients presented with a decrease in visual acuity. The explants were sent to our laboratory and examined using light and scanning electron microscopy. The composition of the deposits was analysed using X-ray spectroscopy. The optical quality of the intraocular lens (IOL) was assessed using the OptiSpheric IOL PRO optical bench (Trioptics GmbH Wedel, Germany). Modulation transfer function (MTF) was measured at all spatial frequencies and United States Air Force (USAF) 1951 resolution target pictures were documented.ResultsMacroscopically, the entire optic was opacified in all IOLs. Light and scanning electron microscopy revealed numerous fine, granular, crystalline-like deposits, which were always distributed in a line parallel to the anterior and posterior surfaces of the IOLs. X-ray spectroscopy could prove the deposits consisted of Calcium and Phosphate. Measurements in the optical bench showed deterioration of MTF values at all spatial frequencies and the USAF target pictures demonstrated a significant reduction of brightness as well as resolution with the opacified IOLs.ConclusionsThe calcification of hydrophilic IOLs only occurs rarely. The exact chemical composition of the deposits can be assessed by means of X-ray spectroscopy. Optical quality analysis of the explanted Euromaxx ALI313Y and ALI313 IOLs showed significant reduction of MTF values, which was confirmed by USAF target pictures.

Pars plana vitrectomy for posterior surface calcification in a silicone intraocular lens in asteroid hyalosis - a report of mistaken identity?

Dear editor Mehta et al recently reported removal of dystrophic calcification on the posterior surface of a silicone intraocular lens (IOL) in a patient with asteroid hyalosis.1 In this case the authors used pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) to successfully remove calcified deposits. We have recently tried unsuccessfully to use PPV to treat an 86 year old patient with calcification of a silicone IOL in the presence of asteroid hyalosis. We chose to avoid IOL exchange due to a history of Fuchs endothelial dystrophy and glaucoma in the left eye, and a failed corneal graft in a rubeotic eye on the right. Our patient did not have an intact posterior capsule having been treated with Nd:YAG capsulotomy 2 years previously, before the calcification occurred. A 25 gauge pars plana vitrectomy was performed after attempting to remove the deposits unsuccessfully from the posterior surface of the IOL with Nd:YAG laser. It was felt that PPV would be less likely to cause corneal decompensation than IOL exchange. In contrast to the experience of Mehta et al1 we found that the vitrector was unable to effectively remove many of the calcified deposits even with high vacuum. Instead the use of microforceps and a silicone tipped flute were required to ‘polish’ the IOL deposits (see Supplementary Video). Although we were able to remove a significant amount of the calcification in this way, the results were ultimately disappointing due to smearing of the deposits which were found to be ‘putty-like’ in consistency. Although there was some improvement in the clarity of the IOL on retroillumination, the patient reported very limited improvement in vision (6/18 preoperatively to 6/12 immediately after surgery), and on transillumination the posterior surface was significantly smudged (Figure 1). Figure 1 Smudging of posterior surface of IOL on transillumination postoperatively. Mehta et al reported that initially their patient underwent an unsuccessful Nd:YAG capsulotomy, however it was not made clear whether the posterior capsule remained intact.1 It has previously been suggested that direct contact of the IOL with the vitreous cavity caused by Nd:YAG capsulotomy accelerates the deposition of calcification on silicone IOLs,2 and other authors of larger case series of this condition have reported it to be mostly found after initial Nd:YAG capsulotomy,3,4 although reports of dystrophic calcification in the presence of an intact capsule do exist.5 Given our experience, we are unclear whether the photo presented demonstrates typical fibrous capsular opacity, or calcification of the posterior capsule rather than a true case of dystrophic calcification of the IOL optic. We believe this is an important distinction to make since we feel that vitrectomy is only likely to be successful if the posterior capsule is intact. A similar case of this condition has been published recently by Ullman and Gupta.5 They also used vitrectomy to treat dystrophic calcification, but found it to be ineffective at removing established calcification on the posterior IOL surface on more than one occasion. They suggested using prophylactic PPV to treat dystrophic calcification at an early stage before symptoms become established. We believe that vitrectomy and surgical capsulectomy should be considered as an alternative to Nd:YAG capsulotomy where IOL calcification is not yet established. It is likely that opening a significantly calcified posterior capsule by Nd:YAG capsulotomy in the presence of asteroid hyalosis will lead to significant future IOL dystrophic calcification. In established calcification of a silicone IOL we feel that vitrectomy is of limited value and IOL exchange should remain the standard treatment.

