Intramedullary Lengthening Nails Research Articles

Motorized Intramedullary Nail Lengthening in the Older Population

Limb lengthening has not been widely employed in the elderly population due to concerns that outcomes will be inferior. The purpose of this multicenter, retrospective case-control series was to report the bone healing outcomes and complications of lower limb lengthening in older patients (≥60 years) using magnetic intramedullary lengthening nail (MILN). Our hypothesis was that healing parameters including consolidation days, the consolidation index, maturation days, and the maturation index, as well as the number of adverse events reported in the older population, would be no different to those of the general adult population. We retrospectively reviewed charts and radiographs from patients ≥60 years of age with limb-length discrepancies who underwent femoral or tibial lengthening using a MILN. Parameters were compared among the age categories “≤19 years,” “20–39 years,” “40–59 years,” or “≥60 years” and propensity-matched cohorts for the age groups 20–59 years and ≥60 years. Complications were reported as percentages for each age category. In the study period, 354 MILN were placed in 257 patients. Sixteen nails were placed in patients 60 years of age or older (mean 65 ± 5 years; range 60–72 years). Comparisons of healing parameters showed no difference between those aged 60+ and the younger cohort. Complication percentages were not statistically significant (p = 0.816). Limb lengthening with MILN may therefore be considered a safe and feasible option for a generally healthy elderly population.

Correction of post-traumatic lower-limb discrepancy with Precice intramedullary lengthening nails: a review of 34 adults with an average follow-up of 2 years.

Background and purposeWe report results and complications of gradual bone lengthening for post-traumatic lower-limb length discrepancy (LLD) with Precice intramedullary lengthening nails in 34 adults.Patients and methodsInclusion criteria were lowerlimb lengthening using the Precice nail, posttraumatic etiology, age older than 18 years, and minimum follow-up of 12 months after implantation. 34 patients met the inclusion criteria. Radiological and clinical outcome data were collected.ResultsPrecice lengthening was performed in the femur in 28 patients (21 antegrade, 7 retrograde) and in the tibia in 6. Mean patient age at time of surgery was 32 years (18–72). Mean preoperative LLD was 31 mm (20–71). Acute correction of axial or rotational malalignment was performed in 11 segments. At final follow-up (mean 2 years [1.1–3.6]), 33 of 34 nails had been removed. All lengthening sites were healed, and all patients mobilized with full weight-bearing. 14 adverse events occurred in 11 patients and were categorized as problems (n = 5), obstacles (n = 3), and complications (n = 6). Unplanned surgery was necessary in 7 patients, 3 of whom did not complete treatment with Precice.InterpretationCorrection of posttraumatic LLD with or without axial malalignment using Precice intramedullary lengthening nails is associated with a low number of complications and good functional outcome. However, one-fifth of patients in this series needed further unplanned surgery for revision of obstacles or complications.

An Update on the Intramedullary Implant in Limb Lengthening: A Quinquennial Review Part 2: Extending Surgical Indications and Further Innovation

The use of the intramedullary lengthening nail has gained in popularity over the last decade. The reduction in complications associated with the use of external fixators and excellent patient outcomes has resulted in the largest change in management of limb length discrepancy since the concept of distraction osteogenesis was accepted by the Western world in the 1980s. Success following “simple” limb lengthening has led to surgeons extending the indications for the lengthening nail, including different bone segments, lengthening associated with potential joint instability and lengthening combined with acute deformity correction. There has been a drive for further implant modification to reduce complications, and enable full weight bearing during the lengthening process. This would offer the opportunity to consider simultaneous limb lengthening.The aim of this review is to evaluate the literature published over the last five years and highlight important learning points and technical tips for these expanding indications.

Does Focal Osteolysis in a PRECICE Stryde Intramedullary Lengthening Nail Resolve after Explantation?

