Wide-necked Intracranial Aneurysms Research Articles

The safety and effectiveness of the Contour Neurovascular System for the treatment of wide-necked aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis of early experience.

The Contour is a new generation intrasaccular flow disruption tool that aims to cover the aneurysm neck and is sized according to the neck diameter. While several case series have been published, no literature review has been performed on this promising device. To assess the safety and effectiveness profile of the Contour Neurovascular System for wide-necked aneurysms. We followed the recommendations of the PRISMA checklist Four databases were searched with a supplemental manual search. All data were analyzed using R software version 4.2.1. We finally included six studies with 131 treated aneurysms. The overall procedural time was 97.27 (95% CI = 70.07-124.47) minutes, ranging from 78.9 to 136.0 min. The pooled adequate occlusion rate was 84.21% (95% CI = 75.45-90.25), and the overall functional independence rate was 94.74% (87.97-97.79). The overall adverse event rate was 4.70 (95% CI = 3.24-6.76), varying among different events from 0.78 to 8.53%. Thromboembolic events were the most commonly encountered in 8.53% of the patients (95% CI = 4.78-14.74), followed by headache and minor stroke with incidence rates of 5.88 (95% CI = 2.83-11.83) and 4.35 (95% CI = 1.41-12.63), respectively. The overall procedural time in studies using the Contour system only was 86.17 (95% CI = 68.70-10.64) minutes, while it was 136 (95% CI = 90.96-181.04) in the Contour-assisted coiling procedures. However, both techniques were comparable regarding adequate occlusion rates and functional independence. With the anticipation of future studies, the Contour Neurovascular System is a safe and effective treatment option for wide-necked intracranial aneurysms.

LVIS EVO stent-through-balloon after hydrocoil embolization of intracranial aneurysms: One-year results.

To evaluate the durability and safety of complete intracranial aneurysm occlusion at one year using the low-profile braided intracranial LVIS EVO stent. This is a retrospective, monocentric, observational study of unruptured wide-necked intracranial aneurysms treated with the LVIS EVO stent-through-balloon technique after balloon-assisted hydrocoil embolization. Imaging and clinical data were assessed by two blinded independent neuroradiologists and neurologists, respectively. Primary endpoint was complete angiographic occlusion on day 0 and at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included clinical safety using the modified Rankin scale (mRS), ischemic and hemorrhagic adverse events, parent vessel stenosis > 50% or occlusion and retreatment rate. 103 aneurysms in 103 patients were included (53 years-old, 77% women). Mean aneurysm size and neck were 7 and 4 mm, respectively. Complete occlusion was 97% initially and 90% at 12 months, with pending follow up in 17.5% patients. Five patients (5%) with partially stented necks were retreated with a second stent in a T-configuration. Two stents failed to open initially and were immediately retrieved. Asymptomatic parent vessel occlusion and severe in-stent stenosis occurred in 1% and 3%, respectively. The 12-month procedure-related permanent neurological deficit and mortality rates (mRS 3-6) were 2% and 1%, respectively. There was one fatal bleeding but no large ischemic complications. Delivering the LVIS EVO stent through a dual lumen balloon after balloon-assisted hydrocoil embolization yields a high and stable rate of complete aneurysm occlusion at one year with a reasonable immediate and delayed complication rate.

Neuroform atlas stent-assisted coiling of tiny wide-necked intracranial aneurysms.

