Intracochlear Trauma Research Articles

Force Perception Thresholds in Cochlear Implantation Surgery

Tissue trauma is a frequent complication of cochlear implantation (CI) surgery, but the relationship between intracochlear trauma, electrode insertion forces, and surgeons' ability to perceive these forces is poorly understood. In this study, we simulated CI surgery using a benchtop apparatus to repeatedly apply small forces to the subjects' hands while reducing the variability in their hand movements. We used a psychophysical testing procedure to estimate the force perception thresholds of 10 otologic surgeons and found a median threshold of 20.4 mN. The results suggest that surgeons have the capability to sense at least some insertion forces and are likely to perceive severe trauma such as occurs when the electrode crosses from one scala to the other.

Insertional depth-dependent intracochlear pressure changes in a model of cochlear implantation

Conclusion: Over time, a homogenous increase in intracochlear pressure was seen in every experiment. Significant reductions in terms of amplitude variation and insertion depth were observed over time, using the one-point-supported insertion method. The frequency of peaks between the thirds was significantly lower when using the two-points-supported insertion method.Objectives: The preservation of residual hearing and minimization of intracochlear trauma are two of the major goals in modern cochlear implantation (CI) surgery. It is assumed that intracochlear pressure measurements yield information about the intracochlear behavior of the electrode itself in the cochlea. The aim of this study was to investigate temporal intracochlear fluid pressure changes using two different kinds of insertion conditions.Method: Cochlear implantations with the Advanced Bionics IJ® electrode were performed in an artificial cochlear model with a constant insertional speed of 0.5 mm/s provided by a linear actor. Amplitude pressure changes and number of pressure peaks were evaluated for every part.Result: Intracochlear fluid pressure changes are assumed to affect the preservation of residual hearing and should be minimized. The stability and reduction of movement of a lateral wall IJ® electrode increase at deeper insertion and affect intracochlear fluid pressure amplitude.

Insertion Depth in Cochlear Implantation and Outcome in Residual Hearing and Vestibular Function.

It has long been known that cochlear implantation may cause loss of residual hearing and vestibular function. Different insertion depths may cause varying degrees of intracochlear trauma in the apical region of the cochlea. The present study investigated the correlation between the insertion depth and postoperative loss of residual hearing and vestibular function. Thirty-nine adults underwent unilateral cochlear implantation. One group received a Med-El +Flex electrode array (24 mm; n = 4), 1 group received a Med-El +Flex electrode array (28 mm; n = 18), and 1 group received a Med-El +Flex electrode array (31.5 mm; n = 17). Residual hearing, cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials, videonystagmography, and subjective visual vertical/horizontal were explored before and after surgery. The electrode insertion depth and scalar position were examined with high-resolution rotational tomography after implantation in 29 subjects. There was no observed relationship between the angular insertion depth (405° to 708°) and loss of low-frequency pure-tone average. Frequency-specific analysis revealed a weak relationship between the angular insertion depth and loss of hearing at 250 Hz (R= 0.20; p = 0.02). There was no statistically significant difference in the residual hearing and vestibular function between the +Flex and the +Flex electrode array. Eight percent of the cases had vertigo after surgery. The electrode arrays were positioned inside the scala tympani and not scala vestibuli in all subjects. In 18% of the cases, the +Flex electrode array was not fully inserted. The final outcome in residual hearing correlates very weakly with the angular insertion depth for depths above 405°. Postoperative loss of vestibular function did not correlate with the angular insertion depth or age at implantation. The surgical protocol used in this study seems to minimize the risk of postoperative vertigo symptoms.