Concerns surrounding osteolysis near and around the modular junction of a stainless-steel intramedullary lengthening rod prompted a manufacturer recall from the United States market in early 2021. These actions were preceded by similar steps taken in Europe. A concomitant review of stainless-steel lengthenings at our institution demonstrated signs of adverse tissue reaction including periosteal reaction and osteolysis at the modular junction and/or male-sided locking screws. Nearly half of our patients presented with these findings on radiographic images. At the time of the previous review, only half of the nearly 60 implanted stainless-steel devices met a 6-month follow-up. At this juncture, many patients have had their devices explanted. Given the suspected adverse tissue reactions caused by a component of the internal device, we sought to examine the rate of osteolysis post-explantation following removal of a stainless-steel nail. We reviewed a consecutive series of patients who underwent implantation of a stainless-steel limb lengthening device in the femur and/or tibia at a single institution between December 2018 and December 2020. Patients were included if their device was explanted. Periosteal reaction and osteolysis was classified according to a novel and validated classification system, as analyzed by five fellowship-trained surgeons. In addition, changes observed prior to explantation were tracked post-explantation to assess for resolution. The incidence of periosteal reaction and osteolysis prior to explantation was 22/57 (39%) and 15/57 (26%), respectively. Of the 15 patients with osteolysis pre-explantation, 14 patients’ implants were explanted. Of these, eight patients had available follow-up films. Two patients were identified as having partial osteolysis resolution at mean 1-year follow-up, while six patients were identified as having complete osteolysis at mean 18-months follow-up. Periosteal tissue reaction and osteolysis largely resolved following explantation in a subset of patients. These results provide further support to the claim that the stainless-steel device contributed to the changes seen. Further follow-up is warranted to examine the longer-term effects of adverse tissue reaction in this patient population.

Quality of life of children during distraction osteogenesis: a comparison between intramedullary magnetic lengthening nails and external fixators

BackgroundDistraction osteogenesis is a very demanding process. For decades, external fixation was the only reliable option for gradual deformity correction. Recently, intramedullary magnetic nails have gained popularity. This research aimed to assess the quality of life in children during gradual deformity correction using intramedullary lengthening nails compared to external fixation.MethodProspective analysis included children who had gradual lower limb deformity correction between 2017 and 2019. Group A included children who had magnetic lengthening nails; patients in group B had external fixation devices. Child health utility 9D (CHU- 9D) and EuroQol 5D youth (EQ- 5D-Y) were used to measure the quality of life at fixed points during the distraction osteogenesis process. The results were used to calculate the utility at each milestone and the overall quality of life adjusted years (QALYs).ResultsThirty-four children were recruited, group A had 16 patients, whilst group B had 18 patients. The average ages were 16.0 years and 14.7 years for groups A and B, respectively. Group A patients reported significantly better utility compared to group B. This was observed during all stages of treatment (P = 0.00016). QALYs were better for group A (0.44) compared to group B (0.34) (P < 0.0001).ConclusionThe quality of life was generally better in group A compared to group B. In most patients, the health utility progressively improved throughout treatment. In the same way, QALYs were better with the lengthening nails compared to external fixators. The magnetic lengthening devices (PRECICE nails) which were used in this research were recently relabelled to restrict their applications in children; this study was conducted before these restrictions.

Motorized intramedullary lengthening followed by osseointegration for amputees with short residual femurs: An observational cohort study

