BackgroundIntraoperative pathological diagnosis has a major influence on the intra- and postoperative management of spinal cord tumors. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the reliability of intraoperative pathological diagnosis for spinal cord lesions by comparing it with the final pathological diagnosis and to determine its usefulness and limitations. MethodThree-hundred and three consecutive patients (mean age, 53.9 years) with neoplastic spinal cord lesions who underwent initial surgery between 2000 and 2021 were included. The anatomical locations of the spinal cord tumors and the implementation rate of intraoperative pathological diagnosis in each tumor type were evaluated. As the primary outcome, we determined the concordance rates between the intraoperative pathological diagnosis and the final diagnosis. When the intraoperative pathological diagnosis and final diagnosis were the same, the diagnosis was defined as a “match.” Otherwise, the diagnosis was defined as a “mismatch.” ResultsThe overall implementation rate of intraoperative pathological diagnosis was 53%, with implementation rates of 71%, 45%, 47%, and 50% for intramedullary, intradural extramedullary, extradural, and dumbbell tumors, respectively. The overall concordance rate was 87.6%, with concordance rates of 80%, 95%, 75%, and 90% for intramedullary, intradural extramedullary, extradural, and dumbbell tumors, respectively (p < 0.05). The diagnoses of ependymomas, low-grade astrocytomas, and high-grade astrocytomas was occasionally difficult among intramedullary tumors. Among intradural extramedullary tumors, differentiation between grade 1 meningioma and high-grade meningioma was difficult using intraoperative pathological diagnosis. ConclusionsSurgeons must recognize the lower accuracy of intraoperative pathological diagnosis for intramedullary and extradural lesions and make a final decision by considering the intraoperative gross findings, preoperative clinical course, and imaging.
Read full abstract