Intramedullary Device Research Articles

Plate, short nail, or long nail? Revision rates and complications of three different treatments for peritrochanteric femur fractures

BackgroundWe sought to investigate the relationship between peritrochanteric femur fracture (OTA 31A fractures) fixation and rates of peri-implant fracture, rates of transfusion, and the rates of increased dependence after secondary surgery for fracture for short cephalomedullary nails (SCMN), long cephalomedullary nails (LCMN), and plate and screw devices (PSD). MethodsMulti center retrospective study involving data collected from 151 Level I-IV trauma centers using ICD9/10 and CPT codes for identification. 13,197 patients with peritrochanteric femur fractures between 2016 and 2021 were included in analysis. ResultsWe report no significant difference in peri-implant fractures in extramedullary and intramedullary devices (LCMN 50, 0.84 %; SCMN 57, 0.88 %; PSD 6, 0.74 %; p = 0.91) as well as no significant difference in the rates of discharge to home after surgical fixation of a peri-implant fracture. ConclusionsThere is no difference in peri-implant fracture rates between SCMN, LCMN, and PSD methods of fixation for peritrochanteric femur fractures. Therefore, longer implants do not seem to protect the femur from future peri-implant fracture when compared to shorter implants. Further analysis is needed to more fully elucidate the morbidity associated with readmission and revision of peri-implant fractures following fixation of peritrochanteric femur fractures. Level of evidenceTherapeutic Level III.

Proximal Humerus Reconstruction in Skeletally Immature Patients

Proximal humerus reconstruction after oncologic resection is complex, with numerous muscular attachments, proximity of critical neurovascular structures, and dynamic stability granting multidirectional motion at the glenohumeral articulation. In skeletally immature patients, additional factors increase the complexity, including remaining limb growth and humerus size. Limb length discrepancy affects the limb's esthetics and function while the humerus size can limit fixation strategies and intramedullary device use. Reconstruction options used in isolation or combination include endoprostheses, osteoarticular allografts, allograft-prosthetic composites, autografts, and arthrodesis. Unique limb salvage options to address the unique factors in young, skeletally immature patients include vascularized fibular epiphyseal transfer, claviculo pro humeri, and expandible endoprostheses. Each option has advantages and disadvantages for anticipated function, durability, shoulder stability, and complications. This review aims to aid preoperative planning and decision making for surgeons and patients undergoing proximal humerus resection and reconstruction with notable remaining growth potential.

Biomechanical characteristic differences of two new types of intramedullary nail devices in the treatment of comminuted intertrochanteric fractures of femur: a comparative study based on finite element analysis

ObjectiveGiven the recent application of two new types of intramedullary nail devices in the treatment of comminuted femoral intertrochanteric fractures (CFIFs), there is still a lack of deep understanding and comparative evaluation of their biomechanical properties. Therefore, this study aims to systematically compare the advantages and disadvantages of these two new devices with traditional proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and InterTan nails in the fixation of CFIFs through finite element analysis.MethodsBased on the validated finite element model, this study constructed an accurate CFIFs model. In this model, PFNA, InterTan nails, proximal femoral bionic nails (PFBN), and new intramedullary systems (NIS) were implanted, totaling four groups of finite element models. Each group of models was subjected to simulation tests under a vertical load of 2100 N to evaluate the displacement and Von Mises stress (VMS) distribution of the femur and intramedullary nail devices.ResultsUnder a vertical load of 2100 N, a comparative analysis of the four finite element models showed that the NIS device exhibited the most superior performance in terms of peak displacement, while the PFNA device performed relatively poorly. Although the NIS device had the highest peak stress in the femur, it had the smallest peak displacement of both the femur and intramedullary nail devices, and the peak stress was mainly concentrated on the lateral side of the femur, with significantly lower stress in the proximal femur compared to the other three intramedullary nail devices. In contrast, the PFBN device had the lowest peak stress in the femur, and its peak displacement of both the femur and intramedullary nail devices was also less than that of PFNA and InterTan nails.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that in the treatment of CFIFs, PFBN and NIS devices exhibit superior biomechanical performance compared to traditional PFNA and InterTan nail devices. Especially the NIS device, which can achieve good biomechanical results when fixing femoral intertrochanteric fractures with missing medial wall. Therefore, both PFBN and NIS devices can be considered reliable closed reduction and internal fixation techniques for the treatment of CFIFs, with potential clinical application value.