Context: Some patients seeking transcutaneous osseointegration for amputees (TOFA) have residual bones so short there is concern whether they provide sufficient surface to support full weight. Our strategy was to lengthen these patients' femurs with a motorized intramedullary lengthening nail (MILN) before TOFA. Aims: The aim of this study is to describe 10 transfemoral amputees' experience with MILN before TOFA, focusing on the complications of MILN and TOFA, and also the patients' preoperative and postoperative quality of life (QOL). Settings and Design: A retrospective registry review of all MILN before TOFA surgeries was performed. Subjects and Methods: The patients' operative complications during/following MILN and TOFA were investigated. Furthermore, the patients' mobility (daily prosthesis wear hours, K-level, Timed Up and Go (TUG), and 6 min Walk Test [6MWT]) and QOL survey data (Questionnaire for Persons with a Transfemoral Amputation [QTFA]) were compared at the initial consultation and at the latest follow-up using Fisher's exact test for frequencies, and Student's t-test for means (significance, P < 0.05). Statistical Analysis Used: Fisher's exact test for frequencies, and Student's t-test for means (significance, P < 0.05). Results: Seven patients had one operative complication each: Three regenerate (autograft and plating), two nail malfunctions (nail replacement), one broken linkage cable (acute length correction with autografting and fixation), and one early consolidation (re-osteotomy). All ten patients had TOFA, an average of 12.0 ± 3.9 months after MILN surgery. One patient had debridement for infection (implant retained) and one patient had the implant removed due to infection. Significant mobility improvements were K-level >2 (2/9 = 22% vs. 9/10 = 90%, P =0.006) and TUG <15 s (1/8 = 13% vs. 6/8 = 75% P = 0.041). Wear hours and 6MWT improved but not significantly. All three aspects of QTFA significantly improved: Global (44.8 ± 29.9 vs. 75.9 ± 26.8, P =0.050), mobility (50.3 ± 30.8 vs. 74.8 ± 18.2, P =.033), and problem (38.8 ± 18.6 vs. 15.6 ± 18.3, P = 0.017). Conclusions: MILN before TOFA reliably achieves stable osseointegration for amputees with short residual femurs. Amputee lengthening remains demanding, but patients report significantly improved QOL and demonstrate improved mobility following TOFA. The minimum length of bone necessary to support a full weight-bearing osseointegrated prosthesis remains unknown.

Femoral Lengthening in Children-A Comparison Between Magnetic Intramedullary Lengthening Nails and External Fixators.

Femoral lengthening can be achieved using external fixators or intramedullary lengthening nails. The purpose of this research was to compare the outcome of femoral lengthening in children using PRECICE magnetic lengthening nails with lengthening external fixators. Retrospective analysis of 50 children who had femoral lengthening. Group A included patients who had lengthening with external fixation, patients in Group B had lengthening with PRECICE intramedullary lengthening nails. Each group included 25 patients. The sample strictly included children aged between 11 and 17 years. Patients in each group were matched according to age and indication for lengthening whether congenital or acquired conditions. The outcomes focused on the ability to achieve target length, healing index, residual malalignment, length of hospitalization following the osteotomy surgery, and encountered complications. Mean patient age was 14.7 years for each group. The length gain was 42±12 mm for Group A and 41.6±8 mm for Group B (P=0.84). Lengthening nails achieved the target length more accurately compared with external fixation (P=0.017). The healing index was significantly higher in group A with 53.2±19 days/cm compared with 40.2±14 days/cm in group B (P=0.03). Group A had significantly higher complications than group B (P<0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in the final coronal malalignment between the 2 groups (P=0.2). The mean length of stay was 9.2±5.8 days for group A and 4.2±3.3 days for group B (P=0.0005). Magnetic lengthening nails are clinically effective for femoral lengthening in the pediatric population. Compared with external fixation, healing index and complications were more favorable with PRECICE nails. Further research is required to study the cost-effectiveness of this technique. Level IV-case series.

Progress of remote-control intramedullary lengthening nail and its clinical treatment concept

Ilizarov's technology is an internationally recognized clinical treatment method for limb orthopedics, but there are many complications related to external fixation. With the development and progress of the times, the remote-control intramedullary lengthening nails had risen to prominence on the international stage as the second generation of orthomelic technology based on Ilizarov's technology. Since the first remote-control intramedullary lengthening nail appeared in the 1980s, after more than 40 years of development, there are currently more than 3 types of extension mechanisms in remote-control intramedullary lengthening nails and a mature and stable clinical treatment model has been formed during the past long-term clinical treatment and experiments, such as the End-Point-First (EPF) program proposed by Professor Peter H. Thaller in Germany. Compared with Ilizarov's technology, the remote-control intramedullary lengthening nail has obvious advantages in convenience, comfort, risk of infection, soft tissue injury, postoperative pain, and controllability of limb lengthening. This article mainly introduces the development and clinical treatment concept of remote-control intramedullary lengthening nail and the latest clinical treatment status of limb lengthening therapy abroad, hoping to provide new cognition and ideas for the further development of limb orthopedics in China.