To investigate the safety and efficacy of Neuroform Atlas stent-assisted coiling for the treatment of tiny wide-necked intracranial aneurysms and evaluate risk factors associated with procedure-related complications. We retrospectively examined 46 patients with 46 tiny wide-necked aneurysms who were treated using Atlas stent-assisted coiling at our institution from August 2020 to May 2022. Patient and aneurysm characteristics, procedural details, procedure-related complications, and angiographic and clinical outcomes were analyzed. A total of 10 patients presented with aneurysmal rupture. Atlas stent placement was successful in all patients. Angiography immediately after the procedure showed complete occlusion in 38 patients (82.6%), neck remnant in 7 (15.2%), and partial occlusion in 1 (2.2%). The mean angiographic follow-up was 8.4 months (range, 6-16). At the last follow-up, angiography showed complete occlusion in 41 patients (89.1%) and neck remnant in 5 (10.9%). No aneurysm recurrence or in-stent stenosis occurred. Incidence of procedure-related complications was 10.8% (intraprocedural aneurysm rupture, two cases; acute thrombosis, two cases; and coil migration, one case); only one patient (2.2%) experienced procedural neurological morbidity. The mean clinical follow-up was 9.7 months. A favorable outcome was achieved in 45 patients (97.8%). In univariate logistic regression analysis, aneurysm size (odds ratio, 4.538; P = 0.045) was significantly associated with procedure-related complications. However, multivariate analysis found no independent risk factors. Atlas stent-assisted coiling of tiny wide-necked intracranial aneurysms is feasible and effective. Outcomes and occlusion rates are favorable and morbidity is low. The complication rate may be higher in larger tiny aneurysms.

Comaneci-Assisted Coiling of Wide-Necked Intracranial Aneurysm: A Single-Center Preliminary Experience.

Wide-necked aneurysms remain challenging for both coiling and microsurgical clipping. They often require additional techniques to prevent coil prolapse into the parent artery, such as balloon- and stent-assisted coiling. Comaneci is an expandable and removable stent that acts as a bridging device and does not interfere with the blood flow of the parent artery. We retrospectively reviewed our institutional radiological and clinical chart of patients treated for saccular intracranial aneurysm via endovascular Comaneci-assisted coiling. The aim of the study was to report our preliminary experience in Comaneci-assisted coiling of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms. We included 14 patients in the study. Of these, 11 had a ruptured intracranial aneurysm and were treated with Comaneci-assisted coiling. We registered five minor intraprocedural complications and two intraprocedural failures of the device. At one-year follow-up, a satisfying aneurysm occlusion was observed in 85% of the cases. Though long-term follow-up data and larger case series are needed, this preliminary study showed the feasibility of the Comaneci-assisted coiling method for both ruptured and unruptured wide-neck intracranial aneurysms, with similar occlusion rates as balloon-assisted coiling. However, we registered high incidence of thromboembolic complications; these were probably related to the lack of heparin administration. The main advantageous application of this technique is likely in cases of ruptured intracranial aneurysms, as there is no need for post-procedural antiplatelet therapy.

Effects of stent-assisted coiling in comparison with flow diversion on intracranial aneurysms.

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and complications of stent-assisted coiling in comparison with flow diversion for wide-necked intracranial aneurysms. Patients with wide-necked intracranial aneurysms who were treated with stent-assisted coiling or flow diversion were respectively, enrolled into the stent-assisted coiling or flow diversion treatment group. The clinical and angiographic data were analyzed. A total of 61 patients with intracranial aneurysms underwent stent-assisted coiling, including 35 (57.4%) female and 26 (42.6%) male patients with 21 (34.4%) ruptured and 40 (65.6%) unruptured aneurysms. Also, 53 patients underwent deployment of flow-diverting devices, including 30 (56.6%) female and 23 (43.4%) male patients with 25 (47.2%) ruptured and 28 (52.8%) unruptured aneurysms. Stent-assisted coiling was performed successfully in 60 patients with 63 stents deployed, and immediate aneurysm occlusion was complete occlusion in 38 (62.3%) aneurysms, residual neck in 12 (19.7%), and residual aneurysm in 10 (16.4%). Procedure-related complications included in-stent thrombosis in three (4.9%) patients, coil protrusion in three (4.9%), and re-rupture of one (1.6%) aneurysm, with a total complication rate of 11.5%. In the flow diversion group, a pipeline embolization device alone was deployed in each of the 24 (45.3%) patients, adjunctive coiling combined with a pipeline device in 29 (54.7%), and double pipeline devices in each of the 6 (11.3%) patients. Immediately after treatment, complete occlusion was achieved in 3 (5.7%) patients with adjunctive coiling, residual neck in 3 (5.7%), and residual aneurysm in 47 (88.7%). Procedure-related complications included aneurysm rebleeding in one patient (1.9%). Clinical and angiographic follow-up was performed 13-49 months (median 29) after the procedure for 49 (80.3%) patients with stent-assisted coiling, with complete aneurysm occlusion in 27 (55.1%) aneurysms, residual neck in 3 (6.1%), residual aneurysm in 5 (10.2%), and recurrence in 14 (28.6%). Follow-up was performed for 14-37 (median 25) months in 45 (84.9%) patients with flow diversion treatment, with complete occlusion in 39 (86.7%) patients, residual neck in 5 (11.1%), residual aneurysm in 1 (2.2%), and no aneurysm recurrence. Stent-assisted coiling comes with more complications but fewer permanent aneurysm occlusions than flow diverters, and flow diverters are superior to stent-assisted coiling in the treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms, especially in the long-term effect.