Biomechanical difference analysis of new and classic intramedullary nail devices in the treatment of basal femoral neck fractures: finite element analysis

ObjectiveThere is currently a lack of in-depth comparative evaluation regarding the biomechanical properties of novel intramedullary nail devices in the treatment of basal femoral neck fractures (BFNF). This study aims to utilize finite element analysis to compare the performance differences of two novel devices with traditional PFNA and InterTan nails in the fixation of BFNF.MethodsBased on a validated finite element model, this study constructed an accurate BFNF model and implanted four different intramedullary nail devices: PFNA, InterTan nail, PFBN (proximal femoral biomimetic nail), and NIS (novel intramedullary system). Under a vertical load of 2100N, the displacement and Von Mises stress (VMS) distribution of each group of models were evaluated through simulation testing.ResultsUnder a load of 2100N, the PFBN device exhibited the best performance in terms of displacement and peak stress, while PFNA performed poorly. The peak displacement of the NIS device was lower than that of PFNA and InterTan nails, while the peak stress of the InterTan nail was lower than that of PFNA and NIS.ConclusionThe PFBN device demonstrates stronger load-bearing and shear-resistant properties in the treatment of BFNF, and the NIS device also shows significant improvement in stability. Therefore, both the PFBN and NIS devices are reliable internal fixation techniques for the treatment of CFIFs, with potential clinical application prospects.

Design innovation and rationale of the intramedullary implants for treating Intertrochanteric fractures: A review

Intertrochanteric fracture management require effective management strategies for early return to function and minimise complications. Intramedullary devices like proximal femoral nail have an biomechanical advantage, particularly in unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Such unstable injury patterns not only require precise reduction technique, but also right implant design to minimise the complications. Novel concepts of reduction like medial cortical support classification and antero-posterior reduction (Subtype classification system) refine the reduction strategies. Despite reporting of the reduction analysis, there has been continuing number of implant failures following proximal femoral nail implantation. Complications like ‘Z’ effect and reverse ‘Z’ effect are very well reported with the 2 screw Recon - Proximal femur nails. Analysis of failure and complications have constantly upgraded the designs of proximal femur nails. Design of the new generation intramedullary implants for treatment of intertrochanteric fractures like Gamma nail, PFNA-II (Proximal Femoral Nail Anterotation), Zimmer Natural Nail, Trigen Intertan nail and TFN – Advanced (Trochanteric Femoral Nail Advanced) are described in this review. While the new implant designs offer advancements, fundamental principles of reduction remains crucial for successful outcomes. Design rationale and instrumentation of each implant must be known at the time of application along with techniques of maintaining the reduction for a successful outcome.

Risk factors for infection in severe open tibial shaft fractures

ObjectiveTo evaluate risk factors for infection in severe open tibial shaft fractures. MethodsA secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective study investigated internal versus external fixation of severe open tibia fractures at 20 US Level I trauma centers. Adult patients, aged <65 years, with a Gustilo-Anderson Type IIIB or severe IIIA metaphyseal or diaphyseal tibia fracture were included. All fractures underwent definitive fixation with either a modern ring external fixator, intramedullary device, and/or plate. Fourteen variables previously identified as risk factors for infection were included in the analysis. Deep surgical site infection was defined as an infection treated with surgical debridement within 1 year of index surgery. ResultsThe study cohort included 430 patients. Deep surgical site infection requiring reoperation occurred in 108 (25 %) patients. The final model identified four risk factors for infection: age >40 years (OR, 2.00; 95 % CI, 1.3–3.1), Gustilo-Anderson Type IIIB (OR, 1.80; 95 % CI, 1.1–3.0), embedded wound contamination (OR, 1.69; 95 % CI, 1.1–2.7), and wound length (OR, 1.02/cm; 95 % CI, 1.0–1.05). The model performed poorly at distinguishing infected from uninfected patients (Area Under the Curve=0.57; 95 % CI, 0.51–0.63). ConclusionsSurgeons can now counsel patients with these risk factors that they are at a markedly higher risk of infection. The identification of these risk factors may direct future research aimed at mitigating the risk of deep surgical site infection in this patient population.

