Intracranial Objective Response Rate Research Articles

Efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and brain metastases: A real-world retrospective study in China.

BackgroundThere is only limited knowledge of the treatment responses and clinical outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in driver gene‐negative non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases (BM). This study aims to assess the efficacy of immunotherapy in these patients in a real world setting.MethodsNSCLC‐BM patients without driver gene mutations who received ICIs were retrospectively identified between July 2017 and December 2019. The primary observation endpoint was intracranial objective response rate (iORR), and secondary objectives were objective response rate (ORR), intracranial and systemic progression‐free survival (iPFS, PFS), and overall survival (OS).ResultsWe reviewed 1578 patients with lung cancer and BM. According to the exclusion criteria, 41 patients were finally enrolled. Among these 41 patients, iORR was 36.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 21.2%–52.0%), whereas iPFS was 6.8 (95% CI = 3.32–10.35) months. Additionally, ORR, PFS, and OS were 24.4% (95% CI = 10.7%–38.1%), 6.2 (95% CI = 4.57–7.83) months and 13.7 (95% CI = 11.20–16.26) months, respectively. ICIs combined with concurrent radiotherapy group exhibited preferred iORR (p = 0.030) compared with no radiotherapy group, and ICIs plus chemotherapy showed improved OS (p = 0.024) compared to ICI monotherapy. Moreover, the lines of ICI treatment ≥2 (p = 0.005) and derived neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) ≥3 (p = 0.010) were independently negative factors for OS.ConclusionIn NSCLC‐BMs patients lacking driver genes, ICIs exhibited an effective drug regime. A combination of ICIs with concurrent radiotherapy showed a better intracranial response, whereas ICIs plus chemotherapy were associated with superior OS.

Programmed cell death 1 inhibitors with or without concurrent brain radiotherapy for lung cancer patients with brain metastases.

Data focusing on the synergistic effect of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors and brain radiotherapy for brain metastases (BMs) in lung cancer is scarce. A total of 60 lung cancer patients receiving PD-1 inhibitors with or without brain radiotherapy were identified in this retrospective study. The primary endpoints were intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), extracranial progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) among three groups. Twenty-one patients received PD-1 inhibitors and concurrent brain radiotherapy, 20 patients were treated with PD-1 inhibitors and non-concurrent brain radiotherapy, and the other 19 patients were treated with PD-1 inhibitors alone. Patients in the concurrent group achieved a higher intracranial objective response rate (iORR, 61.1% vs. 29.4% vs. 25.0%) and a higher intracranial disease control rate (iDCR, 83.3% vs. 58.8% vs. 56.3%) compared with those in the non-concurrent group and PD-1 inhibitors alone group. The median iPFS was significantly longer in the concurrent group than the non-concurrent group and the PD-1 inhibitors alone group (9.8, 5.7, and 4.8 months, P=0.039, respectively). The median PFS were 9.2, 5.7 and 4.6 months (P=0.347) in the concurrent group, non-concurrent group and PD-1 inhibitors alone group. And the median OS were not reached, 12.1 and 6.9 months (P=0.206), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the lack of concurrent brain radiotherapy was independently associated with a shorter iPFS. PD-1 inhibitors with concurrent brain radiotherapy achieved a higher iORR, iDCR, and iPFS in lung cancer patients with treated or newly diagnosed BMs.

Analyses of CNS Response to Osimertinib in Patients with T790M-Positive Advanced NSCLC from ASTRIS Korean Subset, Open-Label Real-World Study.

Simple SummaryPatients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer can have central nervous system (CNS) metastases during their disease course. A high unmet medical need exists especially for patients with T790M-positive NSCLC whose disease progressed after first-line EGFR-TKI. Osimertinib is a third-generation EGFR-TKI with selective activity for both sensitizing and EGFR T790M mutations and has improved CNS activity over first- and second-generation EGFR TKIs and chemotherapies. This study confirmed the clinical activity and CNS efficacy of osimertinib in an unselected real-world population.Up to 40% of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may develop central nervous system (CNS) metastases throughout their disease. Moreover, the first- and second-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors have limited efficacy because of their poor blood–brain barrier permeability. Therefore, we conducted preplanned analyses of ASTRIS, a clinical study of the third-generation EGFR-TKI osimertinib to demonstrate its potential role in intracranial response efficacies. We retrospectively examined 89 NSCLC patients with brain evaluation who were not amenable to curative surgery or radiotherapy and received osimertinib upon confirmation of the presence of the T790M mutation. We collected the information regarding patients’ baseline characteristics, baseline intracranial status, including leptomeningeal metastases (LM), and intracranial responses measured by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, using independent central review. The median age was 60 years, and 69.7% of the patients were female. Sixty-five patients (73.0%) had brain metastases (BM) at baseline and nineteen patients (23.5%) had additional LM. Among patients with brain metastases, 24 (36.9%) had ≥1 measurable brain metastases and 16 were evaluated for the objective response. In the CNS evaluable for response set, the intracranial objective response rate (cORR) and disease control rate (cDCR) were 62.5% (95% confidence interval (CI), 38.3–82.6%) and 93.8% (95% CI, 74.3–99.3%), respectively. The median intracranial progression-free survival (cPFS) was 13.0 (95% CI, 7.21–18.8) months, including patients with measurable and non-measurable BM or LM. Our cORR, cDCR, and cPFS were comparable to those observed in previous clinical trials. The outcome of this study helps to demonstrate the potential role of intracranial efficacies of osimertinib 80 mg administration in T790M-positive advanced NSCLC with/without BM or LM.