Comparative effectiveness of stent-assisted coiling and Woven EndoBridge embolization for the treatment of unruptured wide-neck bifurcation intracranial aneurysms.

Woven EndoBridge (WEB) intrasaccular flow disruptors and stent-assisted coiling (SAC) are viable endovascular treatment options for wide-neck bifurcation intracranial aneurysms (WNBAs). Data directly comparing these two treatment options are limited. The authors aimed to compare radiographic occlusion rates and complication profiles between patients who received WEB and those who received SAC for WNBAs. Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained cerebrovascular procedural database was performed at a single academic medical center between 2017 and 2021. Patients were included if they underwent WEB embolization or SAC of an unruptured WNBA. SAC patients were propensity matched to WEB-embolized patients on the basis of aneurysm morphology. Complete and adequate (complete occlusion or residual neck remnant) occlusion rates at last angiographic follow-up, as well as periprocedural complications, were compared between the two groups. A cost comparison was performed for a typical 5-mm WNBA treated with WEB versus SAC by using manufacturer-suggested retail prices. Thirty-five WEB and 70 SAC patients were included. Aneurysm width, neck size, and dome-to-neck ratio were comparable between groups. Follow-up duration was significantly longer in the SAC group (median [interquartile range] 545 [202-834] days vs 228 [177-494] days, p < 0.001, Mann-Whitney U-test). Complete (66% of WEB patients vs 69% of SAC patients) and adequate (94% WEB vs 91% SAC) occlusion rates were similar between groups at the last available angiographic follow-up (p = 0.744, chi-square test). Complete occlusion rates were comparable on Cox regression analysis after correction for follow-up duration (hazard ratio 1.5, 95% CI 0.8-3.1). Average time to residual aneurysm or neck formation was not statistically different between treatment groups (613 days for SAC patients vs 347 days for WEB patients, p = 0.225, log-rank test). Periprocedural complications trended higher in the SAC group (0% WEB vs 9% SAC, p = 0.175, Fisher exact test), although this finding was not significant. The equipment costs for a typical SAC case were estimated at $18,950, whereas the costs for a typical WEB device case were estimated at $18,630. Midterm complete and adequate occlusion rates were similar between patients treated with WEB and those treated with SAC. Given these comparable outcomes, there may be equipoise in treatment options for WNBAs.

Endovascular treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms using the Nautilus Intrasaccular System: initial case series of 41 patients at a single center

BackgroundEndovascular treatment of intracranial wide-necked and bifurcation aneurysms (WNBA) is technically challenging. The Nautilus Intrasaccular System is designed to provide a mechanical barrier at the aneurysm neck to support coil...

A multicenter retrospective controlled study of the Pipeline™ and Tubridge™ Flow Diverter devices for intracranial wide-necked aneurysms.