Light scattering and light transmittance in a series of calcified single-piece hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses of the same design

To evaluate light scattering and light transmittance of Ioflex hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) explanted because of clinically significant opacification secondary to calcification. John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. Experimental study. Seven explanted and 8 control Ioflex IOLs were studied. Gross and light microscopy of all the IOLs were performed. Light scattering was measured with a Scheimpflug camera, and light transmittance was assessed with a spectrophotometer. Analyses were performed at room temperature in the hydrated state, and findings of the explanted and control IOLs were compared. Light scattering was 219.71 computer compatible tape (CCT) ± 2.62 (SD) for explanted IOLs and 4.75 ± 2.50 CCT for controls. The mean light transmittance in the visible light spectrum was 75.94% to 87.25% for explanted IOLs and 97.54% to 98.97% for controls. The most striking finding was variable degrees of light transmittance between 290 nm and 350 nm (ultraviolet-A and B radiation) in the explanted and control IOLs with expiration dates in 2009/2010 but 0% transmittance in this region in all controls with expiration dates in 2011/2012. Light scattering was extremely high and transmittance was significantly reduced in calcified IOLs. Differences in transmittance observed in the 290 to 350 nm region between IOLs with different expiration dates were related to use of different hydrophilic acrylic raw material suppliers in the manufacture of the IOLs, highlighting the complexity of IOL calcification investigations.

Intraocular Lens Calcification After Keratoplasty

To report calcification of intraocular lenses (IOLs) after various keratoplasty procedures. Clinical data of all cases with calcified IOLs after keratoplasty procedures were analyzed. A total of 6 explanted IOLs were analyzed with light microscopy before and after staining with 1% alizarin red and the von Kossa method. A total of 7 cases occurred after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty, 1 case after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty, and 2 cases after penetrating keratoplasty. Median time interval from keratoplasty to first notice of IOL opacification was 6.5 months (minimum 3 months, maximum 51 months). A total of 3 IOLs had been placed at the time of keratoplasty and 7 IOLs before keratoplasty. All affected IOLs were hydrophilic acrylic and comprised IOLs from at least 3 different polymer sources. Common clinical aspects were some amount of inflammation in the anterior chamber during the postoperative period and use of air at the end of surgery in 8 of the 10 cases. Histochemical analysis demonstrated the presence of fine granular deposits located within the very superficial optic material in all cases. The deposits stained positive for calcium with alizarin red and the von Kossa method. IOL calcification associated with keratoplasty in our series does not seem to be a problem related to a specific IOL model or polymer. The process of calcification may be mediated by inflammation, which also may be related to multiple injections of air into the anterior chamber.

Calcification in Hydrophilic Intraocular Lenses Associated With Injection of Intraocular Gas

To report a distinct type of calcification in hydrophilic intraocular lenses in complicated, traumatized eyes with a history of intraocular gas use. Observational case series. Three cases of hydrophilic intraocular lens (IOL) opacification confined to the pupillary area are reported from clinical practice in London, UK. Clinical details and analysis of the explanted intraocular lenses are provided with environmental scanning electron microscopy images and x-ray energy-dispersive spectroscopy results. All cases were associated with use of intraocular gas in complicated traumatized eyes, and had central areas of IOL opacification over the pupillary zone, confined to the anterior surface of the IOL. Analysis of the lenses showed the opacified areas to be composed of calcium and phosphate. The areas of opacification in all 3 hydrophilic IOLs were attributable to calcification. We postulate that intraocular gas use and the altered blood-aqueous barrier of these complicated traumatized eyes co-act to trigger secondary IOL calcification. Further experimental testing is needed to confirm this clinical association.