Abstract CT170: D-0316 in patients with advanced T790M-positive EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer who progressed on prior EGFR-TKI therapy: results from a phase II study (NCT03861156)

Abstract D-0316 in patients with advanced T790M-positive EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer who progressed on prior EGFR-TKI therapy: results from a phase II study (NCT03861156) Background: Despite initial response to EGFR-TKI, most patients (pts) develop resistance with the EGFR T790M mutation detectable in ~50% of patients treated with first-/second-generation EGFR-TKIs. D-0316 is a third-generation EGFR-TKI that is selective for both EGFR-TKI sensitizing and T790M resistance mutations in pts with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We report the results of a registered, single-arm, phase II study of D-0316 in NSCLC pts with EGFR T790M who progressed on previous treatment with first-line EGFR-TKIs. Methods: In this phase II, open-label, single-arm study, eligible pts were those who had confirmed locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, and had disease progression after first-line EGFR-TKI and with T790M mutation. Pts were initially orally given D-0316 50 mg. However, considering the benefits and risks of the pts, the dose was modified to 100 mg once daily with a 21-day lead-in at 75 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) based on independent review committee (IRC) according to RECIST 1.1.Results: As of October 31, 2019, 176 pts were enrolled in the 50 mg phase, in which 90 pts had partial response, achieving an ORR of 51.1% (95%CI: 43.5-58.7). Despite the immature PFS, disease progression or death occurred in 60 pts (34.1%) and the median PFS was 8.4 months (95% CI: 8.0-NE). Between September 12, 2019 and July 29, 2020, 689 pts were screened and 290 pts (median age 62.5) were enrolled in China and received 100mg D-0316 with a 21-day lead-in at 75 mg. At data cutoff (October 18, 2020), the median duration of follow-up was 5.5 months. 188 of the 290 pts achieved confirmed partial responses by IRC. The ORR was 64.8% (95% CI: 59.0-70.3) and the disease control rate (DCR) was 95.2% (95% CI: 92.0-97.3). The ORR was consistent across in most subgroups. Among 34 pts with brain metastases at baseline, 18 pts achieved confirmed partial responses and the intracranial ORR was 52.9% (95% CI: 35.1-70.2). The PFS, DoR, and OS were premature. The most common treatment-related adverse events were thrombocytopenia (57.2%), headache (27.6%), leukopenia (23.4%), anemia (22.1%) and rash (20.7%). The most common grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events were thrombocytopenia (11.7%). One death was due to treatment-related adverse events (interstitial lung disease). Six interstitial lung diseases (2.1%) were observed during study treatment. Conclusion: D-0316 has showed strong anti-tumor activities and tolerable toxicity in pts with EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC who have progressed after EGFR-TKI treatment. Citation Format: Shun Lu, Yiping Zhang, Guojun Zhang, Jianying Zhou, Shundong Cang, Ying Cheng, Gang Wu, Peiguo Cao, Dongqing Lv, Xiangming Jin, Hong Jian, Chengshui Chen, Guanming Jiang, Panwen Tian, Kai Wang, Hui Zhao, Gongyan Chen, Qun Chen, Cuimin Ding, Junquan Yang, Renhua Guo, Guoping Sun, Bin Wang, Liyan Jiang, Wu Zhuang, Zhe Liu, Jian Fang, Yunpeng Liu, Jian Zhang, Jun Chen, Yueyin Pan, Qitao Yu, Min Zhao, Jiuwei Cui, Dianming Li, Tienan Yi, Zhuang Yu, Yan Yang, Yan Zhang, Xiuyi Zhi, Yunchao Huang, Rong Wu, Liangan Chen, Aimin Zang, Lejie Cao, Qingshan Li, Xiaoling Li, Yong Song, Donglin Wang, Shucai Zhang. D-0316 in patients with advanced T790M-positive EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer who progressed on prior EGFR-TKI therapy: results from a phase II study (NCT03861156) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT170.

Clinical outcomes in patients (pts) with a history of central nervous system (CNS) metastases receiving talazoparib (TALA) or physician’s choice of chemotherapy (PCT) in the phase 3 EMBRACA trial.