PurposeTo compare the safety and efficacy of PipelineTM and TubridgeTM Flow Diverter devices (FDs) in the treatment of intracranial wide-necked aneurysms.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 92 patients with intracranial wide-necked aneurysms who were treated with those two flow-diverter devices (FDs) at four participating centers between July 2012 and December 2020.ResultsThis study included 92 patients who underwent endovascular therapy using either Pipeline™ (n = 39) or TubridgeTM (n = 53) for treating intracranial wide-necked aneurysms. The periprocedural complication developed in 2.56% (1/39) patients of Pipeline group and 3.77% (2/53) patients of the TubridgeTM group. During perioperative period, one patient in Pipeline™ group showed subarachnoid hemorrhage (2.56%, 1/39) and two ischemic complications in the Tubridge™ group (3.77%, 2/53). Follow-up assessments were conducted on 31 patients (79.49%) in the Pipeline™ group (the mean follow-up period was 9.7 ± 3.3 months). The rate of complete aneurysm occlusion at the final angiographic follow-up was 77.42%. Patients with a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0.44 ± 0.31. Follow-up assessments were conducted on 42 patients (79.25%) in the TubridgeTM group (the mean follow-up period was 9.1 ± 4.4 months). The rate of complete aneurysm occlusion at the final angiographic follow-up was 85.71%. Patients with mRS score of 0.52 ± 0.28. Three patients showed parent artery stenosis, and one showed parent artery occlusion.ConclusionBoth the PipelineTM and TubridgeTM are safe and effective for the treatment of intracranial wide-necked aneurysms, with no significant difference in the rate of complete aneurysm occlusion and perioperative complications between the two FDs.

Effects of Enterprise 2 stent-assisted coil embolization for wide-necked intracranial aneurysms

BackgroundThis study analyzed the safety and efficacy of Enterprise 2 stent-assisted coil embolization for wide-necked intracranial aneurysms by examining stent-vessel apposition, operative complications, embolization outcomes, and clinical outcomes.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with wide-necked intracranial aneurysms who underwent Enterprise 2 stent-assisted coiling in our hospital from November 2018 to October 2019. Intraoperative VasoCT was performed immediately after stent release in a continuous cohort of patients to observe stent-vessel apposition. Patient demographic, clinical, and imaging data were recorded and analyzed.ResultsA total of 106 wide-necked aneurysms in 106 patients were treated. Stent release was successful in all patients. Twenty-one patients were enrolled consecutively for VasoCT scanning, and incomplete stent apposition was observed in 5 (23.8%). Perioperative complications occurred in 10 patients (9.4%): cerebral infarction in 6, intraoperative coil prolapse in 1, puncture site pseudoaneurysm in 1, deep vein thrombosis at multiple sites in 1, and transient brainstem mass effect in 1. Among the 95 aneurysms with angiographic follow-up, embolization was satisfactory (Raymond–Roy classifications I and II) in 89 (93.7%). Hyperlipidemia was an independent risk factor for incomplete aneurysm occlusion. At the last clinical follow-up, seven patients had a poor clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≥ 3). Independent risk factors for poor outcomes were preoperative subarachnoid hemorrhage at presentation and cerebral infarction.ConclusionEnterprise 2 stent-assisted coiling for treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms showed good safety and efficacy; however, incomplete stent apposition can still occur in vessels with a large curvature. Preoperative subarachnoid hemorrhage at presentation and cerebral infarction are the main reasons for poor clinical outcomes after stent-assisted coil embolization.

Sequential Flow Diversion After Nitinol Stent Placement for a Large, Matricidal Cavernous Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysm: Technical Video.

The Surpass Evolve flow diverter is a novel 64-wire braided intravascular stent approved to treat unruptured large or giant saccular wide-neck or fusiform intracranial aneurysms of the intracranial internal carotid artery.1-3 Flow diverting stents have been used for the treatment of previously stented aneurysms, including residual aneurysms following prior flow diversion.5-8 This patient initially presented with a large symptomatic matricidal cavernous ICA aneurysm4 that was treated with stand-alone Neuroform Atlas stenting at an outside hospital. Here we present a video demonstrating the placement of sequential Surpass Evolve flow diverter stents within a Neuroform Atlas nitinol stent.