Experimental Investigation on Mechanism of Hydrophilic Acrylic Intraocular Lens Calcification

To construct a model simulating intraocular lens (IOL) opacification attributable to the formation of calcium phosphate deposits and to investigate the kinetics of deposit formation. Prospective laboratory investigation. Department of Ophthalmology, Medical School and Department of Chemical Engineering, Laboratory of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, University of Patras, Greece. Three hydrophilic acrylic IOLs (26% water content) were placed inside a 10-mL double-walled thermostated reactor simulating the anterior chamber. Simulated aqueous humor was injected continuously into the reactor using a pump with variable speed. The observation of IOLs was carried out in situ daily by optical microscopy. Scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive radiographic spectroscopy were used for the identification of the morphologic features and the composition of the deposits. The lenses were removed and inspected 5, 9, and 12 months after the initiation of the experiment. Investigation showed deposits of calcium phosphate crystallites in the interior of opacified IOLs. However, these deposits were not observed on the surface of the IOLs. In agreement with earlier reports by our group and in the literature, IOL opacification is the result of calcification. It is suggested that the surface hydroxyl groups of the polyacrylic polymeric components of the IOLs are capable of inducing surface nucleation and crystal growth of calcium phosphates. However, most important is the finding that the calcification of IOLs is initiated from their interior through the development of sufficiently high local supersaturation, realized through the diffusion of calcium and phosphate ions.

Spectroscopic study of explanted opacified hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses

To report a detailed spectroscopic analysis of explanted hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) that were removed because of postoperative opacification of the lens optic. Thirteen Hydroview H60M (Bausch & Lomb Surgical) IOLs were explanted from 13 different patients on average 56 months after phacoemulsification and IOL implantation. All patients had decreased visual acuity because of a fine granularity of the optical surface of the IOLs. The surface was investigated by gross, microscopic, histochemical and scanning electron microscopic analysis, and the elemental composition of the opacified IOLs was determined by X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF). The spectrograms were compared to three different originally packed and never-implanted hydrophilic acrylic IOLs. Light and scanning electron microscopy of the optical surface of explanted IOLs revealed multiple fine granular deposits varying in size and shape that were positive for alizarin red. XRF confirmed that the explanted IOLs contained not only the previously reported calcium and phosphorous (calcium apatite), chlorine, silicone, sodium, aluminum and magnesium but also iron, sulfur, potassium as well as lesser amounts of iodine, zinc, strontium and yttrium. This is the first spectroscopic analysis determining the content of more than 10 elements of explanted and originally packed never-implanted hydrophilic acrylic IOLs. The possible origin of the different elements obtained from the spectrograms and their implications are discussed.

Postoperative opacification of polymethylmethacrylateintraocular lens

Abstract Background: Opacification of ophthalmic devices has been previously reported in silicone scleral buckle, Molteno implant, and intraocular lens opacification. However, there is no report on polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) intraocular lens (IOL) calcification. Objective: Report the clinical feature, histopathologic and spectrophotometer analysis of opacified three-piece PMMA IOL. Method: A 60-year-old diabetic patient reported decreased visual acuity in her right eye, which had undergone phacoemulsification with PMMA IOL implantation. The ophthalmic examination revealed a white homogeneous opacification of posterior surface of the IOL. The explanted IOL was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive spectroscopy, and alizarin red staining. Results: The scanning electron microscope analysis showed granular deposits on posterior surface of the IOL. Using energy dispersive spectroscopy analysis, calcium and phosphate peaks were revealed, which was confirmed by positive for alizarin red staining. Conclusion: This case report provided evidence of PMMA IOL calcification caused by calcium and phosphate deposits. The possible etiologies were extrinsic and/or intrinsic factors.

Complications of foldable intraocular lenses requiring explantation or secondary intervention—2007 survey update

The tenth annual survey of complications associated with foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs) requiring explantation or secondary intervention was sent to members of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons. Preoperative data about visual acuity, patient signs and symptoms, and complications requiring IOL removal were evaluated. Complications were then tabulated for each of the following major foldable IOL groups: 1-piece (plate) silicone, 1-piece hydrophobic acrylic with haptics, 3-piece silicone, 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic, 3-piece hydrophilic acrylic (hydrogel), 3-piece unknown, multifocal acrylic, and multifocal silicone. One hundred forty-two surveys were returned for evaluation. Dislocation/decentration, incorrect IOL power, glare/optical aberrations, and IOL calcification were the most common reasons for removing foldable IOLs. Good surgical technique, accurate IOL power measurements, and high manufacturing standards for foldable IOL materials and designs are the most important factors in preventing complications.