Functional Outcome of Forearm Fractures Managed With Screw Nails vs. Dynamic Compression Plates: A Prospective Study.

Background Fractures of the forearm are very frequently encountered in day-to-day practice. These fractures have a bimodal age distribution. The forearm fractures are considered intra-articular and need absolute stability for adequate healing. The current treatment modalities include using intramedullary devices such as a square nail, locking intramedullary nail, or using a plate for fixation. In this study, we aim to determine the functional outcome of forearm fractures managed with a screw nail used as an intramedullary device as compared to a locking plate using the Grace-Eversmann criteria. Methodology Patients with forearm fractures were divided into two groups and treated with a screw nail and a dynamic compression plate. Patients were followed up at one month, three months, six months, and one year postoperatively and assessment was done using the Grace-Eversmann criteria. Results The study included a total of 30 subjects, ranging in age from 18 to 65. The majority of the patients had encountered a road traffic accident, following which they incurred a forearm fracture. Grace-Eversmann criteria was used for these patients at follow-up, and a total of 13 patients (86.6%) had good to excellent scores, which was similar when compared to the plate osteosynthesis group (86.6%). A significant difference in the amount of blood loss was noted in the screw nail osteosynthesis group as compared to the plate osteosynthesis group (p<0.05). Conclusions Though a dynamic compression plate is considered a standard method for fixation of the forearm fractures, the use of an intramedullary screw nail as a fixation device gives a similar result with excellent functional outcomes (Grace-Eversmann criteria). It also gives an added benefit of reduced blood loss and preservation of fracture biology.

The Three-Dimensional Relationship of the Axes of the Capitate and Third Metacarpal

We quantified the morphology and angulation of the third metacarpal (MC3) relative to the capitate using three-dimensional computed tomography data to inform surgical procedures such as total wrist arthroplasty and wrist arthrodesis. Specifically, we report the three-dimensional location of the intersections of the long axis of MC3 axis with the capitate cortical surface, the sagittal and coronal angles between the MC3 and capitate axes, and the MC3 shaft angle in the sagittal plane. We tested the hypothesis that these metrics did not differ between women and men. Three-dimensional bone models of the capitate and MC3 were analyzed in 130 subjects (61M and 69F). Long axes of the MC3 and capitate were computed. The intersection of the metacarpal long axis with the cortical surface of the capitate, the angle between the metacarpal-capitate axes, and metacarpal shaft angle were calculated and compared between men and women. The long axis of the MC3 intersected the capitate at two locations on the outer cortical surface of the capitate. The proximal intersection was located near the midportion of the capitate, whereas the distal intersection was typically located within the capitate-MC3 articulation. The angle between the axes of the capitate and MC3 in the sagittal plane was a mean of 15°, ranging from 5° to 23°. The mean sagittal MC3 shaft angle was 166° and ranged from 158° to 173°.There were only subtle differences in these metrics between the sexes. The long axis of the MC3 penetrates the dorsal surface of the capitate about its midportion, but there is notable variation in this location as well as in the angular relationships. Three-dimensional measurements of the relationships between the third metacarpal and the capitate may serve as an important reference for the placement of intramedullary wires, plates, devices, and prosthetics.

The Greco-Nice-Lag: Lag Screw and Double Nice Knot Fixation for Spiral Proximal Phalanx Fractures-Connecting the Shoulder to the Finger.

A colorful array of fixation options exists for the management of operative long oblique or spiral proximal phalanx fractures. These include lag screws, intramedullary devices, Kirschner wires, dorsal or lateral plating, and cerclage wiring. The "Nice double-suture knot," described by Boileau and colleagues, is a sliding, self-stabilizing knot initially created for tuberosity fixation in the shoulder. Nice knot cerclage has been described in shoulder arthroplasty, as well as for comminuted patella fractures. Here we describe a technique utilizing a single lag screw with 2 Nice knot cerclage sutures for the treatment of a spiral proximal phalanx fracture in a 65-year-old active smoker with osteopenia.