Intracranial wide neck aneurysms: clinical and angiographic outcomes of endovascular management

BackgroundThe treatment of intracranial wide neck aneurysms (WNAs) is usually difficult, hence several endovascular techniques were developed. This study aims to assess the clinical and angiographic imaging outcome of endovascular management of intracranial wide neck aneurysm. Forty patients were referred to the neuro-endovascular unit, at our hospital, each with a wide neck aneurysm. They were assessed regarding clinical presentation, aneurysm size, the character of the aneurysm, and the age and sex of the patient. Post-procedural, clinical, and angiographic outcomes of the patients who underwent endovascular intervention were reviewed.ResultsIn this study, the mean aneurysmal neck was 5.4 ± 1.6 mm (mm). Endovascular intervention was carried out in all 40 patients in the form of simple coiling in 3 patients, double-catheter technique in 5 patients, balloon-assisted coiling (BAC) in 16 patients, stent-assisted coiling (SAC) in 13 patients, and flow diverter (FD) in 3 patients. Regarding clinical outcome, 4 patients had unfavorable outcome (the modified Rankin Scale, mRS > 2) at presentation and 3 patients at discharge. There was no unfavorable clinical outcome at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. Overall angiographic outcome at 1-year follow-up, 37/40 aneurysms (92.5%) had complete occlusion while two aneurysms had neck recurrence and one aneurysm had neck recanalization.ConclusionThe current endovascular techniques in the treatment of WNAs are considered effective, feasible, and safe.

Trends of Expanding Indications of Woven EndoBridge Devices for the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: ASystematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Woven EndoBridge (WEB) was introduced for the endovascular therapy of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms. The safety and efficacy have been evaluated through several meta-analyses. However, these reviews did not cover the expanding indications in detail. Therefore, we aimed to show the changing trends for intracranial aneurysm treatment using the WEB device. Asystematic review and meta-analysis was conducted with PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. We searched for studies that reported baseline characteristics of aneurysms and the WEB devices, which had treated more than 20aneurysms consecutively. The pooled proportions of aneurysm indications and used WEB device types were obtained. To evaluate the changing indications for the treated aneurysm size, including the neck diameter, atrend line and linear regression model was measured. A total of 27cohorts were included encompassing 1831aneurysms treated with the WEB. Atotal of 86% were used in the four major locations as on-label indications (middle cerebral artery bifurcation; 34%, anterior communicating artery; 26%, basilar tip; 18%, internal carotid artery terminus; 7%). Among off-label indications, the most common location was the posterior communicating artery (8%), followed by the anterior cerebral artery including the pericallosal artery (6%). The median aneurysm size and neck diameter was 7 mm and 4.6 mm, respectively. The WEB device has been used for the treatment of smaller aneurysms than the initial indication. Also, the proportion for ruptured aneurysm treatment was increased up to 15%. The mechanical and technical development of the WEB resulted in expanding the indications for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. The off-label indications accounted for 14% in total and an increasing number of small aneurysms are treated with WEB devices. Moreover, the proportion for ruptured aneurysm treatment was currently increased up to 14% more than in the beginning.

Results of Temporary Stent-assisted Coil Embolization (CATS) for the Treatment of Wide-neck Aneurysms