Extra- and Intracochlear Electrocochleography in Cochlear Implant Recipients

Objective: To monitor cochlear function by extra- and intracochlear electrocochleography (ECoG) during and after cochlear implantation and thereby to enhance the understanding of changes in cochlear function following cochlear implantation surgery. Methods: ECoG responses to acoustic stimuli of 250, 500 and 1,000 Hz were recorded in 9 cochlear implant recipients with presurgical residual hearing. During surgery extracochlear ECoG recordings were performed before and after insertion of the cochlear implant electrode array. After insertion of the electrode array, intracochlear ECoG recordings were conducted using intracochlear electrode contacts as recording electrodes. Intracochlear ECoG recordings were performed up to 6 months after implantation. ECoG findings were correlated with findings from audiometric tests. Results: Extra- and intracochlear ECoG responses could be recorded in all subjects. Extracochlear ECoG recordings during surgery showed moderate changes. Loss or reduction of the ECoG signal at all three frequencies did not occur during cochlear implantation. During the first week following surgery, conductive hearing loss, due to middle ear effusion, led to a decrease in intracochlear ECoG signal amplitudes. This was not attributable to changes of cochlear function. All persistent reductions in ECoG response magnitude after normalization of the tympanogram occurred during the first week following implantation. Thresholds of ECoG signals were at or below hearing thresholds in all cases. Conclusion: Gross intracochlear trauma during surgery appears to be rare. In the early postoperative phase the ability to assess cochlear status by ECoG recordings was limited due to the regular occurrence of middle ear effusion. Still, intracochlear ECoG along with tympanogram recordings suggests that any changes of low-frequency cochlear function occur mainly during the first week after cochlear implantation. ECoG seems to be a promising tool to objectively assess changes in cochlear function in cochlear implant recipients and may allow further insight into the mechanisms underlying the loss of residual hearing.

Method to estimate the complete and two-turn cochlear duct length.

Using a linear measurement of the cochlea on a single radiographic image can reliably estimate the complete and two-turn cochlear duct length (CDL) in a normal human temporal bone. CDL is measured from the middle of the round window to the helicotrema. Histologic studies have shown the length of the organ of Corti (OC) to range from 25 to 35 mm. CDL measurements, performed either radiographically or histologically, are quite tedious and time-consuming. We propose equations that can reliably estimate both two-turn and complete CDL using a single computed tomography (CT) image. Prior studies of CDL, measured either histologically or radiographically, were reviewed, which yielded distributions of CDL measured at the OC and the lateral wall of the cochlea. Using Escudé's third equation as a basis, we were able to extrapolate complete and two-turn CDL based on a CT scan measurement of the diameter of the basal turn (A). Using measurement A, the relationship of two-turn CDL measured at the OC is 2TL(oc) = 3.65(A-1) and for 2TL(i) = 3.65(A-0.7). The equation for estimation of complete CDL is CDL(oc) = 4.16A - 4 and for CDL(i) = 4.16A - 2.7. Using a single linear measurement from a CT scan image can reliably estimate the two-turn and complete CDLs in human temporal bones. The two-turn length represents the best compromise of cochlear coverage while minimizing intracochlear trauma for electrode insertions.

The Influence of Cochlear Implant Electrode Position on Performance

Objectives: To study the relation between variables related to cochlear implant electrode position and speech perception performance scores in a large patient population. Design: The study sample consisted of 203 patients implanted with a CII or HiRes90K implant with a HiFocus 1 or 1J electrode of Advanced Bionics. Phoneme and word score averages for the 1- and 2-year follow-up were calculated for 41 prelingually deaf and 162 postlingually deaf patients. Analyses to reveal correlations between these performance outcomes and 6 position-related variables (angle of most basal electrode contact, surgical insertion angle, surgical insertion, wrapping factor, angular insertion depth, linear insertion depth) were executed. The scalar location, as an indication for the presence of intracochlear trauma, and modiolus proximity beyond the basal turn were not evaluated in this study. In addition, different patient-specific variables (age at implantation, age at onset of hearing loss, duration of deafness, preoperative phoneme and word scores) were tested for correlation with performance. Results: The performance scores of prelingual patients were correlated with age at onset of hearing loss, duration of deafness and preoperative scores. For the postlingual patients, performance showed correlations with all 5 patient-specific variables. None of the 6 position-related variables influenced speech perception in cochlear implant patients. Conclusions: Although several patient-specific variables showed correlations with speech perception outcomes, not one of the studied angular and linear position-related variables turned out to have a demonstrable influence on performance.