1090 Background: In the EMBRACA trial (NCT01945775) of pts with germline BRCA1/2-mutated HER2-negative locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer (ABC), the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor TALA significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs PCT (8.6 vs 5.6 mo; HR [95% CI] 0.54 [0.41-0.71]; P < 0.0001). Patient-reported outcomes favored TALA, and most common adverse events included anemia, fatigue, and nausea. Previous subgroup analyses found that pts with a history of CNS metastases had improved PFS for TALA vs PCT (HR [95% CI] 0.32 [0.15-0.68]; P = 0.0016) and improved objective response rate (ORR) 63.2% vs 15.8%, respectively (odds ratio [95% CI] 8.95 [1.86-52.26]; P = 0.0013). This retrospective subgroup analysis further explored the clinical characteristics and outcomes in pts with a history of CNS metastases in EMBRACA. Methods: Pts were randomized 2:1 to TALA or PCT. Pts with adequately treated and stable CNS metastases not requiring corticosteroids were included. This analysis assessed intracranial ORR and best overall response (BOR) based on investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1 in pts with intracranial disease at baseline (data cutoff 15-Sep-17), and overall survival (OS; data cutoff 30-Sep-19). Results: In the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, 63 pts (43/287 [15.0%] TALA and 20/144 [13.9%] PCT) had a history of CNS metastases, of which 33 (11.5%) pts (TALA) and 15 (10.4%) pts (PCT) had intracranial disease at baseline. Additional baseline characteristics are shown in the table. Intracranial ORR in pts with intracranial disease at baseline and unconfirmed complete or partial response was 18.2% (TALA) vs 20.0% (PCT) (odds ratio [95% CI] 0.78 [0.13-5.80]; P = 0.765). In pts with intracranial disease at baseline, an intracranial BOR of stable disease was 69.7% for TALA vs 33.3% for PCT. Median OS in pts with a history of CNS metastases was 12.9 mo (95% CI 9.4-15.6) for TALA and 13.4 mo (95% CI 8.8-17.6) for PCT (HR [95% CI] 0.67 [0.37-1.2]; P = 0.1936 [stratified log-rank test]). In the safety population ([n = 43, TALA]; [n = 19, PCT]), median treatment duration (range) with TALA was 5.0 (0.1-36.0) mo compared with 2.1 (0.4-6.9) mo for PCT. Conclusions: In this subgroup analysis, baseline characteristics between pts with a history of CNS metastases treated with TALA or PCT were comparable. More pts with intracranial disease at baseline treated with TALA vs PCT experienced stable disease. Intracranial ORR in pts with intracranial disease was 18.2% for TALA vs 20.0% for PCT. Treatment options for pts with a history of CNS metastases are limited and further investigation in larger data sets is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT01945775 .[Table: see text]

A prospective data analysis of targeted therapy combined with concurrent radiation therapy for brain metastasis from NSCLC with driver gene mutation.

e14006 Background: Previous studies have shown that brain metastases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with positive driver genes have poor prognosis. There is still lack of prospective studies on the efficacy and safety of targeted therapy combined with concurrent radiotherapy for brain metastases(BM). Methods: NSCLC patients, with ECOG score 0-2, having MRI confirmed brain or meningeal metastases were eligible. Patients must have driver gene mutation and received corresponding targeted therapy. The intracranial radiotherapy regimen was SRS or whole brain radiotherapy. The primary objective was iPFS (intracranial progression-free survival); Secondary objectives were: iORR (intracranial objective response rate), PFS (progression-free survival), OS (overall survival). MMSE (Mini Mental State Examination) and FACT-Br was carried out before/after weekly radiotherapy and during systematic treatment. Treatment-related toxicities were assessed according RTOG/EORTC criteria. Tumor responses were evaluated using RECIST V1.1 criteria. Survival analysis was performed using the Graphprism version 6.0 by Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Results: 23 NSCLC with BM was included. Among them, 10 patients were newly diagnosed with NSCLC BM. 2 patients’ BM progressed after targeted therapy. 11 NSCLC patients were newly diagnosed with BM after targeted therapy. 91.3% of patients presented an EGFR mutation, including primarily EGFR 19-exon deletion, EGFR 21-L8585R. 11.5% presented with c-MET mutation. Median age was 58.34 yrs(44-71yrs). Patients were mostly treated with Erolotinib and Gefitinib. All patients were adenocarcinoma. At last follow-up, for patients newly diagnosed with NSCLC BM, 8 patients had achieved intracranial progression, and 7 patients had reached OS, of which 1 died before completing WBRT. The median iPFS was 9.3m(95%CI:0.571-4.055) and the median OS was 11.9m (95%CI:0.2752 -2.732). As for patients who progressed after targeted therapy, one patient’s OS was 4.4m, iPFS of the other patient was 3.9m. Among NSCLC patients who were newly diagnosed with BM after targeted therapy, 8 patients had achieved intracranial progression and 5 patients had reached OS. The median iPFS was 6.13m (95%CI:0.247-1.751) and the mOS was 13.8m (95%CI:0.3660-3.634). Common adverse effects include dry skin, fatigue, dizziness, headache, anorexia, and grade I myelosuppression and no serious adverse events (SAEs); MMSE and FACT-Br scores were no significant differences at baseline and follow-up. Conclusions: In stage IV brain metastatic NSCLC with driver gene mutation, targeted therapy combined with concurrent radiotherapy for BM is tolerable, and there is no significant impact on the quality of life and cognitive function after radiotherapy. The evaluation of efficacy requires further follow-up. Support:LC2019ZD009,81972853 and 81572279.