PurposeIn intracranial wide-neck aneurysms, simple coil embolization is often not a feasible treatment option. Balloon-assisted coiling comes with the drawback of blood flow impairment, whereas permanent stent placement requires long-term antiplatelet therapy. Temporary stent-assisted coiling (coiling assisted by temporary stenting, CATS) is an alternative that eliminates both disadvantages. Because prior studies included only small numbers of patients, it was our aim to analyze the safety and effectiveness of this technique in a larger cohort of patients.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated all endovascular aneurysm treatments at our institution from 2011 to 2020. Out of a total of 688 aneurysm treatments, we intended to perform 95 (14%) with temporary stent-assisted coiling and included them in our study.ResultsSixty-four (64)% of aneurysms were acutely ruptured, 3% were symptomatic but unruptured, and 33% were incidental. Successful stent recovery was possible in 93% of treatments. Initial complete and adequate occlusion rate were 53% and 82%, respectively. Long-term follow-up at 6 and 12 months was available for 71% and 44% of cases. Aneurysm recurrence was observed in 10% of cases after 6 months, and in 17% after 1 year or later. Periprocedural complications were noted in 12 cases (13%), of which only 1 complication was definitely associated with temporary stent-assisted coiling (1%). One of the periprocedural complications resulted in neurological damage, the other complications were asymptomatic.ConclusionTemporary stent-assisted coiling appears to be a safe and effective treatment method in intracranial wide-neck aneurysms. Procedural safety appears to be comparable with balloon remodeling or permanent stent-assisted coiling, but it comes with the further benefit of diminished need for posttreatment antiplatelet therapy, which may improve the outcome of patients. However, to define the true value and potential benefit of this technique, further prospective studies are required.

Long-term results of wide-necked intracranial bifurcation aneurysms treated with stent-assisted coiling using low-profile acandis acclino stents.

Little data exists on endovascular treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms with the Acandis Acclino low-profile self-expanding closed-cell stent systems and is mainly limited to short- or midterm results. We report our long-term, single-centre experience with three generations of Acclino stents treating complex intracranial aneurysms. 62 wide-necked intracranial aneurysms were treated electively using 88 Acclino stent systems. Single stent-assisted coiling was the preferred treatment in 38 cases and the kissing-Y stenting technique in 24 cases. We analysed demographic data and long-term follow-up results. All stents were successfully deployed with immediate complete (Raymond Roy occlusion classification, RROC I) or near-complete occlusion (RROC II) achieved in 93,5%. Follow-up was available in 55 cases with a mean follow-up of 36 months (range 9-80 months). Long-term RROC I or II was achieved in 49 cases (89,1%). Three cases of stable residual aneurysmal filling were observed (5,5%). Seven aneurysms (12,7%) demonstrated a worsening on follow-up leading either to a neck remnant (4 cases, 7,3%) or to an aneurysm recurrence (3 cases, 5,5%). One recurrent aneurysm was retreated with coilembolization (1,8%). The directly procedural-related complication rate was 4,8%. Seven cases of clinically silent in-stent stenosis (12,7%; morbidity n = 0) were detected on long-term follow-up, six of them using the kissing-Y stenting technique. Endovascular treatment of various intracranial aneurysms using the Acandis Acclino stent systems is safe and efficient with high aneurysm occlusion rates combined with low complication rates on long-term follow-up. Overall, rates of in-stent stenosis are low but may depend on the treatment technique (single stent-assisted coiling versus kissing-Y stenting with coiling).

Predictors of thromboembolic complications after stent-assisted coiling of acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms: A retrospective multicenter study.

BackgroundStent-assisted coiling (SAC) has been reported to safely and effectively treat wide-necked unruptured intracranial aneurysms. However, SAC of acutely ruptured aneurysms is controversial because of perioperative thromboembolic complications. We aimed to investigate the predictors of the thromboembolic complications after SAC of acutely ruptured aneurysms.MethodsWe performed a retrospective multicenter analysis of 110 consecutive patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with SAC within 72 h of the onset of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Thromboembolic complications were defined as any angiographic filling defects at the aneurysms base or the distal artery during the stent treatment and the new onset of symptomatic ischemia and a new hypo-density in a vascular distribution confirmed by CT scan within 24 h of treatment. These patients were grouped into patients with thromboembolic complications and those without thromboembolic complications. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of thromboembolic complications.ResultsOne hundred and one patients with 101 ruptured aneurysms were included in this study. 9 (8.9%) patients experienced thromboembolic complications. Patients with thromboembolic complications had a higher rate of unfavorable outcomes at discharge (P < 0.001) and at the last follow-up (p = 0.017). Of these patients, four patients presented with intraprocedural thrombus formation, and 5 experienced postprocedural ischemia. There was a trend toward thromboembolic complications in patients with a higher Fisher grade (p = 0.076) and those treated with intravenous tirofiban (p = 0.052). Patients with thromboembolic complications more often presented with poor grade clinical conditions (p = 0.005) and aneurysms with a large dome to neck ratio (p = 0.031). In the multivariate analysis, a worse World Federation World Federation of Neurological Societies (WFNS) grade (OR = 8.241; 95% CI 1.686–40.292; P = 0.009) and a larger dome to neck ratio (OR = 5.385; 95% CI 1.023–28.337; P = 0.047) were independent predictors of thromboembolic complications.ConclusionPatients with thromboembolic complications are more likely to have an unfavorable outcome. A worse clinical condition before the treatment and a larger dome to neck ratio were independent predictors of thromboembolic complications after SAC of acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Staged treatment for ruptured wide-neck intracranial aneurysm with intentional partial coiling in the acute phase followed by definitive treatment.