Evaluation of Intracochlear Trauma Caused by Insertion of Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays through Different Quadrants of the Round Window.

Hypothesis. This study aimed to evaluate whether there is a difference in the degree of intracochlear trauma when the cochlear implant electrode arrays is inserted through different quadrants of the round window membrane. Background. The benefits of residual hearing preservation in cochlear implant recipients have promoted the development of atraumatic surgeries. Minimal trauma during electrode insertion is crucial for residual hearing preservation. Methods. In total, 25 fresh human temporal bones were subjected to mastoidectomy and posterior tympanotomy. The cochlear implant electrode array was inserted through the anterosuperior quadrant of the round window membrane in 50% of the bones and through the anteroinferior quadrant in the remaining 50%. The temporal bones were dehydrated, embedded in epoxy, serially polished, stained, viewed through a stereomicroscope, and photographed with the electrode arrays in situ. The resulting images were analyzed for signs of intracochlear trauma. Results. Histological examinations revealed varying degrees of damage to the intracochlear structures, although the incidence and severity of intracochlear trauma were not influenced by the quadrant of insertion. Conclusions. The incidence and severity of intracochlear trauma were similar in all samples, irrespective of electrode array insertion through the anterosuperior or anteroinferior quadrant of the round window membrane.

The New Mid-Scala Electrode Array

To analyze the quality of insertion of the newly developed midscala (MS) electrode, which targets a midscalar electrode position to reduce the risk of trauma to the lateral wall and the modiolus. Modern cochlear implant surgery aims for a safe intracochlear placement of electrode arrays with an ongoing debate regarding cochleostomy or round window (RW) insertion and the use of lateral wall or perimodiolar electrode placement. Intracochlear trauma after insertion of different electrodes depends on insertion mode and electrode design and may result in trauma to the delicate structures of the cochlear. We performed a temporal bone (TB) trial with insertion of the MS electrode in n = 20 TB's after a mastoidectomy and posterior tympanotomy. Insertion was performed either via the RW or a cochleostomy. Electrode positioning, length of insertion, and angle of insertion were analyzed with rotational tomography (RT). TBs were histologically analyzed. Results of RT and histology were compared. Scala tympani (ST) insertion could be accomplished reliably by both RW and via a cochleostomy approach. In 20 TBs, 1 scala vestibuli insertion, 1 incomplete (ST), and 1 elevation of basilar membrane were depicted. No trauma was found in 94.7% of all ST insertions. RT allowed determination of the intracochlear electrode position, which was specified by histologic sectioning. The new MS electrode seems to fulfill reliable atraumatic intracochlear placement via RW and cochleostomy approaches. RT is available for evaluation of intracochlear electrode position, serving as a potential quality control instrument in human implantation.

A novel perfusion-based method for cochlear implant electrode insertion

A cochlear implant (CI) restores partial hearing to profoundly deaf individuals. CI electrodes are inserted manually in the cochlea and surgeons rely on tactile feedback from the implant to determine when to stop the insertion. This manual insertion method results in a large degree of variability in surgical outcomes and intra-cochlear trauma. Additionally, implants often span only the basal turn. In the present study we report on the development of a new method to assist CI electrode insertion. The design objectives are (1) an automated and standardized insertion technique across patients with (2) more apical insertion than is possible by the contemporary methods, while (3) minimizing insertion trauma. The method relies on a viscous fluid flow through the cochlea to carry the electrode array with it. A small cochleostomy (∼100-150 um in diameter) is made in scala vestibuli (SV) and the round window (RW) membrane is opened. A flow of diluted Sodium Hyaluronate (also known as Hyaluronic Acid, (HA)) is set up from the RW to the SV opening using a perfusion pump that sets up a unidirectional flow. Once the flow is established an implant is dropped into the ongoing flow. Here we present a proof-of-concept study where we used this technique to insert silicone implants all the way to the cochlear apex in rats and gerbils. In light-microscopic histology, the implantation occurred without cochlear trauma. To further assess the ototoxicity of the HA perfusion, we measured compound action potential (CAP) thresholds following the perfusion of HA, and found that the CAP thresholds were substantially elevated. Thus, at this point the method is promising, and requires further development to become clinically viable.