Misdiagnosis of Hydrophilic Acrylic Intraocular Lens Optic Opacification: Report of 8 Cases with the MemoryLens

To report 8 patients with misdiagnosis of MemoryLens intraocular lens (IOL) late postoperative calcification and the resulting potentially avoidable procedures leading to secondary complications.Retrospective interventional case series.Eight patients with an opacified hydrophilic acrylic MemoryLens.Eight cases of MemoryLens IOL opacification that were originally misdiagnosed were reviewed. The following parameters were noted: baseline patient characteristics, time frame of IOL opacification, original misdiagnosis, subsequent surgical procedures, and postexplantation outcomes and complications. Two explanted lenses from this series were available for laboratory analyses. They underwent gross and light microscopic evaluation and scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS).Patient parameters noted above. The IOLs were examined for distribution, structure, and composition of the deposits causing opacification of their optic components.All 8 patients' IOLs were implanted between August 1999 and March 2000. Complaints of decreased visual function occurred 13 to 58 months after implantation. Half of the patients were initially diagnosed as having posterior capsular opacification and underwent neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser capsulotomy. The other half were initially diagnosed with some form of vitreous involvement and underwent vitrectomies. Six of the 8 patients underwent subsequent lens exchanges, with 3 of them having postexchange complications including endophthalmitis, cystoid macular edema, and retinal detachment. Scanning electron microscopy with EDS confirmed the presence of calcified deposits on the surface of the 2 explants available for analysis. The deposits also stained positive for calcium.Despite previous reports, misdiagnosis of MemoryLens IOL calcification leading to optic opacification still occurs. Not recognizing this process can lead to potentially avoidable surgical procedures and increased risk of complications after repeated interventions.

A New Classification of Calcification of Intraocular Lenses

To define and classify the major types of intraocular lens (IOL) calcification. Retrospective observational case series with clinicopathologic correlation. More than 400 IOLs explanted because of opacification. The authors reviewed the clinical information and histologic findings of all IOLs that had been explanted because of opacification or calcification of the IOLs accessioned in their laboratory between January 1999 and December 2004. The proposed mechanism that led to calcification of each IOL design. Three major types of calcification were identified: (1) primary calcification, (2) secondary calcification, and (3) false-positive calcification or pseudocalcification. The primary form refers to calcification that is inherent in the IOL, that is, is based on possible inadequate formulation of the polymer, fabrication of the IOL, or issues with its packaging process. The calcification presumably occurs in otherwise normal eyes and generally is not associated with preexisting diseases. The secondary form refers to deposition of calcium onto the surface of the IOL most likely the result of environmental circumstances (e.g., changes in the aqueous milieu surrounding the implanted IOL associated with preexisting or concurrent diseases or indeed any condition that has disrupted the blood-aqueous barrier). By definition, it is not related to any problem with the IOL itself. The false-positive or pseudocalcification refers to those cases in which other pathology is mistaken for calcification or false-positive staining for calcium occurs. When evaluating the pathogenesis and nature of IOL calcification in or on any given design, one should categorize it according to these types. Primary calcification is IOL related and the IOL should be withdrawn or modified to correct the problem. After the cause is identified and the lens is implanted again, patients should be followed up for up to 2 years to be sure the problem is alleviated. Secondary calcification is by definition not IOL related; it may occur with virtually all IOL designs implanted under various adverse circumstances. No IOL, hydrophilic or hydrophobic, is immune to secondary calcification. The false-positive form is recognized readily in the laboratory and this erroneous diagnosis is avoided.