Nitroglycerin (NTG) plus whole intracranial radiotherapy for brain metastases (BM) in non-small cell cancer patient (NSCLC): A randomized open label, phase II clinical trial.

9114 Background: Hypoxia has been associated with chemo-radioresistance secondary to Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor induced by Hypoxia Induced Factor (HIF). Nitroglycerin (NTG) can reduce HIF-1 in cell lines, and this may have anti-angiogenic, pro-apoptotic, and anti-efflux effects. Particularly, EGFR mutated (EGFRm) tumor cell lines have been shown to overexpress both VEGF and HIF. In this phase II study, we evaluated the effect of transdermal NTG on intracranial objective response rate (iORR), intracranial progression-free survival (ICPFS), and overall survival (OS) of NSCLC patients with BM. Methods: We performed an open-label, phase II clinical trial among ninety-six histologically confirmed NSCLC patients with BM. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive NTG plus WBRT (30 Gy in 10 fractions) or WBRT alone. iORR and ICPFS were evaluated by MRI by two independent, blinded radiologists. Nitroglycerin was administered using a transdermal 36 mg patch, which released 10 mg in 24 hours with a rest interval of 12 hours from Monday-Friday throughout WBRT administration (10 days). Results: Fifty patients were allocated to the control group, while 46 were allocated to the experimental group (NTG); among these 26 (55.3%) had EGFRm in the control group and 21 (44.7%) had EGFRm in the NTG arm. In terms of the iORR, patients in the NTG group had a significantly higher response when compared to controls (56.6% vs. 43.5%; p = 0.024). Additionally, patients who received NTG in addition to WBRT had an independently prolonged ICPFS compared with those who received WBRT alone (27.7 vs. 9.6; HR: 0.470 [95%CI: 0.24-0.89]; p = 0.021). PFS was also positively impacted (HR: 0.519 [95%CI: 0.27-0.98]; p = 0.043). The benefit in terms of iORR and ICPFS (HR: 0.38 [95%CI: 0.16-0.91]; p = 0.030) was particularly important in the EGFRm patient subgroup. No differences were observed in OS. A significantly higher rate of vomiting presented in the NTG arm of the study ( p= 0.016). Conclusions: The concurrent administration of NTG and chemo-radiotherapy improves iORR and ICPFS among NSCLC patients with BM. The benefit is particularly significant in the EGFRm patient subgroup. Clinical trial information: NCT04338867.

Effective method to reduce the normal brain dose in single-isocenter hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for multiple brain metastases.

Island blocking and dose leakage problems will lead to unnecessary irradiation to normal brain tissue (NBT) in hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) for multiple brain metastases (BM) with single-isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). The present study aimed at investigating whether reducing the number of metastases irradiated by each arc beam could minimize these two problems. A total of 32non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with multiple BM received HSRT (24-36 Gy/3 fractions) with single-isocenter VMAT, where each arc beam only irradiated partial metastases (pm-VMAT), were enrolled in this retrospective study. Conventional single-isocenter VMAT plans, where each arc beam irradiated whole metastases (wm-VMAT), was regenerated and compared with pm-VMAT plans. Furthermore, the clinical efficacy and toxicities were evaluated. Pm-VMAT achieved similar target coverage as that with wm-VMAT, with better dose fall-off (P < 0.001) and NBT sparing (P < 0.001). However, pm-VMAT resulted in more monitor units (MU) and longer beam-on time (P < 0.001). The intracranial objective response rate and disease control rate for all patients were 75% and 100%, respectively. The local control rates at 1year and 2year were 96.2% and 60.2%, respectively. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 10.3months (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.8-13.2) and 18.5months (95% CI 15.9-20.1), respectively. All treatment-related adverse events were grade1 or2, and 3lesions (2.31%) from 2patients (6.25%) demonstrated radiation necrosis after HSRT. HSRT with pm-VMAT is effective and has limited toxicities for NSCLC patients with multiple BM. Pm-VMAT could provide better NBT sparing while maintaining target dose coverage.

Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy With Simultaneous Integrated Boost Versus Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy Plus Stereotactic Radiosurgery for the Treatment of Brain Metastasis From Lung Cancer.