SURGICAL OUTCOMES IN INTRAMEDULLARY FIBULAR NAIL FIXATION COMPARED WITH PLATE FIXATION OF DISTAL FIBULAR FRACTURES

IntroductionThe condition of the soft tissues surrounding an ankle fracture influences timing and treatment of injuries. Conventional treatment used an open approach to facilitate anatomical reduction and rigid internal fixation. Intramedullary devices for fibular fractures provide a safe alternative in patients in which the condition of the soft tissue envelope or the patient's co-morbidities may benefit from a less invasive approach. We compared outcomes for patients treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with those undergoing treatment with fibular nails (FN)Methods13 consecutive patients treated with fibular nails (FN) were compared with 13 age-matched patients that underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). All patients were followed to union. Study outcomes were time from admission to surgery, length of stay, wound failure, implant failure, revision surgery, OMAS and SF-36ResultsThere was no difference in age or sex distribution between groups. There was no difference in OMAS at 1 year (83 ± 9 in FN group; 80± 21 in ORIF group) and SF-36 (94 ± 11 and 90 ± 20). There were 2 implant failures in the ORIF group and none in the FN group. There was one wound failure in the ORIF group and none in the FN group. Patients treated with FN had a shorter time to surgery (1 day ± 24 hours vs 3 days ± 24 hours) and shorter length of stay (1 day ± 24 hours vs 4 days ± 96 hours)ConclusionFN is a safe method to treat patients with displaced distal fibular fractures that may have a poor soft tissue envelope and risk factors for wound healing. FN reduces the time to surgery and overall length of stay compared with similar patients treated with conventional ORIF.

THE FITBONE INTRAMEDULLARY LENGTHENING NAIL IN THE MANAGEMENT OF ADULT AND PAEDIATRIC LIMB DEFORMITY: A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY AT A TERTIARY REFERRAL LIMB RECONSTRUCTION SERVICE

IntroductionManagement of deformity involving limb length discrepancy (LLD) using intramedullary devices offers significant benefits to both patients and clinicians over traditional external fixation. Following the withdrawal of the PRECICE nail, the Fitbone became the primary implant available for intramedullary lengthening and deformity correction within our service. This consecutive series illustrates the advantages and complications associated with the use of this device, and describes a novel technique modification for antegrade intramedullary lengthening nails.Materials &amp; MethodsA retrospective cohort review was performed of patient outcomes after treatment with the Fitbone nail at two tertiary referral limb reconstruction services (one adult, one paediatric) between January 2021 to December 2023. Aetiology, indications, initial and final LLD, use of concomitant rail assisted deformity correction (ORDER), removal time and healing index were assessed. Complications of treatment were evaluated and described in detail, alongside technique modifications to reduce the rate of these complications.Results21 nails (18 femoral, 2 tibial, 1 humeral) were inserted in 6 adult and 13 paediatric patients. Post-traumatic and congenital/developmental LLD were the most common indications for surgery in the adult and paediatric cohorts respectively. ORDER was employed in 11 cases (9 femurs and 2 tibias). Treatment goals were achieved in all but one case. Complications included superficial infection, locking bolt migration, periprosthetic fracture and component failure. Seven patients required unplanned returns to theatre.ConclusionsThe Fitbone nail is an established option for intramedullary limb lengthening, however its use in the UK has been relatively limited compared to the PRECICE until 2021. Our data helps to define its place for limb lengthening and complex deformity correction in both adult and paediatric patients, including in humeral lengthening and retrograde femoral insertion across an open physis. We have identified important potential risks and novel techniques to simplify surgery and avoid complications.

Safety Profile of Seven-Day Intra-articular Antibiotic Irrigation for the Treatment of Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Prospective Randomized Phase II Comparative Study