Role of Silicon Contamination on Calcification of Hydrophilic Acrylic Intraocular Lenses

To verify the presence of the element silicon on hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) explanted because of calcification. Interventional case series with clinicopathological correlation. Twenty explanted IOLs with surface deposits (MemoryLens), and 20 with deposits mostly within their optic substance (SC60B-OUV and Aqua-Sense; 10 each) were used. After gross, microscopic, and histochemical analyses to confirm the presence of deposits, the lenses underwent scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS) for elemental composition, on the external surface of MemoryLens IOLs, and on the surface and internal substance of SC60B-OUV and Aqua-Sense IOLs. The weight percentage of the element silicon was obtained at the level of deposits, and at adjacent deposit-free areas in all lenses. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) coupled with EDS confirmed that the composition of the deposits was calcium/phosphate in all cases. The element silicon was found in all 40 lenses, on all areas analyzed. The silicon weight percentage was higher at the level of the deposits. The presence of aluminum on five MemoryLens IOLs, and in most of the SC60B-OUV and Aqua-Sense lenses might be related to scattering from the aluminum mounting stubs used for surface analyses. Silicone compounds have been implicated in the calcification of another hydrophilic acrylic design (Hydroview). They may also have a role in the calcification of other hydrophilic acrylic IOLs. Further investigation on the relationship between the presence of the element silicon and the silicone compounds found on calcified hydrophilic acrylic lenses is necessary.

Surface calcification of a 3-piece silicone intraocular lens in a patient with asteroid hyalosis: A clinicopathologic case report

To illustrate the laboratory findings in a patient with bilateral asteroid hyalosis who presented with calcified deposits on a 3-piece silicone intraocular lens (IOL). Observational case report. A 76-year-old diabetic woman underwent uneventful cataract surgery in 1994 with implantation of a silicone-optic polypropylene-haptic IOL in the left eye. A neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG) laser posterior capsulotomy was performed 2 years after cataract surgery, but persistent whitish deposits were observed on the posterior optic surface of the lens. Over the next 3 years, the opacification increased in the region corresponding to the capsulotomy. The IOL was explanted/exchanged. The right eye had cataract surgery in 1995. The acrylic lens implanted in this eye developed no opacities after 6 years. Gross, microscopic, and surface analyses of the explanted IOL. Gross and light microscopic analyses revealed the presence of confluent crustlike deposits on the central area of the posterior optic surface, as well as Nd:YAG pits. Individual spherules exhibiting a Maltese-cross pattern under polarizing light were also observed. Energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopic analyses demonstrated the composition of the confluent deposits to be similar to hydroxyapatite. An association between asteroid hyalosis and dystrophic calcification of IOLs has been reported only with silicone plate haptic designs. The material opacifying the 3-piece silicone lens probably was derived from the asteroid bodies or from the process that results in this vitreous condition. Clinical evaluation of other pseudophakic patients with asteroid hyalosis will confirm if this phenomenon is restricted to silicone IOLs.

Complications of foldable intraocular lenses requiring explantation or secondary intervention—2003 survey update

The sixth annual survey of complications associated with foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs) requiring explantation or secondary intervention was sent to members of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons. Preoperative data about visual acuity, patient signs and symptoms, and complications requiring IOL removal were evaluated. Complications were then tabulated for each of the following major foldable IOL groups: 3-piece monofocal silicone, 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic, 1-piece hydrophobic acrylic with haptics, 3-piece hydrophilic acrylic (hydrogel), 1-piece hydrophilic acrylic (hydrogel), 1-piece plate-type silicone, 3-piece multifocal silicone, and Collamer. Two hundred seventy-three surveys were returned for evaluation. Dislocation/decentration, incorrect lens power, IOL calcification, and glare/optical aberrations were the most common reasons for removing foldable IOLs. Good surgical technique, accurate IOL power measurements, and high manufacturing standards for foldable IOL materials and designs are the most important factors in avoiding complications with foldable IOLs.

Complications of foldable intraocular lenses requiring explantation or secondary intervention—2001 survey update

A survey of the complications associated with foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs) that required explantation or secondary intervention was sent to members of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons. Preoperative data about visual acuity, patient signs and symptoms, and complications requiring IOL removal were assessed. Postoperative results and outcomes were also analyzed. Complications and symptoms for each of the following major groups of foldable IOLs explanted were tabulated separately: 3-piece hydrophilic acrylic or hydrogel; 3-piece monofocal silicone; 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic; 1-piece hydrophobic acrylic with haptics; 3-piece multifocal silicone; 1-piece plate-type silicone. A total of 286 surveys were returned for evaluation. Intraocular lens calcification, incorrect lens power, optical visual aberrations, and decentration/dislocation were the most common reasons for removing a foldable IOL. Accurate IOL measurements, meticulous surgical technique, proper patient counseling, and careful manufacture of foldable IOL materials are the most important factors in avoiding complications with foldable IOLs.