Radiotherapy is one of the most important treatments for brain metastasis (BM). This study aimed to assess whether whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) provided any therapeutic benefit compared to WBRT followed by stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Seventy-two consecutive cases of lung cancer with BM treated from January 2014 to June 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Thirty-seven patients were treated with WBRT (30 Gy in 10 fractions) and SIB (45 Gy in 10 fractions), and 35 patients were treated with WBRT (30 Gy in ten fractions) followed by SRS (16–24 Gy according to the maximum tumor diameter). The primary endpoint was intracranial progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were intracranial objective response (partial and complete responses), pattern of intracranial progression, overall survival (OS), and toxicity. The WBRT + SIB group had a significantly longer median intracranial PFS (9.1 vs. 5.9 months, P = 0.001) than the WBRT + SRS group. The intracranial objective response rate was 67.6% and 62.9% in the WBRT + SIB and in WBRT + SRS groups, respectively (P = 0.675). The incidence of progression outside the P-GTV in the WBRT + SIB group was significantly lower than that in the WBRT + SRS group (39.4% vs. 75.0%, P = 0.004). The median OS was 24.3 and 20.3 months in the WBRT + SIB and WBRT + SRS groups, respectively (P = 0.205). There was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3 or worse adverse reactions between the two groups. Compared to treatment with WBRT + SRS, that with WBRT + SIB for BM appeared to contribute to local control.

Updated Integrated Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Entrectinib in Locally Advanced or Metastatic ROS1 Fusion-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSEGenetic rearrangements of the tyrosine receptor kinase ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) are oncogenic drivers in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We report the results of an updated integrated analysis of three phase I or II clinical trials (ALKA-372-001, STARTRK-1, and STARTRK-2) of the ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, entrectinib, in ROS1 fusion–positive NSCLC.METHODSThe efficacy-evaluable population included adults with locally advanced or metastatic ROS1 fusion–positive NSCLC with or without CNS metastases who received entrectinib ≥ 600 mg orally once per day. Co-primary end points were objective response rate (ORR) assessed by blinded independent central review and duration of response (DoR). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), intracranial ORR, intracranial DoR, intracranial PFS, and safety.RESULTSIn total, 161 patients with a follow-up of ≥ 6 months were evaluable. The median treatment duration was 10.7 months (IQR, 6.4-17.7). The ORR was 67.1% (n = 108, 95% CI, 59.3 to 74.3), and responses were durable (12-month DoR rate, 63%, median DoR 15.7 months). The 12-month PFS rate was 55% (median PFS 15.7 months), and the 12-month OS rate was 81% (median OS not estimable). In 24 patients with measurable baseline CNS metastases by blinded independent central review, the intracranial ORR was 79.2% (n = 19; 95% CI, 57.9 to 92.9), the median intracranial PFS was 12.0 months (95% CI, 6.2 to 19.3), and the median intracranial DoR was 12.9 months (12-month rate, 55%). The safety profile in this updated analysis was similar to that reported in the primary analysis, and no new safety signals were found.CONCLUSIONEntrectinib continued to demonstrate a high level of clinical benefit for patients with ROS1 fusion–positive NSCLC, including patients with CNS metastases.

P86.17 Continuous Administration of Low-Dose Apatinib Combined With WBRT for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Symptomatic Brain Metastases

Symptomatic multiple brain metastases occur in non-small cell lung cancer patients (NSCLC) who are without driver mutations or are resistant to epidermal growth factor tyrosine kinase (EGFR-TKI) are often associated with a unfavourable prognosis. Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) which comes with many complications and unsatisfactory effects, is the only option for the treatment. Previous studies have shown that antiangiogenesis combined with WBRT can improve efficiency and prolong survival. This study evaluated the effects and safety of apatinib combined with WBRT in NSCLC patients with symptomatic multiple brain metastases. We performed a retrospective review of 13 patients with multiple brain metastases from NSCLC treated with apatinib (125mg or 250mg, QD, oral) and WBRT. Intracranial objective response rate (IORR), peritumoral edema volumetric measurement, karnofsky performance status (KPS) and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated. Median intracranial progression-free survival (mIPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) were also analyzed. Thirteen patients with NSCLC who were diagnosed with symptomatic multiple brain metastases received apatinib combined with WBRT were inclued, including 1 lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) and 12 lung adenocarcinoma. Six patients were EGFR-TKI resistant, while the other six were without driver mutations. Until the last follow-up in March 2020, 5 patients died, and 8 patients were still alive. The IORR was 84.6% (11/13) and intracranial disease control rate (IDCR) was 100% (13/13). The median edematous volume decreased by 87.96% (range 42% to 98%, p < 0.001), the average KPS score increased from 62.31 ± 12.35 to 82.31 ± 9.27 (t = -8.83, P < 0.001). The mIPFS was 6.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.3 - 9.1], and the mOS was 8.8months (95% CI: 5.8 - 11.8). The most commonly adverse events of apatinib combination WBRT included grade 1/2 fatigue (3, 23.1%), inappetence (3, 23.1%), hypertension (2, 15.4%) and leukopenia (2, 15.4%), and no grade 3/4 AEs were observed. This retrospective study suggests that NSCLC patients with multiple brain metastases treated with apatinib combined with WBRT, achieved encouraging therapeutic effects, showed a significant reduction in tumor size and peritumoral edema, enjoyed an improved KPS score and experienced prolonged survival time. Apatinib combined with WBRT is well tolerated and may be a potential choice for relapsed or drug-resistant advanced NSCLC patients with symptomatic multiple brain metastases.