Background: Evidence supports endovascular coiling for ruptured intracranial aneurysms (RIAs). However, in some cases, it is difficult to achieve complete occlusion by coiling, such as with wide-neck aneurysms. We report our experience with intentional staged RIA treatment using targeted endovascular coiling at the rupture point in the acute phase, followed by delayed stent-assisted coiling, flow diverter stenting, or surgical clipping.Methods: Consecutive patients with RIAs treated between April 2015 and June 2021 were retrospectively investigated. Clinical characteristics, treatment complications, and patient outcomes data were collected.Results: Among 108 RIAs treated in our hospital, 60 patients underwent initial coiling; 10 patients underwent staged treatment. The aneurysm locations were the anterior communicating artery (n = 5), internal carotid-posterior communicating artery (n = 3), internal carotid-paraclinoid (n = 1), and vertebral artery-posterior inferior cerebellar artery (n = 1). The mean ± standard deviation aneurysmal diameter was 9.6 ± 5.4 mm and the mean aspect ratio was 1.2 ± 0.7. As the second treatment to obliterate blood flow to the neck area, we performed five stent-assisted coiling, two flow-diverter stentings, and three surgical clippings. Only one minor perioperative complication occurred. The median duration between the first and second treatments was 18 days (range, 14– 42 days). Good clinical outcome (modified Rankin scale score 0–2) at 90 days was achieved in 5 (50%) cases. The median follow-up duration was 6.5 months (range, 3–35 months); no rerupture occurred.Conclusion: Intentional staged treatment with a short time interval for RIA was effective and feasible.

Safety and Efficacy of Flow Diverter Therapy for Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm Compared to Traditional Endovascular Strategy : A Multi-Center, Randomized, Open-Label Trial

Endovascular treatment of large, wide-necked intracranial aneurysms by coil embolization is often complicated by low rates of complete occlusion and high rates of recurrence. A flow diverter device has been shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of not only large and giant unruptured aneurysms, but small and medium aneurysms. However, in Korea, its use has only recently been approved for aneurysms <10 mm. This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of flow diversion and coil embolization for the treatment of unruptured aneurysms ≥7 mm. The participants will include patients aged between 19 and 75 years to be treated for unruptured cerebral aneurysms ≥7 mm for the first time or for recurrent aneurysms after initial endovascular coil embolization. Participants assigned to a flow diversion cohort will be treated using any of the following devices : Pipeline Flex Embolization Device with Shield Technology (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA), Surpass Evolve (Stryker Neurovascular, Fremont, CA, USA), and FRED or FRED Jr. (MicroVention, Tustin, CA, USA). Participants assigned to a coil embolization cohort will undergo traditional endovascular coiling. The primary endpoint will be complete occlusion confirmed by cerebral angiography at 12 months after treatment. Secondary safety outcomes will evaluate periprocedural and post-procedural complications for up to 12 months. The trial will begin enrollment in 2022, and clinical data will be available after enrollment and follow-up. This article describes the aim and design of a multi-center, randomized, open-label trial to compare the safety and efficacy of flow diversion versus traditional endovascular treatment for unruptured cerebral aneurysms ≥7 mm.