Complications and clinical outcomes of intraocular lens exchange in patients with calcified hydrogel lenses

Purpose: To evaluate the outcomes of intraocular lens (IOL) exchange in patients with calcified hydrogel IOLs. Setting: Ophthalmology departments of 2 university hospitals in Hong Kong, China. Methods: Fifteen patients developed loss of vision resulting from calcification of hydrogel IOLs. The calcified IOLs were explanted and replaced with new IOLs. The best corrected visual acuity before and after surgery was measured and compared. Results: The mean visual acuity was 0.03 (range 0.01 to 0.20) before IOL exchange and 0.20 (range 0.01 to 0.50) 3 months after; the difference was significant ( P < .001). Acuity improved approximately 5 Snellen lines. Complications included posterior capsule rupture in 2 patients and zonular dehiscence in 3 patients; the secondary IOL was placed in the anterior chamber or ciliary sulcus in these patients. Three patients required cutting of the haptics before the calcified IOL could be removed. Conclusion: Intraocular lens exchange was an effective treatment in patients with calcified hydrogel IOLs.

Clinical features of 46 eyes with calcified hydrogel intraocular lenses

Purpose: To clarify the clinical features of delayed calcification of hydrogel intraocular lenses (IOLs) based on observation of a large case series. Setting: Ophthalmology department of 2 university teaching hospitals, Hong Kong, China. Methods: The first 44 patients with a known diagnosis of calcified IOL were recruited. Medical and ophthalmic histories were obtained. Surgical details, surgical complications, and visual acuity before and after IOL implantation were also retrieved. Patients then had a visual acuity test, a slitlamp examination of the features of the IOL calcification, and a fundus examination for clarity of view. Results: Forty-six eyes of 44 patients had IOL calcification. All had a Hydroview IOL. The onset was from 4 to 26 months after surgery. Ninety-three percent of eyes had generalized IOL calcification, and 96% had forceps marks on the IOL. Mean visual acuity deteriorated from 0.4 at 3 months to 0.13 at 19 months. Visual loss was more severe in patients with diabetes mellitus or ischemic heart disease and in those in which the IOL calcified earlier after implantation. Conclusion: All cases of IOL calcification were delayed in onset. The presence of forceps marks may provide a clue to the pathogenesis. Bilateral but asymmetric involvement in 2 patients suggests that the IOL was involved in the pathogenesis. Affected patients lost an average of 2.8 Snellen lines of visual acuity. Some eyes progressed more rapidly; however, the modulating factors remain unknown.

Assessing intraocular lens calcification in an animal model

Purpose: To describe an animal model used to evaluate the propensity of various biomaterials to calcify intraocularly. Setting: Research Department, Allergan Inc., Irvine, California, USA. Methods: Intraocular lens (IOL) optic materials were implanted intramuscularly and/or subcutaneously in rabbits for up to 90 days. The materials included silicone, poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), hydroxyethyl methacrylate hydrogel, and several hydrophobic acrylic materials. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS) were used to detect calcification demonstrated by characteristic discrete nodules containing both calcium and phosphate. Histological methods were used to evaluate tissue reactivity. Disc lenses fabricated from the experimental material were also bilaterally implanted in rabbit eyes that were monitored by slitlamp biomicroscopy. The lenses were explanted at 1, 2, 5.5, 10, and 20 months for SEM/EDS analysis. Results: No calcification was noted in the intramuscularly or subcutaneously implanted silicone, PMMA, and acrylic optic materials. Calcification was noted on the intramuscularly, subcutaneously, and intraocularly implanted experimental acrylic and the intramuscularly implanted hydrogel material; the calcification was more extensive on the hydrogel. Signs that suggested intraocular calcification were first noted on the experimental IOLs at 4 months, but calcification was not confirmed until 10 months. Conclusions: Material calcification occurred more quickly in an intramuscular or subcutaneous environment than in an intraocular environment. Intramuscular and subcutaneous implantation appears to be an excellent model for screening materials for calcification potential. However, calcification is both host environment and material dependent. Using intramuscular or subcutaneous implantation in animal models to predict intraocular calcification in humans must be done with caution.