CORR Insights®: What Are the Potential Benefits and Risks of Using Magnetically Driven Antegrade Intramedullary Lengthening Nails for Femoral Lengthening to Treat Leg Length Discrepancy?

CORR Insights®: What Are the Potential Benefits and Risks of Using Magnetically Driven Antegrade Intramedullary Lengthening Nails for Femoral Lengthening to Treat Leg Length Discrepancy?

Limb Lengthening With Precice Intramedullary Lengthening Nails in Children and Adolescents.

The Precice intramedullary bone lengthening nail has been used in our department since 2013. We sought to determine the efficacy and safety of intramedullary limb lengthening with Precice nails in children and adolescents. We retrospectively investigated patients 18 years and younger who underwent lower-limb lengthening using the Precice nail. Radiologic and clinical outcome data were obtained from a prospective database. The minimum postimplantation follow-up was 12 months. Between March 2013 and March 2020, 161 patients underwent limb lengthening with a Precice nail; 76 patients met the inclusion criteria. We used 84 nails in 76 patients (68 femurs and 16 tibias). Femoral nails were inserted using an antegrade approach in 57 patients and a retrograde approach in 11. The mean age at surgery was 16 years (range, 9 to 18 y). The mean lengthening was 33 mm (range, 14 to 80 mm) with additional acute axial or rotational malalignment correction in 16 segments. At the last follow-up (mean=2.1, years; range, 1 to 5 y), all regenerates had healed and all patients were mobile with full weight-bearing. Complications that necessitated surgical revision occurred in 6 patients (8%), and the desired lengthening was not achieved in 2 patients. Postlengthening malalignment occurred in 4 patients (5 tibial nails). The weight-bearing index, defined as days from surgery to full weight-bearing/cm of lengthening, was a mean of 45 days (range, 7 to 127 d/cm). The Precice nail facilitated reliable and safe bone lengthening and was associated with a low complication rate. Correction of additional malalignment was possible by applying intraoperative acute correction or guided growth. Level IV-therapeutic study investigating the results of treatment.

Femoral lengthening in young patients: An evidence-based comparison between motorized lengthening nails and external fixation

BACKGROUNDFemoral lengthening is a procedure of great importance in the treatment of congenital and acquired limb deficiencies. Technological advances have led to the latest designs of fully implantable motorized intramedullary lengthening nails. The use of these nails has increased over the last few years.AIMTo review and critically appraise the literature comparing the outcome of femoral lengthening in children using intramedullary motorized lengthening nails to external fixation.METHODSElectronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane) were systematically searched in November 2019 for studies comparing the outcome of femoral lengthening in children using magnetic lengthening nails and external fixation. The outcomes included amount of gained length, healing index, complications and patient reported outcomes.RESULTSOf the 452 identified studies, only two (retrospective and non-randomized) met the inclusion criteria. A total of 91 femora were included. In both studies, the age of patients treated with nails ranged from 15 to 21 years compared to 9 to 15 years for patients in the external fixation group. Both devices achieved the target length. Prevalence of adverse events was less in the nail (60%-73%) than in the external fixation (81%-100%) group. None of the studies presented patient reported outcomes.CONCLUSIONThe clinical effectiveness of motorized nails is equivalent or superior to external fixation for femoral lengthening in young patients. The available literature is limited and does not provide evidence on patient quality of life or cost effectiveness of the interventions.