Insertion site and sealing technique affect residual hearing and tissue formation after cochlear implantation

Tissue formation around the electrode array of a cochlear implant has been suggested to influence preservation of residual hearing as well as electrical hearing performance of implanted subjects. Further, inhomogeneity in the electrical properties of the scala tympani shape the electrical field and affect current spread. Intracochlear trauma due to electrode insertion and the insertion site itself are commonly seen as triggers for the tissue formation. The present study investigates whether the insertion site, round window membrane (RWM) vs. cochleostomy (CS), or the sealing material, no seal vs. muscle graft vs. carboxylate cement, have an influence on the amount of fibrous tissue and/or new bone formation after CI implantation in the guinea pig. Hearing thresholds were determined by auditory brainstem response (ABR) measurements prior to implantation and after 28 days. The amount of tissue formation was quantified by evaluation of microscopic images obtained by a grinding/polishing procedure to keep the CI in place during histological processing.An insertion via the round window membrane resulted after 28 days in less tissue formation in the no seal and muscle seal condition compared to the cochleostomy approach. Between these two sealing techniques there was no difference. Sealing the cochlea with carboxylate cement resulted always in a strong new bone formation and almost total loss of residual hearing. The amount of tissue formation and the hearing loss correlated at 1–8 kHz. Consequently, the use of carboxylate cement as a sealing material in cochlear implantation should be avoided even in animal studies, whereas sealing the insertion site with a muscle graft did not induce an additional tissue growth compared to omitting a seal. For hearing preservation the round window approach should be used.

Forces and Trauma Associated with Minimally Invasive Image‐Guided Cochlear Implantation

Minimally invasive image-guided cochlear implantation (CI) utilizes a patient-customized microstereotactic frame to access the cochlea via a single drill-pass. We investigate the average force and trauma associated with the insertion of lateral wall CI electrodes using this technique. Assessment using cadaveric temporal bones. Laboratory setup. Microstereotactic frames for 6 fresh cadaveric temporal bones were built using CT scans to determine an optimal drill path following which drilling was performed. CI electrodes were inserted using surgical forceps to manually advance the CI electrode array, via the drilled tunnel, into the cochlea. Forces were recorded using a 6-axis load sensor placed under the temporal bone during the insertion of lateral wall electrode arrays (2 each of Nucleus CI422, MED-EL standard, and modified MED-EL electrodes with stiffeners). Tissue histology was performed by microdissection of the otic capsule and apical photo documentation of electrode position and intracochlear tissue. After drilling, CT scanning demonstrated successful access to cochlea in all 6 bones. Average insertion forces ranged from 0.009 to 0.078 N. Peak forces were in the range of 0.056 to 0.469 N. Tissue histology showed complete scala tympani insertion in 5 specimens and scala vestibuli insertion in the remaining specimen with depth of insertion ranging from 360° to 600°. No intracochlear trauma was identified. The use of lateral wall electrodes with the minimally invasive image-guided CI approach was associated with insertion forces comparable to traditional CI surgery. Deep insertions were obtained without identifiable trauma.

