Abstract Purpose To examine the reliability of near point of convergence (NPC) across three trials and determine if one trial of NPC is adequate to identify receded NPC post-concussion. Methods Participants included 263 concussed patients (64.3% male; age=16.92±3.49 years) evaluated within 21 days of injury. NPC was measured in centimeters from the tip of the nose using a fixation stick and a Gulick anthropometric tape measure. A two-way, mixed effect, absolute agreement intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC 3,1) was conducted to evaluate reliability across the three trials. A chi-square analysis examined consistency of NPC classification (normal/abnormal) on the initial trial compared to average across three trials. Results Reliability of the three trials was high (.91 [95%CI, .89–.93]). Agreement between Trial 1 classification and classification based on average of all three trials was high (96.2%). Of the 10 participants who were classified differently for Trial 1 compared to average trials, 8 had borderline (e.g., 4–6 cm) measurements on the first trial. Conclusion NPC measurement across trials is reliable for the overall sample, but those who fell well below (i.e. 0–1cm) or well above (>8cm) clinical cutoffs on the first trial were almost always below or above respective cutoffs on the average convergence (>99%). Results suggest it is important to measure NPC across multiple trials for patients with initial borderline measurement.