Intracranial and extracranial efficacy of lorlatinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with second-generation ALK TKIs

Lorlatinib, a potent, brain-penetrant, third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has substantial activity against ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study assessed the overall, intracranial, and extracranial efficacy of lorlatinib in ALK-positive NSCLC that progressed on second-generation ALK TKIs. In the ongoing phase II study (NCT01970865), patients with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC treated with ≥1 prior second-generation ALK TKI ± chemotherapy were enrolled in expansion cohorts (EXP) based on treatment history. Overall, intracranial and extracranial antitumor activity were assessed independently per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. Of the 139 patients with ≥1 prior second-generation ALK TKI (EXP3B-5), 28 received one prior second-generation ALK TKI (EXP3B), 65 two prior ALK TKIs (EXP4), and 46 three prior ALK TKIs (EXP5). In EXP3B-5, the objective response rate (ORR) [95% confidence intervals] was 39.6% (31.4-48.2), intracranial ORR (IC-ORR) was 56.1% (42.4-69.3), extracranial ORR (EC-ORR) was 36.7% (28.7-45.3), median duration of response (DOR) was 9.6months [5.6-16.7; IC-DOR, 12.4 (6.0-37.1); EC-DOR, 9.7 (6.1-33.3)], median progression-free survival was 6.6(5.4-7.4) months, and median overall survival was 20.7 months (16.1-30.3). In EXP3B, the ORR was 42.9% (24.5-62.8), the IC-ORR was 66.7% (29.9-92.5), and the EC-ORR was 32.1% (15.9-52.4). In EXP4 and EXP5, the ORR was 38.7% (29.6-48.5), the IC-ORR was 54.2% (39.2-68.6), and the EC-ORR was 37.8% (28.8-47.5). Lorlatinib had clinically meaningful intracranial and extracranial antitumor activity in the post-second-generation ALK TKI setting, with elevated intracranial versus extracranial ORR, particularly in patients with fewer lines of therapy.

Brigatinib: A Review in ALK-Inhibitor Naïve Advanced ALK-Positive NSCLC.

Brigatinib (Alunbrig®) is an oral, potent and selective anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for treating adults with advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) not previously treated with an ALK inhibitor. In a multinational, phase III study (ALTA-1L) in this patient population, brigatinib significantly improved median blinded independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), the confirmed objective response (OR) rate and the confirmed intracranial OR rate compared with crizotinib. Its tolerability profile in this study was manageable and no new safety concerns were identified. Although final analysis data are awaited with interest, brigatinib therapy extends the first-line treatment options available for standard of care in this patient population, including patients with CNS metastases.

Continuous Low-Dose Apatinib Combined With WBRT Significantly Reduces Peritumoral Edema and Enhances the Efficacy of Symptomatic Multiple Brain Metastases in NSCLC.

Background:Symptomatic multiple brain metastases with peritumoral brain edema (PTBE) occur in non-small cell lung cancer patients (NSCLC) who are without driver mutations or are resistant to epidermal growth factor tyrosine kinase (EGFR-TKI) are often associated with an unfavorable prognosis. Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) which comes with many complications and unsatisfactory effects, is the only option for the treatment. Previous studies have shown that bevacizumab can reduce the volume of PTBE and improve efficiency of radiotherapy. This study evaluated the effects and safety of apatinib combined with WBRT in NSCLC patients with symptomatic multiple brain metastases and PTBE.Methods:We performed a retrospective review of 34 patients with symptomatic multiple brain metastases from NSCLC (number >4, and at least 1 measurable brain metastasis lesion with cerebral edema). Intracranial objective response rate (IORR), peritumoral edema and intracranial tumor volumetric measurement, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated. Median intracranial progression-free survival (mIPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) were also analyzed.Results:Thirteen cases received apatinib (125 mg or 250 mg, QD, oral) combined with WBRT and 21 cases received chemotherapy combined with WBRT were inclued. Apatinib combination group can better reduce the volume of intracranial tumors and PTBE and total steroid dosage used. It was associated with a better IORR (84.6% vs 47.6%, P = 0.067), longer mIPFS (6.97 vs 4.77months; P = 0.014). There was no significant difference in mOS(7.70 vs 6.67 months; P = 0.14) between the 2 groups. The most common adverse events of apatinib combination WBRT included grade 1/2 nausea (4/13), fatigue (3/13), hypertension (2/13) and white blood cell decrease (2/13). No grade 3/4 AEs were observed.Conclusion:Apatinib plus WBRT is well tolerated and may be a potential choice for relapsed or drug-resistant advanced NSCLC patients with symptomatic multiple brain metastases and PTBE.