What Are the Potential Benefits and Risks of Using Magnetically Driven Antegrade Intramedullary Lengthening Nails for Femoral Lengthening to Treat Leg Length Discrepancy?

What Are the Potential Benefits and Risks of Using Magnetically Driven Antegrade Intramedullary Lengthening Nails for Femoral Lengthening to Treat Leg Length Discrepancy?

Complications in Elective Removal of 271 Bone Lengthening Nails (FITBONE, PRECICE and STRYDE).

BackgroundIntramedullary lengthening nails have shown excellent short-term results. The FITBONE and the PRECICE nail are the two most commonly used intramedullary lengthening nails. The manufacturer of each nail recommends the removal of the implant after the completion of the treatment. Despite the need for removal of each nail, the authors are not aware of any prior publications documenting the results of standard intramedullary lengthening nail removal. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the intraoperative and postoperative complications of elective intramedullary lengthening nail removals.Materials and methodsWe performed a retrospective chart review of patients operated with intramedullary lengthening nails at two limb reconstruction centres (one in the United States, and the second in Denmark). Data retrieved from the patient charts included patient demographics, nail information and any complications occurring at or after nail removal. Only lower limb lengthening with FITBONE and PRECICE or STRYDE nails that had an elective nail removal was included.ResultA total of 271 elective nail removals were included in the study. Complications occurred during 3% of the nail removals and in 13% after nail removal. There were 18 reported cases with postoperative knee pain. All these patients had nail removal through the knee joint, representing 8% of the retrograde femur nail removals and 7% of the tibia nail removals. Four postoperative fractures occurred, of which two needed surgery. Eleven percent of femur removals and 26% of tibial removals sustained a complication.Conclusion and clinical significanceThis study emphasises the importance of adequate follow-up of the bone lengthening patient even after the nail has been removed. It also shows that the recommended removal of the intramedullary nail (IMN) lengthening nails must be included in studies reporting on the overall risks of complications using bone lengthening nails.How to cite this articleFrost MW, Kold S, Rahbek O, et al. Complications in Elective Removal of 271 Bone Lengthening Nails (FITBONE, PRECICE and STRYDE). Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2021;16(2):110–115.

International recognition of the Ilizarov bone reconstruction techniques: Current practice and research (dedicated to 100th birthday of G. A. Ilizarov).

The Ilizarov method is one of the current methods used in bone reconstruction. It originated in the middle of the past century and comprises a number of bone reconstruction techniques executed with a ring external fixator developed by Ilizarov GA. Its main merits are viable new bone formation through distraction osteogenesis, high union rates and functional use of the limb throughout the course of treatment. The study of the phenomenon of distraction osteogenesis induced by tension stress with the Ilizarov apparatus was the impetus for advancement in bone reconstruction surgery. Since then, the original method has been used along with a number of its modifications developed due to emergence of new fixation devices and techniques of their application such as hexapod external fixators and motorized intramedullary lengthening nails. They gave rise to a relatively new orthopedic subspecialty termed “limb lengthening and reconstruction surgery”. Based on a comprehensive literature search, we summarized the recent clinical practice and research in bone reconstruction by the Ilizarov method with a special focus on its modification and recognition by the world orthopedic community. The international influence of the Ilizarov method was reviewed in regard to the origin country of the authors and journal’s rating. The Ilizarov method and other techniques based on distraction osteogenesis have been used in many countries and on all populated continents. It proves its international significance and confirms the greatest contribution of Ilizarov GA to bone reconstruction surgery.

Focal osteolysis and corrosion at the junction of Precice Stryde intramedullary lengthening device : preliminary clinical, radiological, and metallurgic analysis of 57 lengthened segments.