BackgroundSystemic intravenous antimicrobials yield poor outcomes during treatment of periprosthetic joint infection due to the inability to obtain minimum biofilm eradication concentrations. This study evaluated the safety of a novel method of optimized local delivery of intra-articular antibiotics (IAAs). MethodsThis was a Phase II, multicenter, prospective randomized trial evaluating safety of a rapid (seven-day) two-stage exchange arthroplasty with IAA irrigation compared to standard two-stage exchange. The Experimental Group received irrigation using 80 mg tobramycin daily with a 2-hour soak, followed by hourly irrigation using 125 mg vancomycin with a 30-minute soak via an intramedullary irrigation device. The Control Group received an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer with vancomycin (average 8.4 g) and tobramycin (average 7.1 g, total 16 g antibiotics). Both groups received 12 weeks of systemic antibiotics following Stage 2. Safety measures included adverse events, peak vancomycin/tobramycin serum concentrations (Experimental Group), blood transfusion, and mortality. There were thirty-seven patients randomized to the Experimental Group and 39 to control. There was no difference in baseline demographics or comorbidities. ResultsThere were no antibiotic medication-related adverse events and 2 serious adverse events related to antibiotic instillation. Of 188 vancomycin peak measurements, 69% had detectable serum level concentrations, with all concentrations well below the maximum acceptable trough threshold of 20 μg/mL. Of the 103 tobramycin peak measurements, 45% had detectable levels, with all below the maximum acceptable peak threshold of 18 to 24 μg/mL. There was no difference in blood transfused per subject (Experimental: 655 mL versus Control: 792 mL; P = .4188). There were two (2) deaths in the Experimental Group and four (4) in the control. ConclusionsThe use of IAA is safe with minimal systemic antibiotic exposure. There was no difference in the rates or severity of serious adverse events between groups. Further research is being conducted to examine treatment efficacy.

Limb salvage reconstruction of the lower limb with complex ankle arthrodesis and magnetic internal lengthening nail.

With advances in orthopedic implants, the use of intramedullary lengthening devices has gained increasing popularity as an alternative technique compared to lengthening with external fixators, with alleged comparable or better outcomes. The aim of this study is to report our single-center technique and outcomes of combined ankle arthrodesis and proximal tibial lengthening using external fixator with a motorized intramedullary nail, respectively. Fourteen patients with post-traumatic advanced ankle arthritis underwent staged ankle arthrodesis with external fixator and proximal tibial lengthening using the PRECICE® ILN. Amount of shortening, length achieved, bone healing index, infection rate, ankle fusion rate, and ASAMI score were evaluated. The average age was 44 years old (range, 30-62). The mean follow up is 70 months (range, 43-121.4). The average amount of limb shortening for patients after ankle fusion was 36.7 mm (18-50) while lengthening was 35.9 mm (range, 18-50). Patients had the nail implanted for an average of 479 days (range, 248-730). Ankle fusions were healed in an average of 178.3 days. There were no surgical infections. All osteotomy-lengthening sites healed after an average 202 days (106-365). The mean bone healing index (BHI) was 56.0 days/cm (21.2-123.6) among the whole cohort. There were no cases of nonunion. ASAMI bone scores were excellent or good among all patients. Ankle arthrodesis with external fixation along with proximal tibial lengthening using motorized IMN yielded high rates of fusion and successful lengthening. This technique could be offered as a reasonable alternative to using external fixation for both purposes. Level IV, Retrospective cohort study.

Geriatric Distal Femur Fractures Treated with Arthroplasty Are Associated with Lower Mortality but Greater Costs Compared with Open Reduction and Internal Fixation at 30 Days.

Distal femur fractures (DFFs) are common injuries with significant morbidity. Surgical options include open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with plates and/or intramedullary devices or a distal femur endoprosthesis (distal femur replacement [DFR]). A paucity of studies exist that compare the two modalities. The present study utilized a 1:2 propensity score match to compare 30-day outcomes of geriatric patients with DFFs who underwent an ORIF or DFR. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data from 2008 to 2019 were utilized to identify all patients who sustained a DFF and underwent either ORIF or DFR. This yielded 3,197 patients who underwent an ORIF versus 121 patients who underwent a DFR. A final sample of 363 patients (242 patients with ORIF vs. 121 with DFR) was obtained after a 1:2 propensity score match. Costs were obtained from the National Inpatient Sample database using multiple regression analysis and validated with a 7:3 train-test algorithm. Independent samples t-tests and chi-square analysis were conducted to assess cost and outcome differences, respectively. Patients who received a DFR had higher transfusion rates than ORIF (p = 0.021) and higher mean inpatient hospital costs (p = 0.001). Subgroup analysis for patients 80 years of age or older revealed higher 30-day unplanned readmission (0 vs. 18.2%; p < 0.001) and 30-day mortality (0 vs. 18.2%; p < 0.001) rates for patients undergoing ORIF compared with DFR. The total number of DFR cases needed to prevent one ORIF-related 30-day mortality for DFR for patients 80 years of age was 6 (95% confidence interval: 3.02-19.9). The mean hospital costs associated with preventing one case of death within 30 days from operation by undergoing DFR compared with ORIF was $176,021.39. Our results demonstrate higher rates of transfusion and increased inpatient costs among the DFR cohort compared with ORIF. However, we demonstrate lower rates of mortality for patients 80 years and older who underwent DFR versus ORIF. Future studies randomized controlled trials are necessary to validate the results of this study.