Round Window Insertion of Precurved Electrodes Is Traumatic

Assess endocochlear trauma by adjusting: 1) location of cochleostomy or round window insertion, and 2) size of precontoured electrode array. Cadaveric temporal bone study. Locations of electrode placement into the cochlea were as follows: 1) round window, 2) anterior inferior to the round window, 3) anterior inferior to the round window niche, 4) superior to the round window niche. Two types of electrode arrays were used: a larger precontoured electrode and thinner precurved research electrode. Histologic sections were made by a blinded third party. Fourteen bones were included in the study. Six (42.8%) of the bones were right ears. Seven bones had no endocochlear trauma. Seven bones have intracochlear trauma. Round window insertions had a high incidence of intracochlear trauma with precontoured electrodes (3/4 bones). Superior cochleostomies with electrode placement had significant intracochlear trauma (2/2 bones). Insertions made anterior inferior to the round window annulus had a 50% incidence of intracochlear trauma (2/4 bones). No endocochlear trauma observed for insertions through traditional cochleostomies (4/4 bones). Less endocochlear trauma was observed with the thinner electrode: 57% versus 42% in the larger electrode array. A higher incidence of tip fold-over was observed with the thinner electrode array (2/7 electrodes). No tip fold-over was noted in the larger electrode. The traditional cochleostomy had the least incidence of endocochlear trauma. The smaller electrode array did not significantly affect the incidence of endocochlear trauma, but the thinner array had a higher incidence of tip fold-over, which caused trauma distally. 2C.

Mechatronic feasibility of minimally invasive, atraumatic cochleostomy.

Robotic assistance in the context of lateral skull base surgery, particularly during cochlear implantation procedures, has been the subject of considerable research over the last decade. The use of robotics during these procedures has the potential to provide significant benefits to the patient by reducing invasiveness when gaining access to the cochlea, as well as reducing intracochlear trauma when performing a cochleostomy. Presented herein is preliminary work on the combination of two robotic systems for reducing invasiveness and trauma in cochlear implantation procedures. A robotic system for minimally invasive inner ear access was combined with a smart drilling tool for robust and safe cochleostomy; evaluation was completed on a single human cadaver specimen. Access to the middle ear was successfully achieved through the facial recess without damage to surrounding anatomical structures; cochleostomy was completed at the planned position with the endosteum remaining intact after drilling as confirmed by microscope evaluation.

Forces and Trauma Associated with Minimally‐Invasive, Image‐Guided Cochlear Implantation

Objectives: Minimally-invasive, image-guided cochlear implantation (CI) uses a patient-customized microstereotactic frame to access the cochlea via a single drill-pass. We investigated the average force and trauma associated with the insertion of lateral wall CI electrodes using this technique. Methods: Microstereotactic frames for 6 fresh cadaveric temporal bones were built using computed tomography (CT) scans to determine an optimal drill path, following which drilling was performed. A tympanomeatal flap was raised, the round window (RW) overhang was taken down, and the RW membrane was reflected posteriorly. CI electrodes were inserted using surgical forceps to manually advance the CI electrode array, via the drilled tunnel, into the cochlea. Forces were recorded using a 6-axis load sensor placed under the temporal bone during insertion of lateral wall electrode arrays (2 each of Nucleus CI422, MED-EL standard, and MED-EL standard with stiffeners). Tissue histology was performed by removing the lateral wall of the cochlea allowing photo-documentation of electrode position and microscopic assessment of intracochlear tissue. Results: After drilling, CT scanning demonstrated successful access to cochleae in all 6 bones. Average insertion forces were 0.0088-0.0780N. Peak forces were 0.0564-0.4688N. Single factor analysis of variance was not statistically significant comparing average forces of different electrodes ( P = 0.77). Tissue histology showed complete scala tympani insertion in all specimens with depth of insertion ranging from 360-600°. No intracochlear trauma was identified. Conclusions: In this cadaver model with a minimally-invasive, image-guided CI approach, the use of lateral wall electrodes was associated with insertion forces comparable to traditional CI surgery. Deep insertions were obtained without identifiable trauma.

Fabricación de un Micro Sensor de Presión Implantable Aplicado a Medir Desviaciones Dentro de la Cochlea

The Cochlear Implant is broadly worn by people with deep hearing damage. This device makes up an electrode array to electrically stimulate the auditory nerves. When the electrode is implanted into the inner ear by surgery, the scala tympani is ill-treated due to the strong pressure applied on the internal ear structures. To minimize this intra-cochlear trauma, it is proposed to fabricate a micro pressure-sensor and built it in the electrode array, in such a way that the pressure applied by the electrode is measured. This work selected the MEMS SU-8 Fabry-Perot interferometer-based pressure sensor. This paper describes the sensor fabrication process carried out, and explains how to integrate this sensor with the electrode array.