AimsThis study aims to enhance understanding of clinical and radiological consequences and involved mechanisms that led to corrosion of the Precice Stryde (Stryde) intramedullary lengthening nail in the post market surveillance era of the device. Between 2018 and 2021 more than 2,000 Stryde nails have been implanted worldwide. However, the outcome of treatment with the Stryde system is insufficiently reported.MethodsThis is a retrospective single-centre study analyzing outcome of 57 consecutive lengthening procedures performed with the Stryde nail at the authors’ institution from February 2019 until November 2020. Macro- and microscopic metallographic analysis of four retrieved nails was conducted. To investigate observed corrosion at telescoping junction, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDX) were performed.ResultsAdjacent to the nail’s telescoping junction, osteolytic changes were observed in bi-planar radiographs of 20/57 segments (35%) after a mean of 9.5 months (95% confidence interval 7.2 to 11.9) after surgery. A total of 8/20 patients with osseous alterations (40%) reported rest and ambulation pain of the lengthened segment during consolidation.So far, 24 Stryde nails were retrieved and in 20 (83%) macroscopic corrosion was observed at the nail’s telescoping junction. Before implant removal 11/20 radiographs (55%) of lengthened segments with these 20 nails revealed osteolysis. Implant retrieval analysis by means of SEM showed pitting and crevice corrosion. EDX detected chromium as the main metallic element of corrosion.ConclusionPatients are exposed to the risk of implant-related osteolysis of unclear short- and long-term clinical consequences. The authors advocate in favour of an early implant removal after osseous consolidation.Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(7):425–436.

Removal of broken PRECICE Stryde intramedullary lengthening nails

This paper describes two different techniques for removal of broken Precice Stryde intramedullary bone lengthening nails, which unlike trauma nails are solid containing mechanical components. Consequently, surgeons face unique challenges when these implants brake within medullary canal. Here, we present our surgical approach for removal of three broken implants. In one patient (46kg) both Ø10mm femoral Stryde implants (max. weight allowance 68kg) broke through the proximal locking screw hole preoperatively on the right side and intraoperatively on the left side (413 and 504 days after index surgery respectively). The third Ø11.5 femoral nail broke through the area containing the magnet (55kg patient, 325 days after index surgery). Level of evidenceIV.

Research progress of intramedullary lengthening nail technology

To review the research progress of intramedullary lengthening nail technology. The foreign literature on the development history, types, advantages and disadvantages, indications and contraindications, complications, and effectiveness of intramedullary lengthening nail were reviewed and analyzed. The intramedullary lengthening nail system mainly includes mechanical type, electric motor drive type, and magnetic drive type. Compared with traditional external fixation and lengthening technology, the intramedullary lengthening nail technology has certain advantages in incidence of complications, bone healing, postoperative functional rehabilitation, incision aesthetics, convenience, and patient satisfaction. However, there are also shortcomings, such as pain, uncontrollable distraction rate, device failure, etc. In the clinical application of intramedullary lengthening nails for limb lengthening, the indications should be grasped reasonably, and the related complications should be prevented and treated. Intramedullary lengthening nails provide a new option for limb lengthening, and the initial effectiveness is good. It is one of the development direction of limb lengthening technology.

Retrograde Extramedullary Lengthening of the Femur Using the PRECICE Nail: Technique and Results.

Lengthening of long bones by distraction osteogenesis is now possible using intramedullary lengthening nails. Constraints of bone size, medullary canal obstruction, and the presence of an open physis are contraindications in skeletally immature patients. We present a technique describing the "off-label" use of a magnetic lengthening nail placed extramedullary and in retrograde manner, for lengthening of the femur in skeletally immature patients. A retrospective review of 5 skeletally immature patients with significant length discrepancy of the femur are presented along with a description of the surgical technique. Data collected included age, sex, date of surgery, diagnosis, presence of associated deformities, the magnitude of length discrepancy, the amount of length gained, the amount of time to achieve full weight-bearing, the time to hardware removal, and any complications. There were 5 patients (3 females). The mean age was 7.2±2.7 years (4 to 10 y). The mean limb length discrepancy was 6.5±3.7 cm (3.5 to 11 cm). A mean length of 3.46±0.4 cm (3.1 to 4 cm) was achieved which represents 12.9±1.8% (10.32 to 13.47%) of the bone length. The time taken to achieve full weight-bearing ambulation was 89.2±19.3 days (60 to 109 d) or 12.7 weeks. All hardware was removed 247.6±215.6 days (99 to 628 d) after surgery. Patients were followed up for a mean duration of 19.2 months (11 to 30 mo). No supplemental fixation was required and no complications were noted. Acute deformity correction was also performed at the time of surgery in 2 patients who had distal femur valgus deformity. Retrograde extramedullary lengthening of the femur is an option that should be considered for limb length equalization in skeletally immature patients. It avoids the inconvenience of external fixation and can be used to simultaneously correct deformities of the distal femur. Although the total amount of length gained is modest, we believe it is a promising limb lengthening technique that merits further investigation. Level III.