Favourable outcome of patients with breast cancer brain metastases treated with dual HER2 blockade of trastuzumab and pertuzumab.

Background:Dual human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab (TP) is a standard therapy of metastatic and localized HER2-positive breast cancer (BC), but its activity in breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) is unknown.Methods:Patients with HER2-positive BCBM were identified from the Vienna Brain Metastasis Registry and clinical data including patient characteristics, therapies and overall survival (OS) were obtained. Patients were grouped into ‘TP’, ‘other-HER2-targeted therapy’ and ‘no-HER2-targeted therapy’ according to received first-line systemic therapy after diagnosis of BCBM. Radiological re-assessment of intracranial lesions was performed in patients treated with TP as systemic first-line therapy according to RANO response criteria for brain metastases (BM).Results:A total of 252 HER2-positive BC patients with BM were available for this analysis. Patients treated with TP as systemic first-line therapy after diagnosis of BM had a significantly longer OS compared with treatment with other-HER2-targeted therapy and no-HER2-targeted therapy (44 versus 17 versus 3 months, p < 0.001; log-rank test). Among radiologically re-assessed patients treated with TP as systemic first-line therapy after diagnosis of BM, 5/14 patients (35.7%) had complete intracranial remission (CR), 8/14 patients (57.1%) partial intracranial remission (PR), 1/14 patients (7.1%) stable intracranial disease (SD) and 0/14 patients (0.0%) progressive intracranial disease (PD) as best response resulting in an intracranial objective response rate (iORR) of 92.9% and an intracranial clinical benefit rate (iCBR) of 100.0%.Conclusion:First-line therapy with dual HER2-inhibition of TP after BM diagnosis was associated with the longest median OS times in patients with BCBM.

Selpercatinib in RET fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (SIREN): a retrospective analysis of patients treated through an access program.

Introduction:Rearranged during transfection (RET) gene fusions are rare genetic drivers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Selective RET-inhibitors such as selpercatinib have shown therapeutic activity in early clinical trials; however, their efficacy in the real-world setting is unknown.Methods:A retrospective efficacy and safety analysis was performed on data from RET fusion-positive NSCLC patients who participated in a selpercatinib access program (named patient protocol) between August 2019 and January 2021.Results:Data from 50 patients with RET fusion-positive advanced NSCLC treated with selpercatinib at 27 centers in 12 countries was analyzed. Most patients were Non-Asian (90%), female (60%), never-smokers (74%), with a median age of 65 years (range, 38–89). 32% of the patients had known brain metastasis at the time of selpercatinib treatment. Overall, 13 patients were treatment-naïve, while 37 were pretreated with a median of three lines of therapy (range, 1–8). The objective response rate (ORR) was 68% [95% confidence interval (CI), 53–81] in the overall population. The disease control rate was 92%. The median progression-free survival was 15.6 months (95% CI, 8.8–22.4) after a median follow-up of 9 months. In patients with measurable brain metastases (n = 8) intracranial ORR reached 100%. In total, 88% of patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), a large majority of them being grade 1 or 2. The most common grade ⩾ 3 TRAEs were increased liver enzyme levels (in 10% of patients), prolonged QTc time (4%), abdominal pain (4%), hypertension (4%), and fatigue/asthenia (4%). None of patients discontinued selpercatinib treatment for safety reasons. No new safety concerns were observed, nor where there any treatment-related death.Conclusions:In this real-world setting, the selective RET-inhibitor selpercatinib demonstrated durable systemic and intracranial antitumor activity in RET fusion-positive NSCLC and was well tolerated.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors with or without Radiotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This study aimed to evaluate the radiologic response and adverse event rates of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy with or without radiotherapy for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) brain metastases. A systematic literature search was performed up to January 3, 2020. Studies evaluating the intracranial objective response rates (ORR) and/or disease control rates (DCR) of ICI with or without radiotherapy for treating NSCLC brain metastases were included. Consequently, twelve studies satisfied inclusion criteria. ICI combined with radiotherapy (pooled ORR, 95%; DCR, 97%) showed better local efficacy compared to ICI monotherapy (pooled ORR, 24%; DCR, 44%; p < 0.01 for both ORR and DCR). Grade 3 or 4 central nervous system (CNS)-related adverse event rates were not different (5% vs. 4%; p = 0.93). In conclusion, ICI combined with radiotherapy showed better intracranial efficacy than ICI monotherapy for treating NSCLC brain metastases. CNS-related grade 3 or 4 adverse event rate was not statistically different between the two groups. Several prospective trials are needed to compare the efficacy of ICI combined with radiotherapy and ICI monotherapy.

Outcome of Patients with NSCLC and Brain Metastases Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in a 'Real-Life' Setting.