The value of ultrasonography in predicting the outcomes of simple long bone fractures treated by closed intramedullary nail fixation

PurposeUltrasonography has been used increasingly in orthopaedic practice credited to its low cost, easy accessibility, non-invasiveness, reproducibility, and safety from radiation. The purpose of this study was to test the validity and efficacy of ultrasonography as an adjunct in the assessment of fracture healing in long bones treated with intramedullary interlocking devices and its predictive value in determining the need for a secondary surgical procedure. MethodsThis was a descriptive longitudinal study of 40 skeletally mature patients who sustained long bone fractures of the tibia or femur treated using intramedullary interlocking nails. Patients with comminuted and segmental fracture patterns were excluded from the study. Each patient was evaluated at 6- and 12-week post-surgery using standard orthogonal radiographs and ultrasonography to assess fracture healing. Patients were then followed up until fracture union. Quantitative data was analyzed using frequency statistics and descriptive data with inferential statistics. ResultsUltrasonography predicted 87.5% union and 12.5% delayed or non-union as early as 6 weeks after surgery, while radiographs predicted 22.5% union as late as 3 months of follow-up. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography in assessing fracture healing were 100% and 97.2%, respectively, with a positive predictive value of 80.0%. Vascular resistance index was less than 0.5 in all patients who developed delayed or non-union. ConclusionUltrasonography is able to predict fracture outcomes much earlier than standardized radiographs with comparable sensitivity and specificity. Vascular resistance index is an objective parameter in assessing callus quality and predicting fracture outcomes.

Management of composite tibial and soft tissue defects via intramedullary bone transport devices and microvascular free flaps: A treatment algorithm and presentation of two cases

Management of composite tibial and soft tissue defects via intramedullary bone transport devices and microvascular free flaps: A treatment algorithm and presentation of two cases

Ultrasonic bone scalpel for long bone resections in limb reconstruction: Device description and case series

IntroductionWhile the ultrasonic bone scalpel (UBS) has shown benefits, including decreased surgical duration, blood loss, and local tissue thermal injury, its implementation has been limited to skull base and spinal surgery. This case series sought to determine the safety and advantages of the UBS for bony resections in limb reconstructive procedures. MethodsA retrospective review of four patients with a median age of 42 ± 13.38 at the time of resection and bone segment transport (BST) surgery was performed with UBS. Patients with prior history of lower extremity trauma with sequelae including non-union (2), osteomyelitis (1), or both (1). Intraoperative and post-operative courses and complications were documented. ResultsEach patient underwent tibial resection with UBS with a median bone resection size of 6.6 ± 2.85. Three patients underwent BST using cables and external fixator and one underwent plate-assisted BST with an intramedullary device. All patients had proximal corticotomies and antegrade transport, with a formal docking procedure at the end of transport. Complications included fixator cable tensioning device failure, frame readjustment, and pin tract infections. Two patients required subsequent grafting for docking site nonunion. One patient terminated bone transport early. No neurovascular injuries, hematomas, or dead space infections were reported. ConclusionThe UBS offers a safe mechanism for long bone resections in lower extremity limb reconstruction. Neurovascular structures within the resection zone were preserved and uninjured, demonstrating major advantages in using this technology. Further study is needed to assess the risk for docking site nonunion with UBS.