Combined antegrade femur lengthening and distal deformity correction: a case series

BackgroundLeg length discrepancy is often associated with distal femur angular deformities such as valgus or flexion. This study aims to report a new technique for simultaneous limb lengthening and acute distal femoral angular correction.MethodsA retrospective chart review of patients undergoing a single procedure was conducted. Patients included had a single operation where they underwent distal femur osteotomy stabilized with a plate followed by antegrade nailing with a magnetically controlled intramedullary lengthening nail (PRECICE, Ellipse Technologies, Inc., Irvine, CA, USA) using a trochanteric entry.ResultsSeven femurs from 7 patients were included. The average age at operation was 13.6 years, and the leg length difference was 51 mm (range 30–105 mm). Associated deformities were valgus (4), knee flexion contracture (2), and both valgus and flexion contracture (1). Lengthening achieved was 43 mm (P = 0.0036), with a consolidation index of 27 days/cm and reliability of 0.87 (6/7). The 5 patients with angulation had an improvement of valgus from 12 to 4° (P = 0.006) and of the mechanical axis deviation from 34 to 3 mm (P = 0.0001). The range of motion also improved in the 3 patients with contractures. Preoperative gait disturbance, hip and knee pain, and functional scoliosis resolved after the limb deformities were corrected.ConclusionCombining a magnetic internal lengthening nail with a second distal osteotomy stabilized with a plate can successfully correct limb length and distal femur deformity acutely without altering the expected result of each procedure.

Patient perspectives in the choice of management of leg length discrepancy

Background: The traditional limb length discrepancy management algorithm dictates that patients with less than 5 centimeters (cm) of leg length discrepancy should not be offered lengthening surgery as a treatment option. With the development of intramedullary lengthening nails, the procedure for limb lengthening has become more patient friendly and reliable. This study investigated current patient preferences for management when faced with a projected final length discrepancy of less than 5 cm. Materials and Methods: Following IRB approval, a retrospective chart review of a single surgeon's experience with patients presenting with clinical and radiological evidence of limb length discrepancy between 2017 and 2020 was performed. Patients were excluded from the study if the final discrepancy or projected discrepancy was more than 5 cm. The same management options for the LLD were presented to each patient and their family: 1) Observation, 2) Shoe lift, 3) Epiphysiodesis/Acute shortening of the longer limb, 4) Limb lengthening of the shorter limb. Results: Sixty-two (62) patients met the inclusion criteria. This was comprised of 45 skeletally immature patients and 17 skeletally mature patients. Forty-four (44) patients (71% of the entire group) preferred to have the shorter limb lengthened. This represents 27 (60%) of the skeletally immature patients and all 17 (100%) of the skeletally mature patients. No patients chose acute shortening or a shoe lift as definitive management. Conclusion: With 71% of patients opting for a lengthening procedure, this study demonstrates that patients prefer limb lengthening over limb shortening for discrepancies less than 5 cm. With improvements in the knowledge and techniques of limb lengthening as well as better patient experience particularly with the intramedullary lengthening nails, surgeons should not feel obligated to only offer lengthening to patients with LLD > 5 cm.