Validation of minimally invasive, image-guided cochlear implantation using Advanced Bionics, Cochlear, and Medel electrodes in a cadaver model

Validation of a novel minimally invasive, image-guided approach to implant electrodes from three FDA-approved manufacturers-Medel, Cochlear, and Advanced Bionics-in the cochlea via a linear tunnel from the lateral cranium through the facial recess to the cochlea. Custom microstereotactic frames that mount on bone-implanted fiducial markers and constrain the drill along the desired path were utilized on seven cadaver specimens. A linear tunnel was drilled from the lateral skull to the cochlea followed by a marginal, round window cochleostomy and insertion of the electrode array into the cochlea through the drilled tunnel. Post-insertion CT scan and histological analysis were used to analyze the results. All specimens ([Formula: see text]) were successfully implanted without visible injury to the facial nerve. The Medel electrodes ([Formula: see text]) had minimal intracochlear trauma with 8, 8, and 10 (out of 12) electrodes intracochlear. The Cochlear lateral wall electrodes (straight research arrays) ([Formula: see text]) had minimal trauma with 20 and 21 of 22 electrodes intracochlear. The Advanced Bionics electrodes ([Formula: see text]) were inserted using their insertion tool; one had minimal insertion trauma and 14 of 16 electrodes intracochlear, while the other had violation of the basilar membrane just deep to the cochleostomy following which it remained in scala vestibuli with 13 of 16 electrodes intracochlear. Minimally invasive, image-guided cochlear implantation is possible using electrodes from the three FDA-approved manufacturers. Lateral wall electrodes were associated with less intracochlear trauma suggesting that they may be better suited for this surgical technique.

Three-dimensional histological specimen preparation for accurate imaging and spatial reconstruction of the middle and inner ear

Purpose This paper presents a highly accurate cross-sectional preparation technique. The research aim was to develop an adequate imaging modality for both soft and bony tissue structures featuring high contrast and high resolution. Therefore, the advancement of an already existing microgrinding procedure was pursued. The central objectives were to preserve spatial relations and to ensure the accurate three-dimensional reconstruction of histological sections.Methods Twelve human temporal bone specimens including middle and inner ear structures were utilized. They were embedded in epoxy resin, then dissected by serial grinding and finally digitalized. The actual abrasion of each grinding slice was measured using a tactile length gauge with an accuracy of one micrometre. The cross-sectional images were aligned with the aid of artificial markers and by applying a feature-based, custom-made auto-registration algorithm. To determine the accuracy of the overall reconstruction procedure, a well-known reference object was used for comparison. To ensure the compatibility of the histological data with conventional clinical image data, the image stacks were finally converted into the DICOM standard.Results The image fusion of data from temporal bone specimens’ and from non-destructive flat-panel-based volume computed tomography confirmed the spatial accuracy achieved by the procedure, as did the evaluation using the reference object.Conclusion This systematic and easy-to-follow preparation technique enables the three-dimensional (3D) histological reconstruction of complex soft and bony tissue structures. It facilitates the creation of detailed and spatially correct 3D anatomical models. Such models are of great benefit for image-based segmentation and planning in the field of computer-assisted surgery as well as in finite element analysis. In the context of human inner ear surgery, three-dimensional histology will improve the experimental evaluation and determination of intra-cochlear trauma after the insertion of an electrode array of a cochlear implant system.

Round window versus cochleostomy technique in cochlear implantation: histologic findings.