Simple SummaryWe identified non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases who were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors at Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden and University Hospital of Heraklion, Greece from 2016 to 2019. We analyzed intracranial efficacies in the patients who had not received local treatment for their brain metastases less than three months prior to the initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitors and had adequate radiological evaluation. We demonstrated that immune checkpoint inhibitors are active in NSCLC patients with brain metastases regardless of the presence of neurological symptoms. This is a novel finding since, until now, this patient group has irrefutably been underrepresented in clinical studies and there is a clear scarcity of data. The results of our analyses suggest that symptomatic patients with active brain metastases (BM) may be considered for immunotherapy in routine clinical practice as well as clinical trials.There is lack of data addressing the intracranial (IC) efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) on brain metastases (BM) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This patient category is underrepresented in randomized clinical trials. We retrospectively collected clinical data on patients with non-oncogenic driven NSCLC with BM who were treated with ICIs at two medical oncology institutes in Sweden and Greece from 2016 to 2019. IC efficacy was assessed in patients who had not received local treatment for BM less than three months prior to the initiation of ICIs and had adequate radiological evaluation. We screened 280 patients, of which 51 had BM. BM was an independent predictor for inferior PFS (HR = 2.27; 95% CI, 1.53–3.36) but not OS (HR = 1.58; 95% CI, 0.97–2.60) for the whole patient population. IC response assessment was done on 33 patients. IC objective response rate (ORR) was 24.2%. The presence of neurological symptoms related to BM did not affect IC ORR (p = 0.48). High PD-L1 levels from extracranial biopsies were not a predictive factor for IC ORR (p = 0.13). ICIs are active in NSCLC patients with BM regardless of the presence of neurological symptoms and can achieve durable IC disease stabilization in a subgroup of patients.

PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitor Combined with Chemotherapy Can Improve the Survival of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases.

IntroductionImmune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy has limited efficacy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases (BMs). With the wide use of ICI-based combinations, the efficacy of different ICI combination strategies in patients with NSCLC and BMs needs to be further elucidated.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 526 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with ICIs from January 2016 to December 2019 in the Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital. Patients with BMs treated with ICIs were further divided into two groups: those with BM prior to the ICI treatment (pBM group), and those with BM after the treatment (aBM group). We assessed intracranial progression-free survival (IPFS), systemic progression-free survival (SPFS), overall survival (OS), intracranial objective response rate (IORR), and intracranial disease control rate (IDCR).ResultsWe found 77 patients out of 526 with BMs; 69 presented the BMs prior to the ICI treatments and 8 showed BMs after the ICI treatments. In the pBM group, the median IPFS and SPFS were 7.39 months and 5.39 months, respectively. Combination therapy significantly improved both the IPFS (p=0.007) and the SPFS (p=0.007) when compared with monotherapy. Further analysis demonstrated that ICIs combined with chemotherapy significantly improved both the IPFS (p=0.009) and the SPFS (p=0.006) when compared with monotherapy. While ICIs combined with anti-angiogenic therapy improved the SPFS (p=0.005) but not the IPFS (p=0.139). The median OS was 27.43 months for patients in the pBM group. Further analyses suggested that combination treatment also improved the OS when compared with monotherapy (p=0.003). Subgroup analysis results showed that ICIs combined with chemotherapy led to better OS than ICIs monotherapy (p=0.006). Radiotherapy had no significant impact on survival (IPFS p=0.272, OS p=0.142) in the patients of the pBM group.ConclusionICIs combined with chemotherapy demonstrated survival benefits over ICI monotherapy in patients with NSCLCs and BMs.

Outcomes in Patients With Non–small-cell Lung Cancer With Brain Metastases Treated With Pembrolizumab-based Therapy

BackgroundPatients with metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) and untreated brain metastases (BM) have been excluded from most trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Real-world evidence on efficacy and survival outcomes of ICIs in patients with BM is limited. Patients and MethodsWe conducted a single-center retrospective study of patients with mNSCLC treated with pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy and compared progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between patients with and without BM using Kaplan-Meier and Cox methodology. We also characterized systemic and intracranial objective response rate (ORR) and treatment details, including timing of cranial irradiation. ResultsBetween Augutst 2013 and December 2018, 570 patients with mNSCLC treated with pembrolizumab-based therapy were analyzed. Of 126 (22.1%) patients with BM, 96 (76.2%) had treated BM (local therapy prior to pembrolizumab), and 30 (23.8%) had untreated BM. Of patients with untreated BM, 17 (56.7%) underwent radiation within 30 days after pembrolizumab initiation. In the remaining 13 (43.3%) treated with pembrolizumab-based therapy alone, intracranial ORR was 36.4%. Patients with and without BM did not have significantly different systemic ORR (27.8% vs. 29.7%; P = .671), PFS (mPFS 9.2 vs. 7.7 months; P = .609), or OS (mOS 18.0 vs. 18.7 months; P = .966). Factors associated with improved survival on Cox analysis included female gender, performance status, adenocarcinoma histology, and first-line therapy. ConclusionsPatients with BM did not have inferior survival to patients without BM after treatment with pembrolizumab-based therapy. In the current era, BM may not automatically confer inferior survival, and should not exclude patients from receiving pembrolizumab-based therapy.