Epidemiology and treatment of proximal femoral fractures in the elderly U.S. population

Proximal femoral fractures are a serious complication, especially for elderly patients. Detailed epidemiological analyzes provide a valuable resource for stakeholders in the health care system in order to foresee future development possibly influenceable by adaption of therapeutic procedures and prevention strategies. This work aimed at answering the following research questions: (1) What are the incidence rates of proximal femoral fractures in the elderly U.S. population? (2) What is the preferred treatment procedure for these fractures? Proximal femoral fractures occurred between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2019 in patients ≥ 65 years were identified from the Medicare Physician Service Records Data Base. The 5% sample of Medicare beneficiaries, equivalent to the records from approximately 2.5 million enrollees formed the basis of this study. Fractures were grouped into head/neck, intertrochanteric, and subtrochanteric fractures. The overall incidence rate, age and sex specific incidence rates as well as incidence rate ratios were calculated. Common Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were used to identify procedures and operations. In 2019, a total number of 7982 femoral head/neck fractures was recorded. In comparison to 9588 cases in 2009, the incidence substantially decreased by 26.6% from 666.7/100,000 inhabitants to 489.3/100,000 inhabitants (z = − 5.197, p < 0.001). Also, in intertrochanteric fractures, a significant decline in the incidence by 17.3% was evident over the years from 367.7/100,000 inhabitants in 2009 to 304.0 cases per 100,000 inhabitants in 2019 (z = − 2.454, p = 0.014). A similar picture was observable for subtrochanteric fractures, which decreased by 29.6% (51.0 cases per 100,000 to 35.9 cases per 100,000) over the time period (z = − 1.612, p = 0.107). Head/neck fractures were mainly treated with an arthroplasty (n = 36,301, 40.0%). The majority of intertrochanteric fractures and subtrochanteric fractures received treatment with an intramedullary device (n = 34,630, 65.5% and n = 5870, 77.1%, respectively). The analysis indicated that the incidence of all types of proximal femoral neck fractures decreased for the population of elderly patients in the U.S. within the last decade. Treatment of head and neck fractures was mainly conducted through arthroplasty, while intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures predominantly received an intramedullary nailing.

Comparison of mini-open reduction and autologous bone grafting with closed reduction and intramedullary device insertion for tibial shaft fractures: a retrospective study

BackgroundWe compared the clinical efficacy of mini-open reduction and autologous bone grafting (GM) and closed reduction (GC) using intramedullary nailing for the treatment of tibial shaft fractures.MethodsThis retrospective study included 70 tibial shaft fractures treated with GM or GC between January 2018 and December 2021. The demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between the two treatment methods.ResultsThis study included 70 patients who were followed-up for 12.4 months. In total, 31 and 39 patients were treated with GM and GC, respectively. The operative duration was significantly shorter for GM (95.2 ± 19.3 min) than for GC (105.5 ± 22.2 min, p = 0.0454). The number of radiation times was significantly lower for GM (14.7 ± 6.3) than for GC (22.2 ± 9.2, p < 0.005). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of the wound complication or infection rates. The malunion and nonunion rates were high after GC than after GM, but there are no significant differences between the groups.ConclusionsClosed reduction and intramedullary nailing remains the first choice for tibial shaft fractures. GM is a safe and effective treatment worth considering. Future prospective randomized controlled trials are warranted.

THE FITBONE LEARNING CURVE: WHEN DOES IT END?

IntroductionThe FitBone lengthening nail (Orthofix UK) is an intramedullary device licensed for the lengthening of long bones in adults in the UK. It contains a motor powered by electricity transmitted via an induction coil placed underneath the skin. It was developed in Germany two decades ago but uptake in the UK has only started more recently. The aim of this study was to review the first cohort of FitBone lengthening nails in a unit with significant experience of other lengthening nails (including PRECICE and Stryde).Materials &amp; MethodsDemographic, clinical and radiological data was prospectively collected on all FitBone cases starting in February 2022. Accuracy of lengthening rate, patient satisfaction and implant issues were all considered. Complications and learning points were recorded and discussed by the multidisciplinary team involved in the patients care.ResultsEleven lengthening nails were inserted between February and November 2022 (6 right femurs, 5 left femurs). The average patient age was 31 (16–57) with 4 females and 7 males. The average lengthening achieved was 44mm (13– 70) over an average of 59 days (35 to 104). Significant technical issues were encountered in this cohort of patients including slow opening up at osteotomy site (3 requiring speeding up of programme), early consolidation (one requiring re-do osteotomy) and backing out of locking screws (3 out of 11 nails). There were also patient use concerns with difficulty using the motor and the inability to reverse the lengthening without an additional component to the motor.ConclusionsWe present the first UK cohort of patients with femoral lengthening using the FitBone implant and device. We highlight the technical and patient issues encountered during this learning curve and propose solutions to avoid these pitfalls.