Low profile visualized intraluminal support stent-assisted Hydrocoil embolization for acutely ruptured wide-necked intracranial aneurysms: A propensity score-matched cohort study

PurposeTo compare the safety and efficacy of low profile visualized intraluminal support (LVIS) stent-assisted hydrogel coil embolization and LVIS stent-assisted bare platinum coil embolization for acutely ruptured wide-necked intracranial. Methods89 patients who underwent LVIS stent-assisted hydrogel coil embolization (hydrogel coil group) and 145 patients who underwent LVIS stent-assisted bare platinum coil embolization (platinum coil group) were retrospectively reviewed after 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM). Procedure-related complications, clinical and angiographic follow-up outcomes were compared between the two groups. ResultsAll baseline characteristics were equivalent between hydrogel coil group and platinum coil group after PSM. There were no statistical differences in immediate postoperative embolization results, clinical and angiographic follow-up outcomes between the two groups (P = 0.514, P = 0.323 and P = 0.949, respectively). Intraprocedural aneurysm rupture, intraprocedural thrombosis and postprocedural thrombosis occurred in 2 patients (2.2%, 2/89), 1 patient (1.1%, 1/89) and 1 patient (1.1%, 1/89) of the hydrogel coil group compared with 1 patient (0.7%, 1/145), 1 patient (0.7%, 1/145) and 2 patients (1.4%, 2/145) of the platinum coil group, respectively (P = 0.559, P = 1.000 and P = 1.000). Nevertheless, the rate of postprocedural aneurysm early rebleeding in the hydrogel coil group was significantly lower than that in the platinum coil group (0.0% vs 4.8%, P = 0.046). ConclusionLVIS stent-assisted hydrogel coil embolization may reduce the risk of aneurysm early rebleeding compared with LVIS stent-assisted bare platinum coil embolization for the treatment of acutely ruptured wide-necked intracranial aneurysms, which implies that hydrogel coil may improve the safety of stent placement for ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Comparing treatment outcomes of various intracranial bifurcation aneurysms locations using the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device

BackgroundThe Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device has Food and Drug Administration approval for treatment of wide-necked intracranial bifurcation aneurysms. The WEB device has been shown to result in adequate occlusion in...

Multicenter Study for the Treatment of Sidewall versus Bifurcation Intracranial Aneurysms with Use of Woven EndoBridge (WEB)

Background The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device was explicitly designed for wide-neck intracranial bifurcation aneurysms. Small-scale reports have evaluated the off-label use of WEB devices for the treatment of sidewall aneurysms, with promising outcomes. Purpose To compare the angiographic and clinical outcomes of the WEB device for the treatment of sidewall aneurysms compared with the treatment of bifurcation aneurysms. Materials and Methods A retrospective review of the WorldWideWEB Consortium, a synthesis of retrospective databases spanning from January 2011 to June 2021 at 22 academic institutions in North America, South America, and Europe, was performed to identify patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with the WEB device. Characteristics and outcomes were compared between bifurcation and sidewall aneurysms. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match by age, pretreatment ordinal modified Rankin Scale score, ruptured aneurysms, location of aneurysm, multiple aneurysms, prior treatment, neck, height, dome width, daughter sac, and incorporated branch. Results A total of 683 intracranial aneurysms were treated using the WEB device in 671 patients (median age, 61 years [IQR, 53-68 years]; male-to-female ratio, 1:2.5). Of those, 572 were bifurcation aneurysms and 111 were sidewall aneurysms. PSM was performed, resulting in 91 bifurcation and sidewall aneurysms pairs. No significant difference was observed in occlusion status at last follow-up, deployment success, or complication rates between the two groups. Conclusion No significantly different outcomes were observed following the off-label use of the Woven EndoBridge, or WEB, device for treatment of sidewall aneurysms compared with bifurcation aneurysms. The correct characterization of the sidewall aneurysm location, neck angle, and size is crucial for successful treatment and lower retreatment rate. © RSNA, 2022 See also the editorial by Hetts in this issue.