Cochleostomy or round window enlargement techniques for cochlear implant electrode insertion result in more abnormal tissue formation in the basal cochlea and are more apt to produce endolymphatic hydrops than round window electrode insertion. Twelve temporal bones from implanted patients were examined under light microscopy and reconstructed with 3-dimensional reconstruction software to determine cochlear damage and volume of neo-ossification and fibrosis after electrode insertion. Amount of new tissue was compared between 3 groups of bones: insertion through the round window (RW), after enlarging the RW (RWE) and cochleostomy (Cochl). The probable role of the electrode was evaluated in each case with hydrops. More initial damage occurred in the Cochl and RWE groups than in the RW group, and the difference was significant between RWE and RW in cochlear segment I (p < 0.026). The volume of new bone in Segment I differed significantly between groups (p < 0.012) and was greater in the RWE group than in either the Cochl or RW groups (post hoc p's < 0.035 and 0.019, respectively). Hydrops was seen in 5 cases, all in the Cochl and RWE groups. Blockage of the duct was because of new tissue formation in 4 of the 5 hydrops cases. With the electrodes in this series, implantation through the RW minimized initial intracochlear trauma and subsequent new tissue formation, whereas the RW extension technique used at the time of these implantations produced the greatest damage. Future studies may clarify whether today's techniques and electrodes will produce these same patterns of damage.

Assessment of intracochlear trauma caused by the insertion of a new straight research array

ObjectiveTo assess the degree of intracochlear trauma using the Cochlear™ Straight Research Array (SRA). This electrode has recently been released by Cochlear™ on the CI422 implant.BackgroundElectroacoustic stimulation (EAS) enables recipients to benefit from cochlear implantation while retaining their natural low-frequency hearing. A disadvantage of short EAS electrodes is that short electrodes provide limited low-frequency stimulation. Thus, loss of the residual hearing may require reimplantation with a longer electrode. In order to overcome this problem, the slim diameter SRA with increased length (20–25 mm) has been designed to provide a deeper, yet non-traumatic insertion.MethodsTwo insertion studies into temporal bones were undertaken. The first involved dissection of the cochlea to gain a view into the scala vestibuli and insertion of the SRA and control electrodes with a microactuator for a surgeon-independent yet controlled insertion. High-speed photography was used to record data. The second study involved a high-resolution X-ray microcomputed tomography (microCT) study to assess electrode placement and tissue preservation in surgeon-implanted bones.ResultsThe SRA had a smooth insertion trajectory. The average angular insertion depth was 383° when inserted until resistance was encountered, and 355° if inserted to a predetermined mark for EAS use. In addition, microCT data showed that this caused no significant trauma or distortion of the basilar membrane up to 20 mms depth.ConclusionTemporal bone studies show that the SRA appears to cause no intracochlear trauma if used as an EAS electrode up to 20 mm depth of insertion.

Intraoperative Monitoring Using Cochlear Microphonics in Cochlear Implant Patients With Residual Hearing

To describe a technique for the intraoperative monitoring of residual hearing during a cochlear implant (CI) procedure and, thus, to identify the time of occurrence and surgical steps leading to hearing loss. Prospective audiologic analysis in a patient series. Tertiary referral center. Patients with residual hearing subjected to cochlear implantation. During cochlear implantation, cochlear microphonics (CMs) in response to frequency-specific stimuli were recorded in patients with residual hearing. Thresholds were determined before and after opening of the cochlea, with a limited portion of the electrode array inserted, and after full insertion. Monitoring of the hearing state using CMs was quick, reliable, and capable of detecting an intracochlear trauma. In a first series of patients, thresholds were preserved in all patients after opening of the cochlea. Thresholds were preserved in 5 of 6 patients after limited insertion and half of the patients after full insertion of the electrode array. Despite threshold preservation until the end of surgery, the residual hearing was lost in patients with deep insertions 1 week postoperative. Intraoperative monitoring of CM thresholds may be valuable for identifying the exact point of time at which residual hearing is affected in CI patients. Opening of the cochlea itself seems to be unrelated to hearing loss. A significant proportion of patients may have hearing loss caused by secondary effects rather than a direct trauma.